
World faces new nuclear arms race, researchers warn
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said nuclear powers including the United States and Russia — which account for around 90% of the world's stockpile — had spent time last year "upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions."
Since the end of the Cold War, old warheads have generally been dismantled quicker than new ones have been deployed, resulting in a decrease in the overall number of warheads.
But SIPRI warned that the trend was likely to be reversed in the coming years.
"What we see now, first of all, is that the number of operational nuclear warheads is beginning to increase," SIPRI Director Dan Smith said.
This was especially the case with China, which SIPRI said had about 600 nuclear warheads and had added 100 new warheads in 2023 and 2024.
"China is increasing its nuclear force steadily," Smith said, adding that the country could reach 1,000 warheads in seven or eight years.
While that would still be well short of Russian and U.S. arsenals, it would make China "a much bigger player," said Smith.
He said the world faced new threats "at a particularly dangerous and unstable moment" for geopolitics, adding: "We see the warning signs of a new nuclear arms race coming."
'Extensive programs'
SIPRI counted a total of 12,241 warheads in January 2025, of which 9,614 were in stockpiles for potential use.
The institute noted in its report that both Russia and the United States had "extensive programs under way to modernize and replace their nuclear warheads."
The United Kingdom was not believed to have increased its number of warheads in 2024, but SIPRI said that given the country's 2021 decision to raise its limit on the number of warheads from 225 to 260, it was likely to increase in the future.
Similarly, while France's arsenal was believed to have remained steady at around 290, "its nuclear modernization program progressed during 2024."
India and Pakistan both "continued to develop new types of nuclear weapon delivery systems in 2024."
India had a "growing stockpile" of about 180 nuclear weapons at the start of 2025, the institute said, while Pakistan's arsenal remained steady at about 170 warheads.
'Doomsday scenarios'
SIPRI also noted that North Korea's nuclear weapons program remained "central to its national security strategy," estimating that it had around 50 warheads and was believed to possess "enough fissile material to reach a total of up to 90 warheads."
Israel — which does not acknowledge its nuclear weapons — is also believed to be modernizing its arsenal, which SIPRI estimated was about 90 warheads at the start of the year.
Smith stressed that the looming nuclear arms race would not just be about "the numbers of warheads."
"It's an arms race which is going to be highly technological," Smith said.
He added that it would be both in "outer space and in cyberspace" as the software directing and guiding nuclear weapons would be an area of competition.
The rapid development of artificial intelligence will also likely begin to play a part, at first as a complement to humans.
"The next step would be moving towards full automation. That is a step that must never be taken," Smith said.
"If our prospects of being free of the danger of nuclear war were to be left in the hands of an artificial intelligence, I think that then we would be close to the doomsday scenarios."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
Former Japanese diplomat: Trump trade comment is for US audience
US President Donald Trump has once again voiced frustration over the progress of trade talks with Japan and is threatening to impose a 30% or 35% tariff on imports. A former senior diplomat tells NHK World Trump's talk is all for forks at home.


Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Major Chinese ports keep Iranian oil flowing despite sanctions
Some of China's largest ports have received Iranian crude this year, supporting a multibillion oil trade and highlighting a significant gap in U.S. efforts to curb funds for Tehran's military and to uphold existing sanctions. From January to June, terminals in the port clusters around Qingdao, Dalian and Zhoushan — major import points that take industrial metals, agricultural and consumer goods, as well as oil — have helped China purchase almost 1.4 million barrels a day of Iranian crude, according to data analytics firm Kpler. In June alone, ports located around Qingdao received as much as 15.5 million barrels of Iranian crude, Kpler data show, equivalent to close to $1 billion at current prices for the discounted oil, with sanctioned tankers used in different legs of the journey from the Persian Gulf to China. The same pattern was repeated elsewhere along China's eastern coast, with ports like Dongjiakou and Lanqiao also taking Iranian cargoes. Though China does not officially recognize U.S. sanctions and defends its right to trade with Iran, large companies with ties to international markets have typically been extremely conservative when it comes to dealing with Tehran and especially with sanctioned counterparts. They fear the prospect of getting tangled in Washington's enforcement efforts and being cut out of international markets. Earlier this year, ports in Shandong were urged by their parent company to keep sanctioned tankers away from their terminals. The continued use of large ports reflects China's pragmatic reading of mixed messages from the Trump administration, which has promised "maximum pressure' and bombed nuclear sites — only for the U.S. president to write days later on social media that China "can continue to purchase oil from Iran'. While Washington has rolled out several rounds of restrictions on Chinese entities seen to be aiding the flows, the U.S. Treasury Department has mainly focused its efforts on tankers, and steered clear of bigger ports and refineries. To date, only one port terminal in Shandong's Dongying region has been blacklisted for receiving Iranian shipments — a move that was interpreted by traders as a deliberate signal meant to avoid collateral damage across other sectors. The resilience of the flows also reflects China's continued need for the discounted barrels, used by a vast private refining industry that has struggled with paper-thin margins as the economy cools. Officially, according to Chinese customs data, the country hasn't imported a single barrel of Iranian crude since mid-2022. But oil that loads at Iranian ports typically makes its way from the Persian Gulf to the waters off Malaysia or to another transfer point, where it is moved from one tanker to another at sea. U.S.-sanctioned vessels are often used on the Iran-to-Malaysia leg of the journey, before transfers are made to other ships, often from the so-called dark fleet, for the remainder of their journey to China.


Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
5 Years since H.K. National Security Law Took Effect: The Chinese-style Rule being Extended Overseas is Abnormal
Hong Kong's 'high degree of autonomy' is a thing of the past — it has been replaced by 'Chinese-style rule' that allows no dissent from the Chinese Communist Party. The international community must not stand by and watch a situation in which human rights are backsliding significantly due to the authoritarian rule over Hong Kong. Five years have passed since the national security law that cracks down on anti-government activities came into effect in Hong Kong at the end of June 2020. Since then, more than 330 people have been arrested over alleged violations of the law and related charges. Authorities have cracked down widely on senior members of pro-democracy groups critical of China and the pro-China Hong Kong government, as well as the leading supporters of those groups, among others. It is obvious that the authorities are using the law as a tool to suppress pro-democracy groups. In addition to the law, the electoral system has been altered to allow only people who are recognized as 'patriots' by the authorities to run in elections. There are now no seats for pro-democracy groups in the Legislative Council, the territory's parliament. China is apparently aiming to eradicate political activities by pro-democracy groups. The pro-democracy League of Social Democrats party announced its disbandment at the end of June, citing 'immense political pressure' as the reason. Hong Kong's largest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, is also in the process of dissolving itself. With the disbanding of both these parties, pro-democracy parties will effectively disappear. Rallies in memory of the Tiananmen Square incident and anti-government protests that used to be held in Hong Kong are no longer allowed. A Hong Kong newspaper known for its criticism of the Chinese Communist Party has also been forced to cease publication. There are concerns about the current state of Hong Kong society, which no longer reflects the diverse will of the people. In response to this situation, pro-democracy activists and others have fled overseas from Hong Kong one after another. It is serious that even people who have fled overseas have become targets of surveillance and intimidation. Flyers were distributed in Britain bearing the address and physical description of a former Hong Kong pro-democracy district councillor. Chinese authorities or their collaborators are believed to have been involved in this incident, and the flyers also said a bounty would be paid if the former councilor was taken to the Chinese Embassy. A similar incident occurred in Australia. Cross-border intimidation is nothing short of abnormal. The introduction of the national security law is contrary to the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984, which stated that Hong Kong would maintain a 'high degree of autonomy' for 50 years after its return to China. Japan, the United States and Europe should continue to point out that the 'Chinafication' of Hong Kong is a violation of this international commitment. Hong Kong's economy is currently strong, partly due to active investment in Hong Kong from China. However, the number of Japanese, U.S. and British companies with regional headquarters in Hong Kong has decreased compared to the level before the implementation of the national security law. The loss of freedom may reduce the credibility of Hong Kong, an international city, thereby damaging China's national interests as well. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, July 2, 2025)