I've met a wonderful man – but he's starting to give me the ‘ick'
I've met a wonderful man. After years of crap dates, false starts, commitmentphobes and ghosting, I've finally met a man who seems to really want to integrate me into his life early in dating (introducing me to friends and family, calling me his girlfriend) and is intelligent and sensitive. My issue is that, a few months in, I find a lot of aspects of his personality quite annoying – anything from talking too loud in restaurants to interrupting when I speak. The sex hasn't been great but is improving as we get to know each other. I'm aware that because of things in my past (emotionally manipulative partners and harassment, borderline stalking from an ex) I can be quite avoidant, and that 'getting the ick' is sometimes more about finding excuses not to be with someone. But how do I know where the line is between avoidance and genuine incompatibility? Just because someone is smart, respectful, and ready to commit doesn't mean they're right for me. At the same time, does doing things I find 'icky' (but are wholly innocuous) mean they're wrong for me? Should I accept that no one is perfect, or keep looking?
Let's look to the philosophers for this one.
In Witnessing Subjectivity
,
Kelly Oliver writes that 'love is an ethics of differences that thrives on the adventure of otherness'. In Alain
Badiou's In Praise of Love
,
Badiou describes the basis of love's starting and flourishing as the 'encounter between two differences'. For Martha Nussbaum, real-life love requires an embracing stance, and saying
yes
'with a mercy and tenderness that really do embrace the inconstancy and imperfection of… real-life love'.
READ MORE
Or as columnist Dan Savage puts it, the price of admission for having true love is embracing that other people are different from you. And along with all the ways that fact makes life more rich and beautiful and exciting and magic, it also fills life with people who talk too loud, who interrupt, who chew with their mouth open, who walk around after a shower only naked from the waist down (the least dignified form of naked) – or whatever their particular constellation of annoying little differences is.
The price of admission that they pay is embracing that you also are different to them, and accepting all of your annoying little differences.
.form-group {width:100% !important;}
I will admit that I find the idea of 'the ick' quite emotionally immature. I promise that I'm not just picking on you – I have been ranting about this for the past couple of years as the term has been popularised on social media. Commonly understood as a point where your attraction to someone dies or turns to one of disgust, people claim that the ick is an unconscious, unavoidable reaction that there's often no coming back from.
In my mind, however, people listing off all the tiny, irrelevant, human reasons they use to discount potential romantic partners feels lacking in empathy, self-awareness and perspective. Icks can often feel deeply embedded in gendered norms, as straight women list off men using umbrellas or lip balm or getting emotional as inspirers of 'the ick', while straight men list women eating a normal amount or enjoying a beer or sitting with a wide-legged stance being an irredeemable turn-off.
There are also ungendered icks – an unusual laugh, the awkwardness of chasing runaway coins, an unflattering outfit, licking the yoghurt off the lid – but what they have in common is a projected shame around being seen as human, imperfect. When we judge other people for being awkward or graceless or dorky or flawed, we're also criticising ourselves by proxy. What are the trivial expressions of humanity that we believe make us unlovable and immediately disposable?
Icks can also, as you are aware, be self-protective mechanisms – ways of pushing away people and justifying our fear of real connection. Instead of admitting that we fear being vulnerable and liking someone, we can create a tiny but inarguable reason to dismiss them. Self-protection and projected shame can go hand-in-hand: the moment we see someone we like having a flawed moment, we become acutely aware of our flaws. Rather than lose control and reveal ourselves as imperfect, we push them away and trade them in for someone new, with whom we can start the cycle of perfect, early-days performing, where we remain shiny and flawless until the ick cycle starts again.
Or we could embrace that, as Tim Kreider once wrote, 'if we want the reward of being loved, we have to submit to the mortifying ordeal of being known'. We could dig deep and put forth our most flawed, awkward, clumsy, coin-chasing, yoghurt lid-licking selves – and believe that we are worthy of love as we are. We could believe that our partners will embrace our humanity, and our differences, and forgive us a million times over for our irritating habits – and we could commit to forgiving them a million times over in return.
I am sure your partner talking loudly and interrupting you is annoying, and if his interruptions feel patronising and disrespectful rather than excitable and clumsy, then that's not an ick, that's an important value mismatch and you should leave. And if he is unkind or unethical or is treating you badly, or even just if the annoyances start to outweigh the good and you genuinely don't enjoy being around him that much and your attraction is waning, then yes – break up with him and find someone you like more. But if he treats you well and makes you laugh and is willing to work on your connection? Well, maybe just get more practised at saying: 'Actually, I wasn't finished' when he interrupts you. Maybe forgive a little more, knowing that he will forgive you for your annoying habits, too. Maybe stay focused on the big, important values instead of the tiny, trivial details.
