logo
Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS fixes so much, but can it beat a Steam Deck?

Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS fixes so much, but can it beat a Steam Deck?

Lenovo Legion Go S - Powered By Steam OS
The Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS is light years ahead of its Windows-powered counterpart. Not only does Steam OS fix a lot of Windows' problems, but it also drops the price by $130. This makes the Legion Go S with Steam OS a viable competitor to the Steam Deck. It's well worth a look if you prioritize a large display, variable refresh rates, and offset sticks.
When I reviewed the Lenovo Legion Go S — the one powered by Windows 11 — I did something I rarely ever do: I told readers not to buy it. No matter how I approached the product, I couldn't recommend it to anyone due to the ubiquitous availability of better, cheaper gaming handhelds. In that review, I mentioned that I was excited to try the second version of the product, the one powered by the Linux-based Steam OS — the same operating system that powers Valve's Steam Deck. Well, Lenovo was kind enough to send me a test unit of the Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS, and I'm excited to tell you all about it.
Given that this product's hardware is exactly the same as the Windows variant (other than the change in button names and case color), I won't spend time re-explaining everything. If you need to catch up on what this product offers from a hardware perspective, read my Legion Go S review first. My colleague Hadlee Simons' hands-on with the Steam OS version at CES 2025 is also worth a read (anything he writes is).
With that in mind, I will split this review into two sections: the first covering what Steam OS fixes, and the second explaining what Steam OS couldn't change.
What Steam OS fixes for the Legion Go S
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
The most significant and positive thing Steam OS does for the Legion Go S is simplify the experience. When you power up the Steam OS version of the Legion Go S, you're not greeted with any familiar Windows tropes. You don't need to log in with your Microsoft account or tell it your preferred keyboard layout. You never see a desktop interface. You do need to go through an initial setup procedure, obviously, but you can navigate through every step with the controller and a smartphone for scanning QR codes — something that can't be done with Windows.
From the time you first boot up the Legion Go S with Steam OS, you immediately understand how this is better than Windows.
Essentially, Steam OS is an operating system built for this particular form factor, whereas Windows is decidedly not (or at least until we know if the Xbox experience on the ROG Xbox Ally finally fixes things). That alone makes the experience using the Legion Go S with Steam OS much, much better than its Windows counterpart.
Even when a wrench is thrown into the works, Steam OS handles it with grace. For example, if you want to play Red Dead Redemption on the Legion Go S, you must use Rockstar Games' stupid (and useless!) launcher. This launcher lacks controller support, which Valve cannot change. So, what Steam OS does in response is warn you that the Rockstar Games launcher lacks controller support and instructs you to use the touch screen instead. It's not perfect, but it's a simple, elegant way of informing the user how best to navigate through this process, since their intuitive reaction — to use the sticks and buttons — will prove ineffective.
Steam OS is also better at the seemingly minor actions one takes when using a large-screen gaming handheld. When you want to stop playing, you just tap the power button. The screen goes dark, and you can put the machine down. You can leave it like that, unplugged, for hours (or even days), and then pick it up, tap the power button, and continue right where you left off. The Windows model doesn't do this nearly as smoothly, and Windows' idle state drains way too much battery for that to be a good idea anyway. For the record, I did this overnight with the Steam OS model, and the battery level only dropped by 3%. At that rate, I could have left it alone for over a week and not needed to be concerned at all.
It's astonishing how much better Steam OS is in an idle state when compared to Windows.
One interesting thing Steam OS does is nerf the teeny, tiny trackpad on the Legion Go S. In my review for the Windows model, I lamented how small and useless the trackpad is on this machine (it's still there on the Steam OS version — the small square under the right stick). In all my time with the Steam OS version, though, I never once got the trackpad to work. Even when I was setting up the Rockstar Games launcher, which is built around keyboard and mouse input, the trackpad didn't function. I feel like Valve was as perplexed with this 'feature' as the rest of the world, and just decided to nerf it rather than instruct users to touch it. In fact, Steam OS didn't let me use the trackpad even when I played games that support mouse input. I realize this is a weird way to approach the issue of the trackpad being so horrible, but honestly, I didn't mind. After a few hours, I simply forgot it existed.
Steam OS also makes it easier to tweak your settings to milk the most out of your games. In most cases, though, you don't need to do this. This is because Valve has pre-configured Steam OS to change in-game settings to work best with gaming handhelds automatically. For example, all in-game settings are maxed out when I fire up my latest save in Horizon Forbidden West on my custom gaming rig with an RTX 4090 inside. When I played Forbidden West on the Legion Go S, though, Steam OS automatically switched to the 'Low' graphics quality preset and tweaked the display settings appropriately. It just worked.
