West Lothian could see another 12,500 homes built by 2038 under development plan
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
West Lothian could see another 12,500 homes built in the decade to 2038.
And communities have told planners that a more diverse choice of homes - including more bungalows- are needed to meet the needs of an ageing population.
A full meeting of West Lothian council agreed to approve the first stage of a new Local Development Plan as a blueprint for the future look of communities.
National planning demands call for West Lothian to have another 9.850 homes by 2038 but planners raised that to more than 12,000 having accepted community calls for greater diversity of house styles, including more bungalows as well as more smaller homes to allow downsizing among a growing elderly population.
There has also been a call for more affordable housing.
This initial stage known as the Evidence Report now goes to the Scottish Government for approval. It sets out where development should take place and what is needed to accompany that development.
Councillors gave cautious welcome to the proposals but aired concerns about health care provision and transport infrastructure, both of which dominate the conversation on existing housing development proposals.
Earlier worries that they would not have enough time to work through the hefty document's 1,000 plus pages were allayed.
Linlithgow Lib Dem Sally Pattle had, at a recent meeting, warned that developers ' would be watching us like hawks' as she stressed the need for councillors to "get things right" in the plan.
She told the meeting: ' After being slightly alarmed a couple weeks ago I'm pleased to say I have had some really good discussions with officers and I really wanted to say extend my thanks for the time that they have provided me with in the last couple of weeks so that I understood the process and am a lot clearer about what is going happen going forward.
"I am now reassured that we have to get this evidence report in I understand the tightness of the timescales we are up against I also have been reassured that we just at the beginning of this process.
'As long as we all keep working together we'll be able to get there with the best outcome for West Lothian so thank you very much.'
Proposing a motion accepting the paper council leader Lawrence Fitzpatrick said; ' We are taking a big step forward; it has required a significant amount of work by council officers. I'm glad to note there has been massive interaction between officers and councillors with regard to queries. I move that we accept the recommendation which includes the corrections to be included.'
Planning officers stressed that the Evidence gathering had consulted communities on their hopes and expectations for the future.
The final Local Development Plan which has to be in place for 2028 should reflect those community demands.
A West Lothian Council spokesperson said: "We would like to thank everyone who engaged in the process that has enabled planning officers to prepare this evidence report. It is important to stress this is an early point in the process of creating a new Local Development Plan for West Lothian.
'Completion of this gate check process will then allow planning officers to prepare the first draft of the new local development plan for West Lothian. This process will once again require extensive engagement with key stakeholders and local communities and the council will once again be calling on members of the public to participate. Details of how you can get involved will be shared in due course.'
The latest information on LDP2 can be accessed via the West Lothian Council website: https://www.westlothian.gov.uk/ldp2-updates
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
West of Orkney windfarm gets green light with 125 turbines approved
Scottish ministers granted offshore consent following a recommendation from the Marine Directorate Licensing Operations Team, allowing the £8 billion, two-gigawatt offshore wind project to move forward. A partnership between Corio Generation, TotalEnergies, and the Renewables Infrastructure Development Group, the wind farm will be located around 30km west of Orkney Mainland and 25km north of the Sutherland coast. It will feature up to 125 fixed-foundation turbines. READ MORE: Wind, words, and willpower: Inside a pivotal week on Skye's energy future ScotWind, managed by Crown Estate Scotland, grants developers the rights to seabed sites to build large-scale offshore wind farms. Project director Stuart Macauley welcomed the decision, stating: 'We'd like to thank the Scottish Government, their officials, and all stakeholders and suppliers who have worked with us so proactively to make this happen.' He also highlighted the need for greater clarity on regulatory issues such as transmission charges, electricity market reform, and the future of Contracts for Difference (CfD) auction rules. 'Like many projects in Scotland and the UK, we and our investors are focused on working with government to achieve the certainty required on key regulatory areas such as transmission charging, electricity market reform and the rules for future CfD auction rounds. 'Gaining clarity on these points will be crucial for investors to fully understand the economic case for progressing into construction and operation. 'The UK Government has set out ambitious decarbonisation goals for 2030 and beyond, and our pioneering wind farm, backed by major international investors, can deliver jobs, inward investment and make a significant contribution to the energy transition in Scotland.' Highland Council had already approved the project's onshore planning application in June 2024. This covers underground cabling and infrastructure needed to connect the wind farm to the national grid in Caithness. In March, the council also confirmed it would not object to the offshore plans submitted to Scottish ministers. The developers have launched several local initiatives, including: A £1m research and development programme led by EMEC in Orkney A £900,000 education initiative with the University of Highlands and Islands A £125k Fit 4 Renewables programme run by ORE Catapult The offshore application included requests under the Electricity Act 1989 and the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, alongside two and a half years of environmental and technical assessments. The West of Orkney Windfarm is expected to play a key role in meeting the UK Government's 2030 net-zero targets.