&w=3840&q=100)
UN adopts resolution on Afghanistan's Taliban rule despite US objections
The 11-page resolution also emphasises the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan, and urges donors to address the country's dire humanitarian and economic crisis.
The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favour, with two the United States and close ally Israel opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran.
Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government.
Germany's UN Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban's near-total erasure of the rights of women and girls.
The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten.
US minister-counsellor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards the Taliban's failure with more engagement and more resources." He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies "in accordance with the expectations of the international community.
For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives, he said. It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behaviour.
Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the US permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions.
The resolution expresses appreciation to governments hosting Afghan refugees, singling out the two countries that have taken the most: Iran and Pakistan.
While the resolution notes improvements in Afghanistan's overall security situation, it reiterates concern about attacks by al-Qaida and Islamic State militants and their affiliates. It calls upon Afghanistan "to take active measures to tackle, dismantle and eliminate all terrorist organizations equally and without discrimination.
The General Assembly also encouraged UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to appoint a coordinator to facilitate a more coherent, coordinated and structured approach to its international engagements on Afghanistan.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump yet again dismisses Elon Musk's ‘America Party', says, ‘it will help us'
US President Donald Trump brushed off tech billionaire Elon Musk's new political party, suggesting it would actually boost his own campaign—just two days after dismissing the idea as 'ridiculous.' 'I think it will help us. It will probably help,' Trump said on July 7 when asked about Musk's formation of the 'America Party,' a political movement Musk says will challenge both Republicans and Democrats. 'Third parties have always been good for me. I don't know about Republicans, but for me,' added Trump. Speaking to reporters on July 7, Trump took direct aim at Musk's announcement, dismissing the concept outright. 'I think it's ridiculous to start a third party. We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system,' Trump said. 'Starting a third party just adds to confusion.' He added, 'It really seems to have been developed for two parties. Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous.' Later, Trump amplified his criticism on his Truth Social platform, writing that Musk had gone 'completely off the rails.' 'I'm saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails', essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Trump posted, while again defending the two-party system as the only viable political structure in the US. Musk, who owns the social media platform X, fired back with a mocking response to Trump's Truth Social comments: 'What's Truth Social?" Musk unveiled his 'America Party' on July 5, citing fierce opposition to Trump's $5 trillion tax and spending bill, which includes a major debt ceiling hike and rollbacks of climate-related incentives. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote on X. He added: 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Although still unofficial, Musk indicated that the new party would focus on unseating GOP lawmakers who voted for Trump's sweeping fiscal package. A poll posted by Musk on July 4 showed 65% of more than 1.2 million respondents supporting the creation of a third party. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote. Trump suggested that Musk's motivation may stem from specific provisions in the spending bill. 'He's probably upset because the Bill eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time,' Trump said.
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
Dollar Dominance, Trade Risks & Delhi's Balancing Act – Why Trump's BRICS Threats Matter For India
New Delhi: At a time when India inches closer to finalising a trade deal with the United States, a thunderclap from Washington has cast shadows over the celebration. US President Donald Trump's blunt message, posted publicly this week, warned that any country aligning with what he described as BRICS' 'anti-American policies' would face an additional 10% tariff without exceptions. As one of the founding members of BRICS, India finds itself at the centre of this growing storm. The recently concluded Rio de Janeiro summit of the bloc had laid out an ambitious declaration. There was no mention of the United States, but it still sent ripples through Washington. The BRICS statement challenged unilateral economic measures, defended multilateralism, voiced concern over tariffs that disrupt global trade and pushed for changes to global governance. These words appear to have stung. What followed was Trump's retaliation. On his Truth Social platform, he wrote that siding with BRICS' economic vision would come at a cost. The timing could