Going by a Supreme Court ruling, T.N. Speaker can act on petition to disqualify O. Panneerselvam
However, this position is not in conformity with the 1986 Rules of the Tamil Nadu Assembly regarding disqualifications, which explicitly state that only an MLA can submit any such petition.
Even in the Odisha case, the locus standi of a non-member of the House in submitting a petition for disqualification of four legislators was raised, but the Supreme Court held that 'not only a Member of the House, but any person interested would also be entitled to bring to the notice of the Speaker the fact that a Member of the House had incurred disqualification under the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution of India.' In the eastern State, the four MLAs, belonging to the National Congress Party (NCP), had joined the then ruling party, Biju Janata Dal (BJD), after which the NCP's State unit president had approached the Assembly Speaker. The matter later became a subject matter before the Orissa High Court and, eventually, the Supreme Court.
As regards the Tamil Nadu Assembly, Rule 6 — References to be by petitions — deals with the matter of who can give the petition. Sub-rule (2) says: 'A petition in relation to a member may be made in writing to the Speaker by any other member.' Here, the term, 'member,' as per Rule (2) titled Definitions, means 'a member of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly.'
The last time the disqualification of legislators was carried out was in September 2017, when the then Assembly Speaker P. Dhanapal took action against 18 MLAs of the AIADMK on the grounds that they had 'voluntarily given up' their membership of the party, after they owed allegiance to the dissident leader, T.T.V. Dhinakaran, who subsequently floated the Amma Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
School Assembly news headlines for today July 25, 2025: From sports to education, check 20+ national & international news
School Assembly news headlines for today July 25, 2025: Good morning students and teachers! Today, July 25, 2025, brings a mix of important news headlines for our school assembly that cover sports, education, and various national and international events. Highlights include the historic signing of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement aimed at boosting trade and defence cooperation, a Supreme Court directive impacting ongoing legal trials, weather concerns with a significant 29% deficit rainfall in Sikkim, and a tragic plane crash near Tynda involving 49 people. In sports, India's Olympic preparations advance with key appointments and milestones. Stay tuned as we explore more than 20 crucial updates to keep us informed and engaged in today's world. Today's national news headlines in English for school assembly, July 25, 2025 India and the U.K. sign a historic Free Trade Agreement, strengthening economic ties between both countries. Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar resigns; BJP begins search for the next Vice-President, considering party insiders. 183 technical issues reported by five Indian airlines this year, while over 100 Air India pilots went on leave following the AI171 crash. The Karnataka High Court halts the deportation of a Russian woman's children, citing child rights in the Gokarna cave case. JD(U) Member of Parliament receives a show-cause notice for comments against SIR, causing embarrassment to the party. Today's international news headlines in English for school assembly, July 25, 2025 Thai and Cambodian soldiers clash near a disputed border, escalating tensions in the region. Qatar strengthens humanitarian support to Gaza, ramping up medical aid and food supplies. UN's top court issues a significant advisory opinion, recognizing a 'clean, healthy, and sustainable environment' as a human right. United States State Department investigates Harvard's participation in the exchange visitor program to ensure regulatory compliance. UK regulator seeks special status for Apple and Google, which could require Big Tech companies to change their mobile ecosystems for fairer competition. Today's sports news headlines in English for school assembly, July 25, 2025 Indian Olympic Association ratifies CEO Raghuram Iyer's appointment and forms an anti-doping panel amid a push for the 2036 Olympic bid. Rishabh Pant becomes the first wicketkeeper to score 1,000+ Test runs in an away country, achieving this milestone during the fourth England Test despite a foot injury. Divya Deshmukh defeats a former world champion to become the first Indian woman to reach the Candidates' tournament in the FIDE Women's World Chess Cup. FIDE allows the Russian team to participate under a neutral flag in the 2025 Women's World Team Championship, sparking a worldwide debate on neutrality in sports. India's sports market is valued at $52 billion and is projected to grow at a 10–12% CAGR to 2030, with strong government support and rising fitness interest fueling the sector. Today's education news headlines in English for school assembly, July 25, 2025 Over 109,000 vacancies announced in Central Armed Police Forces, with major ongoing recruitment drives for students and job seekers. Andhra Pradesh EAPCET Round 1 seat allotment results declared, affecting thousands of engineering aspirants. Authorities seize more than 470,000 pirated NCERT textbooks to combat educational content piracy across states. PayPal integrates UPI