
Can Artifical Intelligence Save America From Its Debt Spiral?
So when the JPMorgan CEO says 'you are going to see a crack in the bond market,' it's worth listening. And he's not alone. Ray Dalio, Peter Orszag, and Paul Tudor Jones are all sounding the alarm on America's fiscal trajectory.
The math is getting hard to ignore. Interest on the debt just crossed $1 trillion annually — more than the U.S. spends on defense, Medicaid, disability insurance, and food stamps combined. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), if passed without offsets, could add $5 trillion to the debt over the next decade.
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, that pushes total public debt to nearly $57 trillion by 2034 — a number so large it's bordering on abstract.
US Debt-to-GDP Ratio; Historical & projected
If 10-year bond yields simply hold at today's ~4.4%, the CRFB estimates we add another $1.8 trillion in interest cost. And if rates rise further, a debt spiral isn't a tail risk — it's the baseline.
But here's the problem: everyone agrees on the diagnosis. No one agrees on the cure.
Raising taxes? Politically impossible.
Cutting entitlements? Untouchable.
Both parties have proven incapable of fiscal restraint — even in peacetime.
So what's left?
If the U.S. is going to escape its debt doom loop, we'll need to grow through it — not tighten into it. And the most credible engine for that growth isn't austerity. It's artificial intelligence.
We are standing at the front end of a once-in-a-century platform shift. AI isn't just another tech cycle — it's a horizontal capability that will transform every sector of the economy, from finance and logistics to energy, healthcare, and defense.
AI isn't just another tech cycle. It's a general-purpose capability that could rewire the productivity backbone of every sector — from private credit and logistics to defense, software, and healthcare.
Already, we're seeing AI reduce due diligence cycles from weeks to hours, compress legal reviews by 80%, and deliver spreadsheet analysis with near-perfect accuracy. AI-powered copilots aren't replacing humans — they're multiplying the throughput of every knowledge worker.
If this productivity surge lifts U.S. real GDP from ~2% to 3–4%, and inflation stays modest, we could see nominal GDP growth exceed 5% annually — fast enough to outgrow the debt even if rates remain elevated.
That's not wishful thinking — it's historical precedent. After WWII, the U.S. carried debt loads above 100% of GDP. We didn't cut our way out. We grew — averaging nearly 4% real GDP growth for two decades through innovation, infrastructure, and industrial scaling.
This isn't an argument to ignore the wolf. It's a call to outrun it.
Yes, 3–4% real growth is aggressive. But it's not impossible. It happened before — and it could again if AI unlocks true economy-wide productivity gains. The U.S. has unique advantages: it leads the world in foundational models, semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and startup formation (yes, we still need more energy to power this expansion). If AI is going to remake the modern economy, it will start here.
Done right, AI can unleash the kind of broad-based productivity boom that defined the post-WWII economic miracle. Between 1947 and 1973, U.S. real GDP grew nearly 4% annually, driven by industrial innovation, global leadership, and a rising middle class. We've been chasing that growth rate ever since.
And the numbers back it up. Vanguard projects that AI adoption could boost labor productivity by 20% by 2035, lifting U.S. GDP growth to 3%+ annually — the fastest pace since the 1990s. JPMorgan Private Bank sees productivity gains materializing as early as the late 2020s, lifting growth above 2.5%. And according to the AI Coalition, AI could raise long-run productivity growth by 0.8 to 1.5 percentage points per year — a massive unlock in a mature $27 trillion economy.
Yes, even 3–4% might not be enough if interest rates spiral. But today's 4.4% Treasury yield isn't permanent — it's a reflection of uncertainty, not inevitability. If AI stabilizes growth expectations, that could anchor yields and restore fiscal confidence. The spread between nominal growth and average borrowing costs is the most important line on the chart — and AI could flip it back in our favor.
Yes, productivity gains may be uneven or delayed. That's true of any general-purpose technology. Electricity and the internet took years to show up in the data. But early results are already promising — especially in high-leverage sectors like finance, law, and logistics.
And no, growth alone won't fix Medicare or solve Social Security. But it will buy time — and make eventual reforms more politically and economically feasible. AI is not a substitute for tough decisions. It's the only viable bridge to a sustainable future.
The original Marshall Plan powered postwar recovery through investment and innovation. AI can do the ... More same for America today.
Post-WWII America didn't just survive high debt. It flourished — building a dominant economy powered by innovation, infrastructure, and productivity. We now face a similar inflection point.
This time, AI is the catalyst.
We have a choice: treat AI like a regulatory threat, or embrace it as a national growth strategy. Because the truth is, America doesn't have a debt problem — it has a growth problem. And the longer we delay confronting that reality, the more constrained our options become.
