Secret Lives of Mormon Wives on swinging scandals, friendship fallouts and religious backlash
What started off as a hobby has now become a job and the women speak openly on the show about the amount of money they make from reality TV and brand deals."It is totally our job now but we chose this and we could all walk away any time if we didn't want to be part of it," Jessi says. Whitney Leavitt explains that "naturally dynamics will change when there's more money and family involved and definitely some people get competitive" but reassures me the group are still friends off camera. Across the two seasons of the show, Jessi and Whitney have had challenging storylines play out - Whitney is presented as the villain in season one and at the end of season two it is alleged Jessi has had an affair. The pair speak candidly about the impact having your life watched and commented on by millions of people worldwide has had on them.
"It's been hard coming to terms with the fact we have no control over the narrative and you don't ever really get over it," Whitney explains. "But you have to accept that and let it go."As the show follows the lives of nine friends, it's easy to see how some of them may create more drama for themselves in order to guarantee some screen time but Jessi insists that's not the case and no one "plays up but naturally emotions are heightened"."We're actually recording four or five days a week so we don't know what will make the final edit."Jessi says her explosive Halloween party was not manufactured by producers and there is just "naturally so much drama that we don't need to create more just for the show".
'Lots of resentment'
Given the intensity of drama and filming demands, the presence of strong aftercare is essential and both women praise the production for its duty of care standards. "There are always therapists on hand and at first I was like why are Taylor and Jen having therapy all the time and now I'm having five or six hours of it a week," Jessi confesses. "I've found it's useful even if you're not going through a hard time." Whitney also accessed some aftercare in season one after being presented as the villain of the show."It totally sucked being the villain and I was angry, had a lot of resentment and was really sad. There were so many overwhelming emotions for me but I was proud that instead of running away I stayed and had those hard conversations I didn't want to have," Whitney says. Whitney was one of the members of the MomTok group that Taylor Frankie Paul publicly revealed was involved in "soft swinging", something she denies and caused a rift to form in their friendship.
The open discussions around sex, marital affairs and alcohol on the show has caused some backlash from the Mormon church. "When the first trailer came out there was some backlash from the church because they were scared but actually we're showing you how we live the Mormon life and we all live it differently," Whitney says. Jessi adds the docudrama shows how "we are all normal and everyday girls, not people wearing bonnets and churning butter like you might think". The women say that not only has the church come to accept the show, they are also helping young women think about their faith differently. "We've definitely influenced people to question their faith, dive deeper into it or be more honest about it and I've had messages from some people saying that they're joining the church because of me," Jessi says. While their religion plays an important part of their life, they're keen to tell me that they are not the face of Mormonism. "There are Mormons who still get upset about it but we're just showing our version of it and I think that's empowering as hopefully people can relate to our stories and struggles."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Love Island producers brought back the baby challenge to ‘stop couple from winning', claim fans
FANS of Love Island think that producers brought back the baby challenge to prevent a certain couple from winning the series. The Love Island final is in touching distance, and fans are convinced the iconic baby challenge made a comeback to ensure one couple does not win by any means. 4 4 Fans think that show bosses do not want one of the couple's to win the £50K cash prize and title of 2025 Love Island winners. That couple is Jamie Rhodes and Yasmin Pettet. The couple, who got together after Casa Amor, recently went exclusive after meeting each other's friends and family. But despite their strong bond, there seems to be a rift of sorts between the pair. When the baby challenge kicked off in Thursday's episode, it was clear that Jamie and Yasmin wanted different things in life. Yas was less than impressed and told her partner that she's not maternal and has no interest in becoming a mother. Despite seeing kids in his future, Jamie assured Yas it wasn't a deal breaker for him. Jamie told Yas he was surrounded by children in his family, and "probably would" want to have children of his own one day. Yas then said she'd rather her friends have kids that she spends time with so she can "give them back". She confessed: "I've never had the desire to have a family." Love Island fans 'work out' why Dejon turned on Meg as villa's strongest couple hit the rocks days before final "It's not a complete deal breaker, but it's definitely up there," Jamie responded. This conversation then sparked fears for the couple, with one eagle-eyed fan thinking the challenge was brought back to purposely ensure the pair do not win this summer 's series. A fan on X shared their theory, writing: "Hear me out: the producers brought back the baby challenge for like 10 minutes just to prompt a conversation between yas and jamie wanting different things because they don't want them to win." "Yes 100% agree with this," said one person. LOVE ISLAND 2025 - ALL the dumped stars so far LOVE Island 2025 is in its penultimate week. Here are all the dumped Islanders