Copper, other metals drop as investors shed risk after Israel strikes Iran
Benchmark three-month copper on the London Metal Exchange shed 1.3% to $9,575 a metric ton by 1010 GMT, the weakest since June 3.
The dollar index climbed and world stock markets tumbled after Israel launched a large-scale military strike on Iran.
A firmer dollar makes commodities priced in the U.S. currency more expensive for buyers using other currencies.
"The market is de-risking on copper and aluminium," said Alastair Munro, senior base metals strategist at broker Marex.
"The key now will be whether the risk managers in the USA start to knock on the money managers' door saying you've got to reduce risk ahead of the weekend."
U.S. Comex copper futures dropped 1.9% to $4.74 a lb, bringing the premium of Comex over LME copper to $879 a ton.
Munro said much of the selling was by Commodity Trade Advisor (CTA) investment funds, which are largely driven by computer programs, while Chinese participants emerged at the lows to do some buying.
In China, the most-traded aluminium contract on the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) gained for the third straight day, up 0.4% at 20,425 yuan per metric ton, outperforming other SHFE metals.
"Aluminium, compared with the other metals, has been performing rather strongly recently as demand from the domestic market has been robust, while SHFE stocks have been declining," a Hangzhou-based analyst from a futures company said.
Aluminium stocks in SHFE warehouses fell to 110,001 tons in the week ended June 13, the lowest since February 2024, having tumbled by 54% since late March.
Among other metals, LME aluminium gave up 1.2% to $2,487.50 a ton, zinc fell 1.7% to $2,598.50, lead dipped 0.3% to $1,991.50, nickel slipped 0.2% to $15,165 and tin was down 0.1% to $32,600.
($1 = 7.1813 Chinese yuan)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
OPEC+ is pumping more oil, but is it needed and at what price?: Russell
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters) LAUNCESTON, Australia - Two questions stand out after the decision by OPEC+ to accelerate increases in crude oil output: who is going to buy the extra crude, and will the group actually export the additional barrels they say they are going to produce? OPEC+ agreed at a weekend meeting to raise production by 548,000 barrels per day (bpd) in August, up from the 411,000 bpd the group had approved for May, June and July, and 138,000 bpd for April. The production boost will come from eight members of the group - Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, Kazakhstan and Algeria. The increase for August means that the eight will have unwound 1.919 million bpd of the voluntary 2.2 million bpd they had imposed last year in a bid to support crude prices. OPEC+ cited what it called "steady global economic outlook and current healthy market fundamentals" in the statement announcing the increased August output, sticking to a theme from its recent communiques that the oil market is in fine shape. However, the reality may not be quite as rosy as OPEC+ paints, with tepid demand growth in major consumers such as China, the world's top oil importer. China's crude imports barely rose in the first five months of the year, with official data showing a gain of 0.3%, or 28,500 bpd, to 11.1 million bpd. The growth rate will likely tick up when June data is released next week, with LSEG Oil Research expecting imports of 11.96 million bpd for the month, up from the customs number of 11.30 million bpd for June 2024. While China's imports are likely to have been strong in June, the reason why is not quite so bullish. It is likely that refiners were buying more crude than they intended to process because prices were lower at the time when June-arriving cargoes were arranged. Global benchmark Brent futures hit a four-year low of $58.50 a barrel on May 5 and had been trending lower since early April, the time period when June-arriving cargoes would have been bought. The weakness in prices has seen oil imports by Asia, which buys about 60% of seaborne crude, rise in June, with LSEG estimating arrivals of 28.65 million bpd, the most since January 2023. The higher June imports lifted Asia's arrivals for the first half of 2025 to 27.36 million bpd, up 620,000 bpd for the same period last year. Coincidentally this is largely in line with the demand growth forecasts for the region by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, with the group's June monthly report forecasting demand growth of 630,000 bpd for non-OECD Asia in 2025. PRICES KEY The question is whether the second half will see higher imports in Asia, or if the momentum seen in June will dissipate. Much will depend on prices, as history suggests that when prices rise importers such as China and India tend to trim imports and use up stockpiles. The brief surge in prices in mid-June sparked by Israel's attacks on Iran, later joined by the United States, will probably be enough to see China lower imports in August and perhaps September. For imports to rise in the fourth quarter, it will likely take lower oil prices to encourage buying and inventory builds. In that case the ball is largely in OPEC+'s court. If the group starts producing what their quotas allow, and furthermore actually exports this oil, then it's likely that prices will continue to soften, thereby encouraging buying. So far, it appears that actual output has lagged the higher quotas, with the five OPEC members of OPEC+ raising output by 267,000 bpd in June, short of the 313,000 bpd allowed, according to a Reuters survey released on July 4. Much will depend on what Saudi Arabia does, given that OPEC+'s largest exporter is the producer with the most spare capacity and the most ability to raise output. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. (Editing by Jacqueline Wong)
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump vows extra 10% tariffs on countries aligning with 'anti-American' policies of BRICS
US President Donald Trump on Sunday said that countries aligning themselves with the "Anti-American policies" of BRICS, will be charged an additional 10% tariff. "Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Trump did not clarify or expand on the "Anti-American policies" reference in his post. Rio summit The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia as members. At a summit in Rio on Sunday, BRICS leaders took aim at Trump's "indiscriminate" import tariffs and recent Israeli-US strikes on Iran. The 11 emerging nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, account for about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output. The bloc is divided about much, but found common cause when it comes to the mercurial US leader and his stop-start tariff wars—even if it avoided naming him directly. Voicing "serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff" measures, BRICS members said the tariffs risked hurting the global economy, according to a summit joint statement. In April, Trump threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive duties, before offering a months-long reprieve in the face of a fierce market sell-off. Trump has warned he will impose unilateral levies on partners unless they reach "deals" by August 1. Earlier, BRICS also offered symbolic backing to fellow member Iran, condemning a series of military strikes on nuclear and other targets carried out by Israel and the United States.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
