logo
The emotional impact of AI: Are we losing human connection?

The emotional impact of AI: Are we losing human connection?

IOL News22-07-2025
Generative AI is well embedded in the daily lives of millions, but a shift is underway that deserves closer scrutiny, the author said.
Image: AI LAB
Generative AI is well embedded in the daily lives of millions, but a shift is underway that deserves closer scrutiny. In 2023, most conversations focused on how Gen AI would transform productivity. Streamlining tasks, automating workflows, and accelerating innovation were our bread and butter. But by 2025, the data is telling a different story: the most common use of Gen AI is now personal and emotional support.
This may seem like progress. Technology is stepping in to help people cope with loneliness, anxiety, and the pressures of modern life. But there is a deeper question worth asking: why is there such a widespread need for emotional support in the first place?
Covid-19 lockdowns left more than an economic and health legacy. Those seismic months fundamentally changed how we interact, work, and connect with one another. The norms established during lockdowns have persisted and, in many cases, deepened. Physical communities have thinned, and social interaction has increasingly shifted online. Those temporary behaviours intended to keep us safe have contributed to a new and more permanent kind of isolation.
Now, instead of rebuilding human connection, machines are becoming our companions and confidants. This is a turning point and it's not a healthy one.
At iqbusiness, we've seen firsthand how Gen AI can empower teams and drive operational gains. These are tangible, valuable applications that no modern business can do without. But leaders cannot ignore the parallel trend unfolding before us: Gen AI is stepping in where human connection is faltering, and that is what needs mending.
In recent analysis of the use cases of Gen AI in Harvard Business Review, Marc Zao-Sanders revealed that the top 10 most widespread uses have shown a significant shift between 2024 and 2025. In 2024, 'Generating ideas' was number one (now down to number 6) but has been replaced by 'Therapy / companionship' (up from two in 2024).
Top 6 Gen AI uses
1 Therapy / companionship
AI-powered tools are helping people manage stress, depression, and emotional regulation. But this surge signals something more: a deep deficit in human relationships. Leaders in businesses, government, schools, places of worship and communities need to take this moment seriously and not lose sight of what – and who – is at stake in the digital revolution.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
2 Organising my life (new entrant)
Many people are using Gen AI tools to track, motivate and organise their goals or tasks to enhance efficiencies and accountability. But in practice, this often results in fewer opportunities for collaboration and moments for professional assistance and insights.
3 Finding purpose (new entrant)
Humans have sought purpose since time immemorial, and Gen AI has not changed that. The wise would heed the words of Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl: 'Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms - to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one's own way.' Are we choosing our own way or allowing tech to make the choices for us?
4 Enhanced learning
AI tutors and adaptive learning platforms make education and learning more personal and accessible for those online. But without mentors or community engagement, much of the learning lacks context and lived insight, and many essential inter-personal skills necessary to grow and succeed are being lost.
5 Generating code for professionals
Gen AI is widely used by designers and product teams to jumpstart ideation, and developers lean on AI co-pilots to write and debug code. This is where Gen AI can have immense and sustainable value. It's efficient, but as reliance increases, deep skills may diminish as we reward speed over exploration and novelty over authenticity.
6. Generating ideas
We've moved quickly from our suspicion of Gen AI just two years ago to everyday use in almost every personal and professional setting. It's use for prompting ideas has dropped from one to six this year as it's overtaken by more alarming uses.
Other uses in the 2025 top ten are: Fun and nonsense, Improving code for pros, Creativity and Healthier living .
Why does this matter now?
The data clearly shows that humans are not only using technology more, but we are asking it to step into roles that used to belong to people without fully recognising or appreciating its social consequences. Turning to machines for comfort and connection is more than an efficiency play, and there is a real risk that this shift becomes self-reinforcing.
The more we normalise AI as a substitute for human interaction, the less incentive we have to invest in rebuilding human systems of care, of investing in our families, teams, communities. The erosion of human connection is not happening in isolation.
It is unfolding against a backdrop of deepening global anxiety — from geopolitical tensions and wars to climate crises and economic instability. Symbols like the Doomsday Clock, now just seconds from midnight, reflect not only existential threats but also our collective sense of unease. In such an environment, it is tempting to retreat into the efficiency and predictability of machines. But when artificial intelligence begins to fill the void left by fractured relationships and fatigued institutions, it risks becoming a crutch rather than a catalyst, enabling us to bypass the hard, human work of listening, empathising, and rebuilding trust. The more turbulent the world becomes, the more vital - not expendable - authentic human connection becomes.
Technology can and should play a role in supporting goals, facilitating communication, easing daily pressures, and navigating challenges with seemingly no solution. But it cannot replace the emotional intelligence, empathy, and accountability that come from forging human relationships and connections. These are not 'soft' attributes; they are the very foundations healthy societies and resilient economies.
Leaders in government, business and civil society must carefully balance the need to create spaces in our organisations where innovation and technology are embedded, but inherently human, real conversation and connections are prioritised.
The most valuable outcomes of Gen AI won't come from what it supercedes, but from how it empowers people to do more, feel more, and relate more to one another.
Adam Craker, chief executive of IQBusiness.
Image: Supplied
Adam Craker is CEO at iqbusiness
BUSINESS REPORT
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bankable new hires: How AI is reshaping banking talent
Bankable new hires: How AI is reshaping banking talent

