What we learnt in the BBC's Toxic Waste Scandal podcast
The verdict is still disputed
The civil court hearing was told the heavy metal cadmium was identified on the former steel site, and a medical expert cited research linking it to birth defects in animals.After the three-month hearing, Justice Akenhead ruled in favour of the claimants – 18 families from Corby.But speaking to the media for the first time, Dr Rick Smith, a clean-up consultant geologist for the council, says he believes the cluster of cases was not down to the transportation of the toxic waste.He said that while he agrees there was "cadmium in the stuff we transported", he disputed it would have caused the birth defects."I find it very hard to accept there was sufficient exposure of this very small number of members of the public to contaminants to have caused these distressing defects," he says."It defies any sort of logic. The whole thing is a mystery."He says the dust which was coming from the lorries was "not considered a health hazard by anyone at that time".Dr Smith added his colleagues were affected by the criticism following the ruling against the council. He said they were "hounded", and some never worked again.
Not all the families were in court
The podcast is hosted by George Taylor, who was born in 1992 with a unilateral upper limb defect, and whose family was one of the claimants in the case.But they missed the verdict at the High Court because they were on holiday in Majorca."My dad would not be swayed – he said we deserved a holiday," George says.But Danielle Holliday, a trainee solicitor at Collins Law at the time, was able to call the Taylors.George's mother, Fiona, recalls that she "just broke down in tears" when she heard the verdict as she sat on the beach.His father, Brian, says he "just got up and walked along the beach, crying".When the family returned to the hotel the case was on the television, including pictures of George, but he says he was "more interested in wrestling my younger brother" at the pool.
It was almost not a cluster
Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter is emeritus professor of statistics in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge.At the time of the court case, he wrote a blog about the cluster of birth defects, and he speaks about it for the first time in the podcast."The number of birth deformities in Corby that were considered in the judgement was not especially unusual," he says."Using the calculations presented by the prosecution, we can estimate there are around 30 areas in the UK about the size of Corby that had more extreme clusters over that period just by chance variation alone."But there well may have been affected births – and of course I have every sympathy for the families. I'm only looking at the very technical issue of whether the data passed this established threshold."And it was very marginal. If there had been one birth defect less in the data considered in the judgement, there would not have been enough effect births to conclude there was an affected cluster."
The council boss still cannot talk
Chris Mallender, the then-chief executive of Corby Borough Council, was prominent during and following the court case, but once the settlement was reached he did not speak about it again.The team behind the podcast attempted to contact him for an interview, and after weeks of trying he eventually got in touch by calling BBC Radio Northampton's public phone-in line.Following the settlement, Mr Mallender signed a non-disclosure agreement, but it was hoped there were still things he was able to talk about on the record.Podcast producer Sarah-Jane Muddiman called him back and spoke to him for 24 minutes, but he said he was not able to be interviewed and did not want details of the conversation to be revealed.
The compensation has helped
Families affected won an undisclosed financial settlement in 2010, held in trust until the children turned 18.George, now 32, says he is not allowed to say how much it was."What I can say is when you've got chronic pain, a hole in your hand and three largely useless fingers, it's handy to have a few quid to help with adaptations, taxis to hospital and pain relief."It's also good to thank your mum and dad for dressing your wounds and keeping you sane."He has also revealed he is "playing host to another tumour, my third one, in my shoulder".It is 13cm across and he could lose his arm, but he adds: "I just want to live my life."
BBC Radio Northampton's eight-part documentary series In Detail: The Toxic Waste Scandal is available for download from BBC Sounds.
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Heartache for Bayesian yacht victim Mike Lynch's family – estate faces bankruptcy after court demands it hand over £700M
IT was a tragedy that claimed the lives of a billionaire father and his daughter, drowned in a storm at sea. British tech entrepreneur Mike Lynch was out celebrating his acquittal from US fraud charges when his £38million yacht Bayesian was knocked sideways by a sudden 80mph gust and started taking in water. 6 6 6 As the boat sank rapidly, his wife Angela Bacares was pulled to safety by a crew member — but Lynch, their 18-year-old daughter Hannah and five others on board never made it out. Now, as the one-year anniversary approaches next month, 58-year-old businesswoman Angela is facing a financial battle. There is the potential of court action by the families of the victims who died on the yacht — and earlier this week, the UK's High Court ruled that her husband's estate owes US tech giant Hewlett-Packard more than £700million relating to fraud claims. The case was brought six years ago by HP after they acquired his company Autonomy in 2011. The firm claimed Lynch and the former chief financial officer had fraudulently inflated its value. While Lynch was facing court action in America, HP was already chasing him through the civil courts in Britain — leading to this week's damages ruling. The High Court ruled that HP had paid a lot more than it would have done 'had Autonomy's true financial position been correctly presented' during the sale. If his estate — which goes to Angela and her remaining daughter Esme, 22 — ends up having to pay, it will almost certainly be bankrupted, leaving no inheritance for the family. It is believed Lynch shielded his wife's personal fortune from the messy court cases. She owned millions of pounds worth of shares held in her name in other family firms. I found doomed Bayesian I saw still haunts me And she made more than £15million from the sale of her shares when Autonomy was taken over. One pal told us: 'Mike wasn't perfect but he wasn't a criminal in any way, shape or form. He had asked various Cabinet ministers and Prime Ministers, including Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson, to help him. 'Rishi and Johnson were more interested in making post- Brexit trade deals than making any trouble on Mike's behalf. 'Rishi and Johnson were more interested in making post-Brexit trade deals than making any trouble on Mike's behalf. 'These cases hung over him for years and he ended up under house arrest in San Francisco unable to leave for months, facing charges that he was ultimately cleared of. 'He helped a lot of people make a lot of money but they assumed he was guilty as charged and then ran a million miles. 'He was abandoned by his peer group and by his government then, when he won his US case, everyone wanted to be his friend again. 'The irony is he had gone out on the Bayesian to celebrate the US court outcome. "It's been one tragedy after another for his family.' The latest damages ruling had been delayed until this week because of the circumstances surrounding the yachting disaster on August 19 last year. The judge expressed his 'sorrow at the devastating turn of events' at sea and offered 'sympathy and deepest condolences'. 'STILL GRIEVING' He even said that he 'admired' Lynch, despite ruling against him. Insiders have told The Sun that the family want to appeal the High Court decision. Our source said: 'It's not just about money, it's about restoring Mike's reputation. "The family are considering their next move but we all know that appealing these sorts of decisions is lengthy and costly. "They are also still grieving their loss.' Lynch created software company Autonomy, which processed people's information and data, in 1996. He sold it to Hewlett-Packard for £8.6billion in 2011. The businessman reportedly netted around £500million from the deal before going on to set up tech investment firm Invoke Capital. Just a year after the mega-bucks deal, HP wrote down Autonomy's value by £6.5billion and brought a £4billion lawsuit against Lynch and ex-finance officer Sushovan Hussain. The allegations that they inflated the value of the company were investigated by the UK Serious Fraud Office too, who found 'insufficient evidence' of wrongdoing — but some aspects of the case were then handed over to US authorities. In 2018, Lynch and Autonomy's former vice-president of finance Stephen Chamberlain were charged with fraud in the US and accused of making false and misleading statements about their company. But both were acquitted following a sensational three-month trial in San Francisco, where Lynch had been extradited to in 2023. If Lynch had been found guilty, he would have faced up to 25 years in prison. 6 He told reporters last year that given his poor health, he would have almost certainly died in jail. The pair were still celebrating their win when Chamberlain, 52, died after being hit by a car while out running near his home in Cambridgeshire. Two days later, the Bayesian sank off the coast of Sicily, claiming the lives of Lynch, Hannah, the vessel's cook Recaldo Thomas, high-profile US lawyer Chris Morvillo, his wife Neda and British banking couple Jonathan and Judy Bloomer. As part of a criminal investigation by Italian authorities, the yacht was raised from the sea bed last month. That inquiry may not conclude until 2027, bringing more heartache for the Lynch family. James Healy-Pratt, a US lawyer representing the family of chef Recaldo, said they would push for compensation from Angela, the crew and yacht management company Camper & Nicholsons. As one of the country's most successful entrepreneurs, Lynch had a life of luxury, enjoying exotic holidays and a £6milliion country mansion in Suffolk, which boasts 2,500 acres. The close family are said to have loved spending time at home, breeding rare livestock, including Suffolk sheep and Gloucestershire Old Spot pigs, which roamed free in the estate's woodland. But the businessman came from humble beginnings. Born to Irish parents — a firefighter father and nurse mother — Lynch won a scholarship to a private school in Essex. Mike worked hard but was very much a family man and wanted to make life as normal for his children as it could be, given the extreme wealth Andrew Kanter He went on to gain a PhD in mathematical computing from Cambridge University. A friend said: 'He really was a genius. "He was just a brilliant mathematician and his life transformed as he built companies. 