Javed Akhtar reminds ‘insensitive' Pak Army: 'We salute our fallen soldiers, you refused to take bodies of your men during Kargil war'
General Asim Munir had said, 'Our forefathers believed that we were different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religion is different. Our customs are different. Our traditions are different. Our thoughts are different. Our ambitions are different…' General Munir's provocative speech by was viewed by New Delhi as having encouraged the terrorists.
In an interview with lawyer and politician Kapil Sibal, Javed Akhtar stressed that India doesn't want to vilify the average Pakistani citizen, but criticised comments made by their 'representatives' as 'insensitive'. He said, 'No country is a monolith. Every citizen of a country can't be the same. If a country's government is bad, then its impact will first be first on its own citizen… Our issue should only be with the government, the army, and the extremists. Our full sympathy should be with the innocents who are suffering because of them.'
Describing the situation as 'tragic' for common Pakistanis, many of whom he considers friends, Akhtar continued, 'I watched their army chief's speech on YouTube. What an insensitive man he seemed to be. Sure, abuse Indians if you feel we're evil, but why are you abusing Hindus? Doesn't he realise that there is a population of Hindus in Pakistan as well? Shouldn't you respect your own people? What sort of man are you? What are you even saying? You have no sense.' Akhtar seemed to be referring to comments made by General Asim Munir, who had said, 'Our forefathers believed that we were different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religion is different. Our customs are different. Our traditions are different. Our thoughts are different. Our ambitions are different…'
Also read – Javed Akhtar reminds Pakistanis that 26/11 attackers are from their country: 'You shouldn't be offended if Indians complain about this'
He continued, 'One of their missiles is called Abdali. Abdali attacked Muslims! He's your hero? What about the people who were born on your soil? You are hailing an invader? Do you have any concept of history? Their issue is that their history and geography are incompatible. The communities they describe as their own want nothing to do with them. Several Arab countries have banned Pakistanis from getting visas. It's like some boy on the streets of Delhi saying he knows Shah Rukh Khan. My friend, Shah Rukh Khan doesn't know who you are! Yeh inka haal hai.'
Akhtar narrated an anecdote to illustrate his point about the Pakistani army not having respect for their own. He said, 'Another truth that Pakistanis must face is this: when one of our soldiers dies, we salute him, but when Pakistani soldiers died in Kargil, they didn't even claim their bodies. It was the Indians who gave them a proper burial. One of our top-ranking soldiers took photographs of their fallen men, had an album made, and presented it to the Pakistanis. They refused to take it. He later accepted it, but unofficially.'
Akhtar, who got a hero's welcome in Pakistan in 2023, had slammed Islamabad in front of a gathering in Lahore, for sponsoring terrorism. Asked why Indians and Pakistanis can't get along, Akhtar had reminded the audience that he witnessed the terror caused by Pakistani attackers firsthand during the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai. In the past, he has also spoken about the lack of respect shown by Pakistanis to Indian artistes over the years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Military Digest: Another Kargil Vijay Diwas, another reminder of some uneasy questions that should not be wished away
In just a few days, the country will celebrate the 26th Kargil Vijay Diwas, marking the successful eviction of the Pakistan Army from the icy heights it had intruded upon in 1999. However, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the failures that allowed Pakistani troops to occupy Indian territory without detection. Celebrated annually on July 26, Kargil Vijay Diwas honours India's victory over Pakistan in the Kargil War of 1999. And while the bravery of the young officers and troops who snatched victory from the enemy's hands in the most treacherous terrains must be commemorated, it is equally important not to forget that there are many questions which remain unanswered till today. There have been numerous public accounts in recent years where senior officers have revealed that there were tell-tale signs indicating something was amiss weeks or months before the intrusions were actually discovered. Officers who were part of the higher echelons at the time have claimed over the years that it was known to Military Operations (MO) Directorate and Military Intelligence (MI) that Pakistan Army was replacing regular infantry battalions along the Line of Control (LoC) with Northern Light Infantry (NLI) units, the ones which eventually intruded into Indian territory. They claimed that the intelligence agencies and Army leadership made insufficient efforts to determine the reasons for this move, as well as where they were being utilised and for what purposes. The unrealistic frontage of 121 (Independent) Infantry Brigade headquartered in Kargil was 227 km, and it had about eight to nine battalions, including a BSF battalion under its Order of Battle (ORBAT). There was one battalion each in Dras, Kaksar, Chhani Gund, one in the central sector and one in Batalik. The brigade had 26 Maratha LI in Mushkoh and 9 Mahar in the gaps created by the withdrawal of the 28th Infantry Division, which had moved to the valley for counterinsurgency operations. This move has also been adversely commented upon in retrospect. The then Brigade Commander, Brigadier Surinder Singh, who was later moved out in the midst of operations and has since challenged his subsequent dismissal from service in the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), has claimed over the years that he sounded sufficient warnings. In a conversation with this correspondent some years ago, Brig Surinder Singh mentioned that he had conducted a reconnaissance as soon as he was posted as Brigade Commander. He said that he found some defences had to be prepared, and he made a detailed report, requesting