YouTube turns 20: From 'Lazy Sunday' to 'Hot Ones'
The video is short -- just 19 seconds -- and not particularly compelling. A viewer would be forgiven for clicking away before it ends.The grainy footage, uploaded on April 23, 2005, of a man standing in front of the elephant enclosure at the San Diego Zoo -- "All right, so here we are in front of the elephants" -- does not look like the sort of thing that would touch off a video revolution.And yet, two decades after that inauspicious start, YouTube is now a cornerstone of the media ecosystem. It's where people go for music videos and four-hour-long hotel reviews. It is a platform for rising stars and conspiracy theorists. It's a repository for vintage commercials and 10 hours of ambient noise. It has disrupted traditional television and given rise to a world of video creators who make content catering to every imaginable niche interest.For every YouTube video you have watched, there are hundreds of millions you will never see.Here's a look back at some of the biggest moments in YouTube history.The first video uploaded on YouTube is titled "Me at the zoo," and it shows one of the platform's founders, Jawed Karim, admiring the elephants at the San Diego Zoo. Karim founded YouTube in February 2005 with Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, but left the venture in 2006.The "Saturday Night Live" music video "Lazy Sunday" was perhaps the first YouTube video to go viral. The video, featuring the cast members Chris Parnell and Andy Samberg rapping about cupcakes and movie snacks, was immediately uploaded by fans after it aired December 17, 2005. The spread of bootleg clips prompted NBC Universal to ask YouTube to remove the clip and other NBC footage for copyright reasons in February 2006.YouTube swiftly became a home for viral hits, which in 2006 included "Flea Market Montgomery," "Charlie the Unicorn" and "Evolution of Dance."Viacom, Microsoft and Yahoo expressed interest in buying YouTube, attracted by its growing audience. In October 2006, Google announced that it was acquiring the platform for $1.65 billion."Chocolate Rain," "Charlie Bit My Finger," "Shoes" and "Leave Britney Alone" were among the YouTube videos that caused a stir in 2007.So did home videos of a little Canadian kid with a big voice, who was building a small legion of fans. Crucially, they also attracted the interest of the R&B singer and songwriter Usher, and an aspiring music manager, Scooter Braun. Braun signed the kid, Justin Bieber, and Bieber Fever ensued.David DeVore Sr. posted a video of his 7-year-old son, David, after a tooth extraction to share with family, but the video of the loopy and screaming child, "David After Dentist," shot around the internet.The younger David said in an interview on Tamron Hall's talk show in January that learning he was famous "came to me in pieces.""I was 7 when it first happened, and a week later we were in New York for the first time," he said.Eating crabs. Tapping fingernails. Whispering the names of items on a grocery receipt. For some, these sounds trigger a brain-tingling sensation now recognized as Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response, or ASMR, a term coined in 2010.YouTube was already filled with terrible songs by amateurs when a music video for "Friday," by 13-year-old Rebecca Black, caught the attention of the public and was eviscerated by armchair critics online.Black is still making music and working as a DJ. This spring and summer, she is a guest on Katy Perry's tour and on the Solid Pink Disco tour headlined by drag artist Trixie Mattel."Kony 2012" did not fit into an existing mold for viral content. It was 30 minutes long, created by a nonprofit group, Invisible Children, and was about a Central African warlord, Joseph Kony.And yet, the video had 100 million views only a week after it was released, with help from celebrity supporters including Bieber, Kim Kardashian and Oprah Winfrey."Kony 2012" ultimately had a mixed legacy, and Kony's location remains unknown. A hearing on the war crimes and crimes against humanity charges against him is scheduled for Sept. 9 at the International Criminal Court at The Hague.Psy, a South Korean singer and rapper, released a music video for his song "Gangnam Style" in July 2012, and by the end of that year it had become the first video on the internet to reach 1 billion views. In 2022, Psy told The New York Times that the song's success haunted him."The songs are written by the same person, the dance moves are by the same person and they're performed by the same person. Everything's the same, but what was so special about that one song?" Psy said. "I still don't know, to this day."The musician T-Pain was for years best known, and often criticized, for hits that leaned heavily on Auto-Tune. That changed when he appeared on NPR's Tiny Desk concert series, singing beautifully without digital effects in a performance that silenced his online critics.The Tiny Desk series, which began in 2008, continues to produce pop culture moments. In the past year, popular Tiny Desk performances have included Doechii and Ca7riel & Paco Amoroso.A popular YouTube genre is unboxing, which features people taking cellphones, makeup, vacuum cleaners and other products out of their packaging and describing them in clinical detail.One of the most successful creators of unboxing videos is Marques Brownlee. He has unboxed items including an original, sealed iPhone, a PlayStation 5 and AirPods Max headphones. After years of reviewing technology for a growing audience, he graduated from college and became a full-time YouTube creator in May 2015. Today, he has 19.9 million subscribers and is a respected voice on consumer technology.The world domination of "Baby Shark" began quietly, when a video of the song was posted on YouTube in November 2015 by SmartStudy, a Seoul-based company that produced children's videos under the Pinkfong brand.Pinkfong remixed the song, adding a new beat, and dropped the inescapable version of "Baby Shark" in June 2016. In November 2020, it became the most viewed YouTube