Finalist for vacant Oklahoma Supreme Court seat tied to group that urged voters to create vacancy in the first place
The court vacancy was created in November, when Oklahoma voters narrowly chose to remove a long-serving justice.
As News 4 reported on multiple occasions leading up to the November 2024 election, a dark money group, 'People for Opportunity,' ran a TV ad urging voters to remove three justices from the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Familiar dark money group with Stitt ties behind pro-Stitt tax cuts ad
'Supreme Court Justices Gurich, Kauger, and Edmonson, all three are activist liberal judges,' a narrator said in the ad, which began airing in October 2024. 'You have the power to remove all three.'
News 4 spoke with People for Opportunity's spokesperson, Dave Bond, in October.
'We're talking about one of the three major branches of our state's government,' Bond told News 4 in October. 'A lot of Oklahomans are interested to know that there's still four justices on the state Supreme Court who were appointed by Democrat governors.'
People for Opportunity's ad paid off.
In November, Oklahoma voters chose to remove one of those justices, Yvonne Kauger.
14 people applied to fill Kauger's seat, and earlier this month, Oklahoma's Judicial Nominating Commission (JNC) handed Governor Kevin Stitt a list of three finalists he can choose from to fill the vacant seat.
As News 4 has reported, the JNC is a nonpartisan group made up of lawyers appointed by the Oklahoma Bar Association, as well as people appointed by the governor, the House Speaker, and the Senate President Pro Tem.
Oklahomans voted to amend the state constitution and create the JNC after a bribery scandal plagued the state Supreme Court in the 1960s.
Prior to that, Oklahoma Supreme Court justices were elected by voters, running on the ballot as members of a political party.
Now, rather than Supreme Court seats being elected, qualified candidates can apply with the JNC to be considered to fill a vacant seat.
The JNC reviews applicants and narrows the pool down to a few finalists for the Governor to select from.
Political analyst and occasional co-host of News 4's FlashPoint, Jeff Berrong, says since Oklahoma modeled the JNC after a similar, highly-respected system in Missouri.
'[Now,] Oklahoma in general is regarded as having a very nonpartisan judiciary,' Berrong said.
Among the three finalists the JNC chose for Stitt to fill Kauger's seat are two judges who currently preside over lower courts in the state, one of whom was appointed to their current role by Stitt.
The third finalist, however, is a private attorney who has never been a judge.
'I was surprised,' said former Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter, a Republican. 'It's important for somebody to have worn a black robe, to have heard arguments, to have interacted with attorneys as a judge, in my opinion.'
The attorney's name is Travis Jett.
Court records show Jett has represented the group 'Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs' (OCPA) in multiple lawsuits.
'[OCPA is] a conservative think tank,' said Berrong.
Berrong also says OCPA holds a decent influence over a certain faction of Oklahoma Republican legislators in deciding which policies they support.
OCPA has openly advocated for reforming and/or eliminating the JNC in recent years.
'They have had a long-held opinion that the Judicial Nominating Commission… they don't like it,' Berrong said. 'If you're wanting judges that have an ideological bent, you don't like something like the JNC because it makes it hard.'
As News 4 reported in October, Bond and several other members of People for Opportunity work for OCPA.
The ad, People for Opportunity—with Bond—ran in October, also criticized the JNC.
'All three appointed by the unelected, liberal Judicial Nominating Commission,' a narrator said in the ad.
Bond is OCPA's Vice President for Advocacy.
Bill would limit initiative petition signatures by county, giving less-populated counties disproportionately larger influence
State court records show Bond has helped OCPA's lobbying arm —a non-profit 501(c)(4) called 'OCPA Impact, Inc.'— carry out lawsuits attempting to stop things like Medicaid expansion and teacher pay raises from appearing on Oklahoma ballots as state questions.
Some of those lawsuits made it to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Court records show Travis Jett represented Bond and OCPA Impact during OCPA's Impact's lawsuits.
Berrong said the connections between Jett, Bond, People for Opportunity, and OCPA, in light of Jett being named a finalist for the Supreme Court vacancy, certainly leave him thinking.
'That was the whole point,' Berrong said. 'I mean, the whole plan was, they singled out these three justices who they did not like, they wanted them to be more conservative activist judges. And they singled them out. They said, we're going to run this campaign against them, so the governor—the hope would be—that he can appoint someone who will who will be more in line with what their views were.'
Over the past week, News has made attempts to speak with both Jett and Bond, but neither responded to News 4.
It's important to note, even though Jett is one of three finalists for the vacant seat, Governor Stitt could very well go choose one of the other two options.
Stitt also did not have any direct say over who the three finalists would be.
He has until May 12 to decide.