China, not the US, is dominating clean energy output
'We are putting up wind. It does not work. Being very weak and expensive, all made in China. I have never seen a wind farm in China. Why is that?' It is not hard to guess the speaker. Of course, while US President Donald Trump might not himself have seen a wind farm in China, the country is by far the biggest generator of wind power globally. The White House's longed-for energy dominance has arrived – but with clean energy it is in Beijing, not Washington. Wherever you look in the universe of low-carbon energy, you see two worlds: China, and everyone else. In manufacturing, in domestic demand, in deployment, in exports, in investments, increasingly in science and clean-tech innovation, China outstrips the remainder of the planet. China's state grid expects 380 gigawatts of solar power and 140 gigawatts of wind to be installed this year. For context, that is almost as much wind capacity, and twice as much solar, as the second-largest user, the US, has – in total. Costs for renewable energy continue to fall. Batteries, required to back up intermittent wind and solar generation, have also become radically cheaper: lithium-ion batteries costing $137 per kilowatt-hour in 2020 can now be obtained in China for less than $60. Meanwhile, though US natural gas remains pretty cheap, its price is not far off double that of a year ago. More concerning, long backlogs in gas turbines mean that the favoured option for meeting new electricity demand is going to be slow and costly. More than half of Chinese motorists now buy an electric car. BYD, NIO, Xiaomi and rivals make inexpensive, increasingly stylish and technically sophisticated EVs, with battery breakthroughs in prospect that would dramatically expand range and cut charging times. They are about to leave the American and European car industries as road kill, unless Detroit and Munich can manage a rapid U-turn. Rare earth minerals The Chinese grip over rare earth minerals, used in powerful magnets for electric car motors and wind turbines, receives much press. Less mentioned is China's dominance of graphite for batteries and elements such as gallium for semiconductors, germanium in electronics, or antimony, used in armaments and making the hard plastic PET. Even in oil, where US technology is generally dominant, China is the leading source of tungsten and industrial diamonds, used for ultra-hard drill bits. Chinese companies have spent decades building vertically integrated supply chains, that make them robust to volatility in often opaque markets, and able to wage price wars against would-be competitors. They have developed extensive overseas operations for minerals that aren't common at home, such as cobalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo and nickel in Indonesia, both important battery components. China also has a decisive lead in processing technology for rare earths, nickel and other major minerals. Even as rival nations look for mineral deposits elsewhere, China's near monopoly in processing is likely to prove more durable than its majority share of mining. Second only to the US in nuclear power generation, it is constructing almost 34 gigawatts of nuclear reactors, far outstripping the 6 gigawatts of the second-largest builder, India. It, like the US and some other countries, is searching for a breakthrough in fusion, the Shangri-la of cheap, clean, limitless energy. It is also the main producer and leading innovator in a whole range of other key energy technology: for example, electrolysers to produce hydrogen, and ultra-high voltage cables to transmit electricity over intercontinental distances. The surge in Chinese renewable and nuclear generation, backed up by the still-growing coal fleet, means electricity should be ample and cheap, and it is getting cleaner. Contrast that with the US or Europe, where new electricity is likely to be slow, costly or both, and it provides a potential big advantage for the intensely contested AI terrain. China is even shooting ahead in space; its Heavenly Questions (Tianwen) programme should make it the first nation to bring rocks back from Mars to Earth for study by 2031, perhaps revealing the first solid evidence of extra-terrestrial life. Meanwhile, the US is dismantling the agency that outshone the Soviet space effort, Nasa, whose own Mars sample return mission is in danger of cancellation. China invested more than $800 billion in the energy transition last year. This was more than the US, EU and UK put together. Energy dark age For now, the US does retain 'energy dominance' in oil and gas. That is probably a wasting asset, as US oil output levels out, electric cars and renewables erode demand for hydrocarbons, and China advances its own oil and gas abilities. The dragon's rise has been aided by an almost unbelievable series of blunders by its rivals. This story of shame mostly attaches to Washington. The closure of the US Bureau of Mines in 1996, the fake scandal over government loans to solar company Solyndra in 2009, the latest gutting of funding for almost every new energy technology, are milestones in an almost deliberate policy to surrender leadership to Beijing. The US is now on track to a new dark age where superstition and political ideology replace the quest for scientific truth. It still has unique advantages of risk-seeking capital and tech-savvy entrepreneurs, but their roots of academia, government laboratories and skilled immigration will wither. The story in Europe is not nearly as bad, but excessive bureaucracy, ideology, fragmentation across national borders, miserly funding for top researchers, an anaemic venture capital scene, painfully slow and expensive construction of big new infrastructure, and the lost decade of the 2010s when clean energy spending stagnated, are all to blame. The US perceived, rightly, that energy dominance is a path to economic and then political dominance. It was wrong about the dominant forms and country of that energy. Outside the Washington bubble, Beijing 's clean energy superiority is neither a bad or good thing, but simply a fact, to which individual, corporate and national manufacturers, and users of energy must adapt.