through its new PayPal World platform, facilitating smoother international education payments for Indian students. Many schools remain closed in several states, including Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh, because of festivals and heavy rainfall alerts. Today's state news headlines in English for school assembly, July 25, 2025 India and the U.K. sign Free Trade Agreement; both nations hail it as a historic step to strengthen bilateral relations. Over 183 technical issues reported by Indian airlines in 2025; Air India pilots' leave post-AI171 crash under scrutiny. BJP initiates search for the next Vice-President after Dhankhar's resignation; senior party insider likely to take the position. IMD issues heavy rainfall alerts for multiple states; Sikkim records 29% shortfall while Gyalshing witnesses the highest rainfall. Amarnath Yatra records over 3.42 lakh pilgrims in 21 days, as a new batch leaves from Jammu amidst tight security. Top business and economic news headlines for July 25, 2025 Sensex drops 542 points while Nifty slips below 25,100 as banking and IT stocks face selling pressure; market remains volatile. Tata Sons Chairman N Chandrasekaran's compensation rises 15% to ₹156 crore in FY25. Indian Bank posts a 24% jump in Q1 net profit driven by improved asset quality. India's corporate bond market hits a record ₹10 trillion in issuances in 2025, signaling robust capital-raising activity. Infosys reports strong sequential quarterly revenue growth, raises FY26 constant currency revenue growth guidance to 1–3% on the back of major deal wins. Daily word and thought of the day for school assembly, July 25, 2025 For the school assembly on July 25, 2025, here are the daily word and thought of the day: Word of the Day: Castigate (verb) – To reprimand someone severely or to criticise harshly. Thought of the Day: "Constructive criticism, when given with kindness, helps us grow stronger and wiser. Let us welcome feedback as a tool to improve ourselves every day." For more informative articles on historical and upcoming events from around the world, please visit Indiatimes Events.
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Decoding ECI's counter affidavit on SIR
The story so far: The Election Commission of India (ECI) filed a counter affidavit in the Supreme Court on July 21, in response to the writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the special intensive revision (SIR) exercise currently underway in Bihar. The text in the 789-page ECI affidavit is only 88 pages long; bulky annexures run into almost 700 pages. Around 625 pages of these annexures comprise representations received by the ECI from various political parties, along with their annexures. What's the rationale for a citizenship test? The compendium of complaints regarding defects in electoral rolls received by the ECI in 2024-2025 mostly contains those filed by BJP units from Delhi, West Bengal, Jharkhand and Andhra Pradesh. One complaint each has been received from the AAP in Delhi, AIADMK in Tamil Nadu, Trinamool Congress in West Bengal and the Maha Vikas Agadi (Congress, NCP-SP and Shiv Sena) in Maharashtra. A preliminary review of the complaints annexed with the ECI's affidavit reveals that they mostly pertain to typical defects like duplication of names in the voter list, non-deletion of deceased voters, exclusion of eligible voters and fake or fraudulent voter registration. None of the complaints involve the electoral rolls of Bihar, nor does any of the complaints allege instances of illegal migrants from foreign countries like Bangladesh, Myanmar, etc. , being included in the electoral rolls in any State. The complaints, which account for almost 80% of the volume of ECI's counter affidavit, do not provide any evidence or justification for the ongoing SIR exercise in Bihar or a nationwide citizenship test of electors across the country, for which the affidavit vehemently argues. Is it legally tenable? The counter affidavit invokes Article 326 which specifies that 'every person who is a citizen of India... shall be entitled to be registered as a voter', and also Section 15 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 which mandates the preparation of electoral rolls 'under the superintendence, direction and control' of the ECI, to insist on its having statutory authority to undertake a 'de novo' preparation of electoral rolls, requiring electors already registered in the electoral rolls to submit fresh documentary proof of their citizenship. The affidavit also rebuffs the apex court's advisory to include Aadhaar card, the Elector's Photo Identity card (EPIC) and ration card in the list of permissible documents for the SIR exercise. There are several fallacies in the ECI's arguments. First, the SIR process shifts the onus of citizenship proof on all existing electors whose names were registered by the ECI through due process. Another due process is also available for the deletion of non-citizens from electoral rolls on the basis of specific complaints backed by evidence. Have those due processes been rendered dysfunctional by the overwhelming nature of inclusion errors vis-a-vis illegal migrants? If so, the ECI's affidavit should have been able to present precise data on the number of complaints received on the inclusion of foreign nationals or illegal migrants in the electoral rolls of Bihar, and all other States for that matter. In the absence of such evidence, ECI's