Tens of thousands defy Hungary's ban on Pride in protest against Orbán
Tens of thousands of people have taken to the streets of Budapest in defiance of the Hungarian government's ban on Pride, heeding a call by the city's mayor to 'come calmly and boldly to stand together for freedom, dignity and equal rights'.
Jubilant crowds packed into the city's streets on Saturday, waving Pride flags and signs that mocked the country's prime minister, Viktor Orbán, as their peaceful procession inched forward at a snail's pace.
Organisers estimated that a record number of people turned up, far outstripping the expected turnout of 35,000-40,000 people.
'We believe there are 180,000 to 200,000 people attending,' the president of Pride, Viktória Radványi told AFP. 'It is hard to estimate because there have never been so many people at Budapest Pride.'
The mass demonstration against the government was a bittersweet marking of Budapest Pride's 30th anniversary; while the turnout on Saturday was expected to reach record levels, it had come after the government had doubled down on its targeting of the country's LGBTQ+ community.
'We came because they tried to ban it,' said Timi, 49. The Hungarian national was marching with her daughter, Zsófi, 23, who had travelled from her home in Barcelona to join the rally.
After the ruling Fidesz party, led by the rightwing populist Orbán, fast-tracked a law that made it an offence to hold or attend events that involve the 'depiction or promotion' of homosexuality to minors, many Hungarians vowed to show their disapproval by attending Pride for the first time.
Viki Márton was among those who had made good on the promise, turning up with her nine-year-old daughter.
The pair had come equipped with hats, water spray, and a swimsuit, more worried about heat than rightwing protesters. 'I want her to see the reality,' said Márton. 'And I'm so excited to be here!'
Earlier this month, police announced they would follow the government's orders and ban the march. The progressive mayor of Budapest, Gergely Karácsony, was swift to respond, saying that the march would instead go ahead as a separate municipal event, with Karácsony describing it as a way to circumvent the need for official authorisation.
On Saturday, the mayor reiterated why the city had decided to host the event, hinting at how the march had become a symbol of discontent against a government that has long faced criticism for weakening democratic institutions and gradually undermining the rule of law.
'The government is always fighting against an enemy against which they have to protect Hungarian people,' said Karácsony.
'This time, it is sexual minorities that are the target … we believe there should be no first and second class citizens, so we decided to stand by this event.'
Akos Horvath, 18, who had travelled two hours from his city in southern Hungary to take part in the march, described it as an event of 'symbolic importance'.
Speaking to news agency AFP, he added: 'It's not just about representing gay people, but about standing up for the rights of the Hungarian people.'
The sentiment was echoed by fellow marcher Eszter Rein-Bódi. 'This is about much more, not just about homosexuality,' Rein-Bódi told Reuters 'This is the last moment to stand up for our rights.'
Tens of thousands of Hungarians, including senior citizens and parents with their children, plus politicians and campaigners from 30 countries, took to the streets on Saturday, despite Orbán's warning on Friday that those who attend or organise the march will face 'legal consequences'.
The Hungarian prime minister sought to minimise concerns over violence, however, saying that Hungary was a 'civilised country' and police would not 'break it up … It cannot reach the level of physical abuse'.
Still, in a video posted to social media this week, the country's justice minister, Bence Tuzson, warned the Budapest mayor that organising a banned event or encouraging people to attend is punishable by up to a year in prison.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
Speaking to reporters on Friday, the mayor brushed off the threat and downplayed concerns that police would later impose heavy fines on attende s. 'Police have only one task tomorrow: to guarantee the safety and security of those gathered at the event,' said Karácsony.
The potential for violence had been amplified after three groups with ties to the extreme right said they were planning counter-marches. As the Pride march got under way, local news site Telex reported that the route of the march had to be changed after one of these groups blocked off a bridge.
Analysts had described the government's bid to crackdown on Pride as part of a wider effort to curb democratic freedoms ahead of a hotly contested national election next year.
Orbán is facing an unprecedented challenge from a former member of the Fidesz party's elite, Péter Magyar, leading Pride organisers to suggest they are being scapegoated as Orbán scrambles to shore up support among conservative voters.
Orbán's government had also prompted concerns across Hungary and beyond after it said it would use facial recognition software to identify people attending any banned events, potentially fining them up to €500 (£425).
Ahead of the march, as campaigners scrambled for clarity on whether or how this technology would be used, AFP reported that newly installed cameras had appeared on the lamp-posts that dotted the planned route.
The threat had been enough to rattle some. Elton, 30, a Brazilian living in Hungary wore a hat and sunglasses as he took part on Saturday, explaining that he had been worried about jeopardising his job and immigration status, but that his Hungarian boyfriend had persuaded him to attend.
'This is my second time at Pride, but the first time I feel insecure about it,' he said.
