5 RISC-V Single-Board Computers Tested : Performance, Benchmarks, Features and Insights
In this exploration, Explaining Computers put five RISC-V SBCs—Orange Pi RV2, Banana Pi BPI F3, Cyped Lite Pi 3A, Milk 5 Jupiter, and Vision 52—to the test. From performance benchmarks and software compatibility to storage speeds and power efficiency, each board offers a unique glimpse into the strengths and growing pains of the RISC-V ecosystem. Whether you're a developer seeking an open source alternative or a tinkerer curious about their potential, this comparison will reveal surprising insights and critical trade-offs. As we navigate the highs and lows of these boards, one question lingers: could RISC-V truly redefine the future of computing? RISC-V SBCs Overview Performance Benchmarks: A Diverse Range of Results
Performance testing revealed significant variability across the five boards. Synthetic benchmarks, such as Geekbench 6, exposed inconsistencies, with some boards underperforming or even failing to complete the tests. The Vision 52 excelled in Silverbench, outperforming its peers in specific tasks, but its Geekbench scores were less impressive, highlighting uneven performance across different metrics.
In real-world scenarios, such as applying a Lava filter to images, the Milk 5 Jupiter emerged as the top performer, closely followed by the Orange Pi RV2 and Vision 52. These results underscore the importance of workload-specific optimization in RISC-V hardware and software integration. While some boards excel in certain tasks, others struggle, reflecting the ongoing development challenges within the RISC-V ecosystem. Software Compatibility: Progress with Persistent Challenges
Software support is a critical factor influencing the adoption of RISC-V SBCs. Most of the tested boards have received recent operating system updates, improving functionality and performance. However, the Cyped Lite Pi 3A faced severe software issues, significantly limiting its usability and making it less viable for practical applications.
The Vision 52, while functional, encountered challenges due to outdated software, which hindered its performance in specific scenarios. In contrast, the Milk 5 Jupiter and Banana Pi BPI F3 demonstrated strong compatibility with widely used operating systems like Debian and Red Hat, showcasing the progress being made in the RISC-V software ecosystem. These developments indicate that while RISC-V software is maturing, further improvements are necessary to ensure a seamless and reliable user experience. Top 5 RISC-V SBCs Compared
Watch this video on YouTube.
Below are more guides on RISC-V single-board computers from our extensive range of articles. Storage Performance: The Importance of NVMe SSDs
Storage performance varied significantly among the boards, with NVMe SSDs delivering the most impressive results. Four of the five SBCs achieved respectable NVMe speeds, averaging around 600 MB/s, making them suitable for applications requiring fast and reliable data access. This performance positions NVMe SSDs as the preferred storage option for users seeking optimal speed and efficiency.
However, microSD card performance lagged behind, with the Vision 52 recording a particularly slow speed of just 21 MB/s. This limitation could pose a bottleneck for users relying on microSD storage for data-intensive tasks. These findings emphasize the importance of NVMe SSDs for users prioritizing storage performance, especially in scenarios where speed and reliability are critical. Power Efficiency: A Strong Showing Across the Boards
Power efficiency is a key consideration for embedded systems, IoT applications, and other use cases where energy consumption is a priority. The tested boards demonstrated commendable energy efficiency, with idle power consumption ranging from 3.1W on the Cyped Lite Pi 3A to 7.4W on the Milk 5 Jupiter.
Under load, the Orange Pi RV2 stood out as the most efficient, consuming just 6.2W, while the Milk 5 Jupiter peaked at 10.1W. These results suggest that RISC-V SBCs are well-suited for energy-conscious applications, though further optimization could enhance their appeal for power-sensitive use cases. The balance between performance and power consumption remains a critical factor for developers and users exploring RISC-V technology. Media Playback: 1080p Streaming and Beyond
Media playback is a common use case for SBCs, and most of the tested boards handled 1080p streaming without significant issues. However, the Vision 52 struggled with higher resolutions, performing better at 720p. This limitation may deter users seeking a seamless media experience, particularly when compared to ARM-based alternatives that excel in high-resolution playback.
