Baku again hits back at Iranian accusations Israel used Azerbaijani territory to attack Iran
For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out.
Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today
Become a member
Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry has refuted insinuations from Iranian Ambassador to Armenia Mehdi Sobhani that Baku allowed its territory to be used by Israel to attack Iran.
On 27 June, Sobhani said, 'We have received information that a small number of drones flew into Iranian territory from the territory of neighbouring countries. Therefore, during a telephone conversation between the presidents of Iran and Azerbaijan, our president asked Aliyev to conduct a serious investigation into this matter. We will await the results of this investigation'.
'It is possible that our enemy, [Israel], made use of the territory of our neighboring state. Azerbaijan has assured us that it will not allow its territory to be used against Iran. However, we all know [Israel] very well: they do not follow any rules, they do not observe any laws. Therefore, there is still a possibility that they were able to take advantage of the moment'.
Although he did not explicitly level accusations at Azerbaijan, Baku responded forcefully, with Foreign Ministry spokesperson Aykhan Hajizada calling Sobhani's comments an 'open provocation'.
'Azerbaijan categorically refutes allegations that its airspace or territory was used by any state to conduct military operations against the neighbouring [Iran] or any other country. Such claims are baseless and lack any credible evidence', Hajizada said.
'We expect Iran to prevent such steps, which are inappropriate to the spirit of our relations, as well as to take necessary steps regarding the opinions voiced by the Ambassador, who regularly demonstrates his pro-Armenian position, rather than represent his country'.
The back-and-forth followed a phone call between Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev, during which Pezeshkian urged Aliyev to investigate if Israel used Azerbaijani territory to launch attacks on Iran.
The growing spat between Baku and Tehran played out elsewhere in Azerbaijani media, with the pro-government media outlet Caliber publishing a scathing criticism of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei under the title 'Khamenei and his war on Azerbaijan: The root of a hatred'.
The article personally attacked Khamenei and argued that 'he is the one behind every anti-Azerbaijani provocation, every disinformation campaign, every initiative aimed against the country'.
In addition, it suggested that Khamenei may be of Armenian descent, but provided no evidence to support its claims.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
OC Media
8 hours ago
- OC Media
Police violently evict residents of Baku neighbourhood ahead of plans to demolish 120 houses
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member Azerbaijani police have reportedly violently dispersed protests by residents of Montin-Keshla, a town in the Narimanov district of Baku, who have been protesting the demolition of 120 houses in their community. Independent news outlet Meydan TV reported that the residents claim that there were no documents confirming the authorities' right to demolish the houses. 'Here, 145 families live, and more than 120 houses are located in this area', a Montin-Keshla resident told OC Media on the condition of anonymity. 'No one from the authorities talked to us about this and we don't know what will happen with the residents. We are being forced to leave the area and now we are moving', they continued, adding that many of the houses being demolished had been there since 2005. 'On Thursday, in front of my eyes, around five people were detained. People were forcibly kicked out of their houses, that is why they confronted police', the resident said. The demolition of the houses is part of the Baku City Plan, a project where Baku will construct again and the old buildings in the many streets will be demolished. As the plan has unfolded, pro-government media has downplayed how it is impacting local residents. Pro-government TV Khazar has quoted as a representative of Azerbaijan Railways as saying that the main reason the houses were being demolished in the area is to remove obstacles around railways forcing trains to go slower when passing through the town. Advertisement The demolition of these houses has been in the pipeline since 2015, with local media reporting that there were 2,840 illegal buildings in the area — of these, 2,304 are residential buildings. At the time, the Transportation Ministry indicated that 883 buildings should be demolished immediately. Several similar incidents have taken place in Baku before; in March, the construction company Melissa Group demolished a house in Baku's Yasamal district while a resident was still inside. After the footage of the incident spread on social media, the foreman and driver of the excavator carrying out the demolition work were detained, in addition to the head ofthe construction company. In February, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) fined the Azerbaijani government approximately €1.7 million ($1.8 million) for illegally demolishing a number of properties in central Baku in 2010 in order to create a new park.