For Hunter, a self-described lifelong Reagan conservative, any possibility of a more politically motivated Oklahoma Supreme Court makes him nervous.
'Ronald Reagan said, 'Look, if I'm in court before of a judge, I don't want a Republican, I don't want a Democrat, I don't want a conservative or a liberal,'' Hunter said. 'I want somebody who's going to follow the law.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Brazil's Supreme Court orders house arrest for former President Bolsonaro, a Trump ally
SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil's Supreme Court on Monday ordered the house arrest for former President Jair Bolsonaro, on trial for allegedly masterminding a coup plot to remain in office despite his defeat in the 2022 election — a case that has gripped the South American country as it faces a trade war with the Trump administration. Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case against Bolsonaro before the top court, said in his decision that the 70-year-old former president had violated precautionary measures imposed on him by spreading content through his three lawmaker sons. Bolsonaro's lawyers said in a statement that he will appeal the decision. They said his words 'good afternoon, Copacabana, good afternoon my Brazil, a hug to everyone, this is for our freedom" — broadcast from a cell phone of one of his sons during a Sunday protest in Rio de Janeiro — cannot 'be regarded as ignoring precautionary measures or as a criminal act.' The trial of the far-right leader is receiving renewed attention after U.S. President Donald Trump directly tied a 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to his ally's judicial situation. Trump has called the proceedings a ' witch hunt,' triggering nationalist reactions from leaders of all branches of power in Brazil, including President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Hours after the decision, the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said on X that the Trump administration 'condemns (de) Moraes' order imposing house arrest on Bolsonaro and will hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct.' 'Putting even more restrictions on Jair Bolsonaro's ability to defend himself in public is not a public service. Let Bolsonaro speak!' the U.S. State Department body said. The case against Bolsonaro Brazil's prosecutors accuse Bolsonaro of heading a criminal organization that plotted to overturn the election, including plans to kill Lula and Justice de Moraes after the far-right leader narrowly lost his reelection bid in 2022. Monday's order followed one from the top court last month that ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle monitor and imposed a curfew on his activities while the proceedings are underway. Following news of the arrest order, a staffer with Brazil's federal police told The Associated Press that federal agents had seized cell phones at Bolsonaro's residence in the capital of Brasilia, as ordered by de Moraes in his decision. The staffer spoke on condition of anonymity due to their lack of authorization to speak about the matter publicly. Bolsonaro is expected to remain in Brasilia for his house arrest as he is not allowed to travel. He also has a house in Rio de Janeiro, where he held his electoral base as a lawmaker for three decades. The former army captain is the fourth former president of Brazil to be arrested since the end of the country's military rule from 1964 to 1985, which Bolsonaro supported. 'Flagrant disrespect' The move from the Brazilian justice comes a day after tens of thousands of Bolsonaro supporters took the streets in the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio, pleading for Brazil's congress to pardon him and hundreds of others who are either under trial or jailed for their roles in the destruction of government buildings in Brasilia on Jan. 8, 2023. On Sunday, Bolsonaro addressed supporters in Rio through the phone of one of his sons, which de Moraes' described as illegal. 'The flagrant disrespect to the precautionary measures was so obvious that the defendant's son, Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro, decided to remove the posting in his Instagram profile, with the objective of hiding the legal transgression,' de Moraes wrote. Flávio Bolsonaro claimed on X that Brazil 'is officially in a dictatorship' after his father's house arrest. 'The persecution of de Moraes against Bolsonaro has no limits!' the senator wrote. De Moraes added in his ruling that Jair Bolsonaro, who governed Brazil between 2019 and 2022, has spread messages with 'a clear content of encouragement and instigation to attacks against the Supreme Court and a blatant support for foreign intervention in the Brazilian Judiciary' — likely a veiled reference to Trump's support for Bolsonaro. De Moraes also said that Bolsonaro 'addressed protesters gathered in Copacabana, in Rio' on Sunday so his supporters could 'try to coerce the Supreme Court.' Last week, the U.S. Treasury Department announced sanctions on de Moraes over alleged suppression of freedom of expression regarding Bolsonaro's trial. On Monday, the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs called the Brazilian justice 'a U.S.-sanctioned human rights abuser' and accused him of using "institutions to silence opposition and threaten democracy." De Moraes said in his decision that '(Brazil's) judiciary will not allow a defendant to make a fool out of it." "Justice is the same for all. A defendant who willingly ignores precautionary measures — for the second time — must suffer legal consequences,' he said. Possible trouble ahead Creomar de Souza, a political analyst of Dharma Political Risk and Strategy, a political consultancy firm based in Brasilia, said Bolsonaro's house arrest opens a new moment for the country's opposition, which will could gather steam in fighting against Lula's reelection bid next year. Now, de Souza said, 'the 2026 election looks like turmoil' and the political debate in Brazil will likely be split between two key struggles. 