defence stores and identifying possible points of intrusion. The higher formation headquarters is alleged to have refused this request, as well as the demand for mines to be laid on LoC. He also said that he briefed higher headquarters on the sand model in the operations room and war-gamed it in August or September 1998. In Mushkoh, posts were vacated in the winter for six months and in Batalik for four to five months. The then brigade commander claimed that he advised against removing the battalions from these places, but they were still removed, which resulted in gaps being created on the LoC that the enemy exploited. According to Lt Gen K H Singh, who commanded the 27 Rajput Battalion during the Kargil conflict, a significant information gap existed at the end of 1998. By March 1999, there were reasonable inputs about the intrusions by Pakistanis. The General also said that tell-tale signs of the intrusions were revealed much earlier than when they were actually discovered in May 1999, and he gave examples of having seen signs of intruders while on a helicopter sortie with the GOC of the Division. In this context, a former officer of the 5th Battalion of the Parachute Regiment (5 Para), ex-Major Manish Bhatnagar, has also raised several questions regarding the discovery of the intrusions and how these were subsequently handled during the conduct of operations. Bhatnagar was court-martialled in 2001 and dismissed from service. He had been found guilty of 'acts prejudicial to good order and military discipline' and handed out what seemed to be an excessive punishment disproportionate to the offence. The more serious charge against him pertained to disobeying a command to attack a position reportedly occupied by the Pakistan army. However, this charge could not be proven during his court-martial, and Bhatnagar was found not guilty. Bhatnagar contended during his trial that he had reported Pakistani intrusions well before they were discovered in May 1999 but that the Army top brass had disregarded his warnings. Bhatnagar's contention is that in January-February 1999, he observed and reported enemy activity at Point 5770, the northernmost and highest peak later reclaimed from Pakistani army regulars as part of Operation Vijay on June 29, 1999, by the 27th battalion of the Rajput Regiment. Bhatnagar said that he repeatedly reported enemy activities and exchange of fire while he was in an eyeball-to-eyeball situation close to Point 5770 and that he even spotted an enemy bunker and reported as above, in regular written situation reports, message log books and conversations up the chain of command to his then commanding officer, Col A K Srivastava. These reports were sent up the chain of command to Brigadier P C Katoch, then commander of the 102 Infantry Brigade and Major General V S Budhwar, then general officer commanding of the 3 Infantry Division. These claims and statements cannot be wished away, and till a definite answer is found to them, they will continue to resonate on every Kargil war anniversary.
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Rahul Gandhi vs BJP Over Trump's '5 Jets Downed' Claim "Traitor's Mentality?" India-News18
| 'What is the truth?': Rahul Gandhi questions PM Modi on Trump's 'five jets shot down' claim; BJP hits back, accusing him of having "traitor's mentality"A political storm has erupted after former US President Donald Trump's explosive claim that India shot down five Pakistani jets—a claim never officially acknowledged by the Indian government. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi, asking, "What is the truth?"The BJP has slammed Gandhi, accusing him of having a 'traitor's mentality' and using foreign narratives to discredit India's armed forces and leadership. With the Parliament monsoon session underway, this political showdown is expected to dominate headlines. n18oc_india
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Sri Lanka sacks high-ranking police officer over Easter Sunday bombings
A Deputy Inspector General of police in Sri Lanka has been sacked from the service following a disciplinary inquiry related to the 2019 Easter Sunday terror attacks. Nilantha Jayawardena, who previously served as the head of the State Intelligence Service (SIS), was placed on compulsory leave by the National Police Commission (NPC) in July 2024, pending an internal investigation. Following the conclusion of the inquiry, the NPC decided to dismiss Jayawardena from service. "It was decided at the meeting of the police commission held on July 17 to order the immediate dismissal from police service of the senior deputy inspector general of police, Nilantha Jayawardena," the NCP said in a statement. About 270 people, including 11 Indians, were killed as suicide bombers belonging to the local Islamist extremist group National Thawheed Jamaat, linked to ISIS, carried out a series of blasts that tore through three churches and as many luxury hotels in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday in 2019. On March 21, 2024, the police commission decided to conduct a disciplinary inquiry against Jayawardena for his negligence of duty, which led to the Easter Sunday attack. The report of the disciplinary investigation was received by the police commission two weeks ago. The commission ruled that Jayawardena was guilty of all the counts in the chargesheet served on him. Jayawardena becomes the most senior police officer to be found guilty of dereliction of duty. He was ordered to pay a 75 million rupee fine as compensation to the victims. The Supreme Court in 2023 ruled that former President Maithripala Sirisena, former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando, former National Intelligence Chief Sisira Mendis and former SIS Chief Jayawardena had violated the Fundamental Rights of the petitioners by failing to act on prior intelligence that could have prevented the attacks. The then President Sirisena was ordered to pay 100 million to the relatives of the victims. The attack became a political issue in the country, with the then rulers, the Rajapaksa family, being accused of using the attack to regain power. The Catholic church, unimpressed by the police investigations, called for international investigations to bring justice to the families of victims.
