UK lenders report surprise rise in mortgages in May, consumer lending cools
LONDON - The number of mortgages approved by British lenders for house purchases unexpectedly jumped in May, according to Bank of England data that suggested the housing market recovered quickly from the end of a tax break for homebuyers in April.
Mortgage approvals rose to 63,032 in May from 60,656 the month before, and confounding the median forecast in a Reuters poll of economists for a fall to 59,750.
"The gradual easing of interest rates could be helping to boost confidence and demand amongst mortgage borrowers," Karim Haji, global and UK head of financial services at accountants KPMG, said.
Britain's housing market slowed in April after the expiry of a tax incentive for some homebuyers.
The BoE's data published on Monday showed approvals for people looking to re-mortgage rose by the most in May since February 2024 in May.
Net mortgage lending - which reflects completed house purchases - rose by a net 2.054 billion pounds compared with a fall of almost 800 million pounds in April.
The BoE data showed unsecured consumer borrowing rose by slightly less than expected, potentially signalling a recovery in spending power.
In cash terms, consumer credit increased by a net 0.86 billion pounds ($1.18 billion) in May from 1.94 billion pounds in April - below the Reuters poll consensus for a 1.05 billion-pound rise.
"The cost of living remains high, but a drop in consumer borrowing in May signals that rising incomes are starting to feed through to the cost of day-to-day expenses," Haji added.
The BoE held interest rates at 4.25% earlier this month, and investors are betting that the central bank will reduce borrowing costs in two further quarter-point moves to 3.75% by the end of the year.
($1 = 0.7302 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Zohran Mamdani and NYC's unaffordable economy
Daniel Wortel-London, Tribune News Service The promise of taxing the rich to fund social services propelled Zohran Mamdani to victory in Tuesday's New York City Democratic mayoral primary. His campaign vows to reverse decades of social service cuts and tackle NYC's pervasive unaffordability. Taxing the rich for the sake of the poor, however, contains an inherent contradiction. The wealthy are, in part, the very group whose concentrated economic activity has displaced working-class housing and jobs for decades. To rely on them to finance an affordable city risks merely perpetuating the problem, a lesson previous mayors learned too late. For Mamdani to truly succeed, he must do more than just tax the rich — he must remake the city's economy in the interests of its workers. This is not a new insight. As my book 'The Menace of Prosperity' details, as far back as Henry George, perceptive New Yorkers understood the intrinsic link between the growth of local wealth and the groth of local poverty. Escalating land values directly translate to higher rents and increased homelessness. Unchecked real estate speculation displaces working-class enterprises and communities. This cycle inevitably leads to growing poverty, elevated crime rates, and declining public health. These social costs, largely generated by an economy designed around the wealthy, are then inevitably passed on to the public sector. Welfare spending and critical social services, for instance, become downstream necessities, mitigating the precarity and homelessness that directly result from an economic model built to serve the needs of the rich. And such high costs repeatedly led to public bankruptcy — in the 1870s, the 1930s, and again in the 1970s. The administration of liberal Mayor John Lindsay perfectly exemplifies this tendency. Throughout the 1960s, New York City's financial sector boomed, yet simultaneously, poverty rates soared, deindustrialization accelerated, and housing costs skyrocketed. Lindsay attempted to tax corporations to fund welfare services for the poor, but in the same breath, he actively subsidized the very corporations whose presence contributed to making the city unaffordable. Such expenditure on behalf of both the rich and the poor ultimately sank the city's finances. This argument is not to deny the crucial role of social spending, nor to dismiss the importance of robust wealth taxation. However, if Mamdani truly intends to fulfill his campaign promise of making New York City affordable, he must move beyond merely treating symptoms and confront the ultimate cause: an economy fundamentally designed to render the city unaffordable for most. Fortunately, compelling examples exist both within NYC and globally that demonstrate a path forward. Worker-owned cooperatives, social housing initiatives, and community-led nonprofit enterprises offer models for providing residents with decent livelihoods without driving up urban unaffordability. Cooperatives, for instance, have shown a proven ability to increase employment faster than conventional firms and to better preserve well-paying jobs during economic recessions. Cities can actively promote these models. A prime example is Preston, U.K., which successfully halved its poverty rate by strategically redirecting economic development funds and municipal contracts towards local cooperatives and community-owned businesses. New York can replicate and expand upon these principles. Instead of wastefully channeling billions to corporations whose promises of jobs and increased tax revenue frequently fall short, we must redirect strategic economic development funds and pension investments towards worker-owned enterprises and small businesses. Instead of selling off vacant city land to for-profit developers, we must transform it into vibrant hubs of small business and cooperative enterprise, stewarded by community land trusts and nonprofit organizations. Rather than sacrificing equity for growth, we must unlock the full economic potential of all our citizens, leveraging the city's power as an institutional investor to encourage progressive worker representation in our business dealings. All this promises to both help make our city affordable and reduce our tax burdens. All this is not to deny that robust wealth taxation remains essential for building an affordable city. But as we tax the rich, we must strategically deploy those revenues to fundamentally displace their outsized hold on our economy, fostering a truly democratic and sustainable future for all New Yorkers.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Starmer's foreign policy wins give his performance a much-needed lift
If you listen to the foreign policy specialists in London on Keir Starmer 's first year as UK Prime Minister, you will get a wholly different appraisal from that dominating this week's front pages in the country. From the pitched battles Mr Starmer is waging in Parliament for his " Plan for Change", the impression that is emerging of him is not good. In short, the Prime Minister has a supermajority that should guarantee his dominance on the political scene but he is instead a premier on the run. Rebellions are proving effective in the Labour party, which is providing to be its own opposition, at least far as Parliament goes. On the world stage, Mr Starmer has proven himself as an operator who can exploit Britain's post-Brexit place in the world. In an interview ahead of the first anniversary of the Labour government, Mr Starmer asserted one tangible achievement of his premiership: his administration has landed a hat-trick of trade deals in recent months. On Monday, the most prominent of these came into effect. Tariffs from the US on British-made cars, aircraft parts and favourable treatment for aerospace and steel have been secured. There are promises of more to come to build on that special access. No other country has yet sealed anything with Washington. The return of US President Donald Trump was undoubtedly a test for Mr Starmer, who is a centre-left politician who tries to avoid the culture wars for domestic political reasons. The trade deal combined with the state visit for Mr Trump, plus a dollop of extra defence spending, were swift antidotes to any divisions that the US President's lieutenants had been preparing to hurl London's way. The challenges for Starmer in foreign policy are not just to keep Trump on side and keep wracking up the trade wins The hat-trick also includes a more sophisticated market access agreement with the EU that can use Britain's largish defence industry as leverage, as the Europeans undergo rearmament. And lastly, a free-trade agreement has been sealed with New Delhi, bringing the promise of a new alignment with the Indian economy. Hopes have consequently risen that Mr Starmer can also seal a GCC-UK free trade agreement. The Bahrain ambassador to London, Sheikh Fawaz bin Mohammed Al Khalifa, last week told me that he hoped to push for a deal by the time his country hosts the GCC Summit in December. Mr Starmer has made a difference in these talks, as he was much more engaged than his predecessor Rishi Sunak had been. The challenges for Mr Starmer in foreign policy are not just to keep Mr Trump on side and keep racking up the trade wins. The backbenches of the Labour party and throughout the progressive or left-wing spectrum of politics are grounds for seeding discontent over the policy on Israel. Mr Starmer directly controls this policy and exercises an iron grip on the government position. It is an approach that goes to the foundational moments of his own rise to Labour leader. Purging the acolytes of Jeremy Corbyn, and eventually the former Labour leader himself, became the way the ex-prosecutor proved his political strength. After almost two years of war in Gaza, there is no doubt of the mood among Labour supporters and voters in general. There are those who argue that the Labour party now faces a huge cultural squeeze. Not only is the Reform UK party bringing Maga-style politics to the country, one poll has predicted it would end up as the biggest party in terms of seats if a new election was held now. There is also the rise of activists on the left who combine appeals on Gaza with Corbyn-style socialism and environmental politics to create a space that Labour is losing. In Westminster, talk of Mr Corbyn and other independents combining and capturing this grassroots activation with a new party is growing. The government continues to promote its mantra of change in every statement. A year ago, the big idea was that Labour could show it was having a grip on the economy to boost investment and create a higher rate of growth. Its early mistakes on spending mean that the growth shift has not come. It is a big blow to Labour, which essentially gambled on there being a kickstart for the taking when it came to power. Reforms like welfare cuts have run aground amid those rebellions that are playing out just as the one-year anniversary looms on Saturday. If, like Margaret Thatcher, Mr Starmer sees growth returning only three or four years down the track, he will have to withstand enormous political pressures in the meantime. The historian and political commentator Anthony Seldon points out that there is a big issue at stake for the UK with Mr Starmer. His time in Downing Street has a sense of last chance for the political system as we know it. Mr Seldon asks if the UK can afford to have another failed prime minister after the Conservative party's costly run. Mr Starmer must hope his touch in foreign affairs can transfer over to a defence of his performance at home fairly soon.
Zawya
7 hours ago
- Zawya
Sterling heads for biggest quarterly jump in more than two years
Sterling was on track for its biggest quarterly rise against the dollar in more than two years on Monday, aided by weakness in the dollar across the board and optimism over a trade deal between the United States and Britain. The pound has been among the top beneficiaries of the "sell America" narrative that has dominated much of market sentiment over the past six months, as investors worry that U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic style of policymaking could trigger a U.S. recession that hurt global economies. The British currency is on track for its strongest quarterly performance since October 2022, having gained about 6% against the U.S. dollar. It has appreciated more than 9% during the past six months. On Monday, the pound see-sawed between marginal gains and losses and was last down 0.1% at $1.3705, having rallied over the past two weeks. Against the euro, the currency slipped, with the euro last up 0.2% at 85.59 pence. Investors were also looking favourably upon British assets, as Britain was first among global economies to strike a trade deal with the United States. An agreement to lower U.S. tariffs on some industrial items from Britain also came into effect on Monday. "The UK was first out of the block in terms of getting a deal signed with the United States, although there is still going to be pockets of uncertainty to some sectors," said Susannah Streeter, senior investment and markets analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. "Even so, it has again brought more stability in terms of the relationship that the UK has with the U.S... compared to the European Union, where there (are) still no agreements." Meanwhile, data confirmed that the British economy grew at its fastest pace in a year in the first three months of 2025, though signs of softening consumer demand could potentially weigh on the economy in the months ahead. Markets are pricing in the likelihood that the Bank of England could deliver 50 basis points worth of interest rate cuts by December, with the first expected in September, according to data compiled by LSEG. Other British assets were also poised to finish the quarter on a strong note, with domestically-exposed FTSE 250 mid-cap stocks set for their best quarterly performance since October 2020.