On the other hand, the Milk 5 Jupiter and Orange Pi RV2 stood out for their smooth playback capabilities, making them strong contenders for multimedia applications. Their ability to handle 1080p streaming reliably positions them as viable options for users prioritizing media performance. Key Insights and Future Potential
Among the tested boards, the Milk 5 Jupiter and Orange Pi RV2 emerged as the most well-rounded options. Their strong performance, robust software compatibility, and efficient power usage make them appealing choices for developers and enthusiasts exploring RISC-V technology. The Vision 52 and Banana Pi BPI F3 also showed promise, particularly in scenarios requiring reliable software support. However, the Cyped Lite Pi 3A's significant software limitations hinder its practicality for most users.
Looking ahead, the future of RISC-V SBCs appears promising. Software ecosystems are steadily improving, with upcoming releases like Debian 13 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux expected to enhance compatibility and performance. While RISC-V SBCs currently trail behind ARM and x86 platforms in desktop and server applications, their open source nature and ongoing development suggest significant potential for growth and innovation. As the ecosystem matures, RISC-V SBCs could become a compelling alternative for a wide range of applications, from embedded systems to personal computing. Performance: Results vary widely, highlighting the need for further optimization.
Results vary widely, highlighting the need for further optimization. Software Compatibility: Progress is evident, but challenges persist, particularly with outdated or unstable software.
Progress is evident, but challenges persist, particularly with outdated or unstable software. Storage: NVMe SSDs deliver strong performance, while microSD cards fall short in speed and reliability.
NVMe SSDs deliver strong performance, while microSD cards fall short in speed and reliability. Power Efficiency: Boards demonstrate impressive energy efficiency, suitable for power-sensitive applications.
Boards demonstrate impressive energy efficiency, suitable for power-sensitive applications. Media Playback: Most boards handle 1080p streaming well, though higher resolutions remain a challenge for some.
As RISC-V technology continues to evolve, its potential to disrupt the SBC market grows. These boards offer a glimpse into what's possible, paving the way for broader adoption and innovation in the years to come.
Media Credit: ExplainingComputers Filed Under: Hardware, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Google undercounts its carbon emissions, report finds
In 2021, Google set a lofty goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2030. Yet in the years since then, the company has moved in the opposite direction as it invests in energy-intensive artificial intelligence. In its latest sustainability report, Google said its carbon emissions had increased 51% between 2019 and 2024. New research aims to debunk even that enormous figure and provide context to Google's sustainability reports, painting a bleaker picture. A report authored by non-profit advocacy group Kairos Fellowship found that, between 2019 and 2024, Google's carbon emissions actually went up by 65%. What's more, between 2010, the first year there is publicly available data on Google's emissions, and 2024, Google's total greenhouse gas emissions increased 1,515%, Kairos found. The largest year-over-year jump in that window was also the most recent, 2023 to 2024, when Google saw a 26% increase in emissions just between 2023 and 2024, according to the report. 'Google's own data makes it clear: the corporation is contributing to the acceleration of climate catastrophe, and the metrics that matter – how many emissions they emit, how much water they use, and how fast these trends are accelerating – are headed in the wrong direction for us and the planet,' said Nicole Sugerman, a campaign manager at Kairos Fellowship. The authors say that they found the vast majority of the numbers they used to determine how much energy Google is using and how much its carbon emissions are increasing in the appendices of Google's own sustainability reports. Many of those numbers were not highlighted in the main body of Google's reports, they say. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the figures. The authors behind the report, titled Google's Eco-Failures, attribute the discrepancy between the numbers they calculated and the numbers Google highlights in its sustainability reports to various factors, including that the firm uses a different metric for calculating how much its emissions have increased. While Google uses market-based emissions, the researchers used location-based emissions. Location-based emissions is the average energy the company consumes from local power grids, while market-based emissions include energy the company has purchased to offset its total emissions. '[Location-based emissions] represents a company's 'real' grid emissions,' said Franz Ressel, the lead researcher and report co-author. 