STEVE HILTON: Gavin Newsom leaves an unexpected legacy in California
"You need to get out of there -- move to somewhere less crazy!"
Or: "Why do they keep voting for that (fill in your curse word of choice…)?"
Well, here's the good news: the answers to those two questions are now coming together in a beautiful and positive prospect: real political change in the Golden State.
My answer to the first question is typically: "Why should we leave? This is my home! I'm raising my family here; I started a business here. Yes, our terrible government has turned everything into a disaster right now, but I love California. It's not us who should leave, but the people who did this to our state! The Democrat politicians: they need to leave office."
Then combine that with how I'm now answering the second question, about why people still vote for the same old you-know-what: "Actually, they're starting to vote differently."
Look at the city of Huntington Beach in Orange County, the iconic 'Surf City USA.'
Just over four years ago, a friend of mine, long-time California Republican Tony Strickland (now a newly-elected State Senator), put together a slate of four energetic candidates to challenge Democrat dominance of the city council.
They pulled it off, taking control 4-3 in the midterm elections in 2022. They went on to implement common-sense conservative policies on crime, homelessness, and what's taught in schools. They even introduced and passed a local ballot initiative on voter ID.
Guess what? In last November's elections, they pulled off a stunning clean sweep. The "MAGAnificent Seven", as they called themselves, won every seat. Huntington Beach went from 6-1 Democrat control to 7-0 Republican.
There were other signs in 2024 that a political revolution may be brewing.
Nearly a fifth of California's counties (10 out of 58) flipped from blue to red in 2024 including Fresno, the state's fifth largest city.
Proposition 36 (which reversed some of the worst parts of former Vice President and California Attorney General Kamala Harris' disastrous pro-crime Prop 47 from a few years earlier) passed with over 70% support. Soros-backed DAs like George Gascon in L.A. were kicked out.
Ballot initiatives to raise the minimum wage, impose rent control and raise taxes were defeated.
And of course, President Donald Trump did better in California than any Republican presidential candidate for decades.
Republican voter registration has also been increasing while Democrat registration has been falling.
And all of this was happening before the catastrophic Los Angeles wildfires, which showed so many people the terrible consequences of what I call the new DEI: Democrat Extremism and Incompetence.
It is Gov. Gavin Newsom who has presided over all this. He's the one that enabled years of far-left insanity that gave California the highest poverty rate in America, the most expensive housing, gas, electricity and water, the highest unemployment, lowest income growth and worst business climate.
The public schools are a disaster, homelessness continues to spiral out of control, the California Dream is out of reach and the fire hydrants are out of water.
On Newsom's watch, California has gone from being America's crown jewel to its worst-run state. No fair-minded person could come to any other conclusion.
It's all laid out in my new book Califailure, along with the accompanying Fox Nation special. You should read the book: it's a warning not to let this happen in your state. It shows exactly how the Democrats did it -- and how to stop it.
But the second part of my book is called Califuture. In it, I lay out a positive, practical plan for turning things around. Commonsense policies that will stop the insane government bloat and nanny state bossiness that is making life a misery for every small business and every family.
Of course, it will only happen if we actually end the Democrats' disastrous one-party rule and elect Republicans to statewide office, like we used to before government unions and far left activists got their stranglehold on power.
Thanks to the sheer scale of "Califailure," with zero sign of any concrete action from the Democrats to clean up the mess they made, Republicans, for the first time in two decades, really do have a shot at winning in 2026. A recent poll showed that 48% of Californians would vote for a Republican governor.
