Trump administration fires hundreds of Voice of America employees
WASHINGTON – The Trump administration on May 15 fired nearly 600 employees at Voice of America, a federally funded news network that provides independent reporting to countries with limited press freedoms.
The layoffs targeted contractors, most of them journalists but also some administrative employees, and amounted to more than a third of Voice of America's staff.
They signalled that the Trump administration planned to continue its efforts to dismantle the broadcaster despite a court ruling in April that ordered the federal government to maintain robust news programming at the network, which President Donald Trump has called 'the voice of radical America'.
In another sign of the Trump administration's hostility toward the broadcaster, the federal building in Washington that houses the media organisation was put up for sale on May 15.
Mr Michael Abramowitz, director of Voice of America, said in an e-mail to his staff that the firings were 'inexplicable'.
'I am heartbroken,' he said.
Mr Abramowitz has sued to stop the Trump administration from closing the news organisation.
Ms Kari Lake, a senior adviser at the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which oversees Voice of America, said the Trump administration acted within its legal authority.
'We are in the process of rightsizing the agency and reducing the federal bureaucracy to meet administration priorities,' Ms Lake, who is leading the efforts to ramp down the operations of Voice of America, said in a statement. 'We will continue to scale back the bloat at USAGM and make an archaic dinosaur into something worthy of being funded by hard-working Americans.'
She added: 'Buckle up. There's more to come.'
Some of the journalists who were terminated were from countries with repressive governments that persecute journalists for independent reporting, Mr Abramowitz said.
Those journalists now have to leave the United States by the end of June, as their immigration status is tied to employment at the news organisation.
In a letter sent on May 15 to employees who were fired, the Trump administration cited 'the government's convenience' as a reason for the terminations.
The employees were under so-called personal services contracts, making them easier to let go than regular full-time employees with full civil service protections.
Mr Trump has accused the outlet, which delivers news to countries with repressive regimes, including Russia, China and Iran, of spreading 'anti-American' and partisan 'propaganda'.
Pro-Trump channel
In March, Ms Lake, a Trump ally and unsuccessful candidate for governor and Senate in Arizona, declared her own workplace 'unsalvageable'.
She has also claimed that the US Agency for Global Media and its newsrooms were rampant with 'waste, fraud and abuse', without providing evidence.
Ms Lake said last week that Voice of America would incorporate content from One America News Network, a pro-Trump television channel that has endorsed falsehoods about the 2020 presidential election.
Voice of America, which was founded in 1942, halted operations on March 15, a day after Mr Trump signed an executive order seeking to gut the US Agency for Global Media.
Its news programming has been partly restored since the April court ruling that stopped the Trump administration from dismantling the agency and other newsrooms it oversees.
The Trump administration has challenged the April ruling, claiming that the lower court went too far in halting other firings that took place in March.
In early May, a federal appeals court paused parts of the April lower court order that required the Trump administration to rehire the employees.
The Trump administration did not appeal parts of the April order that mandated the resumption of Voice of America's news programming.
The lower court found that Congress required the executive branch to keep the network as 'a consistently reliable and authoritative source of news'.
The Trump administration has since kept most of Voice of America's operations shuttered while restoring parts of its service.
Its Mandarin and Persian services, for example, were restored. But the news organisation's English website has stopped updating since March 15. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Epstein furor undermines public trust, Republican election hopes, two US lawmakers say
FILE PHOTO: A screen about the Jeffrey Epstein files is displayed at Times Square in New York City, U.S., July 23, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon/File Photo WASHINGTON - The uproar over disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could undermine public trust in the Trump administration, as well as Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections, two U.S. lawmakers said on Sunday. Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who want the House of Representatives to vote on their bipartisan resolution requiring full release of the government's Epstein files, said the lack of transparency is reinforcing public perceptions that the rich and powerful live beyond the reach of the judicial system. "This is going to hurt Republicans in the midterms. The voters will be apathetic if we don't hold the rich and powerful accountable," Massie, a hardline conservative from Kentucky, told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. Republicans hope to add to their current 219-212 House majority - with four seats currently vacant - and 53-47 Senate majority in November 2026, although the U.S. political cycle traditionally punishes the party of the sitting president during midterm elections. The Washington Post reported late on Sunday that Trump was increasingly frustrated with his administration's handling of the furor around Epstein. Even so, the president was hesitant to make personnel changes to avoid creating a "bigger spectacle" as his top officials underestimated the outrage from Trump's own base over the issue, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources. Khanna said Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered "a crisis of trust" by saying there was no list of Epstein clients after previously implying that one existed. The change in position unleashed a tsunami of calls for her resignation from Trump's MAGA base. "This is about trust in government," the