Maryland city offers $20,000 to relocate to former manufacturing hub
"It was like a real busy town, and then they started downsizing. One leave and the other would leave and we really got hit by it big time," Gus Caporale said.
When the tire factory began laying off employees in 1978, workers told CBS News they hoped only a small group would be affected. Unfortunately, that wasn't the case, and the entire plant shuttered soon after.
As the companies left town, people did as well. In 1940, the population was nearly 40,000. Today, it's been halved to less than 20,000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
But now the city is hoping to turn the page. Last year, Mayor Ray Morriss announced an attention-grabbing offer — $20,000 for 10 people willing to move to the city.
"We were looking for people that were bringing their jobs with them. We were looking for remote workers," Morriss said.
Cumberland is one of more than 70 places in the U.S. that have paid people to uproot and move in over the past five years, according to MakeMyMove.com.
University of Maryland professor Evan Starr said the rise of remote work has made payment programs like these possible.
"If you're a government and you want to bring people to your area, well before remote work, you had to recruit businesses that were expanding. It could be difficult," Starr said.
He points to a successful pioneer in "Tulsa Remote," which has enticed more than 3,000 participants with grants of $10,000 each. The investment has paid off, raising an additional $11 million in new tax revenue, according to the program. "They can use that money to spend on schools and other local amenities. They can make a big difference in the area," Starr said.
Dave Caporale is looking for a similar boost in Cumberland and hopes his family bakery could be bustling like it once was in the early fifties. But if "hope" alone won't get it done, the thinking here is to throw in some dough as well.
Holocaust survivors on bearing witness
Latest news on Pope Francis' health after lung infection, kidney failure
Behind the scenes of "Survivor" Season 48
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dan Rather Calls '60 Minutes' Settlement A 'Sell-Out To Extortion By The President'
Journalist Dan Rather expressed sincere disappointment Wednesday in Paramount Global, the parent company of his former employer CBS News, for agreeing to settle a lawsuit from President Donald Trump's administration for $16 million. 'It's a sad day for journalism,' Rather told Variety in an interview published Wednesday. 'It's a sad day for '60 Minutes' and CBS News.' 'I hope people will read the details of this and understand what it was,' he continued. 'It was distortion by the president and a kneeling down and saying, 'yes, sir,' by billionaire corporate owners.' Trump sued CBS last fall over what he claimed was a deceptively edited '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, his opponent in the 2024 election, and accused the network of 'partisan and unlawful acts of voter interference.' Despite high-profile resignations at CBS and public concern, including from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), that the company would cave to Trump's lawsuit, Paramount Global agreed earlier this week to pay Trump $16 million. The settlement funds are to be allocated to a future presidential library and will not be paid personally to Trump. Rather, a veteran broadcast journalist who anchored CBS News for 24 years and served as a '60 Minutes' correspondent for much of his career, suggested Wednesday that the wealthy owners of CBS's parent company lacked principles. 'Paramount didn't have to settle,' he argued. 'You settle a lawsuit when you've done something wrong. '60 Minutes' did nothing wrong. It followed accepted journalistic practices. Lawyers almost unanimously said the case wouldn't stand up in court.' The deal came at a precarious time for Paramount Global, however, as the company is currently eyeing an $8 billion merger with Skydance Media. The merger requires approval from the Trump administration's Federal Communications Commission. 'I was disappointed, but I wasn't surprised,' Rather said Wednesday. 'Big billionaire businesspeople make decisions about money. We could always hope that they will make an exception when it comes to freedom of the press, but it wasn't to be.' Rather shared that, in his 60 years as a journalist, he has never seen the profession face the political threats it is navigating today. He noted that even 'big time' law firms and universities are settling with Trump — and 'kneeling the same way' as Paramount Global. Rather added that Trump 'knew' the company would fold if he kept applying pressure. 'Trump is now forcing a whole news organization to pay millions of dollars for doing something protected by the Constitution — which is, of course, free and independent reporting,' he told Variety. 'Now, you take today's sell-out.' He concluded, 'And that's what it was: It was a sell-out to extortion by the president.' Bernie Sanders Rips 'Extremely Dangerous' Paramount-Trump Settlement: 'Government Extortion' Paramount Agrees To Pay Trump $16 Million In Outrageous Settlement Fox News Pundit Asks Most Sycophantic Question About Trump. It Does Not Go Well.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside CBS News: Fear, anger and a silver lining after Paramount-Trump settlement
For months, CBS News has been roiled with trepidation that parent company Paramount Global would write a big check to make President Trump's $20 billion lawsuit go away. On Tuesday night, those fears came true. Paramount Global agreed to pay $16 million to settle Trump's legal salvo against "60 Minutes" over the editing of an interview with his 2024 opponent, then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Within the news organization, there was anger over what is widely seen as a capitulation to Trump in order to clear a path for Paramount's $8-billion merger with David Ellison's Skydance Media. The case was labeled as frivolous by 1st Amendment experts. But among some CBS News veterans, tempers were calmed by a sobering reality: that the outcome could have been worse. The biggest concern inside the news division since Trump's complaint was that the media company would be strong-armed into making an apology or statement of regret over a case that they believed had no merit. Amid the internal anger over the settlement, there is relief that that did not happen. "Everybody knew that was a line in the sand," said a relieved CBS News veteran not authorized to comment publicly on the matter. Another journalist at the network, speaking on the same condition, said the thinking among many was that any financial payment