OC Media
14 hours ago
- OC Media
Georgia denies entry to person with no gender marker in passport, accuses them of ‘falsifying' ID
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member A German citizen holding a passport without a gender marker has been denied entry into Georgia for allegedly 'falsifying' their identification and failing to provide other information. Lian von Salzen was travelling from Trabzon, Turkey, intending to cross the Turkish–Georgian land border on Sunday before continuing on to Batumi, Georgia. While they passed through the Turkish border smoothly, they were held up at the Georgian border after handing over their passport to the border official. 'He looked at it for a long time and then he went to his colleague and they were kind of chuckling a bit, laughing', von Salzen told OC Media. 'I realised then that something was wrong with the passport'. As of 1 November 2024, German citizens have been able to more easily change official records to alter their names and genders, or to have their gender marker removed altogether. When von Salzen applied for a new passport prior to travelling, they requested this option — instead of an M or F in their passport, the sex is marked by an X. The border official then asked von Salzen a series of questions regarding where they would be staying while in Georgia, including the full name and phone number of the person they would be staying with. Von Salzen then was faced with a series of officials asking questions before they were eventually handed a paper which said they were being rejected entry into Georgia for the following reasons: Advertisement The person has no travel/health insurance or sufficient funds for residing in Georgia or returning back The person has not provided information or provided false information about 'his/her identity' and purpose of travel When the border officials asked von Salzen to sign the document, they refused as they did not fully understand what was happening due to the language barriers or agree with the reasoning provided. 'They never asked for my health insurance or any bank account', von Salzen said, noting that they tried to show them that they did indeed have the required insurance and funds. 'I feel like it was maybe just an excuse', they said. As for the second reason listed — the falsification of identity — von Salzen believes it was due to the X marker in their passport. However, they noted that they were never asked a question about gender, so 'it wasn't explicit'. After repeating that what was listed on the document was not true, a border official came up to von Salzen and escorted them away. While von Salzen at first thought they were being taken to an interrogation room where they could sort everything out, they were instead taken back to the Turkish border. Von Salzen now plans to appeal the decision, especially after their host back in Turkey emphasised that it could be viewed as a political decision. 'I'm not going to Georgia anymore, but maybe if I speak up, something can be done in the future for other people', they said. According to lawyer Nika Simonishvili, any refusals regarding entry to Georgia must be based on specific circumstances and evidence — however, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Georgian legal system have given the border police 'broad powers', leading to cases of unjustified refusal and abuse of rights. In this case, Simonishvili emphasised to OC Media, the X gender marker cannot be considered incorrect or false information, especially when it is allowed by the legislation of another country and the border police have the ability to identify the person in question. 'Thus, the decision to ban border crossing for this reason cannot be considered legally justified by any criteria and can be viewed only in a political context, as a continuation of [the ruling Georgian Dream party's] anti-LGBT policy', Simonishvili said. OC Media has reached out to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but has not received a response as of publication. The International Civil Aviation Organisation, which sets the global standards for machine-readable passports, has allowed an X designation since the Second World War, though this was for circumstances where the sex was 'unknown' due to the lack of face-to-face issuance of documents. The first person to use the X marker in order to be recognised as neither male nor female was intersex Australian Alex MacFarlane — today, seven countries in Europe, including Germany, as well as Canada, the US, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Australia, and New Zealand offer option X to passport holders.
Civil.ge
16 hours ago
- Civil.ge
17 Detained During Eviction Operation in Tbilisi's Africa Settlement
17 people, including residents and activists who came to support them, were detained by the end of July 24 in Tbilisi's Africa settlement, where dozens of families had been evicted throughout the day. All were charged with administrative offenses for disobeying police orders. Under amended legislation , the offense is punishable by a fine ranging from GEL 2,000 (about USD 740) to GEL 5,000 (about USD 1,845), or by up to 60 days of imprisonment. Tensions flared on Tvalchrelidze Street, where the National Enforcement Bureau carried out evictions from a building it described as unsafe, privately owned, and illegally occupied. The eviction, which took place amid a large police deployment, reportedly affected more than 100 families according to unofficial estimates, and continued until midnight. Heavy machinery was later deployed to demolish the buildings. Dramatic images emerged from the scene, showing confrontation, arguments, and families, including children, sitting with their furniture and belongings and watching the eviction process from outside in desperation. Officials claimed only 39 families lived in the building permanently, while others started renovating to claim compensation. Authorities and pro-government media outlets said residents had been offered assistance. Among those evicted were reportedly dozens of internally displaced persons (IDPs). Residents, however, said more families were affected, and many had nowhere else to go, accusing officials and ruling Georgian Dream mouthpieces of spreading false information, including about the assistance they were offered. One resident accused pro-GD broadcasters Imedi and Rustavi 2 of offering money to others in exchange for recording a prewritten statement claiming they had been treated fairly. The Social Justice Center, a local human rights watchdog, criticized what it described as the state's 'anti-social policy,' saying that 'while the state must protect public safety, human life and health, and the interests of private owners, it should not violate the dignity and other rights of families through harsh eviction practices or by leaving them without shelter.' The group stressed that 'a fair balance between private and public interests must be ensured,' saying the authorities failed to uphold this standard by favoring the building owner and 'failing to guarantee the rights and interests of hundreds of socially protected persons on the ground.' The organization highlighted human rights violations during the eviction, calling the lack of alternative housing for displaced families the 'most acute problem.' It also raised concerns about the eviction's conduct, citing forced removals and police violence. Also Read:
