logo
GPU firms step up their tech stack

GPU firms step up their tech stack

Time of India13-05-2025
Indian AI cloud and GPU-as-a-service companies such as Neysa, JarvisLabs and NeevCloud are altering strategies as AI market dynamics shift. While Neysa continues to invest in advanced GPUs to double down on inferencing, others such as JarvisLabs and NeevCloud are taking a step back and not buying any more GPUs. Instead, they are focusing on building the software stack.The reasons for this range from low utilisation of high-end GPUs, high capital investment required for purchasing them and better and cheaper access to such chips in recent times. In addition GPUs are capital intensive and unless startups have raised enough funds, it is a risky business. While training and fine-tuning of large language models is yet to pick up at scale, companies are also focusing on inferencing, a process in which trained AI models use the data to predict, reason, or solve problems.
The GPU issue
Vishnu Subramanian, founder of Jarvislabs AI, which offers
GPU rental
and
AI cloud services
, explained that one of the reasons they bought GPUs in 2019 was that back then no one else was buying them and costs were exorbitant. Jarvislabs offered the service at an economical price to startups and the student community in the country. But with more companies entering the field in India and globally, costs have plummeted.
'The rental prices and margins at which you can rent has significantly gone down. For example, on-demand H100 (an Nvidia GPU) used to cost $11-12 a year back. Now you can get them for less than $3 from a decent cloud service provider,' he said.
India's appetite for spending on high-end GPUs has declined. 'Even within Jarvislabs, we see a bigger chunk of revenue coming from the West,' Subramanian said. As a result, the company stopped buying GPUs a year ago and is partnering with global players to offer processing capacity.
The Tech stack focus
In addition, Jarvislabs is also focusing on building the orchestration layer. This refers to systems that manage multiple AI components by streamlining the process, scaling and bringing in efficiency. NeevCloud founder Narendra Sen said it began with a plan to build the CoreWeave of India. It started out renting GPUs and then entered orchestration and application layers.
'But we realised that GPUs are a commodity and you need to build a technology for consumer stickiness and provide value beyond the GPU such as improving chip performance,' he said. As a result, NeevCloud, instead of bulking up on GPUs, is taking a call to buy them based on demand. 'This is only 10-20%,' he added. The firm did not disclose the scale of GPU operations, but this had been a key strategy earlier.
Sharad Sanghi, co-founder of Neysa, an AI cloud platform, said some companies are not focusing on GPUs as they are capital intensive and, unless they have money, it is a risky business. Neysa has so far deployed 1,200 GPUs and is in talks to place further orders for advanced chips including Nvidia Blackwells, expected in India later this year. This backs up the company's focus on inferencing-as-a-service.
Sanghi said that with (Indic) foundational models such as Sarvam coming, there will be use cases for training and finetuning. While the firm was doing all three earlier—training, finetuning and inferencing, Sanghi said the enterprise space is going to be more of a market focused on the latter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries

This is an AI image. United States is working toward an interim trade agreement with India that could reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, giving the country a more favorable position compared to other countries in the region. Unlike many nations, India is not expected to receive a formal tariff hike notice this week, and the agreement may be announced through an official statement, Bloomberg reported, quoting sources. The proposed interim trade deal between the two nations would allow both the sides to continue negotiations, giving India time to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement expected later this year, the source added. India, US near trade deal. What happens next if New Delhi joins Trump's shortlist? The planned agreement is likely to set a baseline tariff of under 20%, down from the 26% initially proposed, with provisions to allow further adjustments as part of a final pact. However, the exact timeline for the interim deal remains uncertain. If finalised, India would likely join a select group of nations that have reached trade arrangements with the Trump administration. In contrast, several other countries were hit with surprise tariff hikes of up to 50% this week, ahead of the August 1 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 기미, 레이저말고 이렇게 해보세요 에스테틱최원장 Undo India is pushing for a more favourable deal than the one signed with Vietnam, which included 20% tariffs. Vietnam, caught off guard by the high rate, is now seeking a revision. So far, only the UK has officially signed trade deals with the Trump administration. Earlier on Thursday, Trump told NBC News that he is considering imposing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't yet received specific rates. Currently, the baseline tariff for most US trade partners stands at 10%. For Asian countries, announced rates so far include 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines, and as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar. Despite being among the earliest to initiate trade discussions this year, India-US relations have shown recent tensions. While Trump indicates an imminent agreement, he has also suggested additional tariffs regarding India's BRICS membership. An Indian negotiation team is expected to visit Washington soon to push forward trade talks. India has already made its final offer to the Trump administration and outlined its non-negotiable positions. The key sticking points remain, including the US demand for India to allow genetically modified (GM) crops, something New Delhi has firmly opposed, citing concerns for farmers, while the other unresolved issues include agricultural non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles in the pharmaceutical sector, the source added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

India can deliver 52 GW RTC clean power by 2030, save ₹9,000 crore annually: Report
India can deliver 52 GW RTC clean power by 2030, save ₹9,000 crore annually: Report

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India can deliver 52 GW RTC clean power by 2030, save ₹9,000 crore annually: Report

New Delhi: India can deliver 52 gigawatts (GW) of round-the-clock (RTC) clean electricity by 2030 at a lower cost compared to annually matched clean energy, according to a new analysis by climate think tank TransitionZero. The 52 GW capacity would account for 70 per cent of a hypothetical RTC electricity portfolio designed to meet five per cent of India's national electricity demand. This shift to RTC procurement could result in annual savings of USD 1 billion (approximately ₹9,000 crore) for grid operators by 2030 due to avoided overbuild of generation capacity. According to the report, carbon emissions could be reduced by 2.4 per cent at the system level, with the cost of carbon abatement three times lower than annual matching of clean energy. At full 100 per cent RTC matching, India-wide emissions could be reduced by seven per cent compared to annual matching. RTC clean electricity, or 24/7 carbon-free energy (CFE), matches every hour of electricity consumption with supply from clean sources. The report noted that unlike annual renewable energy certificates, RTC ensures clean power is available consistently across all hours. This is particularly relevant for sectors like heavy industry and data centres, where electricity demand is continuous. 'Our model shows that in India commercial and industrial customers can meet 70 per cent of their hourly electricity demand with carbon-free electricity at a cost below that of annual renewable energy matching, while driving greater levels of decarbonisation and providing significant benefits to the Indian electricity system,' said Irfan Mohamed, South Asia Analyst at TransitionZero. The report highlighted that incentivising RTC electricity procurement is critical for least-cost grid planning. It noted that India can avoid issues being experienced in Europe, where excess solar capacity has contributed to a decline in power purchase agreement (PPA) capture rates, particularly in Spain. 'Round-the-clock clean electricity planning and procurement is a 'no regrets' option for India's energy planners, grid operators, and large corporations,' said Matt Gray, Co-founder and CEO at TransitionZero. 'It shows that companies can procure hourly-matched clean electricity at minimal extra cost, and grid operators can save money through least-cost grid planning. In doing so, governments can help deliver the energy transition at the lowest cost.' The findings come as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) undergoes a multi-year revision, with updates to Scope 2 guidance being considered. Hourly emissions accounting is emerging as a preferred method, though the GHGP does not set targets or rank performance levels.

Reddit Post Warning Indian H-1B Holders Against Buying Homes In US Sparks Debate Online
Reddit Post Warning Indian H-1B Holders Against Buying Homes In US Sparks Debate Online

NDTV

time31 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Reddit Post Warning Indian H-1B Holders Against Buying Homes In US Sparks Debate Online

A Reddit user has sparked a discussion online after warning Indian H-1B visa holders about the risks of owning a house in the US. In the post titled 'Please don't buy a house in this environment', the user who goes by the name 'smokyskyline', highlighted several issues faced by H-1B visa holders, including the financial burden of a mortgage and the unpredictable nature of the US immigration policies. The user also pointed to the instability in the tech sector and "lifestyle inflation" as reasons for concern. "There's a tendency for Indian H1b holders to try to buy a house a few years after they're in the US, in their 30s or so, around the time they're starting a family. There's a strong cultural belief that buying a house is an investment and renting is throwing away money. It's not," the anonymous user wrote. Please don't buy a house in this environment by u/smokyskyline in h1b The Redditor gave three key reasons to support his stance on owning a house while on a temporary work visa. "First, if you run the math on rent vs buy in this environment, rent usually comes on top. Remember, when you are buying, you are also throwing money away- to the bank as mortgage which is primarily interest in the early years. So it's really about the choice of throwing money to the bank vs landlord. Interest rates are high," they wrote. Second, the original poster highlighted lifestyle inflation and its impact on work. "Houses in suburbs typically mean a lot of commute. Less time to work or relax, more time dealing with traffic. And now that you have a house, you'll spend money customising it. You'll look around at your neighbors and start subconsciously start buying more things and more services. And you will resist leaving cities because you don't want to abandon the house you purchased," the user wrote. Lastly, the OP pointed to the instability in the tech sector and the unpredictable nature of US immigration policies as reasons for concern. "The tech environment is way too unstable. Politics follows the same environment. Before you know it, you may lose your job, or the country could be become unfriendlier to H1bs. The stress from a mortgage will be intense. Your company could change its tune any day and you are just a resource," they said. "It feels wrong to not "own", but if you reframe it as paying for the privilege of flexibility and time, it seems a lot better to rent than own. And that is assuming that it's actually more expensive to rent, which it's usually not. Your kids will not care about the difference. And you will be happier," the Redditor concluded. The post has caught the internet's attention, with many users agreeing with the OP. "Even though few may have lucked out, still one of the dumbest move is to buy a house when in H1b and still have a chance to be moved or lose a job," wrote one user. "Listen to this guy! I am the exact guy he described in the post and regret my decision everyday," commented another. "Finally someone said it right. Not worth it at least in the current administration," said a third user. However, some Redditors disagreed, saying that the decision was dependent on the area where one lived or decided to rent vs buy, plus their financial condition, and the housing market. "Owning a house is a necessity. Renting changing houses after every 2-3 years is a lot of work and trouble. Again rent keeps on increasing as per the state of the market. But if you buy a housing loan on a fixed structure with increasing salaries it becomes easier with time. After a certain point you want to settle live in a community," one user wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store