'Market-based emissions are a corporate-friendly metric that obscures a polluters' actual impact on the environment. It allows companies to pollute in one place, and try to 'offset' those emissions by purchasing energy contracts in another place.' The energy the tech giant has needed to purchase to power its data centers alone increased 820% since 2010, according to Kairos' research, a figure that is expected to expand in the future as Google rolls out more AI products. Between 2019 and 2024, emissions that came primarily from the purchase of electricity to power data centers jumped 121%, the report's authors said. 'In absolute terms, the increase was 6.8 TWh, or the equivalent of Google adding the entire state of Alaska's energy use in one year to their previous use,' said Sugerman. Based on Google's current trajectory, the Kairos report's authors say the company is unlikely to meet its own 2030 deadline without a significant push from the public. There are three categories of greenhouse gas emissions – called Scopes 1, 2 and 3 – and Google has only meaningfully decreased its Scope 1 emissions since 2019, according to the Kairos report. Scope 1 emissions, which include emissions just from Google's own facilities and vehicles, account for only 0.31% of the company's total emissions, according to the report. Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions that come primarily from the electricity Google purchases to power its facilities, and scope 3 accounts for indirect emissions from all other sources such as suppliers, use of Google's consumer devices or employee business travel. 'It's not sustainable to keep building at the rate [Google is] building because they need to scale their compute within planetary limits,' said Sugerman. 'We do not have enough green energy to serve the needs of Google and certainly not the needs of Google and the rest of us.' As the company builds out resource-intensive data centers across the country, experts are also paying close attention to Google's water usage. According to the company's own sustainability report, Google's water withdrawal – how much water is taken from various sources – increased 27% between 2023 and 2024 to 11bn gallons of water. The amount is 'enough to supply the potable water needs for the 2.5 million people and 5,500 industrial users in Boston and its suburbs for 55 days', according to the Kairos report. Tech companies have faced both internal and public pressure to power their growing number of data centers with clean energy. Amazon employees recently put forth a package of shareholder proposals that asked the company to disclose its overall carbon emissions and targeted the climate impact of its data centers. The proposals were ultimately voted down. On Sunday, several organizations including Amazon Employees for Climate Justice, League of Conservation Voters, Public Citizen, and the Sierra Club, published an open letter in the San Francisco Chronicle and the Seattle Times calling on the CEOs of Google, Amazon and Microsoft to 'commit to no new gas and zero delayed coal plant retirements to power your data centers'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'In just the last two years alone, your companies have built data centers throughout the United States capable of consuming more electricity than four million American homes,' the letter reads. 'Within five years, your data centers alone will use more electricity than 22 million households, rivaling the consumption of multiple mid-size states.' In its own sustainability report, Google warns that the firm's 'future trajectories' may be impacted by the 'evolving landscape' of the tech industry. 'We're at an extraordinary inflection point, not just for our company specifically, but for the technology industry as a whole – driven by the rapid growth of AI,' the report reads. 'The combination of AI's potential for non-linear growth driven by its unprecedented pace of development and the uncertain scale of clean energy and infrastructure needed to meet this growth makes it harder to predict our future emissions and could impact our ability to reduce them.' The Kairos report accuses Google of relying 'heavily on speculative technologies, particularly nuclear power', to achieve its goal of net zero carbon emissions by 2030. 'Google's emphasis on nuclear energy as a clean energy 'solution' is particularly concerning, given the growing consensus among both scientists and business experts that their successful deployment on scale, if it is to ever occur, cannot be achieved in the near or mid-term future,' the report reads. The Kairos report alleges the way that Google presents some of its data is misleading. In the case of data center emissions, for example, Google says it has improved the energy efficiency of its data centers by 50% over 13 years. Citing energy efficiency numbers rather than sharing absolute ones obscures Google's total emissions, the authors argue. 'In fact, since 2010, the company's total energy consumption has increased 1,282%,' the report concluded.