'He was a very early advocate of artificial intelligence — the very field in which we need expertise in this country.' Long-time friend Andrew Kanter, who was a pallbearer at Lynch's funeral, said: 'He was never happier than when someone asked to see the pigs on his estate. 'Mike worked hard but was very much a family man and wanted to make life as normal for his children as it could be, given the extreme wealth. 'He never let his legal issues get in the way and did everything to make sure his kids grew up untroubled by whatever the world lay at his feet.' 'I truly believe that Mike would have looked at the UK ruling as a good day. "Although the numbers are crazy, even the judge has found that Hewlett-Packard had overstated its claim. 'Mike would have continued to fight this. "He always argued that a law that allows America to extradite British citizens and not have a return agreement was really flawed. 'It's been the case for 15 years and he was going to have that fight too. 'The legal issues weighed heavily on him but he never let it affect his family. 'I never saw him sitting around self-pitying. He wanted to clear his name. 'The loss of Mike is an incalculable loss for technology. 'He was utterly devoted to its growth in Britain.' 6 6
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Top Boy actor charged with raping woman
A Bafta-winning actor who starred in Netflix drama Top Boy is facing multiple sex assault and rape charges. Micheal Ward, 27, played Jamie in the award-winning series, which depicted tensions between fictional London gangs. On Friday, the Metropolitan Police said Ward, of Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, was facing two counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault. All five offences are reported to have taken place in January 2023 and relate to the same woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons. Detective Superintendent Scott Ware, whose team is leading the Met's investigation, said: 'Our specialist officers continue to support the woman who has come forward - we know investigations of this nature can have a significant impact on those who make reports.' Ward, who was born in Spanish Town, Jamaica, moved to Hackney, east London, at the age of four. As well as receiving critical acclaim for his role in Top Boy in 2019, Ward also won a Bafta Rising Star award for his performance in the 2019 film Blue Story. He is due to star in the American film Eddington alongside Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal, which is due to be released in the UK next month. Ward is set to appear at Thames Magistrates' Court on Thursday, August 28. Catherine Baccas, deputy chief crown prosecutor for CPS London South, said: 'Having carefully reviewed a file of evidence, the Crown Prosecution Service has authorised the Metropolitan Police to charge Micheal Ward, 27, with two counts of rape, two counts of assault by penetration, and one count of sexual assault against a woman in January 2023. 'He will appear at Thames Magistrates' Court on Thursday, 28 August 2025. 'We remind all concerned that proceedings against the suspect are active and he has a right to a fair trial. 'It is vital that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.'
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Odey High Court legal claims to be tried together, judge rules
Crispin Odey will have his multimillion pound High Court libel case against the Financial Times tried at the same time as a legal claim lodged against him by five women over denied misconduct accusations, a judge has said. The hedge fund manager is suing the publication for at least £79 million in damages over four articles published in 2023, which contained allegations he had sexually assaulted multiple women, something he denies. The FT is defending the libel claim, arguing its reporting is substantially true and in the public interest. Mr Odey is also defending separate legal action brought against him by five women over alleged misconduct between 1995 and 2023, including one who has accused him of rape. On Friday, Mrs Justice Heather Williams said it was 'incumbent on the court' to avoid the 'undesirable scenario of there being two lengthy trials' on the same issues and the 'duplication of time, effort and costs'. She said that having one trial was 'the best option, or it might be said, the least worst option' to resolve the claims. Reading out her ruling on preliminary issues in the two claims, she said that one trial would also avoid the 'highly undesirable' need for the five women, who are also witnesses in the libel claim, and Mr Odey to give evidence twice. The four articles at the centre of the libel claim were published between June and July 2023. The FT claimed in June that year that it had spoken to '13 women who said they had been abused by Odey', and in July said a further six had made allegations that he 'sexually assaulted or harassed them'. Mr Odey, who previously told the FT the allegations were 'rubbish', left his position at Odey Asset Management (OAM), the hedge fund he founded, days after they were published. OAM, which was founded in 1991, was then wound down after several banks cut ties after the accusations first came to light, although it remained a registered company. Records from Companies House, the UK's official register, showed that Mr Odey was reappointed a director of the firm in late September last year. Mr Odey was first sued by some of the women in 2023, and launched the libel claim in May 2024. In documents related to the libel battle filed at the High Court, seen by the PA news agency, Mr Odey's lawyers claimed he had suffered a 'very significant financial loss' as a result of the articles, but that he 'will limit his claim to the sum of £79 million'.