IOL News

time20 hours ago

  • IOL News

Bankable new hires: How AI is reshaping banking talent

The proliferation of AI in the workforce not only demands embedding AI fluency early, but also, a more strategic approach to developing young talent, says the author. Image: AI Lab Artificial Intelligence (AI) is disrupting every phase of the banking value chain – including, critically, the recruitment of a workforce equipped to navigate its breakneck pace of change while sustaining both current and future business resilience. We're witnessing a paradox in recruitment. While companies rely on AI to filter applications, candidates are also turning to AI to refine and enhance theirs. From autogenerated responses to simulated interviews, technology is influencing both sides of the process. In a country where youth unemployment stands at 45.5% among individuals aged 15-34 years, the proliferation of AI in the workforce not only demands embedding AI fluency early, but also, a more strategic approach to developing young talent. Rethinking Graduate Roles Absa's graduate programme within Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) reflects this mindset. It's an 18-month rotation through various desks, including research and technical teams, and now includes exposure to AI, which is a growing exploratory area. Our Gen A Grad Programme blends theory, business skills, technical knowledge, soft skills, and on-the-job learning. Two years ago, the bank partnered with a corporate executive training firm to enhance the programme's relevance and introduce an AI component. Today, our graduates work on practical, real-world case studies in GenAI, AI, and data — and the feedback from receiving teams suggests we are on the right track. Receiving teams have praised the diverse and forward-thinking skillsets that these graduates bring. The programme has trained many graduates, equipping them with the tools to lead confidently in a technology-driven financial landscape. Where early-career professionals once gained experience by handling routine administrative tasks, AI now takes care of many of these responsibilities, from notetaking to task-tracking. This creates space for young hires to contribute more strategically from the outset. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ However, it also raises the bar: employers must ensure that graduates are equipped not only with technical know-how but with a critical understanding of how to use these tools effectively, ethically, and responsibly. At the same time, digital inequity presents a real challenge. Not all graduates have access to advanced AI tools, reliable internet, or exposure to the systems they'll be expected to use in the workplace. Left unaddressed, this divide creates a two-speed workforce. Graduate programmes must account for this gap and provide equal opportunities for all entrants to thrive. Authenticity and Ethics in an AI-Driven Talent Landscape As we accelerate digitisation, we must remain committed to human-centred hiring. Applicants want to be seen for who they are, not simply how well they navigate an algorithm. Similarly, employers want to attract real talent, not just those who know how to game AI-powered systems. That's why it's critical to establish clear standards around the ethical use of AI in recruitment. Creating a culture of ethical AI use starts early. This goes beyond compliance; it's about shaping habits and values from the outset. Young professionals should be encouraged to question the tools they use, understand AI's limitations, and be confident in their own voice. On the employer side, transparency and consistency are vital, along with providing support for responsible AI engagement across all levels of experience. Technical expertise – like coding in Python or Java – is still important. But so are softer skills like adaptability, digital storytelling and data ethics. Future-ready professionals will be those who combine technical fluency with a clear sense of accountability and social impact. Build with People, Not Just Technology The future of banking isn't just digital. It is also human. To navigate AI disruption effectively, banks must prioritise people-first transformation. That means building graduate programmes that mirror the pace of change to fully meet the moment. It also means crafting upskilling strategies that blend theory with application, and most of all, creating environments where innovation thrives. We don't yet know exactly what the AI-era bank will look like in 10 years. But we do know it will be built by people who understand technology, adapt with agility, and bring purpose-driven thinking to the table. Marsha De Wet is the Global Markets Chief Operating Officer at Absa CIB. Image: Supplied Marsha De Wet is the Global Markets Chief Operating Officer at Absa CIB *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL BUSINESS REPORT