video ever. At 15.8 billion views, it still is.Music videos dominate YouTube's most-watched lists, but none have topped "Despacito" by Luis Fonsi, featuring Daddy Yankee. The video was filmed in Puerto Rico, where both artists are from, and is the most watched music video on YouTube. It is also one of the most watched videos ever, with more than 8.7 billion views.Like all social media platforms, YouTube has been in a constant struggle to determine what content it will allow. In 2018, it joined several other companies in removing most posts and videos from the right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his website, Infowars.Other prominent voices who have been restricted on the platform include President Donald Trump and Andrew Tate, an influencer known for his misogynistic views and ostentatious displays of wealth. (YouTube reversed its suspension of Trump's account in March 2023.)Countless video call gaffes were lost to history during the coronavirus pandemic. One that was preserved featured a Texas lawyer, Rod Ponton, who could not figure out how to turn off a Zoom filter that made him look like a gray cat with sad eyes when he joined a virtual hearing in civil forfeiture case. "I'm here live," Ponton told the court. "I'm not a cat."Ponton has since embraced his brush with internet fame. "It did let everybody have a moment of humor and a moment of sanity during the dark days of the pandemic," he told the Times this year. "I'm glad it happened, even at my expense."Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast, created a YouTube account when he was in middle school, in 2012. He eventually found success with a video format that involved giving money to people in need, and he has for years been one of the most popular creators on the platform. His most popular video is "$456,000 Squid Game In Real Life!" from November 2021.Podcasts, once an audio-only medium, are now frequently recorded on video and posted on YouTube.In the final quarter of 2023, 16 of the top 30 podcasts were available as filmed videos, according to a Times analysis of data published by Edison Research. In the same period two years earlier, seven of the top 30 podcasts were available as filmed videos."Hot Ones," the interview show in which guests sample increasingly spicy hot sauces on chicken (or vegan) wings, had several hit episodes by the time Conan O'Brien, a fixture of traditional television, made an appearance.His unhinged performance -- he appears to come unglued as he swigs sauce straight from the bottle -- had "Conan O'Brien" trending online for days. "Many of my friends went online and thought I died," he said.Chicken-based interview shows are now a recognized stop on the celebrity PR circuit, with "Chicken Shop Date," hosted by Amelia Dimoldenberg, producing its own set of viral moments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Influencers log out—when the likes don't pay for the rent
After nine years of writing comedy scripts, shooting sketches, and chasing YouTube views, Om Suri hit pause. His channel 'Oye Omi' had nearly 73,000 subscribers, but not enough to pay his bills. Two months ago, he quit full-time content creation and is scouting for a regular job. Suri is not alone. As India's 8-million-strong creator economy gets overcrowded and unpredictable, many influencers, especially those with smaller followings, are quietly walking away from the spotlight. Shrinking advertisement revenue, inconsistent brand deals, and rising financial strain are driving creators back to the stability of traditional employment. Influencers, those who have built a dedicated following on digital platforms, are known to quit their regular jobs and pursue full-time content creation. But lately, this trend is reversing. With the millions of content creators competing for your attention and brand deals, the earnings are dwindling, and survival is becoming difficult by the day, especially for those with smaller followings or limited network to pull in regular brand work. The middle rung of influencers is the worst hit. Advertisement revenue on popular platforms like YouTube is often meagre, which influencers say ranges from $0.4 to $3 per thousand views. This financial crunch is making many creators abandon their influencer careers to return to traditional jobs. According to Suri, YouTube's financial sustainability is a challenge for many creators. "To make a living, you have to post consistently and get regular brand deals," he says. "Due to overcrowding, this has become a rat race, where all of us are competing for the same brand deals. However, brands only pick the top creators with the most followers." Suri also highlights the issues with brand collaborations. "Many brands that pay well also require the promotion of risky things such as betting or trading, which I personally rejected as a creator," he says. "Besides, larger creators are sought after, while smaller creators are mostly offered barter collaborations on Instagram, where you're only given products to promote for free; you don't earn." Indian influencers' advertisement revenues are paltry compared with their global peers. "Advertisers in India don't pay as much, so the AdSense revenue on YouTube is as low as $1 per thousand views – over 10 times lower than what is given globally," Suri says. "It is also difficult to compete against corporate giants who have created YouTube channels and creators who have a talent management agency and a team to produce content." Suri has applied to various companies and agencies for roles in creative fields such as writing, editing, or anchoring, leveraging the skills he picked up during content creation. The commerce graduate's goal now is to find a stable job that pays regularly. Aashish Gupta, another creator who zoomed out of his content journey to settle in as the talent manager of a more popular content creator, Elvish Yadav, points to a generational phenomenon of job security. 