Steam OS does a lot of the legwork for you when it comes to making sure your games play well.
If you want to get more granular with your settings, Steam OS supports that and makes it incredibly easy. You can tweak performance settings on a universal or per-game basis by hitting the Quick Access Button (signified by three dots and located at the upper right, above the Menu/Start button). This includes enabling a variable refresh rate (something no version of the Steam Deck offers), limiting the thermal design power (TDP), changing scaling levels, and much more. You can also show performance stats while you play, and Steam OS lets you choose how much of this information you see.
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
Granted, the Windows version of the Legion Go S offered some of these features through Lenovo's own apps and widgets. However, in Windows, they weren't as easily accessible and not nearly as granular. Also, you don't need to use these on the Steam OS version. Like I said, the operating system does a great job of pre-configuring the system for each game you launch. But if you want to get nitty gritty to bring out the best performance you can get (or do the opposite to preserve as much battery life as possible), you can easily do that.
Speaking of battery life, this is also nominally better with Steam OS. I don't have any numbers to share, but with this model, I didn't reach for the charger nearly as much as I did with the Windows version. This makes a ton of sense when you remember that all the useless things Windows does in the background, Steam OS doesn't do. I don't want there to be any misconceptions here, though: if you're playing a graphically demanding AAA game, battery life on the Steam OS version is going to be very similar to the Windows version — maybe 90-120 minutes of gameplay at a full charge. But when the device is just idling or you're doing things like tweaking settings, buying games, or reading game news, battery life is tangibly better.
One of the things Steam OS does better than Windows is to cost nothing. Thanks, open-source licensing!
The most significant thing Steam OS fixes, though, is the price. Without Windows on board, the Steam OS version of the Legion Go S drops by a whopping $130 to $599. This alone makes it much more of an appealing product when compared to the Windows model, which inexplicably starts at $729. For the sake of comparison, the Steam Deck OLED with 512GB of storage costs $549.
While this is all great news, Steam OS is just software. It can't change the hardware aspects of the Legion Go S. Steam OS also comes with its own drawbacks. This brings me to the next section of this review.
What Steam OS can't fix
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
While Steam OS is fast, smooth, elegant, and feature-rich, it is, at its core, not as good as Windows for wide game support. This is because many games available through Steam rely on Windows features to function properly. Since Steam OS is based on Linux and uses Proton as a compatibility layer, this leaves a swathe of very popular games unplayable natively on the Legion Go S, including Fortnite, many EA Sports games, Reign of Kings, and more. To be clear, that doesn't mean low framerates or glitchy interfaces — that means the games literally will not launch. Ultimately, this is the ace in the hole that the Windows version of the Legion Go S has.
You'll need to sacrifice game support with Steam OS. Heavy hitters like Fortnite won't work without Windows.
Granted, there are ways around this limitation via Linux applications such as Heroic Game Launcher, which plays nicely with third-party game stores like Epic Games Stores, GOG Galaxy, and more. Game streaming is another good option, either from a cloud service like Xbox Game Pass or from your own Windows computer with something like Moonlight. Still, almost everything on Steam that isn't a VR-only title will launch on a Windows handheld without any tinkering or workarounds. This is something Steam OS cannot claim, as Windows restrictions, Proton incompatibilities, and occasionally anti-cheat software do mean not everything will run well or at all. If there's a particular game you want to play, I'd recommend you check ProtonDB to see what the status is.
Steam OS also has no effect on the hardware limitations of the Legion Go S. I've already talked about how Valve nerfed the teeny trackpad, but it can't change all the other problems Lenovo introduced with this design. The whole device is still too heavy, for example. The button placement is still questionable, especially the Steam and Quick Access buttons being directly above Start and Select (I hit the wrong buttons many times during my testing). The microSD card slot is still on the bottom of the device, which could be problematic for people who like to dock their handhelds. The two USB-C ports are still right next to each other, making it tricky to plug in two things at the same time. These are all deficiencies I pointed out in my review of the Windows model, and they're still problems on the Steam OS version.
Granted, no single one of these compromises is a deal-breaker. When you put all of them together, though, it does feel like the device is still not much better than a Steam Deck, which is $50 cheaper than Lenovo's offering. This, ultimately, is the biggest hurdle facing this product.
Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS review verdict: A personal choice
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
The Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS ($499.99 at Manufacturer site) is the first third-party product to run the operating system. That being the case means the only logical competitor to the Legion Go S is Valve's own Steam Deck, specifically the 512GB OLED model ($549 at Manufacturer site). So what exactly are you getting from Lenovo that you're not getting from Valve?