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
How to Easily Automate Your Daily Life with AI
Imagine waking up to a world where your morning routine is already planned, your emails are sorted, and your grocery list is updated—all without lifting a finger. This isn't a distant sci-fi fantasy; it's the power of artificial intelligence (AI) in action. AI is no longer just a buzzword reserved for tech enthusiasts; it's a practical tool that can transform how you live, work, and connect with others. From automating tedious tasks to offering personalized insights, AI has the potential to free up your time and energy for what truly matters. But here's the catch: many of us are still unsure how to harness this technology in meaningful ways. If you've ever wondered how AI could simplify your life, you're in the right place. In this guide by Tina Huang, you'll uncover actionable strategies to integrate AI automation into your daily routines. Whether it's using AI to streamline your workday, manage your finances, or even strengthen your relationships, this guide will show you how to unlock its full potential. You'll learn how to automate repetitive tasks, personalize your experiences, and make smarter decisions—all with the help of AI. But this isn't just about convenience; it's about reclaiming your time and focusing on what truly enriches your life. As you explore these possibilities, you might find yourself asking: how much more could I achieve with AI as my partner? Practical AI for Daily Life Enhancing Productivity with AI AI tools are designed to help you work smarter by automating repetitive tasks and providing actionable insights. These tools can significantly improve your overall productivity in several ways: Streamline daily planning with AI-generated travel itineraries, task organization tools, and calendar management systems. with AI-generated travel itineraries, task organization tools, and calendar management systems. Identify objects or troubleshoot issues using AI-powered image recognition and diagnostic tools. using AI-powered image recognition and diagnostic tools. Summarize content such as presentations or videos and recommend products tailored to your preferences. By automating these tasks, AI allows you to focus on higher-priority activities, make faster decisions, and reduce the mental load of managing daily responsibilities. AI in the Workplace AI is a powerful tool for improving efficiency and organization in professional settings. It can help you stay focused and productive by automating routine tasks and offering advanced solutions for complex challenges: Automate administrative tasks like creating to-do lists, summarizing emails, or organizing meeting notes. like creating to-do lists, summarizing emails, or organizing meeting notes. Enhance writing and brainstorming with AI-powered tools that assist in drafting, editing, and generating ideas for documents or presentations. with AI-powered tools that assist in drafting, editing, and generating ideas for documents or presentations. Streamline data management by creating dashboards, analyzing datasets, and generating visual reports for better decision-making. These tools not only save time but also allow you to focus on strategic and creative aspects of your work, ultimately boosting overall productivity. How to Automate Your Daily Life with AI Watch this video on YouTube. Here are additional guides from our expansive article library that you may find useful on AI automation. AI in Personal Life AI extends beyond professional use, offering practical solutions to simplify and enrich your personal life. Here are some ways AI can make a difference: Personalize daily routines by generating meal plans, outfit suggestions, or home design ideas tailored to your preferences. by generating meal plans, outfit suggestions, or home design ideas tailored to your preferences. Access health insights with AI tools that provide preliminary guidance on symptoms or suggest wellness strategies. with AI tools that provide preliminary guidance on symptoms or suggest wellness strategies. Optimize financial decisions by analyzing insurance plans, tax strategies, and budgeting options. By incorporating AI into your personal routines, you can make more informed decisions and free up time for activities that matter most to you. Transforming Financial Management with AI Managing personal finances can be daunting, but AI-powered tools simplify the process by offering intelligent solutions. Here's how AI can help: Track expenses , automate bill payments, and create saving or investment plans tailored to your goals. , automate bill payments, and create saving or investment plans tailored to your goals. Analyze spending habits to identify areas for improvement and provide actionable insights for better financial health. to identify areas for improvement and provide actionable insights for better financial health. Plan for the future by generating retirement strategies and evaluating long-term financial goals. With AI, financial management becomes more efficient, allowing you to reduce stress and focus on achieving your financial objectives. AI in Education and Learning AI is transforming education by making learning more personalized, accessible, and