'One is the effort of Bolsonaro supporters to keep strong on the right, no matter if it is pushing for amnesty in congress or putting themselves physically out there,' the analyst said. 'The second is how the Lula administration will try to show that the country has a government.' 'This is just the start,' he concluded. The latest decision from the top court keeps Bolsonaro under ankle monitoring, allows only family members and lawyers to visit him and seizes all mobile phones from his home. Lula was imprisoned for 580 days between 2018 and 2019 in a corruption conviction that was later tossed out by the Supreme Court, citing the bias of the judge in the case. Michel Temer, who became president after Dilma Rousseff was impeached in 2016, was arrested for 10 days in 2019 in connection with a graft investigation, which later ended without a conviction. Earlier this year, de Moraes ordered the detention of President Fernando Collor, who was in office from 1990 to 1992 until he was impeached. The 75-year-old former president was convicted for money laundering and corruption in 2023 and is now serving his more than eight-year sentence. Hours after the order, right-wing lawmakers criticized de Moraes' decision and compared Bolsonaro's situation to that of his predecessors. 'House arrest for Jair Bolsonaro by de Moraes. Reason: corruption?' asked lawmaker Nikolas Ferreira. 'No. His kids posted his content on social media. Pathetic.' The far-right leader is already barred from next year's election due to an abuse of power conviction by the country's top electoral court. 'And those who attacked it are about to pay,' Salabert said.


NBC News
29 minutes ago
- NBC News
Nebraska Republican faces rowdy town hall with questions about Epstein files and fired BLS chief
Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., held a town hall Monday that started with boos from the crowd shortly after he took the stage and ended with chants of 'vote him out' when the event ended. In between, the Nebraska Republican was consistently heckled while responding to questions about releasing more information on Jeffrey Epstein, President Donald Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner and cuts to Medicaid in the GOP's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Audience members began yelling at Flood and booing him when he talked about Medicaid and the impact of Trump's sweeping domestic policy law on hospitals in Nebraska. Flood argued that there's 'a lot of misinformation' about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which no Democrats voted for when it made its way through Congress this summer. Later he faced a question that suggested he was covering up files related to Epstein. Flood responded by saying he supports releasing the files and will co-sponsor a non-binding House resolution calling for their publication. Flood added that he supports an effort led by House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., to have Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell sit for a deposition. Comer last week postponed Maxwell's deposition, previously scheduled for Aug. 11, until at least October to let the Supreme Court decide in late September whether it will review her case. Flood also weighed in on the firing of BLS chief Erika McEntarfer, who Trump dismissed Friday shortly after the agency published figures showing that hiring in the U.S. had significantly slowed significantly in recent months. The congressman suggested he might have handled the situation differently, while adding that he does not know 'all the details' about McEntarfer's firing. 'I don't know what the situation was with the Department of Labor person. Neither do you. I don't know. I don't know,' Flood said. 'I can tell you I've been an employer for a lot of years, and there's always two sides to every story, and I don't know what that side was. I will say this, though, if all that person did was get the data out there, if all that, and I don't know that's the case, but if that's all they did, I would not have fired her.' Several Republican senators, as well as economists and statisticians, took issue with Trump terminating McEntarfer last week. Audience members yelled, jeered and booed throughout the event, with audible chants of 'free Palestine,' 'tax the rich,' and during the town hall's conclusion, calls to 'vote him out.' When Flood attempted to engage with audience members on those topics, he was largely met with more protests. Attendees asked at least three different questions about the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, specifically about Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which one attendee called 'Alligator Auschwitz.' Inquiring about the immigration detention facility in Florida, one attendee asked Flood, 'How much do taxpayers have to pay for a fascist country?' Flood responded to by saying the majority of Americans voted for Trump and not for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. 'Americans voted for a, for a border that is secure, and I support the president enforcing our immigration laws, which, by the way, were written by Congress,' he added, prompting more boos. The Nebraska Democratic Party encouraged people to attend Flood's town hall, telling voters of Nebraska's 1st Congressional District in a social media post, 'you know what to do!' The party also encouraged attendance at Flood's last in-person town hall in the state, in May, when he was grilled by audience members and at one point conceded he had not read a bill in full before voting in favor of it.


Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Jack Smith was 'racing against the clock' to get cases against Trump to a jury: Sen Tom Cotton
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., explains why he requested a special investigation into Jack Smith's actions to bring charges against President Donald Trump prior to the 2024 election on 'Hannity.'