The Legion Go S has the same operating system as a Steam Deck at a very similar price. It all comes down to individual preferences after that.
The most significant thing is the display. The Legion Go S has an 8-inch 1,920 x 1,200 LCD panel, which dwarfs the Steam Deck's 7.4-inch 1,280 x 800 OLED. Yes, OLED is superior to LCD, but resolution and size make a big difference, too. Likewise, the Legion Go S has a faster refresh rate at 120Hz (the Steam Deck taps out at 90Hz). Additionally, the Lenovo handheld supports variable refresh rates, which the Steam Deck does not.
In other words, just because the Steam Deck has OLED and the Legion Go S doesn't, shouldn't be the deciding factor on which is better. Lenovo's display is terrific, regardless of the panel type.
Another thing the Legion Go S has over the Steam Deck is processing power. On paper, the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go in the Legion Go S isn't too much better than the Steam Deck's AMD Zen 2. However, the Z2 Go is capable of hitting much higher power draw than the Zen 2 — 28W vs 15W, respectively. This means that you can, theoretically, milk more frames from the Legion Go S than you can from the Steam Deck at the expense of battery life (and sweaty palms). You'll need to be comfortable tweaking settings, both in-game and on the handheld itself, but if you care enough to do so, the Legion Go S should be superior regarding performance. Also, keep in mind that a second version of the Legion Go S with Steam OS is on the way, and it will have the Ryzen Z1 Extreme under the hood — a CPU that will absolutely destroy the Z2 Go and the Zen 2. However, that model will cost $899 (!!!), so buyer beware.
If you prefer a larger display, VRR support, offset sticks, and the potential for eking out more frames, maybe the Legion Go S is what you're looking for.
Outside of these two major differences, there are minor ones as well. The Legion Go S has offset sticks, for example, something that many players prefer. There's also an eight-way D-Pad on the Legion Go S, which could give you an edge in fighting games over the four-way D-Pad on the Steam Deck.
Really, even with the $50 difference in price taken into account, choosing between the Legion Go S with Steam OS and the Steam Deck OLED is a matter of taste. You need to decide what hardware features you prefer and then go with the model that makes the most sense for you.
The bottom line here, though, is that this is a far cry from the Lenovo Legion Go S with Windows. When you combined Windows' cumbersome, battery-draining design with the hardware deficiencies of the Legion Go S and its way-too-high price, you had a product I couldn't recommend to anyone. The Steam OS version, though, is a fine choice for anyone who really likes the Steam Deck but wishes that it catered a bit more to their own play style and priorities.
Lenovo Legion Go S - Powered By Steam OS
Native Steam OS integration • Large display • Great price
MSRP: $599.99
The first true Steam Deck competitor.
The Legion Go S with Steam OS is the first gaming handheld to feature the same operating system as the category-defining Steam Deck. See price at Manufacturer site
Positives Native Steam OS integration
Native Steam OS integration Large display
Large display VRR support
VRR support Great price
Cons Too heavy
Too heavy Nerfed trackpad
Nerfed trackpad Can be game support issues
Can be game support issues Questionable design

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?
Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?

Quantum computing soared following the release of Google's Willow quantum chip in December. IonQ is still deeply unprofitable, but the company expects its revenue to double this year. The company is building momentum following a deal with EPB and multiple acquisitions. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › Quantum computing stocks captivated investors like few other sectors in recent months. Ever since Alphabet's Google announced its state-of-the-art quantum chip, Willow, in December, quantum computing stocks have soared. Many investors see them as the next major technology on the horizon, following in the footsteps of artificial intelligence (AI). One of the biggest players in AI is IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), a developer and seller of quantum computers. The company sells hardware, software, and services, making its quantum computers available through providers like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, a business model known as quantum-computing-as-a-service (QCaaS). IonQ differentiates itself from other publicly traded quantum computing stocks like Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and Quantum Computing because of its trapped-ion technology, which uses atoms suspended in a vacuum and manipulated with lasers. Right now is also an excellent time to consider buying IonQ stock, as it's down 30% from its peak late last year, and it's pulled back by nearly as much after a surge in late May, following an interview in Barron's with CEO Niccolo de Masi, who said the company aimed to be the "Nvidia of quantum computing." With IonQ stock having cooled off a bit in June, let's take a closer look at what the stock has to offer. Despite a market cap over $10 billion, IonQ is still essentially a development-stage company, as it brought in just $7.6 million in revenue in the first quarter. However, that was down slightly from the year before, showing the company is not delivering the kind of growth you might expect from a high-priced stock like IonQ. IonQ is also deeply unprofitable, with the company posting a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) operating loss of $75.7 million in the period, or 10 times what it brought in revenue. It does expect revenue growth to accelerate over the remainder of the year, forecasting $75 million to $95 million in revenue for the full year. That forecast, which includes some small acquisitions, targets revenue roughly doubling from $43.1 million last