not have been more crucial. He is expected to begin announcing trade deals from Monday, and India is among the countries on the list. In Delhi, this new tension is being watched with a mix of caution and calculation. Trade experts in the capital believe the core of Trump's anger lies deeper within the BRICS push for currency alternatives. For years, Russia and China have spoken of a new financial system to bypass the dollar. In 2022, Russia even floated a proposal for a BRICS reserve currency. Many Indian analysts suspect this is what triggered Trump's fury. The dollar remains Washington's most powerful economic weapon. The United States used it in 2012 to isolate Iran and again in 2022 against Russia. Any attempt to weaken its grip invites blowback. Despite its lack of political cohesion, BRICS still threatens that power by raising the idea of currency diversification. Indian economists see the bigger picture. The call for a common BRICS currency faces hurdles. Political will is scattered. China's dominance in the bloc sparks unease among other members. But the conversations alone unsettle Washington. That is why even vague references to multilateral financial systems draw fire. Meanwhile, India, experts are of the view, must walk a fine line. It is preparing for what is being described as a 'mini trade deal' with the United States. Reports suggest Delhi has already agreed to a baseline 10% tariff, but higher rates – up to 26% – remain on the table. Agriculture and dairy continue to be sticking points. At the same time, India cannot ignore its standing in BRICS. It shares that space with strategic rivals like China but also long-standing defence and energy partners like Russia. The bloc includes emerging economies looking for new trade paths. Turning away completely would be costly. Domestic industry lobbies in India are growing nervous. Sectors like textiles, pharma and information technology could suffer if Trump hikes tariffs further. Executives fear the fallout of a new wave of American protectionism. What adds to the anxiety is the unpredictability. Trump has changed course before. His sudden termination of a long-standing free trade pact with Vietnam has become a cautionary tale. Despite the tensions, some foreign policy voices in Delhi urge calm. They argue that BRICS has always been an idea more than an institution. Its members rarely share political agendas or geographical interests. But that has not stopped it from becoming a target. Others believe Trump's aggressive approach may backfire. His posture could push India to double down on groups such as BRICS and the Global South. But that path brings its own dilemmas, especially with China pulling the strings in many of these platforms. At the heart of it all, the challenge remains the same – can India navigate between its old allies and emerging coalitions without inviting punishment from either? With Trump's new tariffs looming, the question is no longer hypothetical. The countdown has begun.


Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Donald Trump to attend FIFA Club World Cup Final at MetLife Stadium on July 13 ahead of 2026 World Cup
Donald Trump will attend the FIFA Club World Cup Final at MetLife Stadium on July 13. FIFA President Gianni Infantino visited Trump Tower, showcasing the trophy and thanking Trump for hosting the tournament. The event precedes the 2026 FIFA World Cup, also in New Jersey, while concerns arise regarding immigration policies affecting global fans and players. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Big FIFA matches before the final Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump's sports appearances and immigration concerns FAQs U.S. President Donald Trump will attend the FIFA Club World Cup Final on July 13 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. Trump said he'll be watching the soccer game in person this Sunday. The match is part of the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 tournament being held in the U.S, as per the President Gianni Infantino visited Trump Tower in NYC earlier this week. Infantino brought the FIFA Club World Cup trophy to show Trump during the visit. Infantino had previously given Trump a symbolic key to the trophy, showing appreciation, as mentioned in the report by also thanked Trump for hosting the tournament. The FIFA Club World Cup Final is on July 13, which also sets the stage for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The 2026 FIFA World Cup final will also be in New Jersey, and this current event is a prep step, as per the the Club World Cup semi-finals, Chelsea vs Fluminense will be played on July 8 at 3 p.m. at MetLife. The other semi-final, Real Madrid vs PSG, is on July 9 at 3 p.m. The winners of these two matches will play in the final on July 13, as mentioned in the report by has attended several sports events recently like the Super Bowl, College Football National Championship, and UFC fights. Trump even announced the White House will host a UFC fight next year, according to the people have raised concerns about immigration and ICE presence around this FIFA tournament and next year's World Cup. There are fears that Trump's strict immigration policies could affect how global fans and players feel during these events, as stated in the report by Donald Trump said he will attend the FIFA Club World Cup Final at MetLife Stadium on July final will feature the winners of Chelsea vs Fluminense and Real Madrid vs PSG, played on July 8 and 9.