
Shannon LNG power plant project stalled by legal challenge
The environmental group argues that the greenhouse gas emissions that would result from the gas-powered electricity generation plant have been undercounted.
It says if the plant goes ahead, the electricity sector will breach the emissions threshold legally set for it.
It also says An Bord Pleanála, by granting planning permission, failed in its responsibilities under Section 15 of the Climate Act which requires that public bodies act in accordance with the Climate Action Plan.
Judge Richard Humphreys granted the group's request for leave for a judicial review and listed the case for a fortnight's time.
Shannon LNG has been trying to build a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal and regassification plant on the Co Kerry coast for almost 20 years and is involved in a protracted planning and legal battle over the project.
However, last March it received permission for a separate but related electricity generation plant on the same site.
The plant, which would be one of the country's biggest, would burn high-emissions conventional fossil fuel gas to generate electricity.
It would also have the option of burning even more emission-intensive LNG if the import terminal and regassification plant receive permission.
Opponents argue that approving the power plant will make it harder to refuse the LNG facilities and create a 'lock-in' effect, embedding LNG in the country's energy supply for the long term.
ADVERTISEMENT
Shannon LNG argues the power plant is necessary because of the growing demand for electricity in the country.
It argues shipping LNG into Ireland is necessary because most of the country's supply of conventional fossil gas comes from an undersea pipe from the UK which could be vulnerable to disruption.
The Government supports that view and earlier this year lifted a ban on LNG importation.
In papers lodged to the court, FIE said there were critical failures in the environmental impact statement submitted by Shannon LNG in its planning application.
Paul Price, adjunct professor at Dublin City University, said the method the company used to calculate the likely greenhouse gas emissions was incorrect and the emissions were 'significantly underestimated'.
The group argues that new power plants that would generate more than 3 gigawatts (GW) of electricity were already awaiting construction – more than the 2GW the Government said was needed to meet electricity demand to the end of the decade.
"Even on the developer's emissions calculations (which significantly underestimate greenhouse gas emissions) this single power station would on its own account for one-third own of all budgeted emissions from the entire electricity sector in 2030,' it argues.
'Nowhere does the Inspector [of An Bord Pleanála] explain how this could possibly be compliant with the relevant carbon budgets and sectorial emissions ceilings.'
The matter back in court on May 26th.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sunday World
6 hours ago
- Sunday World
Conor McGregor's plans for mega-mansion in Kildare refused by planning appeals board
The online planning records show the appeal was refused on Monday after being lodged in February this year. CONOR McGregor's plans for a new mega-mansion have been shot down by An Bord Pleanála this week. He had appealed a decision by Kildare Co Council to refuse his spectacular plans to rebuild his home in Straffan. The online planning records show the appeal was refused on Monday after being lodged in February this year. The council had previously refused permission for the six-bedroomed 32,693sq ft house on the grounds it was 'excessive' and 'visually incongruous'. The council had written to McGregor requesting further information on his plans and outlined some of its issues with his application. Concerns were expressed over the size and scale of the development in the rural area which isn't consistent with the council's design for rural houses. Conor McGregor. Photo: Collins News in 90 Seconds - Thursday, July 3 The council also stated that the site for the property's Waste Water Treatment System is 'unsuitable' for various reasons. It had said a new plan must also comply with rural house design guidelines by designing buildings that are 'restrained and absent of fussy add-ons or frills' and not include unnecessarily large rooms 'that are rarely used, which will increase area, cost and bulk'. A submission lodged on behalf of McGregor in January stated that the site 'has the capacity to comfortably absorb the proposed dwelling without resulting in any undue impacts of dis-amenity to surrounding residents'. This was followed by Kildare Co Council's decision to refuse which was then appealed by McGregor to An Bord Pleanala. McGregor paid €3 million for the existing house at The Paddocks and later bought the nearby 5 Castledillon Lower, Straffan, Co. Kildare for €1.65 million according to the Price Property Register. Guests arriving at the planned house would have been greeted with a view of the basement swimming pool through a glass floor in the reception hall According to the plans lodged in the initial application, one wing of the house would have be an open-plan dining and living room area that opened onto a covered terrace leading to an outdoor swimming pool. There was also a playroom and a chef's kitchen, pantry, cloakroom as well as a more private dining room on that side of the house. The sunken basement where the 20-metre long indoor was planned there were also plans for a 14-seater cinema. The basement was where a gym was to be located along with a jacuzzi, a dry and wet sauna as well as a treatment room. Up a curving double staircase led to where the first-floor bedrooms would have been including a 'master suite' which took up one entire side of the house. In the planning application's design statement by Tyler Owens Architects it was stated that McGregor's existing house is 'substandard in its construction'. It noted the styles and sizes of some of the local properties in the vicinity such as Straffan Lodge and The K Club, adding: 'We believe our proposal is suitable for the size of the site, and the local character of these buildings indicated'.