year. There are other signs the company is making progress. It signed a $22 million deal with EPB of Chattanooga, an energy and telecom company, and it's waiting to close on its acquisition of Lightsynq Technologies, a maker of quantum interconnects to bridge the gap to large-scale quantum computers. IonQ also took part in Nvidia's first-ever Quantum Day, where it demonstrated quantum-accelerated computation and commercially relevant applications, further evidence that quantum computing could is progressing toward mainstream. Additionally, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in June that the technology is at an inflection point, comments that came just months after he said that "very useful" quantum computers could be decades away. There's no question that there's a ton of uncertainty around quantum computing stocks right now. Valuations have been inflated by the attention placed on the sector following Google's announcement about Willow last December. Based on IonQ's guidance, the company still trades at a price-to-sales ratio of more than 100 using its 2025 forecast. However, there is real momentum in the industry, and analysts expect IonQ's revenue to double both this year and next. Given its leadership in quantum computing, business momentum, and expected revenue growth, opening a small position in the stock seems reasonable for risk-tolerant investors. Keep in mind that the risk with IonQ remains high at the current valuation, and the stock could fall a long way if its performance comes up short in the coming quarters. Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jeremy Bowman has positions in Amazon and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider
Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider

Ascent Solar (ASTI) Technologies announced that it has entered into a Teaming Agreement to supply a US-based defense solutions provider with its cutting edge, thin-film solar technology solutions for upcoming orbital applications and future missions. 'Our thin-film solar technology's ability to reliably deliver power solutions on short timelines makes Ascent the perfect choice for agreements with defense tech brands,' said Paul Warley, Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies. 'There are a number of hurdles slowing the deployment of reliable solar solutions in space that few are equipped to face. However, Ascent's technology differentiators – specifically our lightweight, flexible and durable design -continue to provide a market-ready solution that mitigates many space environment challenges, allowing for long-term application on a wide variety of spacecraft.' Take advantage of TipRanks Premium for 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See today's best-performing stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on ASTI: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Why Is Ascent Solar Technologies Stock (ASTI) Up 150% Today? Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories! Ascent Solar enters collaborative agreement notice with NASA Ascent Solar files to sell 3.21M shares of common stock, warrants Ascent Solar Reduces Authorized Shares to 200 Million Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals
X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals

This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. After announcing that hashtags would be banned from all Promoted Posts on X last week, X owner Elon Musk also flagged another coming to change to X's ad process, with bigger ads to soon cost more per placement. Which, like the decision on hashtags, relates to aesthetics, and ensuring that the X feed looks neat and clean. As explained by Musk: 'X is moving to charging for ads based on vertical size, so an ad that takes up the whole screen would cost more than an ad that takes up 1/4 of the screen, otherwise the incentive is to create giant ads that impair the user experience.' To be clear, X hasn't enacted this update as yet, and there's nothing mentioned about the change in X's ad pricing overview at this stage. But the change is coming, which is another consideration for your X campaigns. So why the update? Well, as Musk notes, right now, advertisers are able to take up more screen space with bigger images and videos in their ads, which wins them greater screen presence. As you can see in these examples of X's text, image and video ads, each can vary in size, depending on the length of the attachment you include in your promotion. Here's another comparison of varying X ad size (on desktop): You can also see how Community Notes alerts extend this even further, taking up more feed space. There are limits on this, as the text element gets cut off after 180 characters (hidden by a 'show more' tag beyond that), and there are size restrictions for images and videos. But you can see how the variation can lead to differing ad experiences. And clearly, Elon's not happy with some of the longer ads he's seeing. So does this make logical sense, or is it a cash-grab by X, which is still struggling to make money? Maybe both? It does make some sense to charge based on ad size, which other platforms do already, and given the variance based on your visual attachments, there could be a significant difference in this respect. And yes, that will also enable X to make more money, though really, this depends on how much more X is planning to actually charge brands to get these bigger ads, which could have a significant impact on your platform planning. If Elon ups the price by a lot, you can bet that many X ads will suddenly shrink in response, as ad partners look to see if they can get the same response from less spend. But if the variance is little, then maybe there's no difference, and it won't be a big consideration for your promotions. We don't know what the new pricing structure will be, nor how it will be communicated to advertisers, but it is coming, and will be another factor to take note of in your planning. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store