Mici, a 21-year-old Budapest resident, said she had attended Pride marches in the past but this time had weighed whether to join in after she was spooked by reports of the facial recognition system.
'At first, I was scared to come out because of the news, but I feel safe with so many people.'
She hoped that the massive turnout for the march would be enough to push the Orbán government to change its stance.
'I think the crowd that has come from across Europe, the record numbers, will make Hungarian people see that this cause is well-supported.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: If ever we needed an effective opposition to rout Labour, it's now
Is there no limit to the price Britain must pay for having given Keir Starmer 's Labour Party a chance a year ago? This is rapidly becoming one of the worst governments in modern history. Some of its hopelessness and nastiness was predictable. Labour signalled loudly to its more militant supporters that it planned a class-war attack on private education. Other plans were buried deep in the small print. Or they were hinted at by the choice of ministers to carry them out. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, for instance, had disclosed to all who paid attention to her writings that she was gripped by Left-wing dogmas. She professed to revere the Cambridge eccentric Joan Robinson, who spent much of her career admiring the disastrous policies of Maoist China and North Korea. Later we discovered that she was inexperienced as well. Did Sir Keir Starmer realise this, or was he also beguiled by her dubious claims that she had spent a decade working as an economist at the Bank of England? It appears he has now decided to leave her in place to absorb as much as possible of the derision and dissent which her policies have brought about – a cruel revenge, if so. As her next duty will almost certainly be a huge stealth tax rise, achieved by failing to raise thresholds in line with inflation, he will no doubt prefer to let her take the punishment for that too. But this will not protect him from the general civil war which he began by permitting ill-planned attempts to slash the winter fuel allowance and cut welfare payments. Did he really not grasp that his huge new parliamentary party was full of men and women who are profoundly, emotionally committed to spending other people's money on a grand scale? Perhaps not. Sir Keir's own politics are something of a mystery, even to him. The sense of a man floundering between vague principles and a definite desire to stay in office is very strong. For example, he now says that he deeply r egrets describing Britain as an 'island of strangers', which many took as an echo of the late Enoch Powell's 1968 speech about immigration. He claims not to have read it properly before delivering it – a ridiculous thing for a Prime Minister to say. This retraction of his own scripted words must surely be the end of his attempt to save his bacon by trying to copy Reform UK. He also claims to be sorry about an earlier pessimistic speech about the economy, saying: 'We were so determined to show how bad it was that we forgot people wanted something to look forward to as well.' But do they have anything to look forward to, apart from an intensifying civil war between Sir Keir and his traditionally Leftist deputy Angela Rayner? Sir Keir and Ms Rayner are like two opponents grappling with each other on the edge of a precipice. The danger is that they will both fall together, leaving the country to suffer. As things stand, we could have four more years of this unsuccessful and increasingly divided government. It is vital that those who are opposed to its policies coalesce quickly into a coherent and effective opposition, which can both hold Labour to account and prepare to replace it with a competent pro-British government ready to step in, stop the rot and undo as much of the damage as possible.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
As the BBC airs punk band's shocking chants, STEVE POLLARD asks: Has baiting Jews become the new national pastime?
The Glastonbury music festival bills itself as a celebration of all that is good in the world, with great artists communing with a crowd of 200,000 self-styled progressives, for whom the festival is a chance to wallow in their own goodness and smug sense of superiority. But nothing better illustrates the darkness that has entered the soul of today's progressives than the crowd's response yesterday to punk duo Bob Vylan, whose screams of 'Free, free Palestine ' and 'Death, death to the IDF' were chanted back with such fervour that the scene was like a 2025 version of Hitler's Nuremberg Rallies. The chant was 'Death, death to the IDF', but what they meant – because the IDF is the army of the world's only Jewish state – was 'Death, death to the Jews'. Imagine being a Jew at Glastonbury, knowing that you are hated by almost everyone around you. In Sasha Baron Cohen's satirical film, Borat, the character describes a game, 'Hunt the Jew'. Everyone laughed at that when the film came out in 2006. But yesterday's Glastonbury chanting showed that its satire is all too pointed. Imagine, I ask you, being a Jew in Britain. In the 20 months since 1,200 Jews were massacred by Hamas in Israel, the UK has seen a leap in anti-Semitic incidents. Between January and June last year there was a 41 per cent increase in assaults on Jews. But that is almost the least of it. The biggest impact in Britain of the October 7 attack has been the unleashing of this torrent of Jew-hate – the likes of which we saw yesterday. Every other week there are hate marches in London and elsewhere with chants to ' globalise the intifada' – to kill Jews, in other words. There is open support for Hamas and Hezbollah, not least by Kneecap, another band performing at Glastonbury. There is pure hatred and poison. But for Jews in Britain, the real point about all this is the double standard. Can you imagine if someone had stood on that stage and screamed 'Death to Muslims'? There would certainly – and quite rightly – have been anger from the