Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition
It will replace the previous Independent Financial Review Panel which has been defunct for a number of years.
TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed the Bill is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves' with a pay rise (Liam McBurney/PA)
Currently, the basic salary for an MLA is £51,500, but this can rise with position including chairing some committees or serving as a minister, with the First and deputy First Ministers receiving a salary of £123,500.
A report alongside the Bill showed MLA salaries are lower than those received by Members of the Scottish Parliament (£72,196), Assembly Members at the Welsh Assembly (£72,057) and Members of the Irish Parliament (113,679 euros/£94,537).
The Bill, put forward by the Assembly Commission, was passed by an oral vote by MLAs on Monday, with the sole MLAs representing the TUV and People Before Profit both opposing the Bill.
TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed it is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves a substantial pay rise', and objected to former MLAs being entitled to sit on the new board.
People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll also criticised that former MLAs could sit on the board, and said that a pay rise for MLAs amid 'rising rates of poverty' would be 'completely tone deaf'.
However UUP MLA Andy Allen, who sits on the Assembly Commission, described a 'technical Bill' to deal with the process of how salaries and pensions are set.
Closing the debate Sinn Fein MLA Sinead Ennis slammed what she termed 'inaccuracies and misunderstandings' over the Bill.
She also warned that if the Bill did not pass the Assembly 'will have failed' to ensure legal clarity and leave no structure in place to determine the salaries and pensions of MLAs.
'In passing this Bill today, future discussions and decisions around the salaries and pensions of members will shift to the independent remuneration board,' she told MLAs.
'That board has independence in deciding what factors it wants to consider before determining its view on the appropriate level of salaries and pensions for members.
'That is the appropriate way of dealing with these matters.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Why having a public inquiry into Sandie Peggie-NHS Fife case would be a terrible idea
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... How we will miss it when it is over. Over the summer, the Sandie Peggie employment tribunal has been as reliable a source of comedy as any end-of-the-pier show. If only the basis for it wasn't so important and serious. We will have to await the outcome but one thing is certain, someone will call for a wider inquiry. It might be into the policy or practice but some sort of investigation will be demanded. That would involve more lawyers and expense, only to produce some recommendations which would be ignored and then forgotten. That's how things work nowadays. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Figures from the Institute for Government show that before 1997, there were never more than three public inquiries running in the UK at the same time. At the moment, there are 21 – the highest number ever. A public inquiry into the case involving nurse Sandie Peggie, seen at the Scottish Parliament, and NHS Fife might prove to be an expensive waste of time (Picture: Andrew Milligan) | PA Trams inquiry lasted nine years From the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry to the Covid-19 Inquiry, on the surface they have become the natural means of establishing the facts in matters of public interest. Alternatively, they are a handy means of kicking the can down the road. Take the long-running Edinburgh Trams Inquiry. Lord Hardie's probe into why the city's tram project was £400m over budget and five years late was started in 2014 and ran longer than the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War. It took nine years to report and cost more than £13m. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The report concluded there had been 'a litany of avoidable failures' and that 'poor management and abdication of responsibility on a large scale have had a significant and lasting impact on the lives and livelihoods of Edinburgh residents, and the reputation of the city'. When the report was finally issued in September 2023, Lord Hardie wasn't available to answer questions from the media but he did issue a 48-minute video statement on YouTube. To date, it's been viewed a grand total of 694 times. Lessons learned? Of course that is no way to measure the success of these things. We should look instead at the changes made, the individuals punished and the lessons learned for the future. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What are they? The actions of some individuals were heavily criticised but no one lost their job. Instead City of Edinburgh Council said they'd already made changes to ensure the same thing couldn't happen again and the Scottish Government said: 'The inquiry took too long, was too costly and in some instances the evidence heard does not support the conclusion drawn.' So what was the point when the bungling and the hopeless duck and weave out of the way long before a conclusion and the competent have already changed things to avoid a repetition? Let's see where we get to with the Scottish Hospitals and the Covid-19 inquiries but the idea that ineptitude will be punished or processes will change feels like wishful thinking.
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Number of new homes being built in key sector ‘in decline'
The latest analysis from the Scottish Property Federation (SPF) and Savills has shown a continued decline in the number of units under construction in the second quarter of this year 2025 when compared to the same period last year. This takes the total number for build-to-rent homes under construction down to 2,101 from the prior year's figure of 2,472 homes. However, there was a 16 per cent increase of new developments being finished in the second quarter of 2025 compared to 2024. READ MORE: The SPF said that 'while this is a welcome increase, this further highlights the real challenge the Scottish sector continues to face is one of pipeline exhaustion'. The SPF in its submission to the Housing (Scotland) Bill consultation on how powers within the Bill could be used to exempt certain types of properties from rent control, is urging that the built-to-rent sector be issued with blanket exemption. David Melhuish, director of the Scottish Property Federation, said: "The continued decline in the number of BtR schemes starting on site, reflect that persistent policy uncertainty, especially around rent controls, continues to have a damaging impact upon investor confidence in Scottish BtR. "On this trajectory Scotland will soon exhaust the pipeline of new BtR developments, as completions continue to exceed commencements. "To restore investor confidence and to kick start new supply of rental homes, we are calling as part of our response to the Scottish Government's recent housing consultation, for built to rent/mid-market rent to be granted an exemption from rent controls across Scotland." Barbara Welsh, chair of Living Rent, the tenants' union said that "building expensive build-to-rent properties will not solve the housing crisis", adding: "These properties are completely beyond the reach of most tenants. "Building more build-to-rent properties will do nothing for tenants unable to pay their rent, the thousands stuck in temporary accommodation or those left waiting on social housing waiting lists. "Build-to-rent developers are not struggling. As they point out, there has been a boom in build-to-rent in recent years and the Housing Bill already allows for landlords to make above inflation profits year on year."
Belfast Telegraph
2 days ago
- Belfast Telegraph
MLA brands NI Civil Service participation in Belfast Pride as ‘overtly political' as First Minister defends decision
The participation of Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS) staff in Belfast Pride this year is 'overtly political and highly divisive', an MLA has claimed. The TUV's Timothy Gaston was speaking after a Freedom of Information (FoI) request revealed the head of the NICS was warned that taking part in the Pride Parade this weekend would leave the civil service 'open to the charge of acting politically'.
