Telephone tapping constitutes a violation of right to privacy: Madras HC
As laid down in paragraph 28 of the decision of the Apex court in People's Union for Civil Liberties, it was only when the above two situations exist that the authority may pass an order directing interception of messages after recording its satisfaction that it was necessary or expedient so to do in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence, he added.
Allowing a petition filed by P Kishore, Managing Director of Everonn Education Limited, the judge quashed an order of the union government, which authorised tapping of the mobile phone of the petitioner, in connection with a case relating to bribery and corruption, probed by the CBI, involving an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax.
The judge said in the instant case, the impugned order dated August 12, 2011 does not fall either within the rubric of "public emergency" or "in the interests of public safety" as explained by the Supreme Court in the case of People's Union for Civil Liberties. The facts disclose that it was a covert operation/secretive situation for detection of crime, which would not be apparent to any reasonable person.
As the law presently stands, a situation of this nature does not fall within the four corners of Section 5(2) of the Act as expounded by the Supreme Court in the case of People's Union for Civil Liberties, which has been approved by the Constitution Bench of the SC in K S Puttaswamy case, the judge added.
The judge said the authorities have also contravened Rule 419-A(17) of the Telegraph Rules by failing to place the intercepted material before the Review Committee within the stipulated time to examine as to whether the interception was made in compliance with Section 5(2) of the Act.
As a consequence, the impugned order must necessarily be set aside as unconstitutional and one without jurisdiction. Besides violating Article 21, it was also ultra vires Section 5(2) of the Act besides being in violation of the mandatory provisions of Rule 419-A of the Rules, the judge added.
The judge said it follows that the intercepted conversations collected pursuant to the impugned order in violation of Section 5(2) of the Act and Rule 419-A(17) of the Rules shall not be used for any purposes whatsoever.
The judge said it was, however, made clear that the above direction shall have no bearing on the other material that has been collected by the CBI subsequent to and independent of the intercepted call records, which shall be considered by the trial court on its own merits without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC asks magistrates to follow SC guidelines in social media cases
Vijayawada: The AP high court on Saturday issued a circular, instructing all judicial magistrates to follow the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar, and Imran Pratapgarhi vs State of Gujarat, in matters related to social media postings or comments. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Stating that any deviation from these guidelines will be viewed very seriously, the HC warned that judicial magistrates, who violate the circular, would render themselves liable for contempt of the high court, in addition to facing a departmental inquiry. The registrar judicial of AP high court stated that it was brought to the HC's notice that most judicial magistrates were remanding the accused in cases pertaining to social media postings or comments without adhering to the principles laid down in the Arnesh Kumar case. The registrar judicial further mentioned that in the case of Imran Pratapgarhi, the Supreme Court held that the police, before registering an FIR involving speech, writing, or artistic expression (where the offences carry 3 to 7 years of imprisonment), must conduct a preliminary inquiry under section 173(3) of BNS. The inquiry must be preceded by approval from an officer of the rank of DSP and must be concluded within two weeks. Observing that the apex court issued the guidelines with the aim of preventing the misuse of criminal law to stifle free expression, the high court instructed all judicial magistrates to satisfy themselves before ordering remand, particularly in cases relating to social media postings, ensure that the investigating officer complied with the law laid down in the Arnesh Kumar and Imran Pratapgarhi cases. They must also ensure that the accused committed repeated and multiple offences and, if not remanded to judicial custody, may influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, and that the police require custodial investigation.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Ravished her instead of protecting her': Man gets 25 yrs in jail for raping motherless, 13-yr-old niece
Shimla: The Una special court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act has sentenced Kewal Krishan, 43, to 25 years of rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 for the repeated rape of his 13-year-old motherless niece in 2023. Additionally, the convict received one year of imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5,000 for threatening the survivor. "In the case in hand, the victim was the niece of the convict and was under the age of 16 at the time of the incident. Thus, the convict was supposed to protect her, but instead of protecting her, he ravished her. Hence, if leniency is shown to such an offender, it will give the wrong message to society," reads the judgment pronounced by special judge Naresh Kumar on July 3. However, the special judge mentioned that considering all facts and circumstances on record, it cannot be said that the present case fell in the category of the rarest of rare cases, and as such, the penalty of death is not called for. Acknowledging that the survivor endured significant trauma and pain, the special judge mentioned that the ends of justice would be met if a sum of Rs 5 lakh was recommended as compensation for relief and rehabilitation to the survivor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 3/4/5 BHK Sea View Homes in Sewri by L&T Realty L&T_The Gateway Get Offer Undo This compensation is to be paid from the state victim compensation fund or another scheme established for the purpose under Section 357(A) of CrPC. In case no such fund or scheme is established, the compensation is to be provided by the state govt. The FIR was registered for the commission of offences punishable under sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 6 of the Pocso Act , 2012, on Nov 9, 2023, at women's police station in Una. The 13-year-old survivor, along with her aunt and grandmother, filed a complaint stating that she, her father, uncle Krishan, and younger sister lived in their house. Her father was addicted to alcohol, and her mother died five-six years prior. The survivor's father was often away from home in connection with work. The survivor submitted that for four months, when her father was not home, her uncle raped her and threatened her not to reveal the abuse.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Stop eviction drives conducted sans due process, CLP urges guv
1 2 3 Guwahati: Assam's Congress Legislature Party (CLP) members on Saturday met governor Lakshman Prasad Acharya at the Raj Bhawan here and submitted a memorandum seeking his intervention to halt the ongoing and proposed eviction drives allegedly affecting indigenous, tribal, and erosion-displaced communities. In their memorandum, the opposition members said "The incidents of eviction transgresse the provisions of the Forest Rights Act 2006, the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA 1996), Chapter X (Protect Land Rights in Tribal Belts/Blocks) of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, Assam (Temporarily Settled Tenancy Areas) Act 1971 and landmark decisions by the Supreme Court." The CLP delegation also demanded that an independent commission of inquiry be constituted for probe into all evictions conducted since 2022, with a special focus on Sixth Schedule districts and tribal belt and block protections. "Direct the Govt of Assam to publish a comprehensive land rights regularisation policy, clearly distinguishing long-settled indigenous occupants from speculative encroachers," they said in the memorandum, added that legal and humane rehabilitation measures must be ensured in line with constitutional morality and India's obligations under the UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. "The people of Assam — especially its tribals, erosion-displaced citizens, and indigenous communities — look to your office as the constitutional conscience of the state. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo These eviction drives, conducted without due process or consent in the name of "development", threaten to dispossess the very people whose land rights the Constitution seeks to uphold," the memorandum read. They also submitted a "People's Charter for Humane and Lawful Eviction Policy in Assam" which "outlines urgent reforms that uphold constitutional values, protect marginalised communities, and promote accountability". The charter includes establishment of a state-wide eviction protocol, mandatory rehabilitation and resettlement framework, suspension of all evictions without due process, setting up of a legal aid and grievance redress platform and creation of a multi-stakeholder eviction review board.
