MPs slam ‘disgraceful' rollback of Northern Ireland veterans legislation
The debate followed a public petition against repealing the legislation which attracted more than 170,000 signatures.
Conservative MP John Lamont, who opened the parliamentary session, said the rollback could lead to 'two-tier' payouts for figures such as former Republican politician Gerry Adams.
Mr Lamont said: '[The change] could result in a six-figure payout for Mr Adams, simply because his interim custody order was not considered by the secretary of state, but rather a junior minister.
'That is simply outrageous.
'We have seen a lot of examples of two-tier justice since the Labour government came to power, but this may simply be the worst of all.
'Is the Government really contemplating creating a system to drag northern Irish veterans through the courts, whilst potentially paying millions to terrorists?
'We should also be clear about the differences between the actions of soldiers and terrorists. When terrorists get up in the morning, they go out with murderous intent to use violence to attack our democracy. Soldiers do not.
'The Legacy Act is by no means perfect, but it is better than the disgraceful spectacle of veterans being dragged through the courts.
'Doing so is not sustainable – legally or morally.'
(left to right) Rohit Pathak, Denise Walker, 58, former catering corps veteran from Glasgow, and Anthony Johnson, 67, veteran and protester, participate in a march outside Parliament (Lily Shangaher/PA)
Others echoed Mr Lamont's comments, highlighting the implications the rollback could have on the armed forces in future conflicts.
Conservative MP Sir David Davis argued the change would mean that British soldiers would be abandoned by the country they served.
He said: 'Getting this right is not just a matter of historical justice.
'The legal witch-hunt won't end in Northern Ireland.
'It'll cast a shadow over every future conflict that our armed forces engage in, and undermine their abilities to defend us.'
He added: 'Those who freely talk about human rights would do well to remember that our rights, our law, our democracy and our nation were protected by the very veterans that are at risk today.
'So let us all make one promise, that no British soldier will ever again be abandoned by the nation they have so bravely protected.'
Other MPs voiced their support in favour of the Government's proposals, arguing that the current act is not fit for purpose.
Labour MP Louise Jones suggested that the lack of support for the legislation among victims, politicians across parties in Northern Ireland, and veterans themselves meant it ought to be repealed.
She said: 'This Legacy Act has been found to be unlawful. It gives immunity to terrorists, and it denies justice to the families of the 200 service personnel that were murdered by terrorists during the Troubles.
'It is not supported in its current form by victims, it's not supported by a Northern Irish party, and many veterans are troubled by it. It must go and be replaced, and I call on the minister to outline how we can protect veterans from malicious lawfare of any conflict.'
'We have a huge duty here in Westminster to work with those communities not against them, and I hope everyone here will reflect on that important undertaking.'
Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn pointed to statistics from the Centre for Military Justice that show that only one British soldier has been convicted since the Good Friday Agreement in 1998.
He suggested that this was the case over the 27 years, despite immunity for British military personnel not being enshrined in law for the majority of this time.
Catriona Wallace, a veteran and protester (Lily Shanagher/AP)
Mr Benn also argued that the changes would allow incomplete investigations into the deaths of soldiers to reopen.
He said: 'Legacy is hard. This is the unfinished business of the Good Friday agreement.
'And that is why we need to listen to the many families who lost loved ones, including the families of British service personnel, who served so bravely.
'There are more than 200 families of UK military personnel who are still searching for answers 30, 40, 50 years ago about the murder of their loved ones.
'The Police Service of Northern Ireland recently confirmed they had 202 live investigations into Troubles-related killings of members of our armed forces, and a further 23 into the killings of veterans.
'Each and every one of those investigations was forced to close by the Legacy Act, and we will bring forward legislation to deal with that.
'The other challenge is the lack of confidence in the act on the part of communities in Northern Ireland, which we are going to seek to reform.
'We owe it to all these families.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
21 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Davey proposes major shake-up of green energy contracts to ‘slash bills'
The Liberal Democrat leader will call for a 'rapid' transition to Contracts for Difference (CfD), which work by guaranteeing generators a fixed 'strike price' for electricity regardless of the wholesale price. CfDs are awarded by Government auction to firms bidding to produce renewable energy for the UK grid, with developers either paid a subsidy up to the strike price or repaying the surplus while the market price fluctuates. In a speech at the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank, Sir Ed will say that only 15% of green power is produced under such contracts, with the rest still coming from an old legacy scheme. The 2002 Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROC) scheme, which does not involve a strike price guarantee, closed to new generation in 2017 but still governs some projects on contracts due to expire by 2037. Sir Ed will argue that the ROC scheme was introduced 'when ministers didn't have the foresight to realise that renewable power would get so much cheaper over the next two decades'. He will call on ministers to move all legacy agreements on to CfD, saying the transition would slash household energy bills by 'breaking the link' between gas prices and electricity costs. The party leader is expected to say: 'People are currently paying too much for renewable energy. 'But not for the reasons Nigel Farage would have you believe. 'Because generating electricity from solar or wind is now significantly cheaper than gas – even when you factor in extra system costs for back-up power when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining. 'But people aren't seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because wholesale electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.' Sir Ed will add: 'Unlike Contracts for Difference, companies with ROCs get paid the wholesale price – in other words, the price of gas – with a subsidy on top. 'Subsidies paid through levies on our energy bills – costing a typical household around £90 a year.' The Lib Dem leader will describe the legacy system as 'manifestly unfair' for consumers and call on the Government to 'start today a rapid process of moving all those old ROC renewable projects on to new Contracts for Difference.' Taking aim at the Reform UK and Tory leaders, who have both expressed scepticism about the Government pledge to achieve net zero by 2050, Sir Ed will say: 'The narrative – seized upon by Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch – says the reason energy bills are so high is that we're investing too much in renewable power. 'And if we just stopped that investment – and relied more on oil and gas instead – bills would magically come down for everyone. 'The experience of record high gas prices in recent years shows that's not true… we know that tying ourselves ever more to fossil fuels would only benefit foreign dictators like Vladimir Putin – which is probably why Farage is so keen on it. 'But refusing to engage hasn't stopped his myths from spreading, from gaining traction in the new world of fake news. So we must change that.'
The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Davey proposes major shake-up of green energy contracts to ‘slash bills'
CfDs are awarded by Government auction to firms bidding to produce renewable energy for the UK grid, with developers either paid a subsidy up to the strike price or repaying the surplus while the market price fluctuates. In a speech at the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank, Sir Ed will say that only 15% of green power is produced under such contracts, with the rest still coming from an old legacy scheme. The 2002 Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROC) scheme, which does not involve a strike price guarantee, closed to new generation in 2017 but still governs some projects on contracts due to expire by 2037. Sir Ed will argue that the ROC scheme was introduced 'when ministers didn't have the foresight to realise that renewable power would get so much cheaper over the next two decades'. He will call on ministers to move all legacy agreements on to CfD, saying the transition would slash household energy bills by 'breaking the link' between gas prices and electricity costs. The party leader is expected to say: 'People are currently paying too much for renewable energy. 'But not for the reasons Nigel Farage would have you believe. 'Because generating electricity from solar or wind is now significantly cheaper than gas – even when you factor in extra system costs for back-up power when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining. 'But people aren't seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because wholesale electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.' Sir Ed will add: 'Unlike Contracts for Difference, companies with ROCs get paid the wholesale price – in other words, the price of gas – with a subsidy on top. 'Subsidies paid through levies on our energy bills – costing a typical household around £90 a year.' The Lib Dem leader will describe the legacy system as 'manifestly unfair' for consumers and call on the Government to 'start today a rapid process of moving all those old ROC renewable projects on to new Contracts for Difference.' Taking aim at the Reform UK and Tory leaders, who have both expressed scepticism about the Government pledge to achieve net zero by 2050, Sir Ed will say: 'The narrative – seized upon by Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch – says the reason energy bills are so high is that we're investing too much in renewable power. 'And if we just stopped that investment – and relied more on oil and gas instead – bills would magically come down for everyone. 'The experience of record high gas prices in recent years shows that's not true… we know that tying ourselves ever more to fossil fuels would only benefit foreign dictators like Vladimir Putin – which is probably why Farage is so keen on it. 'But refusing to engage hasn't stopped his myths from spreading, from gaining traction in the new world of fake news. So we must change that.'
Leader Live
37 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Davey proposes major shake-up of green energy contracts to ‘slash bills'
The Liberal Democrat leader will call for a 'rapid' transition to Contracts for Difference (CfD), which work by guaranteeing generators a fixed 'strike price' for electricity regardless of the wholesale price. CfDs are awarded by Government auction to firms bidding to produce renewable energy for the UK grid, with developers either paid a subsidy up to the strike price or repaying the surplus while the market price fluctuates. In a speech at the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank, Sir Ed will say that only 15% of green power is produced under such contracts, with the rest still coming from an old legacy scheme. The 2002 Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROC) scheme, which does not involve a strike price guarantee, closed to new generation in 2017 but still governs some projects on contracts due to expire by 2037. Sir Ed will argue that the ROC scheme was introduced 'when ministers didn't have the foresight to realise that renewable power would get so much cheaper over the next two decades'. He will call on ministers to move all legacy agreements on to CfD, saying the transition would slash household energy bills by 'breaking the link' between gas prices and electricity costs. The party leader is expected to say: 'People are currently paying too much for renewable energy. 'But not for the reasons Nigel Farage would have you believe. 'Because generating electricity from solar or wind is now significantly cheaper than gas – even when you factor in extra system costs for back-up power when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining. 'But people aren't seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because wholesale electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.' Sir Ed will add: 'Unlike Contracts for Difference, companies with ROCs get paid the wholesale price – in other words, the price of gas – with a subsidy on top. 'Subsidies paid through levies on our energy bills – costing a typical household around £90 a year.' The Lib Dem leader will describe the legacy system as 'manifestly unfair' for consumers and call on the Government to 'start today a rapid process of moving all those old ROC renewable projects on to new Contracts for Difference.' Taking aim at the Reform UK and Tory leaders, who have both expressed scepticism about the Government pledge to achieve net zero by 2050, Sir Ed will say: 'The narrative – seized upon by Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch – says the reason energy bills are so high is that we're investing too much in renewable power. 'And if we just stopped that investment – and relied more on oil and gas instead – bills would magically come down for everyone. 'The experience of record high gas prices in recent years shows that's not true… we know that tying ourselves ever more to fossil fuels would only benefit foreign dictators like Vladimir Putin – which is probably why Farage is so keen on it. 'But refusing to engage hasn't stopped his myths from spreading, from gaining traction in the new world of fake news. So we must change that.'