so far ... Sophie Lee Blu Chegini (has since returned) Malisha Jordan Will Means Shea Mannings Poppy Harrison Caprice Alexandra Megan Clarke (has since returned) Remell Mullins Ryan Bannister Alima Gagigo Martin Enitan Chris Middleton Yas Broom Rheo Parnel Giorgio Russo Emily Moran Andrada Pop Ben Holbrough Tommy Bradley Lucy Quinn Lauren Wood Harrison Solomon (quit) Emma Munro Boris Vidovic Billykiss Azeez "Actually tho because megan and toni also don't want kids but that conversation wasn't shown???" added a second. "And I still voted for them because I'm not a sucker," declared a third. While the original poster replied: "Producers think they're so sneaky but we see through it!" Meanwhile, others predicted the pair will not last long. "Oh dear - Yas & Jamie might fall out over wanting kids," said one person. "I love them. But Yas and Jamie won't last. They just want different futures. Jamie would be an amazing dad," said a second. While a third wrote: "That's the end of Yas & Jamie…he fully got the ick Kids is always a deal breaker for someone who really wants kids, especially when you then try to tell man about your cat instead." 4
Sky News
22 minutes ago
- Sky News
US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays
Donald Trump's trade war has been difficult to keep up with, to put it mildly. For all the threats and bluster of the US election campaign last year to the on-off implementation of trade tariffs - and more threats - since he returned to the White House in January, the president 's protectionist agenda has been haphazard. Trading partners, export-focused firms, customs agents and even his own trade team have had a lot on their plates as deadlines were imposed - and then retracted - and the tariff numbers tinkered. While the UK was the first country to secure a truce of sorts, described as a "deal", the vast majority of nations have failed to secure any agreement. Deal or no deal, no country is on better trading terms with the United States than it was when Trump 2.0 began. Here, we examine what nations and blocs are on the hook for, and the potential consequences, as Mr Trump's suspended "reciprocal" tariffs prepare to take effect. That will now not happen until 7 August. 2:49 Why was 1 August such an important date? To understand the present day, we must first wind the clock back to early April. Then, Mr Trump proudly showed off a board in the White House Rose Garden containing a list of countries and the tariffs they would immediately face in retaliation for the rates they impose on US-made goods. He called it "liberation day". The tariff numbers were big and financial markets took fright. Just days later, the president announced a 90-day pause in those rates for all countries except China, to allow for negotiations. The initial deadline of 9 July was then extended again to 1 August. Late on 31 July, Mr Trump signed the executive order but said that the tariff rates would not kick in for seven additional days to allow for the orders to be fully communicated. Since April, only eight countries or trading blocs have agreed "deals" to limit the reciprocal tariffs and - in some cases - sectoral tariffs already in place. Who has agreed a deal over the past 120 days? The UK, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union and South Korea are among the eight to be facing lower rates than had been threatened back in April. China has not really done a deal but it is no longer facing punitive tariffs above 100%. Its decision to retaliate against US levies prompted a truce level to be agreed between the pair, pending further talks. There's a backlash against the EU over its deal, with many national leaders accusing the European Commission of giving in too easily. A broad 15% rate is to apply, down from the threatened 30%, while the bloc has also committed to US investment and to pay for US-produced natural gas. 1:40 Where does the UK stand? We've already mentioned that the UK was the first to avert the worst of what was threatened. While a 10% baseline tariff covers the vast majority of the goods we send to the US, aerospace products are exempt. Our steel sector has not been subjected to Trump's 50% tariffs and has been facing down a 25% rate. The government announced on Thursday that it would not apply under the terms of a quota system. UK car exports were on a 25% rate until the end of June when the deal agreed in May took that down to 10% under a similar quota arrangement that exempts the first 100,000 cars from a levy. Who has not done a deal? Canada is among the big names facing a 35% baseline tariff rate. That is up from 25% and covers all goods not subject to a US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that involves rules of origin. America is its biggest export market and it has long been in Trump's sights. Mexico, another country deeply ingrained in the US supply chain, is facing a 30% rate but has been given an extra 90 days to secure a deal. Brazil is facing a 50% rate. For India, it's 25%. What are the consequences? This is where it all gets a bit woolly - for good reasons. The trade war is unprecedented in scale, given the global nature of modern business. It takes time for official statistics to catch up, especially when tariff rates chop and change so much. Any duties on exports to the United States are a threat to company sales and economic growth alike - in both the US and the rest of the world. Many carmakers, for example, have refused to offer guidance on their outlooks for revenue and profits. Barriers to business are never good but the International Monetary Fund earlier this week raised its forecast for global economic growth this year from 2.8% to 3%. Some of that increase can be explained by the deals involving major economies, including Japan, the EU and UK. US growth figures have been skewed by the rush to beat import tariffs. There is an elephant in the room: inflation. Countries imposing duties on their imports force the recipient of those goods to foot the additional bill. Do the buyers swallow it or pass it on? The latest US data contained strong evidence that tariff charges are now making their way down the country's supply chains, threatening to squeeze American consumers in the months ahead. It's why the US central bank has been refusing demands from Mr Trump to cut interest rates. You don't slow the pace of price rises by making borrowing costs cheaper. A prolonged period of higher inflation would not go down well with US businesses or voters. It's why financial markets have followed a recent trend known as TACO, helping stock markets remain at record levels. The belief is that Trump always chickens out. He may have to back down if inflation takes off.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Let them, creatine and fibermaxxing: the biggest wellness trends of 2025 (so far)