of less than $20 million without an apology would count as a partial win. As the negotiations to end the suit lingered, it became more apparent that corporate interests overrode any concerns about the appearance of caving to Trump's demands. Trump filed suit in October, claiming "60 Minutes" edited an interview with Harris to make her look smarter and bolster her chances in the election, which Trump won decisively. CBS denied the claims, saying the edits were routine. "If there wasn't a merger pending and they took this to court they would have won," the journalist said of Trump's case. "I think they understood that if they made an apology they would have an internal rebellion and they would have because there was nothing to apologize for." Some say that the departures of former "60 Minutes" executive producer Bill Owens and CBS News and stations head Wendy McMahon were enough to satisfy the Trump camp's desire for an apology. Both executives were adamant that CBS News did nothing improper in the handling of the Harris of interview. Trump's legal team claimed victory. 'President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit,' a spokesman said in a statement. But while "60 Minutes" avoided the humiliation that would have come with a statement of contrition, the program that is the foundation of the news division now has to move forward in an era of media mistrust on the political right and disappointment on the left by those who believe courage is in short supply. According to several CBS News insiders who spoke to The Times, no one is expected to depart "60 Minutes" in protest of the settlement decision. Andrew Heyward, a former CBS News president who is now a consultant, said it will be up to the new owners of CBS to maintain the program's journalistic independence. "If that's jeopardized in the future, that would be unfortunate for CBS News and the country," he said. Though there is anger, many feared a bleak future for the news organization and the rest of the network if Paramount Global couldn't close the Skydance deal. The lawsuit was seen as an obstacle to the deal, which needs approval from the Federal Communications Commission, run by Trump appointee Brendan Carr. "We can get outraged all we want, but the fact is we were in a really precarious situation," said one of the journalists not authorized to speak publicly. "If that merger went dead, I don't know if anyone would have come along and bought the whole company." Read more: George Stephanopoulos signs new deal with ABC News amid Trump lawsuit turmoil While ownership change usually generates fear and uncertainty through media organizations, insiders at CBS News say they will be happy to see Paramount Global's controlling shareholder Shari Redstone in their rearview mirror once the Skydance deal is done. The feelings inside the news division regarding Skydance range from hope for new investment from deep-pocketed Ellison to resignation that "it can't get any worse." As for any damage to its reputation, CBS News is taking some comfort in the fact that ABC News hasn't noticeably suffered from its own $16 million settlement over anchor George Stephanopoulos mistakenly saying Trump was convicted of rape rather than sexual abuse in the civil suit brought by E. Jean Carroll. Stephanopoulos signed a new contract at the network amid the controversy and his program "Good Morning America" hasn't suffered a ratings loss since. Viewers have high expectations for "60 Minutes," which after 57 seasons still ranks as the most-watched news program on television (it's also the most profitable show on CBS). If the program is allowed to maintain the same standard of deep reporting it's known for, the audience will get past a bad corporate decision, according to Heyward. "People on the right will say it's another example of mainstream media getting what it deserves," Heyward said. "People on the left will say it's another example of a corporation caving to President Trump for its own selfish interests. And most people will go back to watching '60 Minutes' and expect strong independent reporting without fear or favor — that's what really matters." Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elizabeth Warren Calls for Bribery Investigation Into Paramount-Trump Settlement as Blowback Widens
Wednesday morning brought blowback to the settlement between Paramount Global and President Trump from Democratic lawmakers and regulators. Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that she is demanding an investigation into the settlement, and said that she 'will soon introduce new legislation to rein in corruption through presidential library donations.' More from The Hollywood Reporter Inside CBS News, Staffers Voice Disgust, Anger, Relief and Anxiety After Trump Settlement Paramount and Trump in "Advanced" Settlement Talks As Merger Deadline Nears "BET Is Not Immune" From Paramount Job Cuts, CEO Scott Mills Says in Unveiling "Streamlining" 'With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight,' Warren said in a statement. 'Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken.' In addition, Democratic FCC commissioner Anna Gomez released a statement requesting that the broadcast regulator, chaired by Brendan Carr, bring the pending Paramount-Skydance transaction to a full-commission vote. 'This moment marks a dangerous precedent for the First Amendment, and it should alarm anyone who values a free and independent press,' Gomez said. 'Approving this transaction behind closed doors would be a shameful outcome that denies the American people the transparency and accountability they deserve, especially when press freedom is at stake.' The settlement between Paramount and Trump will see the media giant pay $16 million ($15 million to a future presidential library and $1 million in legal fees), but it will not include an apology. That said, the settlement does require that 60 Minutes release any future transcripts with presidential candidates. Paramount had said previously that 'this lawsuit is completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process. We will abide by the legal process to defend our case.' Still, the pending license transfer at the FCC has raised alarm bells, with Democratic members of Congress and outside groups suggesting that if the FCC approves the deal after a settlement, Paramount executives could be exposed to anti-bribery laws. The Paramount settlement is similar in scale to a settlement from Disney over an ABC News broadcast. Inside CBS News, staffers expressed anxiety and relief at the settlement, angry at the precedent it sets, but relieved that they can move on without it hanging over their work. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire