Strong argument for cockpit video recording, says Iata chief in the wake of Air India crash report
SINGAPORE - There is a strong argument to be made for video recorders to be installed in aircraft cockpits to aid in accident investigations, said International Air Transport Association chief Willie Walsh, in his first comments about
an interim report on the Air India crash in June that killed 260 people .
'Based on what little we know now, it's quite possible that a video recording, in addition to the voice recording, would significantly assist the investigators,' said Mr Walsh on July 16 in an interview with Singapore media.
Pilot unions have long resisted calls for cockpit video recording, citing concerns over privacy and potential misuse. The International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations, for instance, said it was sceptical that confidentiality of such recordings could ever be fully guaranteed, according to a July 16 report by Reuters.
Mr Walsh, a former pilot turned airline chief executive , said he can understand the reluctance among flight crew to have video cameras installed in the cockpit.
But the head of Iata, a global airline trade body representing some 350 carriers, emphasised the need for air accident investigations to be conducted fully and properly.
'Our industry has always been very open in sharing information,' he added.
Mr Walsh also called on governments to publish accident reports in a timely manner in line with international obligations.
'I think we would all benefit from the publication of these reports so that we can assess them and learn from any issues that are relevant to the rest of the industry,' he said.
The debate on whether video cameras should be installed in airplane cockpits was reignited after the release of the preliminary report on the ill-fated Air India Flight AI171 on July 11.
The report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) raised questions about the movement of the fuel control switches on the Boeing 787 jet, which were
toggled to the
cutoff
position one after the other seconds after takeoff , shutting down both of the plane's engines.
The AAIB shared a snippet from the cockpit voice recording, noting that one of the pilots was heard asking the other why he cut off fuel to the engines. The other pilot responded that he did not do so. The report did not say how or why the fuel switches were moved.
The AAIB report also flagged a 2018 advisory from the US Federal Aviation Administration, which recommended the inspection of the locking feature of fuel switches of several Boeing models.
This prompted airlines around the world, including
national carrier Singapore Airlines and its budget arm Scoot , to carry out precautionary checks in the days after the report's release.
Mr Walsh commended the AAIB for the release of its interim report, which he said contained more information about the crash than most people were expecting.
He said it was sensible for airlines to check the fuel switches on their Boeing aircraft despite there being no formal recommendation from the US aircraft maker to do so.
Switching gears, the Iata chief also addressed questions about the impact of trade tariffs, which he said may lead to airlines being reluctant to take delivery of new aircraft, given the uncertainty over how this will affect the cost of planes
'We'll wait and see... It'll impact all aspects of the aerospace industry and have an impact on most, if not all, airlines as well,' he added.
Mr Walsh was in Singapore to attend a series of
high-level
aviation
meetings held in the city-state over the week.
He was also taken on a visit to the development site of the upcoming Terminal 5 (T5), which will take Changi Airport's handling capacity to 140 million passengers yearly, up from 90 million today, when it opens in the mid-2030s.
Mr Walsh said he was impressed by the design and thinking behind the future mega-terminal, noting the investments being made in innovation and technology, and the planning that has been done to ensure minimal connection times for passengers.
'Some of the work that I see Changi undertaking... ultimately will benefit everybody in the industry, in the areas of automation and AI (artificial intelligence ),' he added.
Mr Walsh said the team at Changi Airport has a 'laser focus' on the cost of the T5 development, revealing that the multi-billion dollar project is 'significantly under budget'.
'Critically, everything they're doing is to ensure that they do it in a cost-effective manner, so that the charges that airlines and ultimately the passenger faces are being controlled,' he said.
Rising fees at Changi Airport have been a bugbear among airlines here, and it was cited as
a factor behind the demise of low-cost carrier Jetstar Asia .
Asked if there is a place for budget carriers at Changi and other high-cost airports, Mr Walsh said he does not agree that the low-cost airline model is dead, but there are certain airports where it may not make sense.
He cited London's Heathrow Airport as one example, noting the cost of operations and lack of access to takeoff and landing slots there.
Mr Walsh said the fact that some airlines are categorised as budget or low-cost does not automatically ensure their financial success. 'We are a very competitive industry,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
3 days ago
- CNA
Air India warned by regulator over 'systemic' lapses in fatigue management and training
NEW DELHI: Air India has been warned by India's aviation regulator that it could face enforcement action for breaching safety standards related to crew fatigue management and training, government notices to the airline seen by Reuters showed. The airline self-reported the problems, which occurred this year and last year, to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) last month, just days after one of its Boeing 787 Dreamliners crashed in Ahmedabad city, killing 260 people. Four government notices, dated Jul 23, criticised Air India for repeated failures in safety compliance and follow many other warnings in the past. Potential regulatory action could include fines or ordering that executives be removed from their jobs. They cite a combined 29 violations, including pilots not being given mandatory rest, poor compliance with simulator training requirements, lack of training for a high-altitude airport and flying on international routes with insufficient cabin crew. "Despite repeated warnings and enforcement action of non-compliance in the past, systemic issues related to compliance monitoring, crew planning, and training governance remain unresolved," said one of the notices. "The recurrence of such violations suggests a failure to establish and enforce effective control mechanisms," it said. Air India said in a statement that the notices related to voluntary disclosures made over the past year, and it will respond to the regulator. "We remain committed to the safety of our crew and passengers," it added. The DGCA did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. INVESTIGATIONS AND WARNINGS Air India has come under intense scrutiny since the Ahmedabad crash, which was the world's worst aviation disaster in a decade. A preliminary report found that the fuel control switches were flipped almost simultaneously after takeoff and there was pilot confusion in the cockpit. One pilot asked the other why he cut off the fuel and the other responded that he hadn't done so, the report said. Separately, the EU's aviation agency said this month it will investigate Air India Express, the airline's budget service, after Reuters reported the carrier did not change the engine parts of an Airbus A320 in a timely manner. India's watchdog also found in May that Air India flew three Airbus planes even though they were overdue for checks on emergency equipment. The crash and the warning notices have increased challenges for Indian conglomerate Tata, which took over the airline from the government in 2022 with the aim of turning it into a world-class airline. This week's government notices were addressed to senior executives, including the airline's director of flight operations, Pankul Mathur, and its director of training, Amar Bhatia. One of the notices said there had been "weekly rest violations" detected for two pilots in June 2024 and one in June 2025, though it did not say how many extra hours the pilots flew. Another notice said that last year, two pilots took simulator training but did not start flying within the prescribed time limit, a lapse that requires them to undergo training again. In April this year, a pilot flew from Kathmandu without the mandatory special simulator training required for the airport, the notice added. Kathmandu has mountainous terrain and a high-altitude table-top runway. Table-top runways have steep drops at one or both ends. "This is substantially risky because Kathmandu is an airport which requires prior training ... in case of any emergency (pilots) will not have the time to peruse a manual," Vibhuti Singh, a former legal expert at India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. The warnings also included concerns that cabin safety teams has "repeatedly failed to adhere" to rules, as four international flights in April and May this year flew with fewer cabin crew than the 15 required. One senior Indian government official with direct knowledge of the notices said the administration was concerned that "Air India is taking things for granted", adding "we have given them many warnings." Air India received nine warning notices in the past six months, the government told parliament this week. Last year, authorities warned or fined airlines in 23 instances for safety violations. Eleven instances involved the Air India group.