crowd. But when it is Jews who are the target, they cheer. And where are the police? Whatever your views of Lucy Connolly's imprisonment after her Southport riot tweets, the double standard is shocking. The lead singer of Bob Vylan incited a mob. Will he be arrested, charged and prosecuted? There is, I suggest, not the slightest chance if the past 20 months of open anti-Semitism is anything to go by. For those who make a regular pilgrimage to Glastonbury, it is more than just a music festival – is a carnival of light and peace. Not for Jews. Palestinian flags fly everywhere. Leaders of Palestine Action – shortly and rightly to be proscribed as a terrorist organisation – are given a platform to spread their bile. The now infamous Kneecap rapper J J O Dochartaigh wore a 'We are all Palestine Action' T-shirt on stage and led a Free Palestine chant. Glastonbury, in reality, reflects the state of modern progressivism – a poisonous cocktail of anti-Israeli prejudice, support for Islamist terror and a moral calculus so warped that Nazi-style chanting is seen as upstanding and worthy.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour considers copying Macron's net zero housing laws
Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner are considering copying French laws that impose strict net zero limits on housebuilders. The Cabinet duo are exploring whether to adopt Emmanuel Macron's green approach, which has driven up construction costs by around a fifth. In 2022, France introduced a law setting limits for how much carbon buildings should produce over their lifetime, including their construction. It comes as Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, faces an uphill battle to fulfil Labour's manifesto promise to build 1.5 million new homes by 2030. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'Adopting French-style regulations would seriously undermine house-building efforts in the UK. 'Already, Labour's tax policies, reduction in housing starts and failure to control our borders are pricing British families out of the market. This latest proposal would only make things worse, leaving hard-working people with less chance of owning a home. 'Above all, it highlights once again the recklessness of Labour's unrealistic net zero targets. This must not go ahead.' Mr Macron's reforms have proven controversial, being blamed for driving up construction costs, thwarting development and causing house prices to stagnate. Under the scheme, the limits are gradually ratcheted down. They were toughened at the start of this year, with the next change scheduled for 2028. But amid mounting criticism, ministers in Paris are attempting to backtrack and have ordered a review of the planned level for three years time. Valérie Létard, the French housing minister, said there was a need to find a better 'balance of standards' that 'allow for faster projects', adding: 'Urban planning and housing must serve our citizens and not be a source of administrative bottlenecks or a drop in purchasing power.' In a note issued last year, BCG, a leading consulting firm, said the regulations had sparked 'a dramatic effect on construction costs and property values'. 'In new build, the rules require companies to use more energy-efficient materials and equipment,' experts from the company wrote. 'As a result, the cost of constructing a new building has risen by an estimated 10-20 per cent, significantly slowing demand.' The firm said the new regulations had also exacerbated concerns about a value gap opening up between new homes and older, less energy-efficient ones. Despite the criticisms, officials at both Mr Miliband's and Ms Rayner's departments confirmed they were looking at introducing similar rules in the UK. The net zero department, run by Mr Miliband, quietly revealed that it was looking at the French-style reforms in a paper published last week. A Government spokesman insisted no decision has been taken on whether to go ahead. Any changes would come on top of other controversial net zero reforms that have been driven through by Labour ministers. They include the planned introduction of a 'glass tax' that is set to push up the cost of a bottle of wine by 9p and beer by 4p. Mr Miliband is also considering proposals to shift green levies from electricity bills to gas ones, pushing up the cost of central heating. The Home Builders Federation, the trade association for housebuilders, said the UK industry was already building more energy-efficient homes and cautioned against extra regulation. Rhodri Williams, its technical director, said: 'As we look to increase housebuilding to address our chronic housing shortage, and address the failings in the planning system that have for too long resulted in endless delays and additional costs for construction projects generally, any moves to add further potentially significant restrictions on construction need to be carefully considered. 'Adding yet more costs into housebuilding, on top of the other recent major increases for, amongst other things, solar panels, biodiversity net gain, the building safety levy, and employee costs would make even more sites unviable to develop and potentially slash housebuilding across the country.' Ms Rayner, who has fronted the pledge, is under growing pressure amid a widespread expectation that she will not be able to deliver the target of 1.5 million new homes across the course of this Parliament. Despite sweeping changes to planning rules, housebuilding slowed down by 14 per cent last year, according to the British Property Federation. Asked about the prospect of the new net zero limits, a spokesman for the Ministry of Housing said: 'No decisions have been made on this. We are currently considering the right approach to embodied carbon in new buildings, and will ensure that our plans do not block development. 'We are taking decisive action to speed up the planning process and deliver our stretching target of 1.5 million homes through our Plan for Change, with work already being driven through our seismic planning reforms and landmark Planning and Infrastructure Bill.'