California Democrat told "Meet the Press." "This is about being a reform agent of transparency." President Donald Trump, who on Sunday announced an EU trade deal in Scotland, has been frustrated by continued questions about his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and 2019 death by suicide in prison. Massie and Khanna believe they can win enough support from fellow lawmakers to force a vote on their resolution when Congress returns from its summer recess in September. But they face opposition from Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent lawmakers home a day early to stymie Democratic efforts to force a vote before the break. Johnson, who also appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press," said he favors a non-binding alternative resolution that calls for release of "credible" evidence, but which he said would better protect victims including minors. "The Massie and Khanna discharge petition is reckless in the way that it is drafted and presented," Johnson said. "It does not adequately include those protections." Massie dismissed Johnson's claim as "a straw man" excuse. "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted," he said. "They're hiding behind that." Trump has tried and failed so far to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term. On Saturday, Trump repeated his claims without evidence that 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and other Democrats should be prosecuted over payment for endorsements from celebrities including Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce and the Reverend Al Sharpton. Last week he accused former President Barack Obama of "treason" over how the Obama administration treated intelligence about Russian interference in U.S. elections nine years ago, drawing a rebuke from an Obama spokesperson. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally, said on Sunday that Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, had found new information that investigators initially discovered no evidence of Russian election interference but changed their position after Obama told them to keep looking. "I'm not alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me," Graham told "Meet the Press." Democratic Representative Jason Crow dismissed Gabbard's claims, telling the "Fox News Sunday" program that the national intelligence director had turned herself into "a weapon of mass distraction." The Department of Justice has said it is forming a strike force to assess Gabbard's claims. REUTERS
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
What is the status of US tariff negotiations?
Find out what's new on ST website and app. On July 27, the US struck a framework deal with the EU, imposing a 15 per cent US import tariff on most EU goods, half the threatened rate. WASHINGTON - US tariff negotiations with key trading partners have shifted into high gear as economies race to avoid steeper duties before an Aug 1 deadline. Many of these tariff hikes were part of a package first announced in April, under which dozens of economies were due to face higher levies - up from a 10 per cent level – over their trade surpluses with the United States. The twice-postponed deadline for duties to take effect is now Friday, Aug 1 . But Washington has expanded its group of targets coming up against these tariffs, while announcing agreements with the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. A deal with the European Union unveiled on July 27 sees a 15 per cent tariff imposed on European exports to the United States, down from the 30 per cent that Mr Trump earlier threatened. Where do other US trade talks stand? South Korea: Heightened pressure Seoul is racing to reach a deal with Washington, as Tokyo's success in landing an agreement has 'amped up the pressure for South Korea,' a government source told AFP. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15 World Three dead, several injured after train derails in Germany World US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war Opinion Vaping, Kpods and teenage risk-taking: An old problem in a new world Local media reported that Seoul was preparing to propose more than US$100 billion (S$128 billion) in investment as part of a broader agreement, with expected participation by major firms such as Samsung and Hyundai Motor. The South Korean government did not confirm this. But South Korean officials have outlined proposals to deepen collaboration in sectors like shipbuilding, semiconductors and batteries. National Security Advisor Wi Sung-lak has told reporters that the two countries are in 'the final and most crucial phase of negotiations' to avert Mr Trump's proposed 25 per cent duty. India: Cautious optimism Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told Bloomberg Television on July 24 that he was optimistic his country could reach an agreement with the United States to avert Washington's 26 per cent tariff threat. Mr Goyal insisted there were not any sticking points in the US-India relationship or in trade talks, and clarified that immigration rules – including those around H-1B visas for skilled workers – had not come up in negotiations. Despite Mr Goyal's remarks, local media reported the prospects of an interim deal before Aug 1 had dimmed. Taiwan: Working hard Taiwanese Premier Cho Jung-tai said on July 24 that officials are 'working hard' on negotiations, amid worries that an unfavorable tariff level could hit the self-ruled island's economy. Vice-President Hsiao Bi-khim said Taipei's negotiating team was 'working almost 24 hours a day to achieve trade balance and Taiwan's industrial interests, and even to further deepen cooperation'. Canada, Mexico: Deal unclear Although Canada and Mexico were spared from Mr Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs announced in April, goods from both countries entering the United States generally face a separate 25 per cent duty if they fall outside a North American trade pact. This figure stands to jump to 30 per cent for Mexico come Aug 1, while the level for Canada was set at 35 per cent. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said her administration was 'doing everything' possible to avert the duties and that she would speak with Mr Trump if necessary to try to reach a pact. Mr Trump told reporters on July 25 that there was no deal with Canada so far. Brazil: Political nature Brazil is girding for a virtual trade embargo on its planes, grains and other goods if Mr Trump's threatened 50 per cent tariff on its exports takes effect on Aug 1. The United States runs a trade surplus with Latin America's biggest economy, which was not originally expected to face steeper tariffs under Mr Trump's 'reciprocal' duties plan. Mr Trump has not attempted to hide the political motivation in targeting Brazil, citing a judicial 'witch hunt' against his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro, when he unveiled the tariff rate. The political nature of the spat makes a last-minute deal appear less likely. AFP
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
For Trump, EU trade deal was badly needed
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Both parties agreed on July 27 to a broad-brush trade deal that sets a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods. EDINBURGH, Scotland - For months, President Donald Trump's penchant for overhyping the speed at which he could negotiate complex trade deals has been the butt of Washington jokes. 'Ninety days ago, Donald Trump promised the world that his tariffs would lead to 90 deals in 90 days,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in July, adding: 'By my count, he's about 88 trade deals short.' So on July 27, when Mr Trump announced a trade agreement with the European Union, it was not only his biggest trade deal to date, but also, politically, his most badly needed. After going months without securing deals, Mr Trump is now coming off his most productive stretch of trade negotiations, landing agreements in recent days with the Philippines, Japan and Indonesia as well as the European Union, which represents 27 countries. The deal with the European Union, at least upon first impression, seemed to give Mr Trump much of what he wanted. 'I'm very surprised how the European Union gave in to Trump's demands,' said Professor Douglas Irwin, a professor of economics at Dartmouth College. 'I thought the EU would be the most prone to retaliation. And yet, they didn't do it. They really gave in to most of what Trump wanted.' Though many details of the agreement were unclear, the European Union and the United States agreed on July 27 to a broad-brush trade deal that sets a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods, including cars, averting what could have become a painful trade war with a bloc that is the United States' single biggest source of imports. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15 World Three dead, several injured after train derails in Germany World US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war Asia Displaced villagers at Thai-Cambodian border hope to go home as leaders set to meet for talks The European Union also agreed to purchase US$750 billion (S$960 billion) of US energy, which Ms Ursula von der Leyen, president of the EU's executive branch, said would be spread over three years. That, she noted, is roughly the length of Mr Trump's remaining term in office. The bloc also agreed to increase its investment in the United States by more than US$600 billion. The two sides agreed to drop tariffs to zero on a range of goods including aircraft, plane parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment and some agricultural products, Ms von der Leyen said. She acknowledged that the tariffs could prove tough for some European businesses, but defended the deal in light of higher tariffs Mr Trump had threatened. 'Fifteen percent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get,' she said. It was a positive political development for Mr Trump on a number of fronts. Economists have mostly been sour on the idea of his sweeping tariffs, warning of dire consequences including inflation and rising unemployment. And even as many criticised the wisdom of Mr Trump's economic policies, his administration came under added fire over its struggle to negotiate deals. The agreement with the European Union, the America's largest trading partner, may tamp down some of the criticism. The agreement may also offer Mr Trump a way to divert the news cycle from his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files , a controversy that has dogged him for weeks. At a news conference on the trade deal, a reporter asked Mr Trump whether he had rushed the agreement forward in an attempt to knock the Epstein story line out of the news. 'You've got to be kidding,' a frustrated Mr Trump responded. 'That had nothing to do with it.' Trade negotiations are famously complex and time-consuming, so most analysts doubted that Mr Trump could have much success in quickly striking deals. The Peterson Institute for International Economics said in a 2016 analysis that negotiations for a single trade deal can take more than a year, with implementation taking multiple years. That did not stop the White House from issuing bold predictions. Within days of the April 2 announcement of tariffs on countries across the globe, White House officials said about 70 countries were calling to strike deals. Mr Trump's trade adviser predicted 90 agreements in 90 days. As the deals proved tougher to negotiate than advertised, Mr Trump lamented the pressure he was under. 'Everyone says, 'When, when, when are you going to sign deals?'' he said in May. At one point, he said, 'We don't have to sign deals.' The agreements Mr Trump has announced in recent days contain mostly top-line figures. They are not the detailed, complex documents that the United States has historically negotiated, which can number in the hundreds of pages. And the new deal with the European Union could still run into trouble. The Trump administration faces nearly a dozen lawsuits seeking to have its tariffs declared illegal on the grounds that Mr Trump does not have the authority to impose them without the consent of Congress. Should those suits succeed, Mr Trump would be back to square one. Mr Andrew Hale, a trade policy analyst for the conservative Heritage Foundation, cautioned against reading too much into the deal with the European Union until the text is released, and the lawsuits are resolved. 'These are not comprehensive free trade agreements,' he said. 'Let's make that very clear. And much of this may evaporate.' NYTIMES