I know you've been seriously hurt before, and I'm sorry. I've been there. I know it's easy to believe that to keep yourself safe, you have to have your shoelaces tied, ready to run. But imperfection is not danger. Imperfection is vulnerability. I suspect that you're scared of the vulnerability of loving someone, and being seen by someone – and ironically, this fear is making you a little bit emotionally unavailable. But that vulnerability is where the potential for real love lies, so you need to decide if you want to show up for it.
My partner has never hung up a towel to dry in his life. He is late to everything. He once inexplicably showed my philosopher-poet father a computer-animated redesign of a centaur, which was just a horse with a man's arse. I write about sex in a national newspaper. My nose runs whenever I eat anything above room temperature. Any time I open my handbag, there's a 50/50 chance a stray, matted hair extension will fall out of it. We have both been violently ill in front of the other. There are endless other embarrassing details about ourselves and our relationship that I would never dream of putting in print, and an endless list of reasons we could use to discount each other. We are both imperfect and strange and flawed and deeply annoying – and I have never been so happy in my goddamn life. The price of admission is worth it.
This man may or may not be the person for you. But see if you can hold space for his imperfection, his flaws; see if you can turn the ick into a crossroads where you choose to lean into the mortifying ordeal of knowing another and being known. Either you'll find love or a lesson. Either will be invaluable. Good luck.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
My son is clearing out his childhood things – but these items he knew I'd want to keep
My younger son , who finished the Leaving Cert a few weeks ago, has been going through his room setting aside childish things. I see that his purge is overdue; there were games and toys that were almost already outgrown when we moved from England five years ago. We should probably have been even more ruthless in packing, but as we understood the difference between the space we could afford in the English midlands and the space we could afford in Dublin , my husband and I discarded more than half our own possessions. (I acknowledge our good fortune in being able to afford any space at all in Dublin.) We couldn't bear to ask the same of the children. My son is thoughtful and knows that I think more nostalgically of his childhood than he does, full now of the joys of new adulthood. He set aside things he thought I'd want to keep. He was, of course, mostly right; our children know us well. There was some furniture from the dolls' house my grandfather had made for me 45 years ago. The house itself long gone to other lives, but a hand-carved wooden cradle to hold a baby the size of a grape endures, carried as a talisman of my grandfather's love across decades and seas and borders. READ MORE There was a family of plastic squirrels with fluffy tails that will probably be on the planet centuries after humans have blown each other to oblivion. I don't know what I was thinking when I bought them for his third birthday, except that my son would like them. He did, carried them in dimpled fists and small pockets around the park and the shops, handed them to me for safekeeping while he climbed at the playground and fed the ducks. They are so small, surely no harm to keep them though they are neither useful nor beautiful, though space is tight and shipping costly. Take a photo, I tell myself, let them go, but the idea of them lying in a bin – not even recyclable, not desirable second-hand – is too much. And then – I know from the smell before I come to them – there is a box of 64 wax crayons, all more or less used, the pinks, purples and oranges more than the others, the greys and browns hardly at all. They've survived the years because they lived at my grandparents' house, and my grandparents clove to order and neatness, stored things tidily arranged in their original packaging. [ There's a clear difference between those who grew up taking photos of themselves and those of us who didn't Opens in new window ] My brother and I had art supplies at home, in abundance, in constant use. There was a yellow plastic tub that had once held two litres of Neapolitan ice-cream, divided like a flag into thirds of vanilla, strawberry and chocolate, for years after holding handfuls of pencil crayons of different lengths and thicknesses and hardness, the leads broken and ends chewed. 'The crayon box is one of vanishingly few objects I can touch now that I touched in early childhood.' Photograph: Getty Images It was practical enough. We drew daily, which was the point. In adult life I tend much more towards such contained chaos than towards my grandparents' neatness, and my own kids' crafting supplies lived in biscuit tins and shoeboxes. The tidiness was appealing because we loved our grandparents and that was how they were. But because the crayons remained a set, remained in order, separate, they passed from me to my sons. Because I'd taken care of the box, they did, and so here it is, one of vanishingly few objects I can touch now that I touched in early childhood. I look through them, read the names on the labels, the precursors of my adult fascination with the names of paint colours, with words for light. The colours are disordered, juxtaposed in ways I find ugly and I start to rearrange them, rediscover that the crayons I loved most of all are the least used because I saved them for best, for later, for special occasions that never came. I still delight in rose pink and sunset orange and violet, glowing colours that I was taught 'didn't go' and couldn't be worn together. I wear them now, on confident days. I glance down at my lined adult hands, at the scars on the fingers from cooking and rock-climbing and I see the rings that replace the beloved engagement ring I lost last year. The stones I wear constantly now are purple, yellow, crimson and orange, my childhood self still almost in touching distance as my children's childhoods fade.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