engaging. Here are some key applications: Access on-demand tutoring and create customized study plans to suit your learning pace and style. and create customized study plans to suit your learning pace and style. Generate learning materials such as flashcards, mock exams, or audio-visual content to enhance understanding. such as flashcards, mock exams, or audio-visual content to enhance understanding. Design immersive learning experiences for advanced educational needs, including virtual simulations and interactive courses. These tools empower learners to take control of their education, making it more effective and enjoyable. Advancing Careers and Businesses with AI AI can be a valuable asset in achieving professional and business goals. Whether you're job hunting or managing a company, AI offers practical solutions: Optimize resumes , refine job search strategies, and practice interview scenarios with AI-powered tools. , refine job search strategies, and practice interview scenarios with AI-powered tools. Create business plans , design websites, and develop marketing materials using AI-driven platforms. , design websites, and develop marketing materials using AI-driven platforms. Automate workflows, research funding opportunities, and manage customer data for streamlined operations. By using AI, you can enhance efficiency, improve decision-making, and achieve your career or business objectives more effectively. Improving Relationships with AI AI can also play a role in strengthening personal relationships by offering tools to improve communication and understanding. Here are some examples: Seek relationship advice or practice difficult conversations using AI-powered voice assistants or chatbots. or practice difficult conversations using AI-powered voice assistants or chatbots. Explore communication strategies in a safe, judgment-free environment to enhance interpersonal skills. These tools can help you build stronger connections and navigate relationships with greater confidence and empathy. Creative and Specialized Applications of AI AI's versatility extends to creative and niche applications, allowing you to explore new possibilities and solve unique challenges: Create digital art , edit images, or develop custom applications tailored to your needs. , edit images, or develop custom applications tailored to your needs. Enhance business operations by automating lead generation, customer service, and data management tasks. These applications demonstrate AI's potential to inspire creativity and address specialized needs, making it a valuable tool for both personal and professional endeavors. Media Credit: Tina Huang Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
AI Showdown: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, & Grok Go Head-to-Head
Artificial intelligence chatbots are reshaping how we approach problem-solving, content creation, and productivity enhancement. This detailed comparison examines four leading AI systems—ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Grock—to help you identify the best fit for your specific needs. By analyzing their performance across critical areas, this guide provides actionable insights into their strengths and limitations. The video below from Mrwhosetheboss gives us a detailed comparison of the four AI tools. Watch this video on YouTube. Key Performance Areas Problem-Solving When addressing complex challenges, ChatGPT and Google Gemini stand out for their ability to balance theoretical reasoning with practical solutions. These systems excel in breaking down intricate problems into manageable steps, making them reliable for both academic and professional tasks. Grock, while impressively fast and confident, often sacrifices depth for brevity, which can limit its effectiveness in nuanced scenarios. On the other hand, Perplexity struggles with accuracy in highly detailed or layered problems, making it less dependable for users requiring precision. Product Recommendations AI-driven product research can be a mixed bag. Grock leads in identifying specific product features and delivering concise recommendations. However, all four systems occasionally generate incorrect or fabricated information, emphasizing the need for users to verify AI-generated suggestions. While ChatGPT and Google Gemini provide more detailed analyses, their recommendations may lack the specificity that Grock offers. Perplexity often provides reliable sourcing but can falter in delivering actionable insights. Translation and Language Understanding For multilingual users, ChatGPT and Perplexity excel in handling nuanced translations and complex linguistic tasks. Their ability to interpret context and cultural subtleties makes them ideal for global communication. Google Gemini delivers solid translations but lacks the finesse and contextual depth of its competitors. Grock, while fast, often produces overly literal translations, which can hinder effective communication in professional or creative settings. Critical Thinking and Analysis All four systems demonstrate the ability to identify logical fallacies and analyze complex scenarios. However, ChatGPT and Perplexity shine in analytical reasoning, particularly when interpreting visual data or addressing abstract concepts. Their capacity to break down arguments and provide detailed explanations makes them invaluable for tasks requiring critical thinking. Google Gemini performs well in structured analyses but can be overly verbose, while Grock prioritizes speed over depth, limiting its analytical utility. Content Generation For creative tasks, ChatGPT leads the pack with its ability to produce well-structured and engaging content, including itineraries, stories, and articles. Its versatility makes it a go-to choice for users seeking high-quality outputs. Google Gemini offers detailed responses but often leans toward verbosity, which can detract from usability. Perplexity and Grock show inconsistency in creative outputs, making them less reliable for content-heavy projects. Image and Video Generation In multimedia tasks, Google Gemini emerges as the leader, particularly in video generation, where it delivers high-quality visuals suitable for professional projects. ChatGPT and Perplexity perform adequately in image generation, offering decent results for less demanding tasks. Grock, however, struggles with accuracy and detail, making it less effective for users requiring precise or high-quality multimedia outputs. Fact-Checking Accuracy is a cornerstone of AI reliability. ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Grock perform well in debunking false claims and providing factual information. Perplexity, while generally accurate, occasionally lacks confidence in its responses, which can undermine user trust. This highlights the importance of cross-referencing AI-generated information, especially for critical decisions. Integrations and Features Google Gemini excels in integrations, particularly with Google Workspace and live data, making it a strong choice for users embedded in the Google ecosystem. Its seamless connectivity enhances productivity and collaboration. ChatGPT offers a wide range of plugins and customizable assistants, providing versatility for diverse applications. Grock uses real-time data from X (formerly Twitter), giving it a unique edge for social media-related tasks. Perplexity, while functional, lacks the advanced integrations of its competitors. Memory and Personalization Memory retention remains a challenge for all four systems. None of the evaluated AIs demonstrate strong conversational memory, which limits their ability to provide personalized experiences over time. This shortcoming affects their utility in tasks requiring long-term context or user-specific adaptations, highlighting an area for future development. Humor and Creativity For users prioritizing humor, Grock outshines its competitors, likely due to its training on data from X. Its witty and concise responses make it ideal for casual interactions. However, ChatGPT remains the most versatile for crafting creative and engaging content, offering a balance between entertainment and productivity. Google Gemini and Perplexity provide functional but less dynamic outputs in this area. Speed and Responsiveness For time-sensitive tasks, Grock is the fastest, delivering quick responses with minimal delay. ChatGPT follows closely, offering a balance between speed and detail. Google Gemini, while slower, provides more comprehensive answers, appealing to users who prioritize depth over speed. Perplexity offers moderate responsiveness but lacks the agility of its competitors. Voice Interaction In voice-based applications, ChatGPT and Google Gemini lead with their advanced voice synthesis capabilities. Their natural and human-like interactions make them suitable for virtual assistants, accessibility tools, and other voice-driven tasks. Grock and Perplexity lag behind in this area, offering less refined voice outputs. Final Rankings ChatGPT (29 points): The most consistent and versatile option, excelling in problem-solving, creativity, and usability. The most consistent and versatile option, excelling in problem-solving, creativity, and usability. Grock (26 points): The fastest AI with strengths in humor and concise responses, though it lacks depth in some areas. The fastest AI with strengths in humor and concise responses, though it lacks depth in some areas. Google Gemini (22 points): Strong in integrations and video generation but hindered by verbosity and slower speed. Strong in integrations and video generation but hindered by verbosity and slower speed. Perplexity (19 points): Reliable in sourcing but inconsistent in creative and analytical tasks. Choosing the Right AI for Your Needs Selecting the right AI depends on your priorities. ChatGPT offers a well-rounded experience, making it ideal for users seeking versatility and reliability. Grock is perfect for those who value speed and humor, while Google Gemini excels in integrations and multimedia tasks. Perplexity caters to niche applications but struggles with consistency in creative and analytical outputs. By understanding their strengths and limitations, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your goals. Stay informed about the latest in AI Chatbots Comparison by exploring our other resources and articles. Source & Image Credit: Mrwhosetheboss Filed Under: AI, Android News, Apple iPhone, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