Business Times
3 days ago
- Business Times
Air India warned by regulator over 'systemic' lapses in fatigue management and training
[NEW DELHI] Air India has been warned by India's aviation regulator that it could face enforcement action for breaching safety standards related to crew fatigue management and training, government notices to the airline seen by Reuters showed. The airline self-reported the problems, which occurred this year and last year, to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) last month, just days after one of its Boeing 787 Dreamliners crashed in Ahmedabad city, killing 260 people. Four government notices, dated July 23, criticised Air India for repeated failures in safety compliance and follow many other warnings in the past. Potential regulatory action could include fines or ordering that executives be removed from their jobs. They cite a combined 29 violations, including pilots not being given mandatory rest, poor compliance with simulator training requirements, lack of training for a high-altitude airport and flying on international routes with insufficient cabin crew. 'Despite repeated warning and enforcement action of non-compliance in the past, systemic issues related to compliance monitoring, crew planning, and training governance remain unresolved,' said one of the notices. 'The recurrence of such violations suggests a failure to establish and enforce effective control mechanisms,' it said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Air India said in a statement that the notices related to voluntary disclosures made over the past year, and it will respond to the regulator. 'We remain committed to the safety of our crew and passengers,' it added. The DGCA did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. Air India has come under intense scrutiny since the Ahmedabad crash, which was the world's worst aviation disaster in a decade. A preliminary report found that the fuel control switches were flipped almost simultaneously after takeoff and there was pilot confusion in the cockpit. One pilot asked the other why he cut off the fuel and the other responded that he hadn't done so, the report said. Separately, the EU's aviation agency said this month it will investigate Air India Express, the airline's budget service, after Reuters reported the carrier did not change the engine parts of an Airbus A320 in a timely manner. India's watchdog also found in May that Air India flew three Airbus planes even though they were overdue for checks on emergency equipment. The crash and the warning notices have increased challenges for Indian conglomerate Tata, which took over the airline from the government in 2022 with the aim of turning it into a world-class airline. This week's government notices were addressed to senior executives, including the airline's director of flight operations, Pankul Mathur, and its director of training, Amar Bhatia. One of the notices said there had been 'weekly rest violations' detected for two pilots in June 2024 and one in June 2025, though it did not say how many extra hours the pilots flew. Another notice said that last year, two pilots took simulator training but did not start flying within the prescribed time limit, a lapse that requires them to undergo training again. In April this year, a pilot flew from Kathmandu without the mandatory special simulator training required for the airport, the notice added. Kathmandu has mountainous terrain and a high-altitude table-top runway. Table-top runways have steep drops at one or both ends. 'This is substantially risky because Kathmandu is an airport which requires prior training ... in case of any emergency (pilots) will not have the time to peruse a manual,' Vibhuti Singh, a former legal expert at India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. The warnings also included concerns that cabin safety teams has 'repeatedly failed to adhere' to rules, as four international flights in April and May this year flew with fewer cabin crew than the 15 required. One senior Indian government official with direct knowledge of the notices said the administration was concerned that 'Air India is taking things for granted', adding 'we have given them many warnings.' Air India received nine warning notices in the past six months, the government told parliament this week. Last year, authorities warned or fined airlines in 23 instances for safety violations. Eleven instances involved the Air India group. REUTERS

Straits Times
4 days ago
- Straits Times
Air India warned over ‘systemic' lapses in fatigue management and training, documents show
Find out what's new on ST website and app. The latest notices cite a combined 29 violations, including pilots not being given mandatory rest. NEW DELHI - Air India has been warned by India's aviation regulator that it could face enforcement action for breaching safety standards related to crew fatigue management and training, government notices to the airline seen by Reuters showed. The airline self-reported the problems, which occurred in 2025 and 2024, to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in June, just days after one of its Boeing 787 Dreamliners crashed in Ahmedabad city, killing 260 people. Four government notices, dated July 23, criticised Air India for repeated failures in safety compliance and follow many other warnings in the past. Potential regulatory action could include fines or ordering that executives be removed from their jobs. The latest notices cite a combined 29 violations, including pilots not being given mandatory rest, poor compliance with simulator training requirements, lack of training for a high-altitude airport and flying on international routes with insufficient cabin crew. "Despite repeated warning and enforcement action of non-compliance in the past, systemic issues related to compliance monitoring, crew planning, and training governance remain unresolved," said one of the notices. "The recurrence of such violations suggests a failure to establish and enforce effective control mechanisms," it said. Air India said in a statement that the notices related to voluntary disclosures made over the past year, and it will respond to the regulator. "We remain committed to the safety of our crew and passengers," it added. The DGCA did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. Air India has come under intense scrutiny since the Ahmedabad crash, which was the world's aviation disaster in a decade. A preliminary report found that the fuel control switches were flipped almost simultaneously after takeoff and there was pilot confusion in the cockpit. One pilot asked the other why he cut off the fuel and got a response that he hadn't done so, the report said. REUTERS