Be Awake and Be Aware: A warning for our times
Article content
I was shaken awake from my comfortable slumber when I was introduced to the following list of markers depicting the rise of fascism. Do you see any parallels to our present landscape?
Article content
Private enforcers at political rallies.
Discrediting of the free press. Co-opting religion as source of authority,
Hyper-militarism. Promises of future greatness via magical impact of the great leader.
Xenophobia. Heightened misogyny.
Tolerance for attacks on the marginalized.
Appeals to a glorious mythic past. Insistence on allegiance to symbols of patriotism,
Strong-arm rhetoric.
Threats to crush purported enemies.
Thinly veiled racism. Open contempt for immigrants
Discrediting of elected officials and bodies. Attempts to circumvent legislative process. Threats to undermine the judiciary.
Relentless blaming of foreign powers for domestic woes. Demands for unwavering loyalty to the leader
Article content
Article content
This list was representing the warning signs of fascism present in the mid-1940s yet could easily speak to our present reality. Dr. Rob Fennell from Atlantic School of Theology in 2016 warns that it seems history is repeating itself.
Article content
Article content
Fennell recently preformed a one-man production entitled Bonhoeffer meets Trump. He imagined a conversation between a 1940s German Protestant pastor named Dietrich Bonhoeffer and USA President elect Donald Trump. Bonhoeffer appears as a ghost in Trump's dream, much like Scrooge's old friends appear to him in A Christmas Carol. The play is set in the present time and the conversation highlights who Bonhoeffer was and parallels to our present reality.
Article content
Bonhoeffer was a Protestant theologian during the Second World War. He warned people about the dangers of fascism. He called people to be awake and aware of coming ruin. Because of his outspoken manner, he was arrested, deemed to be a political prisoner, sent to a German concentration camp and executed in 1945.
Article content
Article content
Fennell's presentation emphasizes the startling similarities between the present-day American political climate and the ideologies of 1940s Germany.
Article content
Upon viewing Fennell's supposed conversation, many question began to form in my head: How can we possibly live faithfully in times of chaos, confusion, and uncertainty? Are we aware of the impending dangers? Are we awake and prepared to resist and speak truth to power? Are we going to allow history to repeat itself?
Article content
Fennell attempts to broadly answer these questions by stating, 'So often people deny or avoid the reality of the present moment and in doing so, are lulled into perilous and dangerous times.'
Article content
Fennell did offer suggestions on how to respond to our political reality. First, be rigorously aware of what is happening. Second, be awake and willing to speak out and up against harmful measures. Fennell warned us that all too often people assume someone else will speak up against an atrocity until they discover that there is no one left to speak. He read a powerful poem called First They Came by Pastor Martin Niemoller, a contemporary of Bonhoeffer's:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
3 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Alberta once welcomed immigrants now under microscope by government's panel
Article content It's been several weeks since Stampede ended, and Calgary's Ismaili community held its annual Stampede breakfast. As always, the event attracts several thousand attendees and stands as a microcosm of what defines Calgary today, and who has helped to shape it. Article content There is no mistaking the immigrant impact on this city and province. Article content Article content In attendance at the breakfast, there are always representatives of current and past generations – many sporting myriad versions of the ubiquitous Smithbilt hat rooted in the immigrant story of the Schumiatcher family, who came to Calgary in 1910 and created the iconic white hat in 1946. Article content Article content From teachers to entrepreneurs, business, arts and community leaders – we are a richer community because of all who have chosen to make Alberta home. And that includes my parents. Article content Article content Which is why the Alberta Next panel – which kicked off just after Stampede Week and is seeking feedback from Albertans on the province's place in Confederation through the summer – is troubling for me. More specifically, it's the question focused on immigrants – targeting those who don't meet certain criteria and could be denied access to social services supports if they come to Alberta. Article content I was in Poland when the panel was announced. It's where my parents were born and raised before the Second World War – and it was my first visit to the country, which had the largest Jewish population in Europe until war broke out. Article content I am a first-generation Canadian. My parents came to Canada, and to Alberta, in 1951. They survived the horrors of the Second World War, with my dad Moshe losing his entire family and my mother Tova and her parents being the only surviving members of her immediate family. My brother and I grew up in the shadow of loss, which hung over our house every day. Article content Article content Canada was a place of refuge, where my parents could rebuild their lives, and Edmonton was where they settled. Article content You see, the war interrupted my mother's education. When she left Poland, she had a high school diploma. And no English skills. She spoke many other languages, but not English. My dad had a Master's degree in history, but lacked a teaching certificate or other qualifications. He also didn't speak English. Article content Odds are, they wouldn't have qualified for social services support under the current construct of the question being put before Albertans and the panel. Article content Yet, as so many immigrants do, they figured it out. My dad did become a teacher, and my mother went back to school. She graduated with a PhD in history from the University of Alberta in 1968 and retired as professor emerita in 1996.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Recognizing a state, and making a point
