Modern couples are cutting these pricey traditions from their wedding budgets
A survey of 2,000 engaged Americans currently planning their wedding found the days of glamorous overspending may be less common with the current financial climate front of mind.
Advertisement
Twenty-two percent of those polled described their wedding budget as 'modest,' while only 5% said they were planning something extravagant.
An additional 16% said they were working with the 'bare minimum.'
7 Twenty-two percent of those polled described their wedding budget as 'modest.'
VlaDee – stock.adobe.com
The survey, conducted by Talker Research on behalf of JJ's House, also found that the average couple expects to spend a third (33%) of their combined annual income on the big day.
Advertisement
That translates to an average wedding budget of $21,058.
While it was once tradition for the bride's family to pay for the entire wedding, that model may be fading fast in today's financial climate.
The vast majority of couples (85%) now say they're footing the bill themselves, with only 14% receiving contributions from both sets of parents and just 10% relying on one side of the family.
7 The survey found that the average couple expects to spend a third (33%) of their combined annual income on the big day.
zimmytws – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
Still, rising prices are testing the patience of even the most optimistic planners.
Venue rentals (39%), photography (34%), catering (34%) and attire (32%) were listed among the most surprising sticker shocks.
The average wedding dress budget alone came in at $7,497.
'We're seeing a clear shift toward weddings that reflect both budget constraints and personal values,' said a spokesperson for JJ's House. 'Couples are being more intentional with their spending, not because the day matters less, but because they're investing even more in the life that comes after it.'
Advertisement
7 The vast majority of couples (85%) now say they're footing the bill themselves, with only 14% receiving contributions from both sets of parents.
arinahabich – stock.adobe.com
Some couples are adapting to the economic climate by getting creative.
One in four (25%) have postponed the wedding to save more money.
Others have opted for DIY décor (27%), more affordable venues (24%) or secondhand outfits (19%) in place of designer brands.
Nearly half (46%) of brides said their bridesmaids will be paying for their own dresses, while only 27% plan to cover the cost for their wedding party.
Another 27% aren't having bridesmaids at all.
7 The average wedding dress budget alone came in at $7,497.
Kristina Blokhin – stock.adobe.com
7 When it comes to attire, price was the top deciding factor (43%), followed by comfort (37%) and style (29%).
Wedding photography – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
When it comes to attire, price was the top deciding factor (43%), followed by comfort (37%) and style (29%).
Sustainability and ethical sourcing ranked lower at 6%, though more than half (51%) believe younger generations will increasingly prioritize those values in future planning.
That shift is already happening in other areas.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents said they would consider lab-grown diamonds for financial reasons, while 67% would do so for ethical ones.
Advertisement
7 Seventy-seven percent of respondents said they would consider lab-grown diamonds for financial reasons, while 67% would do so for ethical ones.
standret – stock.adobe.com
And 76% said it was important that their wedding reflect their values.
The survey also found that the average wedding guest list includes 107 people, and just 13% plan to host multiple events like welcome parties or next-day brunches.
One in five (19%) are postponing their honeymoon due to financial reasons, and 11% said they're skipping it entirely.
Advertisement
Despite the challenges, most couples are tackling planning as a team.
7 One in five (19%) are postponing their honeymoon due to financial reasons, and 11% said they're skipping it entirely.
Getty Images
A strong 81% said both partners are involved, while only 33% said the bulk of responsibility falls on them alone. Just 7% said their partner is taking the lead.
Still, navigating family expectations remains tricky.
Advertisement
Thirty-one percent said they've experienced pressure to include specific traditions or customs even if they don't align with their values or budget.
'Couples today are walking a tightrope between tradition and reality,' the JJ's House spokesperson added. 'They still want a meaningful celebration, but there's a growing awareness that starting married life in debt or under pressure to impress isn't worth the cost.'
Survey methodology:
Talker Research surveyed 2,000 engaged Americans (18+); the survey was commissioned by JJ's House and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between June 6 – June 17, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump makes academia face the damning truth about foreign students
Are American graduate schools still American? That's what President Donald Trump is asking as he takes action against Harvard University and its large international-student population. His effort to restrict Harvard's foreign-student visas seeks to address a growing problem in higher education: Many of our most renowned graduate schools are overwhelmingly non-American. Advertisement On Wednesday, Columbia University capitulated on the issue — agreeing in its deal with Trump to 'take steps to decrease financial dependence on international student enrollment.' The Ivy also promised to probe 'international student-applicants [on] their reasons for wishing to study in the United States' — in other words, to keep out the sneaky saboteurs coming here to wreak havoc. Significantly, Columbia's decision signals to other top-tier schools, Harvard in particular, that it's not worth fighting the administration over international-graduate-student enrollment. Advertisement And that is welcome news indeed. We support international educational exchange, as most Americans do. The problem is disproportionality: A huge influx of foreign students has changed the character of traditionally American institutions, leaving American students increasingly crowded out — and even making them targets of prejudice and discrimination. The numbers speak for themselves. Advertisement During the 2023-2024 academic year, the United States hosted 1.1 million international students, a sharp 7% increase from the year prior. Nearly half of them, 500,000-plus, were graduate students. International grad-school enrollments grew by 10.2% between 2021 and 2022, as American enrollments dropped by 4.7%. Some fields, mostly STEM-related, have seen a 100% international-student enrollment boom since the COVID-19 pandemic. Advertisement President Donald Trump listens during a briefing with the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, at the White House in Washington. AP At Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government, for example, the percentage of international students rose from 56% in 2023 to 59% in 2024. At Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Columbia and others, international students make up 48% or more of the graduate-student body. At MIT, it's 42%. As the foreign graduate population soared, so too did antisemitism and anti-Americanism on college campuses. Coincidence? We don't think so. One analysis found that once the international-student population surpasses 13% at a university, campus protests double. Advertisement Any reasonable observer of the post-Oct. 7 campus troubles must notice the heavy involvement of foreign graduate students like Mahmoud Khalil, who reportedly helped organize a campaign of intimidation at Columbia. Rather than trying to address the problem, schools like Harvard are fighting federal subpoenas seeking foreign students' disciplinary records — while simultaneously claiming the government has no proof their foreign students are a problem. Only intense pressure from Trump forced Columbia to confront the truth. But the problem is not just campus culture — there's strong evidence that international enrollment is shutting American students, particularly minorities, out of opportunities. Advertisement Harvard's Kennedy School saw a 50% drop in 'black or African American' enrollment in 2023 compared to 2021, while international enrollment rose. In addition, multiple scholarship opportunities at publicly funded colleges are open only to illegal-immigrant students, excluding those who are American-born. Demonstrators join the group Crimson Courage, who gathered to support Harvard University during a hearing before a federal judge at the federal courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts, U.S., July 21, 2025. REUTERS Our Equal Protection Project has filed legal challenges to such programs at five schools (so far — there are many more), prompting the US Department of Education to open investigations into our cases. Advertisement And there's a hidden long-term cost to these disproportionate numbers of foreign students in America's graduate programs: brain drain. Most of the international students who gain higher-level degrees in American programs take their education and skills back to their home countries — talent and training lost to us domestically, because those spots could and should have been filled by Americans. Only about 30% of all international graduate students eventually seek green cards and legal permanent US residency. Advertisement And there's some evidence that those who do join the US workforce after graduation undercut their job-seeking American classmates — because employers can sponsor them for H-1B visas and hire them on the cheap. Most international students come here for good reasons, but their disproportionate representation has undeniably created negative consequences. Trump's effort to force schools to address the problem is a step in the right direction — and the Columbia deal shows academia that ignoring it is no longer an option. We love international students. But we also love the American character of our American universities — and don't want to see that lost. William A. Jacobson is a clinical professor of law at Cornell University and founder of the Equal Protection Project and where Kemberlee Kaye is operations and editorial director.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Think They Need $4 Million To Retire Comfortably — Can You Guess How Many Really Have That Much?
You know how a million dollars used to sound like the ultimate goal? These days, it barely turns heads — especially when it comes to retirement. Now, $4 million is being tossed around as the new benchmark for a "comfortable" retirement. But the reality is, very few Americans are anywhere near that kind of wealth. According to Federal Reserve data, to be in the top 5% of U.S. households, you'd need about $1.17 million in total net worth. The top 2% starts around $2.7 million — and to break into the top 1%, you'd need a staggering $11.6 million. That means someone with $4 million in net worth falls comfortably above the top 2%, but still far from the 1% threshold. Based on this range, it's fair to estimate that only about 1.3% to 1.5% of U.S. households have $4 million or more in total net worth. Don't Miss: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. And remember — that includes everything: home equity, retirement accounts, business assets, and personal property. It's not what's sitting in your 401(k). So when surveys suggest Americans need $4 million just to retire, they're aiming higher than nearly 99% of the country ever reaches. So how did $4 million become the retirement magic number when so few people have it in any form? $4 Million Retirement Myth A 2023 New York Life survey found that the average American worker now believes they'll need $4.3 million to retire comfortably. That's not just the wealthy talking — that's everyday people. And it reflects a growing anxiety about the cost of living, inflation, healthcare, and longevity. The problem? Very few people are even close. According to the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances, the average retirement savings among Americans is about $334,000 — but the median is far lower, at just $86,900. That paints a much more sobering picture of where most people actually stand. Even having $1 million saved for retirement puts you in the top 3.2% of savers. So the idea that $4 million is "normal" or "necessary" might be more myth than fact. Trending: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — Most People Don't Know What They'll Need The confusion is understandable. Most people don't actually know how much they'll need — or when they'll retire. You might have a timeline in mind, but life doesn't always follow the plan. In fact, 58% of workers end up retiring earlier than expected, often due to unforeseen circumstances, according to research from the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies in collaboration with the Transamerica Institute. Part of the issue is the heavy reliance on retirement calculators — those sleek tools many people plug their age and income into hoping for clarity. But many of these calculators are built by investment firms that have a vested interest in encouraging people to save more and invest more. They often assume luxury-level lifestyles, long retirements, and no other income sources like Social Security. That means these tools can overshoot what's actually needed — leaving users discouraged and feeling like they're impossibly behind. What Do You Really Need? Truthfully, the amount you'll need to retire depends on a mix of personal factors: Where you plan to live Your desired lifestyle Healthcare needs How long you plan to work Other income sources like pensions or Social Security Many financial experts agree that a more realistic retirement target for most Americans is somewhere between $1 million and $2 million — not $4 million. That's still a hefty number, but far more achievable over time, especially when combined with other income sources or downsizing let's not forget what Warren Buffett famously said: "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Passive income — through dividends, rental property, or even part-time work — can significantly stretch retirement dollars. So What's the Move? If $4 million feels out of reach, you're not alone — and you're not doomed. The key is consistency over perfection. Saving regularly, investing smartly, and avoiding lifestyle inflation can go a long way. And if you're not sure where to start, talking with a financial advisor can help put your actual retirement needs into perspective — not some one-size-fits-all online projection. Because at the end of the day, it's not about hitting an arbitrary number. It's about being able to retire on your terms — and live well doing it. Read Next: Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? . Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article People Think They Need $4 Million To Retire Comfortably — Can You Guess How Many Really Have That Much? originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Billionaire Co-Owner Of New York Jets Completes Purchase Of Crystal Palace F.C.
Chairman Steve Parish celebrates Crystal Palace's FA Cup win at Wembley Stadium on May 17, 2025 in ... More London. (Photo by) Robert 'Woody' Johnson has completed his purchase of a 43% stake in Crystal Palace from Eagle Football Holdings, the south London club confirmed on Thursday. The 78-year-old billionaire said he was honored and privileged to be joining the ownership group of Crystal Palace. 'It is an organization with a proud history, tradition, and deep roots in English football in south London, which I came to admire during my time as U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom,' he said. 'This is more than an investment - it's a commitment to realizing the vision for the club, the community, and the culture around Selhurst Park.' he added. Johnson served as the U.S. ambassador to the U.K. during Donald Trump's first term as President. As the heir to the health products giant Johnson & Johnson, he has a net worth of $3.5 billion, according to the World's Real-Time Billionaires ranking. Johnson joins Steve Parish, the club's chairman, and fellow Americans Josh Harris and David Blitzer on the board of Crystal Palace. Parish said, 'At this exciting time for Crystal Palace, we are delighted to be welcoming Woody to the ownership of the football club, and we very much look forward to working alongside him to build on our historic recent success moving forwards.' Johnson's investment in Palace comes at A time when the club is waging a campaign to overturn UEFA's decision to eject them from the Europa League for breaching the European governing body's rules on multi-club ownership. Eagle Football, the investment vehicle of John Textor, also owns a 77% stake in in French club Lyon, who had also qualified for the same competition. Lyon takes precedence over Palace because of their higher league finish. The seven-time French champions were sixth in Ligue 1, whereas Palace was 12th in the Premier League. Palace have instead been demoted to the Conference League, and Nottingham Forest have taken their place in the Europa League. Palace have submitted an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against their demotion. The club have lodged their appeal against UEFA, Lyon and Nottingham Forest. CAS is expected to make its decision on the case on or before August 11. UEFA's decision to strip Palace of its place in the Europa League was 'the most ridiculous technicality you could ever imagine,' Parish had said to Sky News earlier. And he later said that he was "very hopeful" UEFA's decision would be overturned. 'We don't think this is the right decision by any means,' Parish told The Rest is Football podcast. 'We know unequivocally that John [Textor] didn't have decisive influence over the club. We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.' Earlier this week, Crystal Palace supporters traveled to UEFA's headquarters in Switzerland to protest the governing body's decision. The Holmesdale Fanatics, an ultras-style supporters' group, said that they delivered a letter to UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin to demand that Palace be reinstated into the Europa League. They also delivered a suitcase filled with fake money as a means of illustrating 'the contradictions between their supposed 'fundamental values' of integrity and fairness, and the reality of their business methods and general conduct.' New York Jets owner Woody Johnson speaks at the press conference in New Jersey. (Photo by Ed ...)