logic that inclusion in electoral rolls through summary revisions are only provisional and only those added or verified through intensive revisions like SIR have more authenticity, does not hold. Second, the Representation of the People Act, 1950, does not make any distinction between electors added through summary revisions and those added through 'special intensive revisions'. While section 21(3) of the law permits the ECI to direct a 'special revision' for individual constituencies or their parts, the word 'intensive' does not find any mention in the law. The Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 were amended in 1987 to introduce two separate categories of electoral roll revisions, summary and intensive. However, even the 1960 rules do not provide any specific definition or modalities for 'intensive' revisions. The statutory foundation of SIR, therefore, remains fuzzy. Third, the arguments provided by ECI's affidavit in rejecting the Supreme Court's advice to include EPIC, as one of the documents to prove eligibility, contradicts the exemption granted to electors included in the 2003 electoral roll from furnishing any document under SIR 2025 other than 'the relevant extracts of the said part showing their name in the 2003 electoral roll'. ECI's affidavit states that the children of electors included in the 2003 rolls have also been allowed to use this avenue to prove their eligibility. Such privileging of the inclusions in the 2003 electoral rolls, over and above all electoral rolls published by the ECI in two subsequent decades, is legally questionable. The ECI's affidavit mentions that the 2003 Bihar SIR guidelines prescribed four indicative documents as proof of citizenship, namely 'NRC Register where available; Citizenship Certificate; valid passport; or Birth Certificate.' However, a copy of the 2003 SIR guidelines have not been provided with the affidavit. Was there any house-to-house enumeration and citizenship verification for the entire electorate during the 2003 Bihar SIR on the basis of such documentary requirements? How many illegal migrants were detected and deleted from rolls in 2003? These facts need to be ascertained and debated before accepting inclusions in the 2003 electoral rolls as probative evidence of citizenship under SIR. Fourth, the ECI's affidavit asserts the applicability of the contrived citizenship criteria introduced by the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2003 in SIR 2025; whereby (a) Each voter has to submit documentary proof of his/her date and place of birth; (b) For those born between July 1, 1987 and December 2, 2004, additional documentary proof of date and place of birth of either father or mother is required; and (c) For those voters born after December 2, 2004, both parents' date and place of birth are required to be submitted. The constitutionality of this controversial citizenship amendment legislation, which had proposed to introduce a National Register of Indian Citizens (NRC), remains under challenge before the apex court. The rules under this Act were notified even before the CAA, 2003, was passed and notified, casting doubts over its legal status. Most importantly, the Registrar General of India never issued any order to initiate the NRC, as stipulated in the citizenship rules. Hence, the NRC does not exist anywhere in India, except for the State of Assam. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had clarified in December 2019 that his Cabinet had never discussed the initiation of the NRC since 2014. When the authorities statutorily mandated to initiate the NRC and its underlying citizenship scheme apropos CAA, 2003 have decided not to proceed with it till date, can the ECI claim to have any legal mandate to implement the same citizenship test in Bihar, in lieu of an electoral roll revision? What will be the impact? The ECI's counter affidavit has tried to counter criticisms regarding the exclusionary nature of the SIR exercise by highlighting that filled up enumeration forms have already been collected and digitised from over 90% of the 7.89 crore electors in Bihar. The moot point here is that the ECI's affidavit does not disclose the number or proportion of digitised enumeration forms which are accompanied with the required documents. Rather, the affidavit mentions that 'each elector who has submitted the enumeration form with or without documents will be included in the draft roll to be published August 1, 2025.' Thus, the coverage of over 90% of the electors in the SIR process has been attained by postponing the requirement for document submission along with the enumeration forms. The scrutiny of enumeration forms and documents by the electoral registration officers are to commence only after the draft rolls are published. This does not testify for the inclusivity of the entire SIR process. The status of the SIR exercise reported in the ECI's affidavit contains data till July 18, 2025. The updated status provided by the ECI's press note on July 22 is reproduced in Table 1. Till then, around 21.35 lakh (2.7%) electors were yet to receive and submit their enumeration forms. Major political parties of Bihar were officially requested by the ECI to connect with the remaining electors, through their functionaries and booth level agents. Till July 24, around 7 lakh forms were not received. Inability of the ECI in ensuring cent percent coverage through its own machinery of booth level