'While obviously, money is the primary factor for most creators who quit content like me, it is also the circumstances," he said. Gupta started creating content in 2018 while he was in college, and balanced it with other pursuits, including film and music production and corporate jobs. He, however, realized that content monetization has a short shelf-life. "The thing with content monetization is that it is a risky job, which one can do in their early 20s, wherein there are no responsibilities. But one can't sustain in it close to their 30s," he said. Gupta, who says he had financial commitments at home, highlights the challenges of inconsistent income and the favouring of top influencers. "This industry favours the top influencers with more followers and the ones who have a good network to get regular brand deals," he says. 'Otherwise, it is difficult to continue in this field because one month when we get a deal, we would earn around ₹10,000-20,000. But after that, we would struggle to make any money for a few months that followed... the inconsistency made it difficult to survive." Industry watchers believe that while the outflow of content creators is not alarming just yet, it reflects a deeper industry problem. "Over 2 lakh content creators have stopped producing content since 2024... This may look like a big number, but it is not alarming just yet if compared to the influx of new creators in the industry," says Anirudh Sridharan, co-founder of creator network Hashfame. Sridharan explains that the industry's growth is not likely to be hampered by this outflow, given the large number of active creators. "Against that, the outflow of 2-3% people is normal in any industry that is operating at such a scale, and it cannot hamper the growth of the industry," he says. He, however, warns this could become a bigger issue in future if the core problems are not addressed. According to Sridharan, the three primary reasons for creators quitting are mental strain, lack of monetization opportunities, and loss of relevance. "For tackling the monetization problem, we have to consider the content economy as a large army of GenZ workforce catering to their need, rather than looking at them just like a bunch of youngsters using their phones to make videos for social media," he says. Sridharan also highlights the need for more conscious investment from brands. "Brands have to invest more consciously, as currently this industry is very unorganized and operated on a manual model, where rarely do brands go beyond the creators that come on the top of their mind or are a part of their network to discover more creators," he said. This lack of discoverability leads to inconsistent income distribution, where the top 1% creators earn the largest portion of the ₹3,500 crore creator economy. He also noted that only a small percentage of creators can make a decent income. "Only 5-10% beyond that are able to make a decent income of say ₹50,000 per month," he said. The rest are either doing this part-time or struggling financially, and eventually, they may lose cultural relevance and be forced out of the business unless they constantly reinvent their content. Sandwich issue Brands say they prefer more established creators, who are more relevant because of the better return on investment (ROI) they provide with their solid metrics. However, they also say nano influencers, with sub-10,000 followers, charge incredibly low fees and even work on a barter basis in most cases, making them the second-best choice. Thus, brands mostly tap into these two categories, while leaving the rest of the influencers scrambling for deals. 'Purely from the lens of an ROI, celebrity influencers might command a premium fee, but they deliver unmatched top-of-funnel impact, typically driving a 3x–5x spike in brand searches and recall within days of a campaign. Their scale compresses the awareness curve, making them a solid financial bet when the objective is mass reach," said Murali Krishnan, chief marketing officer of food chain Wow! Momo. 'On the other end, nano influencers, consistently deliver 6–10% engagement rates, which is nearly 2–3x higher than mid-tier creators, and they do it at a fraction of the cost," Krishnan adds. "The challenge lies with mid-size micro- and macro-influencers, where their ability to deliver either deep influence or wide reach is getting diluted." The marketing chief said his brand is increasingly adopting a barbell strategy, putting major investments in celeb influencers for impact, and scaling up nano collaborations for frequency and grassroot authenticity, while being extremely selective with the middle-tier influencers, who are sandwiched between these two. Side hustles Instead of completely logging out, some content creators are creating content on the side, while focussing on their regular job. Take Macedon D'mello, who earlier created comedy-related content but has now pivoted to dance-related material on Instagram. He works full time in a digital marketing agency, while also taking up freelance choreography, acting and voice-over gigs. "One does not have to necessarily give up on content creation. I have a regular job but I continue to pursue content, create for brands and also freelance on the side," D'mello tells Mint. 'Content audience was at peak during covid, and at that time it made sense for creators to rely on it for their income completely. But if they didn't make it big, it is best for them to do it as a side hustle, while earning from other sources to balance their passion with their profession," D'mello adds. "These small creators, with 5,000-10,000 followers, who are also doing a 9-5 job with a stable income charge a basic amount… And for that, they deliver videos that are as aesthetic and polished as someone with 4–5 lakh followers. And brands get usage rights too, said Kunal Chhabhria, partner at CollabX Entertainment. Echoing Chhabhria's view, Zil Shah, a talent agent at the same firm says: 'Stability of income has become more important now. Some creators manage both, they shoot over weekends, edit at night, and work a 9-5 during the day. Others have taken a break from content completely. And this isn't a one-off case it's becoming quite common."