If AI can unlock a new era of economic abundance, it won't just be good for business. It may be the only way to save the Republic's balance sheet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Officials Are Doing Everything They Can To Obscure The Actual Fallout Of His Tax Bill
In interviews on Sunday, Trump officials did everything they could to downplay the Medicaid cuts in his massive tax bill, given the electoral backlash Republicans could face. During an appearance on CNN's 'State of the Union,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that Democrats were trying to 'infantilize the poor' by raising concerns that new work requirements for Medicaid would be burdensome and result in people losing their benefits. And during an interview on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett denied that many people would lose health coverage at all. 'There are no change in benefits. There's a change in requirements to get the benefit,' said Bessent. 'The idea that it's going to cause a massive hemorrhaging of insurance doesn't make a lot of sense to us,' said Hassett. Trump officials' efforts come as members of their own party have warned about the price the GOP could pay for this legislation in the 2026 midterms due to the popularity of Medicaid and the polarizing nature of the cuts. Work requirements are typically more popular, though support for them declines after people learn that most recipients are already working, and that these policies can increase administrative costs. According to an estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the tax bill is set to have a devastating impact on as many as 11.8 million people, who could lose their health insurance. The newly established work requirements — which require many able-bodied adults to provide proof that they're working, volunteering or going to school for 80 hours a month – are expected to push people who don't meet these standards off these benefits and make it harder for people who do to prove their eligibility. That policy has some exemptions, including for parents of younger children, people with disabilities, and for pregnant people. One major challenge raised by the new work requirements in the tax bill is that they will make it more complicated for recipients to access Medicaid by adding to the red tape people will have to go through to prove their eligibility. 'While work requirements do not reliably increase employment, they do significantly increase the administrative burden and costs of applying for safety net programs,' a memo from the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute previously explained. Gig economy workers who have unpredictable hours, as well as people who provide caregiving for adult family members, are also among those who might not meet the work requirements. Bessent countered that he believed that 'poor agency' and that to ask them to 'register twice a year for these benefits is not a burden.' People could also lose coverage under Affordable Care Act plans because pandemic-era subsidies that help cover the cost of insurance plans are set to expire, though they could still be renewed by the end of the year. 'The bill would [also] increase [ACA] verification requirements and would effectively end automatic reenrollment,' both factors that would make it harder to get and keep coverage, CNN reports. Hassett dodged a question on the subsidies during his appearance on 'Face the Nation' and went on a tangent about the taxes that hospitals face. 'I think nobody's going to lose their insurance,' he concluded despite the analysis that suggests otherwise.

USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
'Train wreck': Trump slams Musk after billionaire announces new political party
President Donald Trump took aim at Elon Musk after his former adviser announced the creation of new political party following staunch opposition to the president's signature legislation. "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump wrote on social media July 6. "He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States." Musk announced the formation of the "America Party" on July 5, the day after Trump signed his mega-bill. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects the legislation will increase the national debt by $3.4 trillion, which Musk as lambasted. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," Musk wrote on his social media platform X on July 5. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Trump criticized third parties in his July 6 post. "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats," Trump wrote. Musk − the world's richest person with a worth of $405 billion, according to Forbes − spent nearly $290 million to help Trump and other Republicans get elected. In the opening months of Trump's presidency, Musk led the effort to slash federal agencies through the Department of Government Efficiency. The two have feuded in recent weeks as Musk strongly criticized Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which includes tax cuts, increased spending on immigration enforcement and the military and deep spending cuts in Medicaid. The bill increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. Musk has threatened to boost primary challengers against those who supported the bill, which included all but two Republicans in the House and three in the Senate. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" Musk wrote before Trump signed the legislation. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk had taken steps to repair his strained relationship with the president ‒ including personally apologizing for insults he made during his combative exit from the Trump administration last month - before the new round of sparring.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
J.P. Morgan Maintained Their Hold Rating on Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) is one of the . On June 26, J.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott maintained their Hold Rating on Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) with a price target of $185. Schott acknowledged that the company's underlying business is well-positioned for over 5% sustained top-line growth, driven by the company's innovative medicine and meditech portfolio. However, he also noted some key challenges that temper his optimism. Schott highlighted the erosion of Stelara sales due to biosimilar competition, which he believes is expected to negatively impact growth. A smiling baby with an array of baby care products in the foreground. Moreover, the ongoing talc litigation remains a significant overhang. And lastly, the pharmaceutical portfolio is forecasted to remain flat year-over-year, with notable declines in drugs like Stelara. As a result of these challenges, Schott remains cautiously optimistic about Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ). While we acknowledge the potential of JNJ as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data