officers (BLOs) and volunteers further exposes the impracticality of the SIR schedule. Moreover, over 53 lakh (6.7%) electors were not found at their residential addresses by the BLOs. While around 1 lakh among them are reported as 'not traceable' and another 7 lakh as multiple enrolments, the numbers of deceased electors at over 21.6 lakh (2.7%) and those permanently migrated at 31.5 lakh (4%), are quite significant. Whether errors are involved in such exclusions can be known only after the publication of the draft rolls. The constituency-wise distribution of these exclusions also remains unreported. The impact of deletion of migrated electors can be substantial if they are clustered within a few constituencies and demographics. Why is ECI not accepting Aadhaar, ration cards? ECI's non-acceptance of the apex court's advisory on including Aadhaar and ration cards in the list of indicative documents rests on tenuous grounds. The ECI's own enumeration form for SIR 2025 seeks the Aadhaar number from all electors, albeit on a voluntary basis. The ECI's affidavit states that statutorily 'Aadhaar is not proof of citizenship', which is specious logic, because statutorily the ECI has no mandate to conduct a citizenship test. In the case of ration cards, the ECI has cited 'widespread existence of fake ration cards' as the ground for non-acceptance. A data table in ECI's affidavit on the coverage of some of the eleven eligibility documents for SIR 2025 in Bihar show 13.89 crore 'Residence certificates' and 8.72 crore caste certificates issued from 2011 to 2025, far exceeding the total number of electors in the electoral rolls. If residence certificates can be accepted as eligibility proof of SIR 2025, despite their total number exceeding Bihar's current aggregate population, how can ration cards be rejected as a document on the grounds of being forgery-prone? Any widely accessible official card or document in a vast country like India with millions of poor and illiterate citizens would be prone to counterfeits — currency notes offering the most common example. Solutions need to be found in plugging systemic loopholes, enhanced vigilance and effectively designed counter-measures. Unless the ECI revises its rigid insistence on citizenship determination, the Bihar SIR exercise is likely to result in a fiasco bigger than the four-year-long NRC process in Assam between 2015 and 2019, which was eventually rejected by all those who demanded it after reportedly spending ₹1,600 crore of public money. (Prasenjit Bose is an economist and activist)
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Assam Chief Secretary Over Goalpara Demolition Drive
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice on a plea seeking contempt action against the Assam Chief Secretary and other officials for allegedly conducting a mass eviction and demolition drive in Goalpara's Hasila Beel in violation of the apex court guidelines. A bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, sought responses of Chief Secretary Ravi Kota, Principal Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Gyanendra Dev Tripathi, Goalpara's District Commissioner Khanindra Choudhury, Goalpara's Superintendent of Police Nabaneet Mahanta, and other officials in the matter. "Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. [P]ersonal presence of the alleged contemnnor(s) is dispensed with, until further orders," ordered the Bench, also comprising Justice K. Vinod Chandran. As per the plea, filed through advocate Adeel Ahmed, no sufficient time or any opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and in an "arbitrary and high-handed manner" a notice was issued to remove their houses, structures, shops, buildings and crops within two days. "The houses, crops, properties, belongings, etc. of the petitioners and other similarly situated persons have all been demolished in the eviction and demolition exercise." The petitioners, claiming to be landless, said that their forefathers had to settle in the Hasila Beel revenue village of Balijana Revenue Circle about 50 to 60 years ago after losing their houses and land due to the riverbank erosion of the river Brahmaputra. The plea said that the eviction and demolition exercise was carried out without granting a personal hearing and without providing adequate time for appeal or judicial review, in blatant violation of the guidelines issued in the case titled "In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures". In November last year, a bench of then Justice Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan laid down pan-India directives governing demolitions of unauthorised structures. The top court had cautioned that flouting its directions by state authorities will result in criminal contempt and prosecution. Issuing a slew of directions under Article 142 of the Constitution, the apex court said that no demolition will be carried out without a prior show-cause notice. It added that the demolition order will not be implemented for a period of 15 days and will be displayed on a designated digital portal to be maintained by every municipal and local authority. The Supreme Court had clarified that its directions will not be applicable if there is an unauthorised structure in any public place, such as a road, street, footpath, abutting railway line or any river body or water bodies and also to cases where there is an order for demolition made by a court of law.