Staying up to date on wellness trends can be tough. What if you get sat next to an energy healer at a dinner party? What are you going to talk about? Raw milk is already sort of passé. Don't worry, we've got you covered. Here are the wellness trends everyone is discussing in 2025, and what you need to know about them. Down in the dumps? Try putting together a 'dopamine menu' – a list of activities designed to boost your mood. The term first popped up in 2020, and has since taken off on social media, with thousands of users sharing what they 'order' when they feel low. It's helpful to think of a dopamine menu like a regular menu, Adrienne Matei explained, with 'starters' that take little time and effort, more substantial 'mains', and 'sides' that zest up the day. Matei spoke to several happiness experts about the items on their dopamine menus. These included giving people compliments, sitting in your favorite green space, cuddling with a loved one, and smashing objects to bits in a rage room. Whatever works for you! More about dopamine menus This year, millions of people realized they can't control the actions of others – no matter how desperately they might want to. At the end of 2024, podcaster and self-help guru Mel Robbins published a book called The Let Them Theory. Its central thesis was simple: if someone is doing something that bothers you, let them. The book made a splash. It jumped to the top of bestseller lists. There were news articles and podcast episodes about the theory, and Oprah called it a 'gamechanger'. People even got 'Let them' tattoos. The theory was not without critics. Some claimed Robbins cribbed the idea from poet Cassie B Phillips, whose poem, Let Them, went viral in 2022. Others said the concept was obvious. But sometimes obvious advice is the most helpful. As one therapist said: 'It's a reminder that it's OK to step back, let people be who they are, and stop carrying things that aren't ours to carry.' More about the 'let them' theory Strength training has been the darling of the fitness world recently (deservedly so), and as more people spend time moving heavy weights, there is an increasing demand for products and supplements that help maximize each lift. Enter creatine. Long a favorite supplement among athletes and fitness professionals, creatine is a naturally occurring compound that helps power short bursts of high-impact activities – think sprints or heavy lifts. Synthetic creatine is often sold as a white, flavorless powder that one can mix with water or juice (some influencers take it dry as a stunt, but experts strongly discourage this as it could lead to choking). Creatine is considered safe for most healthy adults. And while research doesn't fully support popular social media claims that creatine helps build muscle, it might do so indirectly by giving you more energy during intense workouts. More about creatine Sign up to Well Actually Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life after newsletter promotion In May, Kardashian matriarch Kris Jenner set the internet abuzz when she appeared at Lauren Sanchez's Paris bachelorette party with a face that looked remarkably smooth and taut. (Is that the most cursed sentence I've ever typed? Who's to say.) Online, many speculated that her youthful appearance was the result of a deep plane facelift – a technique that works with deeper layers of tissue than a traditional facelift. Searches for the term soared. (Jenner did not discuss or confirm any particular procedures.) Deep plane facelifts are pricey, because it is a more complex procedure, and also tends to last a few more years. They can set patients back anywhere from $30,000 to $100,000. By contrast, the average cost of a regular facelift in the US is about $11,395. More about deep plane facelifts Psyllium husk has been touted by influencers as 'nature's Ozempic' – a cheap, non-prescription alternative to GLP-1 medications. But this comparison is 'oversimplified and misleading', warns Lena Beal, spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Psyllium husk comes from the seed of a desert shrub, and is the leading ingredient in popular laxatives like Metamucil. When consumed with water, it's simply a good source of soluble fiber, and has been found to help lower levels of 'bad' cholesterol, slow down digestion and increase satiety. If psyllium husk isn't your thing (some people don't enjoy the gloopy, gel-like texture it develops in water) don't fear. There are plenty of other good sources of fiber, like fruits, vegetables and legumes. More about psyllium husk As protein mania reaches a fever pitch, consumers are already looking toward the next nutrition trend. According to some on social media, the future is all about 'fibermaxxing' – a trendy term for 'eating a lot of fiber'. As one wellness influencer put it, fiber is 'super cool'. Indeed, one study found a fiber-rich diet can improve heart health and reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer. You could give psyllium husk a try – or just eat an apple. More about fibermaxxing