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Prostitution Scotland: MSPs told to 'pull the plug' on Ash Regan proposals over 'significant concerns'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... MSPs are being told to 'pull the plug' on proposals to overhaul prostitution law as it will have a 'limited effect' on trafficking and human exploitation. Alba MSP Ash Regan is hoping to introduce what is known as the Nordic model to Scotland. This would legalise the selling of sex while criminalising the buying of sex. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, civil servants who have spent the past few months trawling international evidence on tackling trafficking and sexual exploitation have questioned how effective this model would be. Ash Regan MSP. | Getty Images Community Safety Minister Siobhian Brown has also written to Holyrood's criminal justice committee saying she has 'significant questions and concerns' about Ms Regan's Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill. The Scottish Government research says: 'Much of the literature reviewed focuses on criminal justice interventions. This tends to focus on the effectiveness of preventative measures, which aim to reduce demand for prostitution (e.g. via deterrence). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The evidence reviewed suggests that such measures may have limited impact on preventing trafficking and sexual exploitation.' In her letter to the Holyrood committee, Ms Brown said she noted the 'challenges experienced internationally' in implementing the Nordic model. She said she had 'concerns about the accuracy' of the Bill's cost estimates. 'There remain significant questions and concerns regarding the measures within the Bill and how they would work in practice, the extent to which they would deliver on the policy intent, and the associated financial implications,' she said. National Ugly Mugs, which is described as a sex worker safety charity, is now urging the criminal justice committee and others to throw the bill in the bin. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lynsey Walton, chief executive of the charity, said: 'Sex worker groups, alongside leading non-government organisations like Amnesty and the World Health Organisation, have long warned that criminalising the purchase of sex only serves to make life more difficult and dangerous for sex workers, while having no impact on trafficking and exploitation. "We are pleased that the Scottish Government has now accepted that the international evidence backs this up. 'MSPs now need to pull the plug on Ms Regan's misguided and dangerous legislation, and focus on supporting sex workers' rights to work safely and free from stigma.' Ms Regan said: 'The Scottish Government that looks to our Nordic nations for inspiration on baby boxes and oil funds must not have a blind spot on following their lead on tackling the commercial sexual exploitation, including sex trafficking, of women and girls. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It is unusual for the Government to not have shared with me, at our meetings, that they were publishing a report two days before I presented my Bill to the criminal justice committee last Wednesday.' She criticised the Government report for 'not evaluating legal models such as the Nordic model' and for not assessing how the Nordic model compares to full decriminalisation of prostitution.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
New £4.4m ferry disruption fund opens for eight islands
🧭 What is the Islands Business Resilience Fund (IBRF)? A £4.4 million Scottish Government fund aimed at supporting island businesses hardest hit by west-coast ferry disruption. Run by Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE). Applications open July 2 and close midday September 1. Decisions and payments are expected by October 31. Grants range from £3,000 to £35,000 depending on business size and demand. ✅ Who's eligible? Businesses on these eight islands only: South Uist, North Uist, Eriskay, Benbecula, Berneray, Grimsay, Colonsay, and Arran. Must be in tourism-related sectors or the manufacture or transport of perishable goods (e.g. seafood). Islands were selected for having over 15% ferry service cancellations across three seasons — far above the 7% CalMac network average. 🚩 Why it's controversial Exclusion of other hard-hit islands The Mull & Iona Ferry Committee says Mull (and Iona), along with Coll, Tiree, Islay and others, have seen serious disruption — but are not included. Mull lost 22% capacity since March due to MV Isle of Mull being sidelined — though this isn't counted under the scheme's eligibility criteria. Questionable criteria Critics call the 'over 15% cancellations' rule arbitrary and exclusionary, saying it ignores capacity loss and ongoing maintenance issues. There's concern the fund doesn't align with the Islands (Scotland) Act, which aims to support all affected communities. Financial shortfall South Uist reports losses of £1 million over Easter–June 2024. Mull has lost around 7,000 passengers and 10% car traffic by June 2025 — figures campaigners argue outstrip the current £4.4m total. 🧑🎤 Voices from the islands 'Why exclude islands that are really suffering? It's not just bizarre and unfair on the face of it, it's actually, I think, contrary to the islands act, I don't think it's correct in law.'— Joe Reade, Chair of the Mull and Iona Ferry Committee. At least it's a gesture. It will benefit some people. It'll let them survive, because the hit has been really hard on people." —Mary Schmoller, member of the board of the South Uist community landowner, Stòras Uibhist 🛠️ What happens next? Applications open July 2, 2025, closing September 1, administered by HIE. Decisions and payouts expected by October 31. Campaigners are calling for: Wider eligibility that includes islands like Mull, Coll, Tiree, Islay. Revised criteria that account for capacity loss, not just cancellations. More detail on eligibility and payment formulas is expected soon.
