logo
Why US and Russia are bound to cooperate beyond Earth

Why US and Russia are bound to cooperate beyond Earth

Russia Today2 days ago
The head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Bakanov, has made a rare visit to the United States – his first official trip since assuming the top job at Russia's space agency. The occasion? To attend the launch of Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov aboard a SpaceX spacecraft and to meet with his counterpart, acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy.
Whether or not he meets Elon Musk remains to be seen. But this trip is significant far beyond the question of private handshakes.
This was, first and foremost, a political and diplomatic visit – the kind that's planned months in advance and requires high-level approval. That it's taking place now, in the midst of a direct confrontation between Moscow and Washington over Ukraine, speaks volumes. It marks the first in-person meeting between the heads of Roscosmos and NASA since 2018, when Dmitry Rogozin hosted Jim Bridenstine at Baikonur.
Rogozin's own planned return visit to the US was blocked in late 2018, despite his openness to meeting Musk. His inclusion on Western sanctions lists made it politically toxic for Washington to host him. Subsequent Roscosmos chief Yury Borisov never even got the opportunity for face-to-face talks – the Biden administration declined, citing political optics during the Ukraine conflict. Communications were limited to a few phone calls. But with the return of Donald Trump to the White House and a reshuffled US space leadership, conditions for engagement have shifted.
It hardly matters that the American side was represented by an acting official – Sean Duffy, appointed just two weeks ago – or that NASA has seen more leadership turnover than Roscosmos in recent years. Duffy doesn't make key decisions. He speaks for the White House. The symbolism lies in the fact that a meeting is happening at all, after years of virtual silence under the Biden administration.
The timing is not accidental. The meeting coincided with the anniversary of the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz mission, when the US and USSR docked their spacecrafts in orbit at the height of the Cold War. Back then, both sides had nuclear weapons aimed at each other's capitals. And yet, they still shook hands in space. If they could do it then, the logic goes, they can do it now.
The second reason for the visit – the flight of a Russian cosmonaut on an American spacecraft – sends an equally pointed message: despite geopolitical conflict, collaboration remains possible. NASA's reliance on Musk's rockets has only grown, especially after Boeing's Starliner program stumbled again. The next Starliner launch is planned as a cargo-only mission; crewed flights are on hold. Caution prevails.
In this context, the Roscosmos visit functions as a subtle form of diplomacy: why fight down here when we could build together up there? The International Space Station (ISS) remains the last major joint venture between Russia and the US. Beyond it, nothing binds the two powers in peaceful cooperation.
While technical matters were on the agenda, diplomacy took precedence. Still, two important points emerged from the talks. First, Sergey Krikalev – Russia's special presidential envoy for space – hinted that both sides have preliminarily agreed to extend ISS operations until 2030. Previously, the Russian government had only committed to supporting its segment of the station until 2028, anticipating that the first module of its next-generation Russian Orbital Station (ROS) would be launched by then. The US, meanwhile, has committed to operating its segment until 2030, with the possibility of continuing through 2032.
Krikalev's statement carries weight. As a presidential envoy, he can speak with more flexibility than Bakanov, who is still bound by formal government directives. Nevertheless, the implication is clear: the door is open to extending joint operations well beyond 2028.
Second, Bakanov stated that the two sides also discussed future space cooperation – including potential collaboration on the Russian orbital station and on deeper space missions. If negotiations go well, we could see the ISS extended through 2035, with Russia possibly participating in – or helping shape – a successor project: an ISS-2. For Trump, a renewed global space station could be cast as a diplomatic victory, potentially traded for Western concessions on Ukraine.
If that happens, Russia's role in ISS-2, especially in partnership with BRICS countries, would elevate the project into a truly multipolar enterprise. A space station that is not just international, but universal.
And then there is the Mars question – Musk's long-standing obsession and a second pillar of any future space agenda. A meeting between Bakanov and Musk, if it happens, would be behind closed doors and entirely unofficial. Just like when Vladimir Popovkin, a former Russian space chief, secretly met with Musk years ago.
Bakanov's goal, it seems, is to demonstrate that Russia's aerospace sector has something to offer – that it is not a relic, but a relevant partner in humanity's next leap. If Russia does not participate in the Mars project, it risks being left behind.
But what could attract Musk's attention? In reality, Russia has two trump cards: its nuclear-powered space tug technology and its deep, unmatched experience in space medicine. If harnessed wisely, these assets could give Moscow a seat at the Mars table – whether as partner or competitor.
In sum, the Roscosmos visit to the US is about far more than a launch or a handshake. It's a signal – deliberate and strategic – that Russia still sees space as a domain for cooperation, not conflict. And that in the great void above us, there may yet be room for common ground.This article was first published by the online newspaper Gazeta.ru and was translated and edited by the RT team
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US aiming to ‘win second space race'
US aiming to ‘win second space race'

Russia Today

time16 minutes ago

  • Russia Today

US aiming to ‘win second space race'

Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy has reportedly directed the agency to accelerate its timeline for placing a nuclear reactor on the Moon, in what US officials describe as a bid to outpace China and Russia in a new era of space competition. The directive, first reported by Politico on Monday, calls for the development of a 100-kilowatt fission reactor capable of operating under lunar conditions by 2030. The move was framed as part of a strategic effort for space supremacy. 'This is about winning the second space race,' a senior NASA official told the outlet. Washington claimed victory in the first race against the USSR after successfully landing a manned mission on the Moon in 1969. According to the document, also cited by other outlets, 'it is imperative the agency move quickly' in securing the technology for future exploration and national security projects. The memo warned that if another country succeeds in deploying a lunar reactor first, it could 'declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States.' Nuclear power is viewed as a breakthrough for sustained space exploration. Russia is developing its own space-based reactor for the Zeus nuclear-powered space tug, formally known as the Transport and Energy Module. NASA previously funded the development of a 40-kilowatt lunar fission system, awarding three companies $5 million each to study its feasibility. Long lunar nights and shadowed regions make solar energy unreliable, prompting interest in alternative solutions. Duffy, who also serves as secretary of transportation, was appointed acting NASA chief last month by US President Donald Trump. Under the Trump administration, the agency's focus has shifted to manned missions to the Moon and Mars, while funding for robotic science missions has been reduced as part of broader government spending cuts.

Sanctions on Russia's partners ‘obvious next step' – US NATO envoy (VIDEO)
Sanctions on Russia's partners ‘obvious next step' – US NATO envoy (VIDEO)

Russia Today

timean hour ago

  • Russia Today

Sanctions on Russia's partners ‘obvious next step' – US NATO envoy (VIDEO)

Targeting Russia's partners with sanctions and tariffs is the 'obvious next step' in US efforts to mediate the Ukraine conflict, Washington's ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, says. Moscow has stated that it is open to talks, holding three rounds of US-mediated negotiations with Kiev in the past two months that resulted in major prisoner swaps and settlement proposals. It views the conflict as a Western proxy war and has said the hostilities would end if Kiev accepts neutrality and demilitarization. US President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with delays in settlement efforts and threatened to place 100% tariffs and secondary sanctions on Russia's trade partners if a deal is not reached by August 8. 'President Trump's been clear that this war needs to end… And... is creating the environment that Russia will come to the table and negotiate a ceasefire,' Whitaker told Bloomberg TV on Monday. Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, discusses the Netherlands contributing €500 million ($579 million) to Ukraine's defense as part of a US initiative on "Balance of Power" 'Secondary sanctions and tariffs against those that are paying for this war, like China, India, and Brazil, by buying the oil that Russia is producing, is an obvious next step to try to bring this war to an end.' While Trump has acknowledged that new sanctions might prove ineffective, Whitaker said Washington sees targeting Russia's oil trade as worth trying. 'I think this is going to really hit them where it counts, and that is in their main revenue source, which is the sale of oil to these countries,' he stated. On Monday, Trump threatened New Delhi with new tariffs unless it halts Russian oil purchases. India has refused to take part in the sanctions on Russia, calling its energy trade a matter of national interest. Moscow has faced waves of Western sanctions since the Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022. It has condemned them as illegal and counterproductive, adding that they have largely failed, as Russia redirected most of its trade to Asia, with China and India now its biggest energy buyers. Russian officials say the sanctions will not alter the course of the conflict and have downplayed Trump's threats, adding that the country has built 'immunity' after years of sanctions.

German major general dismisses talk of Russian attack against NATO
German major general dismisses talk of Russian attack against NATO

Russia Today

time4 hours ago

  • Russia Today

German major general dismisses talk of Russian attack against NATO

Russia is committed to the Ukraine conflict and is unlikely to pursue an attack against NATO, according to the commander of the German Army's Homeland Security Division, Major General Andreas Henne. European officials have increasingly claimed in recent years that Moscow is planning to attack the US-led military bloc – speculation which Russia has dismissed as 'nonsense.' Henne was asked to comment on the possibility of an attack in an interview with Focus magazine published on Monday. 'The Russians are very committed in Ukraine and couldn't possibly carry out such an attack to its conclusion. I'm telling you this as a military analyst,' he said. 'One can't rule anything out with regard to Russia, but I personally think that we will experience many more summers of peace.' Since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, NATO has 'adapted and created a new force model,' Henne stated, adding: 'This envisions us bringing forces to the northeast flank very quickly.' Germany is the US-led military bloc's 'most important hub' for this, he said. The German Defense Ministry has reported a sharp rise in military recruitment since the start of the year, which officials in Berlin have claimed is directed at countering the alleged 'threat' from Moscow. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has condemned the claims, accusing Berlin of 'whipping up hysterical Russophobia' in Europe. 'Everything is being done to create an image of our country as an enemy,' he said in a press briefing last week. Russia has condemned NATO's recent push to increase military spending to 5% of GDP, accusing European members of the US-led military bloc of rampant militarization. 'Today's Europe has completely plunged into a Russophobic frenzy, and its militarization is becoming, in fact, uncontrolled,' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said last week in an article for Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store