My father has been having affairs with men for years and now he has walked away from our family
Dear Roe, Last year, my father left my mother, telling us that he is gay after almost 40 years of marriage. It seems he has had a succession of secret relationships with men over the last 20 years. He is now in a relationship with a much younger man. My mother is absolutely devastated and my siblings and I are so angry with our father for all the lies and deceit. It seems our whole family life, our childhoods have been built on a lie. I can't ever forgive my father for what he has done to my mother or for all the lies. He has just walked away and left us all – he seems to pretend that my mother or my siblings no longer exist. Everything is extremely stressful and our family is completely fractured. I can't see any way forward. The way forward is through, and together. I'm so sorry this has happened to your family. It's completely understandable that you all feel utterly wrecked and unmoored by his lies throughout your childhood and his cruel decisions since. READ MORE I have a tremendous amount of sympathy for people who don't feel safe or comfortable being out or living in alignment with their desires and sexuality. I think – particularly for people of an older generation – homophobia is a devastating, oppressive violence and when you withhold acceptance, safety, social support, community and the chance to have a family from queer people, it is of course going to push some people to repress their desires. Whatever the specific contours of his sexuality, I don't doubt that your father held genuine love and affection for your mother – you can't fake an entire 40-year relationship . I also don't doubt that he genuinely loves you and your siblings, because you also can't fake parenting for decades. But he still lied and betrayed your mother, and shattered your image of their relationship. Of course that pain is going to cut incredibly deeply. Your father had many other choices, other options for how to address his desires. He could have told your mother about his sexuality and either asked to open the relationship or accepted if she wanted to end it. He could have embraced honesty and vulnerability and allowed for the possibility of the relationship ending with some pain, of course, but also honesty and respect, prioritising everyone's dignity and his relationship with you and your siblings. He could have had his affairs but still chosen to behave differently when he finally told your mother, acknowledging that his journey to living authentically had included living deceitfully in a way that caused you all pain, and included a commitment to rebuilding trust and connection with you and your siblings, and showing respect to your mother and her experience. There's a lot he could have differently, and he didn't, and I'm sorry. .form-group {width:100% !important;} I do want to leave open the possibility that he may still try to do better in the future. The extremity of his behaviour – his complete turn away from you and your siblings – feels like a shame reaction; an inability to be around you without crumbling under the weight of both how he felt, hiding this part of himself for so long, and what he's done to all of you. I'm sure you all feel like a mirror he can't quite look in right now, as it reminds him of both the pain he felt and the pain he inflicted. That doesn't excuse his behaviour, it's just one way to understand it. Whether he ever returns to that accountability is out of your control. What is in your control is how you care for one another now. The above is all about him – now is all about you. This time, this heartbreak, this grief – it belongs to you, your mother and your siblings. Focus on each other. You are not powerless here. The truth is, your family life wasn't a lie, even if parts of it were built on one. What's fractured right now is your sense of narrative, your understanding of the past. Part of what makes this situation so painful is that you're not only grieving what's happening now, you're also grieving the past you thought you had. That's a very particular kind of loss. You may find yourself questioning your memories or wondering what was real. That disorientation is completely normal in the wake of betrayal. It can help to remember that just because he had secrets doesn't mean the love, warmth or joy you experienced were illusions. Your memories are still yours. They still matter. The laughter, the love, the everyday rituals, the memories you hold with your mother and siblings – those were all real. And the relationships between you and your mother and your siblings can become even stronger in the wake of this hurt, if you face the pain together and commit to honesty, mutual support and room for different kinds of grief. You don't all have to feel the same way, or even forgive your father on the same timeline – or ever. But you do need to make space for one another's experiences. Your father's silence, denial and compartmentalising shaped the emotional environment you grew up in. It might be tempting to deal with this the same way, by shutting down or avoiding painful truths. Try not to I would encourage you all to find good therapists that you can see individually, and one you could see together. Having a space where you can individually work through your specific feelings about this experience and another where you can speak together and hear each other will be really helpful. Let each other have your own unique experience of it, while supporting each other. There will also be times when you all need some joy, a break from this pain, to create new memories with each other to remind you that your bond is still there, that your connection and joy was not solely dependent on your father but exists between all of you. Don't let any form of shame prevent you from addressing this loss with your friends and loved ones – because it is a loss. There will be much to grieve, and grief festers when silenced. Your father's silence, denial, and compartmentalising shaped the emotional environment you grew up in. It might be tempting to deal with this the same way, by shutting down or avoiding painful truths. Try not to. Choose honesty, transparency and connection – even when it's difficult. That's how you build something stronger than what was broken. Share your messy, complicated feelings with people who can offer you love and listening and support back, and feel the different forms of love and support and loyalty that still exist in your life. Your anger is valid. So is your heartbreak. But try not to let them calcify into something that consumes your life. Anger can be clarifying – it shows you where your boundaries are, what you value, how much you care – but if you cling to it too tightly, it risks burning everything, including the parts of your life you still want to protect. Don't let your anger at your father blind you to the love and family that still exists for you, and don't let your anger at him seep into your relationships with your mother and siblings. [ 'Should I tell my wife that I'm a crossdresser after more than 20 years together?' Opens in new window ] You don't have to forgive your father today. You may never forgive him fully. But for your own sake – not his – I encourage you to keep the door open to change, should he show up with real remorse, accountability and a desire to repair what he's broken. Not because he necessarily deserves it, but because you deserve freedom from the heaviness of his choices. For now, pour your energy into rebuilding trust and safety within the family that remains. Let yourselves feel what you feel – grief, confusion, betrayal, even love – and keep talking about it. This is a long process. But you are already walking through it. And if you keep showing up for each other, you will find your way forward – not the family you thought you had, but a family still, and one built now on truth. Good luck.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
‘I Humbly Beg Your Speedy Answer' by Mary Beth Norton: A dive into 1690s messy relationships
'I Humbly Beg Your Speedy Answer': Letters on Love & Marriage from the World's First Personal Advice Column Author : Mary Beth Norton ISBN-13 : 9780691253992 Publisher : Princeton University Press Guideline Price : £20 Modern dating looks like a nightmare. They treat you mean to keep you keen. They ghost you, ignoring your messages. Maybe their ex isn't quite as ex as they implied. Exasperated, you pour your heart out to a newspaper advice column and the whole country gets to wallow in your relationship woes. Take heart: you're not the first. In 1691, the London bookseller John Dunton started a new publication with his two brothers-in-law. Called the Athenian Gazette or Casuistical Mercury, the pitch was that anyone could send a question on any topic at all to the anonymous Athenian Society and have it answered in print. The paper was a hit – a cheap single sheet hawked around the city's coffeehouses by Mercury Women – and their postbag soon filled with questions not just on science and theology, but about sex and relationships. READ MORE Mary Beth Norton's collection of these questions and responses is a cheerful (if sometimes repetitive) dive into the messy realities of courting, sex and marriage in the 1690s. Readers' problems ranged from the mundane – unhappy marriages, difficult in-laws, broken promises – to the dramatic. The Athenian inbox bulged with queries from accidental bigamists, adulterers and a man who had mistakenly married his own daughter. One correspondent, struggling with impure thoughts, asked if it would be permissible 'to castrate himself in order to deliver himself from the most urgent temptations. (The answer: no.) While even the Athenians thought some of the letters they received were probably made up, they offered pithy and often cutting advice. To someone in the grip of lust outside of marriage, they primly remarked that 'fornication is damnable without repentance is believed by all but papists and atheists'. To a writer who asked, 'How may a man reclaim a headstrong or unruly wife?', they answered, 'the surest way of all is being a good husband yourself, for bad husbands are very often the cause that wives are no better'. A young woman mad with love for a forbidden suitor was given some practical advice: 'read history (nothing amorous)'. This collection of amorous histories shows that rubbernecking at the relationship disasters of others is nothing new. It might be useful reading for anyone writing a wedding speech – or contemplating a new relationship – this summer.