So, there you are: this could well be Gavin Newsom's greatest legacy: flipping California red!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Buttigieg: Approach to transgender rights ‘starts with compassion'
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Democrats should approach transgender rights, including eligibility requirements for trans athletes, 'with compassion' during an interview aired early Monday with NPR's 'Morning Edition.' Buttigieg, who confirmed in May that he is weighing a bid for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination after passing on a Senate run in Michigan, was asked about his messaging on transgender rights in response to remarks from former Obama White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel that diminished trans identities. Emanuel, a Democrat and former Chicago mayor, has also said he is considering a 2028 presidential bid. 'Your approach starts with compassion — compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them,' Buttigieg, who ran unsuccessfully for the 2020 Democratic nomination, told host Steve Inskeep on Monday. 'And I think when you do that, that does call into question some of the past orthodoxies in my party, for example, around sports, where I think most reasonable people would recognize that there are serious fairness issues if you just treat this as not mattering when a trans athlete wants to compete in women's sports,' Buttigieg said. 'Meaning the parent who has complained about this has a case,' Inskeep interjected. 'Sure,' Buttigieg said. 'And that's why I think these decisions should be in the hands of sports leagues and school boards and not politicians. Least of all, politicians in Washington trying to use this as a political pawn.' Buttigieg's stance on transgender athletes echoes that of other potential Democratic candidates for the 2028 presidential election. In May, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said the party should be more open to hearing legitimate concerns about trans students participating in girls' and women's sports, similarly advocating for compassion and a hands-off approach from Washington. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), seen as a top contender for the 2028 nomination, said in March that he found transgender girls and women competing on female sports teams 'deeply unfair.' He later said he would be open to a conversation about limiting their participation in California if such a discussion were conducted 'in a way that's respectful and responsible and could find a kind of balance.' Newsom applauded a pilot program announced last month by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports in the state, allowing more girls to qualify for California's track-and-field championship in events where a transgender student-athlete also qualified. The issue is likely to play out on the campaign trail. Roughly two-thirds of Americans said in a recent Gallup poll that they support policies preventing transgender people from participating on sports teams that match their gender identity. On Monday, Buttigieg said he disagrees with the Trump administration's approach to transgender athletes, which includes a sweeping executive order stating that the U.S. opposes 'male competitive participation in women's sports' and more than two dozen federal investigations into states, universities, school districts and athletic associations that continue to allow trans women and girls to compete on teams that match their gender identity. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee updated its eligibility rules last week to exclude transgender female athletes, citing Trump's order. The NCAA barred trans women from competition in February, shortly after Trump issued the order on trans athletes. President Trump and administration officials have refused to use the word 'transgender' in orders and policies related to transgender Americans, routinely referring to trans women as 'biological males' and 'men.' An executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office proclaims the federal government recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female. 'I think that chess is different from weightlifting, and weightlifting is different from volleyball, and, you know, middle school is different from the Olympics,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'So, that's exactly why I think that we shouldn't be grandstanding on this as politicians. We should be empowering communities and organizations and schools to make the right decisions.' Buttigieg, who is gay, has criticized other recent moves by the Trump administration that target transgender Americans, including a Department of Defense policy that took effect last month barring trans people from serving openly in the military. 'Deep down, I have to believe that most Americans get that whatever group happens to be disfavored at the moment, and it's always somebody, that the kinds of politicians — left, right or center — that get ahead by stepping on their faces, nothing good comes of that,' Buttigieg said at a VoteVets Action Fund town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in May, responding to a question about Democratic messaging on transgender rights. In February, Iowa became the first state to remove anti-discrimination protections for a previously protected class when it struck safeguards for transgender people from its civil rights code. 'There's a perception that Democrats became so focused on identity that we no longer had a message that could actually speak to people across the board, or that we were only for you if you fit into a certain identity bucket,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'And the tragedy of that is that I believe the right kind of Democratic vision is one that lifts everybody up — it pays specific attention to discrimination or mistreatment of people because they're Black or because they're women or LGBTQ or whatever reason that might be. But you don't have to be in this particular combination of categories to benefit from what we have to offer.'
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth signs agreement to accept Qatar plane donation: Reports
The United States and Qatar are days away from finalizing an agreement for a Boeing jet that will be used as Air Force One, after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and his Qatari counterpart earlier this month signed an agreement outlining the terms of Qatar's 'unconditional donation,' multiple outlets have reported. The Washington Post first reported that the U.S. and Qatar are expected to finalize an agreement next week — even as the Pentagon months ago said the deal was complete — and that an outline on the terms of the deal was signed on July 7 by Hegseth and Saoud bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, Qatar's deputy prime minister and minister of state for defense affairs. That document states that the plane is a 'bona fide gift' to the Defense Department and that the U.S. will pay nothing to Qatar for its transfer. 'This donation is made in good faith and in the spirit of cooperation and mutual support between the parties,' the document states, as reported by CNN. 'Nothing in this [memorandum of understanding] is, or shall be interpreted or construed as, an offer, promise, or acceptance of any form of bribery, undue influence, or corrupt practice.' The memorandum further emphasizes the transfer of the plane is 'not connected or otherwise related to any governmental decision and, as such, is not made, offered, promised or accepted because of any past, present or future official act or decision and is not intended to obtain or retain any improper advantage or to influence any official decision.' The Hill reached out to the Pentagon, which declined to comment. The Pentagon on May 21 announced that it officially accepted the 13-year-old luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, seen by President Trump as a supplement to the aging Air Force One fleet. The controversial gift was first announced ahead of Trump's visit to the Middle East in early May, with the commander-in-chief claiming that the plane — one of the largest foreign gifts ever accepted by a U.S. president — can be used as a stand-in for the aging Air Force One fleet as delays continue in Boeing's refurbishment of the two 747 aircraft purchased during Trump's first term. But the transfer has been heavily criticized by both Democrat and Republican U.S. lawmakers, who say it raises ethical and corruption questions in addition to costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit the plane into a secure and working Air Force One. Trump has repeatedly described the plane as a 'gift' and 'free of charge,' but American taxpayers will still foot the bill for the Air Force to retrofit the plane, a costly process given it must be stripped nearly to the studs to install the required security and communications equipment. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink last month optimistically estimated that the retrofit job will cost 'less than $400 million,' but aviation experts and engineers have placed the figure at as much as $1 billion or more. To fund the retrofit, the Air Force has plans to pull hundreds of millions of dollars from the Sentinel program — an over-budget and over-schedule upgrade to America's nuclear-equipped missiles — to an unspecified classified project believed to be the Air Force One upgrade. The aircraft is currently sitting in San Antonio as it awaits its retrofit.
Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Sherrod Brown met with Schumer in Ohio amid 2026 Senate push
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and former Sen. Sherrod Brown met in Ohio this weekend, as Brown weighs a possible comeback bid to flip a GOP Senate seat in the state, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Schumer has lobbied Brown for months to run. Fresh off a major recruiting victory in North Carolina, he wants to expand that luck to Ohio. Brown, 72, lost re-election last year, and is considering both a Senate and gubernatorial bid in Ohio, according to sources familiar with his thinking. The former three-term Democratic senator is likely his party's best chance at running a competitive 2026 campaign in the state. Former Vice President Kamala Harris lost Ohio last year by over 10 points. Brown lost by just under four points. The big picture: Schumer has limited pickup opportunities in the Senate next year. Hitting recruitment home runs could help him expand that map. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) on Monday announced he would run for Senate. Axios scooped last week that Cooper was planning to enter the race, which was a priority for Schumer and co. Democrats are also hopeful that Maine Gov. Janet Mills will decide to run for Senate next year, challenging Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine.) for the seat. Zoom in: While party insiders see Ohio as a stretch target for Democrats, Brown's entrance would instantly shift those dynamics. He'd face Republican Jon Husted, who was appointed to fill the vacant seat created when JD Vance resigned from the Senate to serve as vice president. Between the lines: Since leaving office, Brown has launched a pro-workers organization that promotes understanding the lives of American workers. And since his loss last year, Brown has made the case in public columns that the Democratic Party must reconnect with the working class. "It is an electoral and a moral imperative, and it will be my mission for the rest of my life," Brown wrote in a March column for The New Republic. "To win the White House and governing majorities again, Democrats must reckon with how far our party has strayed from our New Deal roots, in terms of both our philosophy toward the economy, and the makeup of our coalition," he added.