Opinion Canada will recognize a state that does not exist. A state that may never exist. A state that has yet to meet the internationally accepted attributes of statehood: a permanent population, a defined territory, an effective government, and exercised sovereignty. This is Palestine. Palestine is not yet a reality, but Canada is recognizing another reality. The reality of war, hunger, hardship, and politics. Almost two years after the horrific Hamas massacre of Israelis and others on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel is locked into a grinding war of lethal attrition against Hamas in Gaza. No immediate ceasefire prospects and no clear end game by any of the protagonists except the destruction of the other exists. ABDEL KAREEM HANA / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES A Palestinian boy carrying a plastic jerry can of water walks past buildings destroyed during Israeli air and ground operations in Gaza City on July 25. The most volatile neighbourhood in the world has seen more than 50 wars, insurgencies, coups, and rebellions of one sort or another since the end of the Second World War. The pattern is violently familiar and, therefore, depressingly inuring to most of us. Many expected Gaza to follow this same pattern. Israel's right to exist in peace and the monstrous scale of the Hamas terrorism gave it the legal and moral agency to strike back, hard. Retaliation by Israel would be harsh but somehow acceptable. Few shed any tears when key Hamas leaders were hunted down and eliminated. The tears came afterwards. The relentlessly dangerous and difficult task of eradicating a deeply embedded terrorist network in dense urban areas has meant more civilian casualties and visible suffering than much of the international community could stomach. With no end in sight. This is what prompted Prime Minister Mark Carney's momentous decision to recognize the State of Palestine during the next United Nations General Assembly this fall. 'The deepening suffering of civilians leaves no room for delay in co-ordinated international action to support peace, security, and the dignity of all human life', he said in a formal statement this week. There is something else, though. Canada has concluded that the Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu will never accept a two-state solution of a fully sovereign Palestine living side by side with Israel. This has been the bedrock foreign policy principle of Canada — and many other countries — for peace in the Middle East. Unwilling to dismiss this principled approach, the Canadian prime minister has decided to dismiss the Israeli prime minster's approach to the principle. 'Regrettably, this approach is no longer tenable', Carney said. 'Prospects for a two-state solution have been steadily and gravely eroded' he went on, listing four reasons, three of which identify Israeli actions, making clear where most of the blame resides. With zero influence over how Israel is prosecuting the war, Canada is joining other countries to influence what happens after the war. In that sense, Canada is remaining consistent with the United States. Not the U.S. of President Donald Trump but the U.S. of former president Joe Biden. One month into the war, in November 2023, the U.S. set out a 'day after the war' declaration for Gaza and Israel. Meant to prevent a wider conflict from erupting, that declaration stated: 'The United States believes key elements should include no forcible displacement of Palestinians from Gaza. Not now. Not after the war. No use of Gaza as a platform for terrorism or other violent attacks. No reoccupation of Gaza after the conflict ends. No attempt to blockade or besiege Gaza. No reduction in the territory of Gaza.' Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. This may yet come to pass, but it appears very far off right now. Politicians though live in the here and now. They see hunger lines in Gaza and become distressed. They read motions to annex the West Bank from the Israeli Knesset or statements by the Israeli prime minister to never agree to a fully fledged Palestinian state and become disturbed. They see no end in sight and are frustrated. All this is leaving Israel more politically isolated today than it was before Oct. 7. But it is also more militarily powerful, capable, and dominant in the region than ever before. And it has a fast friend in Donald Trump creating a superpower 'alliance of two' giving it more licence to act as it sees fit in Gaza and the region. It is doing so, and countries have taken notice. Short of declaring war, recognizing a governing entity, no matter how tenuous, as a sovereign state is as declaratory you can get in international relations. Canada, like France and Great Britain, is utilizing the entirely precedented and legal discretion it has under international law to unilaterally recognize another state. But doing so now, absent a negotiated peace settlement to create such a state, is not so much a diplomatic gesture of support for Palestinians, but a diplomatic rejection of Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank. For Canada, the momentous part is not breaking with international law by declaring its recognition of Palestine as a state but breaking with its own international tradition of allying with the U.S. on key international issues. Indeed, this decision signals a widening chasm with America. Trump wants 'to break us, so that America can own us', said Carney on election night. What he didn't say is that maybe Canada has to break with America first. David McLaughlin is a former clerk of the executive council and cabinet secretary in the Manitoba government.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Southern Baptist policy head resigns after 4 years of navigating internal conflicts
The head of the Southern Baptist Convention's policy arm has resigned after nearly four years leading the staunchly conservative agency, which in recent years has fended off critics within the nation's largest Protestant denomination seeking to push it even further to the right. The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission on Thursday accepted the resignation of its president, Brent Leatherwood, the agency confirmed. The ERLC has advocated against abortion and transgender rights while promoting a strongly pro-Israel stance, a longtime evangelical priority, and an expansive view of religious liberty in the public square similar to how it's been defined in recent U.S. Supreme Court cases. Church representatives at the Southern Baptist Convention annual meeting in June voted decisively to retain the commission — effectively a vote of confidence against efforts to abolish it. Some critics within the convention wanted it to take a harder-line stance on immigration and to endorse criminal penalties for women seeking abortions. 'In all of our advocacy work, we have sought to strike a balance of conviction and kindness, one that is rooted in Scripture and reflective of our Baptist beliefs,' Leatherwood said in a statement. 'That has meant standing for truth, without equivocation, yet never failing to honor the God-given dignity of each person.' Scott Foshie, chair of the commission's trustees, credited Leatherwood for demonstrating 'loving courage in the face of a divisive and increasingly polarizing culture in America.' Commission Vice President Miles Mullin was named acting president. Sundays Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba. Leatherwood has led the agency for four years, first as acting president and then as president. A year ago, the agency issued an embarrassing retraction of an announcement of Leatherwood's firing after he complimented then-President Joe Biden — deeply unpopular among conservatives — for ending his reelection campaign. It turned out that the chairman who announced Leatherwood's firing had acted without a required vote of the board's executive committee. The commission's board subsequently gave Leatherwood a strong vote of confidence but cautioned against stirring unnecessary controversy. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