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Stephen A Smith blasts Michelle Obama over ESPN drama jab and offensive Donald Trump claim
Stephen A Smith blasts Michelle Obama over ESPN drama jab and offensive Trump claim (Image Via X) On August 2 and 3, 2025, a heated exchange unfolded between ESPN star Stephen A. Smith and former First Lady Michelle Obama . The clash began when Michelle Obama, on her 'IMO' podcast, compared ESPN comment shows especially featuring Stephen A. Smith to The Real Housewives of Atlanta. In response, Stephen A. Smith pushed back sharply on his YouTube show, calling her 2024 campaign remarks 'offensive' and saying he took them personally. What followed is a clash of perspectives blending sports, politics and media culture. Michelle Obama's ESPN comparison draws fire On August 1, 2025, during an episode of her 'IMO with Michelle Obama & Craig Robinson' podcast, Michelle Obama likened watching ESPN even shows like First Take to reality TV. She said: 'If I listen to ESPN for an hour, it's like watching The Real Housewives of Atlanta. It's the same drama… they're yelling at each other… Stephen A. Smith… he's just like every other talk show host.' She described the network's debates as sociological drama, full of constant tension and conflict. Also Read: "He's Not Their Media Puppet": Michelle Obama's Blunt Take On Stephen A. Smith Sparks A Heated Debate Among Fans Stephen A. Smith's response to Michelle Obama On August 2–3, 2025, Stephen A. Smith answered on his own show. He began by expressing respect: 'Michelle Obama… you are revered by me personally… but I'm still a bit salty at you.' He criticised her campaign claim that 'a vote for Trump was a vote against women,' stating he found that message emotionally manipulative and offensive. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions Trek Kit India Learn More Undo He emphasised that voters decide based on many issues like economy, security, immigration, safety, long before considering identity politics. Smith also challenged her reality‑TV comparison of ESPN. He argued that sports commentary is live, competitive, authentic entertainment and not scripted reality TV. 'You are so wrong about that assertion,' he said, defending ESPN's value. Despite disagreement, Smith lauded her: he said Obama was 'sensational' and suggested she or Barack Obama would beat Donald Trump in a presidential run. Yet he reaffirmed that he 'won't say a negative word' about her personally. This dispute highlights the intersection of sports media criticism and political tension. With Michelle Obama's viral podcast comments and Stephen A. Smith's candid rebuttal, both delivered on different platforms and dates, the back‑and‑forth reflects deep cultural divides over identity, political messaging, and media presentation. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
India Today
10 hours ago
- India Today
Not just 2-part film, Ramayana is now available as an AI series
'Ramayana' has been part of Indian mythology for ages. But what if we tell you that it is now being re-interpreted into a series using Artificial Intelligence? Yes, you heard it right! Mumbai-based Cinefai Studios released the trailer for their latest project, 'Ramayana', a few days ago. The trailer of the new episodic series offers a glimpse into the classic Indian epic crafted entirely using advanced AI critic Taran Adarsh shared the trailer for the series on X. He also informed that the first episode of the series is already out. The trailer showcases the gripping tale of Ram and Sita retold through next-generation visualisation techniques. It is available for viewing on the studio's Instagram and YouTube channels. Several social media users reacted to the post, saying the trailer looks good. One of the users said, "This is really mesmerising (sic)" Second user said, "AI influence is going to be epic in coming times (sic)". Another said, "Next level VFX (sic)."The 'Ramayana' series has used AI tools to create realistic imagery and intricate character designs. The AI technology allows the makers to achieve detailed visuals with fewer resources than the traditional route. However, it remains to be seen if the series manages to preserve the cultural and emotional essence of Valmiki's tale of Rama, Sita, and Bollywood is also gearing up to bring a grand spectacle of 'Ramayana' on the big screen. Directed by Nitesh Tiwari, this film is being produced with a budget exceeding Rs 4,000 crore, divided into two parts. The film will reportedly feature heavy use of VFX alongside AI-generated dubbing upcoming film features Ranbir Kapoor as Lord Ram, Sai Pallavi as Sita, Yash as Ravana, Sunny Deol as Hanuman and Vikrant Massey as Lakshman. The first part of the film is scheduled for a Diwali 2026 release, followed by the second part in 2027.- Ends