The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Renaming An Bord Pleanála - and letting everyone know - has cost €77,000
THE RENAMING OF An Bord Pleanála to An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) has cost the State planning watchdog nearly €77,000. New figures provided by An Coimisiún Pleanála show that the renaming has cost the State's flagship planning agency €76,921. The largest component is a €22,045 spend on the installation of external signage over its entrance and two corner projection signs with the new name at the agency's Marlborough Street HQ in Dublin 1. The €76,921 outlay also included a spend of €18,450 on architect consultancy which provided design, coordination and project management services for internal ground floor signs and external signage. The spend also included €18,450 on a radio ad campaign, €5,380 on a new sign installation cancellation fee, €6,363 on newspaper notices and €3,637 on the change of name on the corporate seal and rubber stamps. Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin today described the spend as 'completely unnecessary as there was no need to change the name of An Bord Pleanála'. When first mooted in 2023 in wake of scandals at An Bord Pleanála, trade union FORSA expressed its opposition to plans to change the name as it would amount to a 'collective punishment'. Advertisement In correspondence with then Minister for Housing Darragh O'Brien, assistant general secretary at FORSA, Ian McDonnell said that the Forsa branch within An Bord Pleanála had passed a motion 'expressing their opposition to this proposed name change'. McDonnell said that the proposed chance 'reflects negatively on all who work in the organisation' and is akin to 'collective punishment of all (past and present) in the organisation who have worked and continue to work diligently and conscientiously in accordance with public sector values of impartiality and integrity'. Ó Broin said that as a member of the Oireachtas Housing Committee he tabled an amendment to the then Planning and Development Bill to have the name of An Bord Pleanala retained but this was rejected by Government. Asked about staff's attitude to the name change, a spokesman for An Coimisiún Pleanála today said: 'In terms of staff feeling on the name change, while there was some unhappiness about the changing of the name when it was first suggested in early 2023, now the name change has taken place, the staff and planning commissioners of the Commission have embraced and accepted the name change. He stated that 'good developments are built on solid foundations and An Coimisiún Pleanála is built on the most solid of foundations which is down to the part played by all former staff and Board members who have served with An Bord Pleanála over the last 48 years'. As part of the bid to reduce backlog in appeals, the number of senior planning inspectors at An Coimisiún Pleanála totals 60 at the end of June 2025 compared to 45 at the end of December 2023. The appeals board now has two Directors of Planning while the number of planning inspectors has reduced from 39 at the end of last year to 35 now though five new appointees are due to start in July and August. The most recent quarterly figures show that the number of cases on hand at the end of March this year was 1,369, which was down 39% on the 2,247 cases on hand at the end of March 2024.


RTÉ News
2 days ago
- RTÉ News
Renaming of An Bord Pleanála cost €77,000
The contentious renaming of An Bord Pleanála to An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) has cost the State planning watchdog just under €77,000. New figures provided by An Coimisiún Pleanála show that the renaming has cost the State's flagship planning agency €76,921 and the largest component is a €22,045 spend on the installation of external over entrance signage and two corner projection signs with the new name at the agency's Marlborough Street HQ in Dublin 1. The €76,921 outlay also included a spend of €18,450 on architect consultancy which provided design, coordination and project management services for internal ground floor signs and external signage. The spend also included €18,450 on a radio ad campaign; €5,380 on a new sign installation cancellation fee; €6,363 on newspaper notices and €3,637 on the change of name on the corporate seal and rubber stamps. Sinn Fein Housing spokesman, Eoin Ó Broin today described the spend as "completely unnecessary as there was no need to change the name of An Bord Pleanála". When first mooted in 2023 in wake of scandals at the then An Bord Pleanála, trade union, FORSA expressed its opposition to plans to change the name as it would amount to a "collective punishment". In correspondence with then Minister for Housing Darragh O'Brien, assistant general secretary at FORSA, Ian McDonnell said that the Forsa branch within An Bord Pleanála had passed a motion "expressing their opposition to this proposed name change". Mr McDonnell said that the proposed chance "reflects negatively on all who work in the organisation" and is akin to "collective punishment of all (past and present) in the organisation who have worked and continue to work diligently and conscientiously in accordance with public sector values of impartiality and integrity". Deputy Ó Broin said that as a member of the Oireachtas Housing Committee he tabled an amendment to the then Planning and Development Bill to have the name of An Bord Pleanala retained but this was rejected by Government. Asked about staff's attitude to the name change, a spokesman for An Coimisiún Pleanála today said: "In terms of staff feeling on the name change, while there was some unhappiness about the changing of the name when it was first suggested in early 2023, now the name change has taken place, the staff and planning commissioners of the Commission have embraced and accepted the name change. He stated that "good developments are built on solid foundations and An Coimisiún Pleanála is built on the most solid of foundations which is down to the part played by all former staff and Board members who have served with An Bord Pleanála over the last 48 years". As part of the bid to reduce backlog in appeals, the number of senior planning inspectors at An Coimisiún Pleanála totals 60 at the end of June 2025 compared to 45 at the end of December 2023. The appeals board now has two Directors of Planning while the number of planning inspectors has reduced from 39 at the end of last year to 35 now though five new appointees are due to start in July and August. The most recent quarterly figures show that the number of cases on hand at the end of March this year was 1,369 which was down 878 or 39pc on the 2,247 cases on hand at the end of March 2024.