South Africa is not ready for the coming white-collar AI bloodbath
South Africa is not ready for the coming white-collar AI bloodbath

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

South Africa is not ready for the coming white-collar AI bloodbath

South Africa is not ready for the coming white-collar AI bloodbath, says the author. Image: AI LAB A major disruption is unfolding in global white-collar employment. According to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, up to 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs could vanish in the next five years due to advances in artificial intelligence. As detailed in Axios' article 'Behind the Curtain: A White-Collar Bloodbath', this isn't science fiction; it's a forecast from one of the leading minds in the AI field. South Africa, already battling youth unemployment and graduate underemployment, is ill-prepared for this transformation. According to StatsSA, South Africa's youth unemployment rate stood at 45.5% in quarter one 2024, and even university graduates struggle to find meaningful, skills-aligned work. Our economy continues to rely heavily on labour-intensive sectors like mining and retail while offering limited pathways into knowledge work. Now, with AI rapidly mastering entry-level professional tasks, such as document drafting, basic analysis, and customer interaction, the last buffer between graduates and long-term exclusion may collapse. This shift is not about robots in factories; it is about machines replacing tasks traditionally assigned to junior professionals. Legal clerks, marketing interns, junior auditors, and admin graduates' roles, meant to build workplace experience, are increasingly handled by AI systems that are faster, cheaper, and tireless. Employers may not downsize immediately, but they are already freezing hiring or redesigning roles to be 'AI-first.' Without access to these stepping-stone roles, South Africa's already marginalised youth may find themselves locked out of the formal economy altogether. The government, academia, and business sectors are largely unresponsive to this looming crisis. Government conversations remain stuck in Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) rhetoric, disconnected from the speed and nature of current technological shifts. We are no longer preparing for change; we are reacting too late to one that is already here. To date, responses have been piecemeal. The Department of Communications and Digital Technologies has produced documents like the National Data and Cloud Policy and launched an AI Institute with the CSIR and UJ. However, these efforts lack a coordinated AI-readiness strategy that connects automation with job protection, ethical deployment, and skills development. The 2020 Presidential Commission on the 4IR laid out strong recommendations, but implementation has stalled. Meanwhile, digital upskilling initiatives funded through the National Skills Fund or SETAs focus mostly on basic IT literacy and coding, not AI fluency or workplace adaptation. Universities and TVET colleges continue to produce graduates for roles vulnerable to automation. While some institutions offer data science or entrepreneurship programmes, the majority of curricula remain outdated. Employers, for their part, are adopting AI in operations, particularly in banking, consulting, and customer service, but without public commitments to ethical deployment, job transition planning, or internship preservation. Public discourse is also behind. Civil society and researchers have begun tackling data ethics and algorithmic bias, but little attention is paid to AI's role in reshaping the graduate labour market. As a result, policy and pedagogy remain misaligned with the rapid automation of professional tasks. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ South Africa urgently needs a coordinated national strategy for AI integration and labour resilience. This strategy must include: Regulation of AI deployment in sectors like finance, education, and HR. An AI usage tax or levy to fund reskilling, digital public employment schemes, or universal basic income pilots. Labour market forecasting that tracks which roles are most vulnerable and identifies growth sectors suited to human skills. The education sector must act now. From basic education through to postgraduate study, curricula must equip students with data literacy, AI ethics, systems thinking, and interdisciplinary problem-solving. All disciplines, not just STEM, must be AI-aware. Pedagogies must evolve from rote learning to adaptive, applied learning. Employers must also take responsibility. Ethical AI adoption should include commitments to preserving pathways for young professionals, supporting employee reskilling, and maintaining entry-level learning opportunities. Without these, automation will deepen inequality and economic exclusion. We must also be bolder in where we look for future jobs. Care work, social entrepreneurship, the digital creative economy, rural innovation, and climate adaptation all require skills that AI cannot easily replicate, such as human judgement, emotional nuance, and cultural intelligence. If supported with funding and training, these sectors could provide both dignity and economic inclusion. While structural change is vital, individuals, especially tertiary students, must act proactively. First, they must become AI literate, understanding how platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and are transforming work. Many free or low-cost online courses are available. Second, students must strengthen human-centred skills such as ethical reasoning, creativity, communication, and teamwork, areas where machines still struggle. They should build real-world experience through volunteering, student leadership, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Third, graduates must build adaptable portfolios, showcasing skills through blogs, digital artefacts, or small projects. A certificate alone will no longer open doors. Finally, students should demand more from their institutions, AI-informed teaching, curriculum updates, and exposure to emerging tools and thinking. This moment demands courage and clarity. AI is not on the horizon; it is in the room. Without urgent, collaborative action across government, higher education, and business, South Africa risks cementing a two-tier society: those who build and manage the machines, and those left behind. If we act wisely, we can still shape a future where human talent and machine capability work together to create inclusive, ethical prosperity. Dr Zamandlovu Sizile Makola is a senior lecturer in the College of Economic and Management Sciences (CEMS) at Unisa. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT

Purpose at the pinnacle: Why boards must reclaim organisational intent
Purpose at the pinnacle: Why boards must reclaim organisational intent

IOL News

time22-07-2025

  • IOL News

Purpose at the pinnacle: Why boards must reclaim organisational intent

Stakeholders are increasingly attuned to authenticity, and they hold boards accountable not just for financial results, but for moral coherence. Image: AI Lab Nqobani Mzizi For many organisations, the word "purpose" has become an aspirational placeholder—framed on walls, repeated in reports, and recited at town halls. Yet too often, it remains disconnected from the daily decisions that shape an organisation's impact. When boards treat purpose as a branding exercise rather than a governance imperative, they reduce it to performance theatre. This squanders the board's most powerful tool—the ability to drive true strategic alignment and long-term value creation. The board is the highest custodian of purpose. Defining purpose is not management's job alone. That accountability lies at the board's apex. King IV echoes this, stating under Principle 1 that the governing body should lead ethically and effectively, and under Principle 4 that it should ensure the organisation is seen as a responsible corporate citizen. Purpose is the anchor aligning ethical conduct and strategic direction. According to ISO 37000, the international governance standard, organisational purpose is the foundation from which all governance conditions and practices flow. Yet in too many boardrooms, purpose is treated as abstract or sentimental—useful for external messaging, but irrelevant to risk oversight or financial strategy. This failure to anchor purpose at the governance level explains why so many organisations drift. Without clear organisational intent, strategy becomes reactive, culture becomes performative, and stakeholder trust becomes fragile. And while boards may pride themselves on fiduciary rigour or ESG compliance, they often overlook the foundational question: 'what are we here to do, and for whom'? Organisational purpose is not a slogan. It is a directional force. When articulated with clarity and courage, it helps boards make trade-offs, allocate capital more wisely, and weigh long-term implications against short-term wins. In times of crisis or disruption, purpose becomes the compass. But a compass only works when it is consulted. And boards that delegate purpose-setting to branding consultants or CSR departments are not governing; they are observing. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading South African examples illustrate this alignment. Take African Bank: its board anchored the organisation's mission to 'advance lives through financial services,' ensuring strategic decisions, from capital allocation to product approval, reflected this intent. When launching Isiko, a financial product designed for culturally significant events like lobola or cultural ceremonies, management's proposal was evaluated against the board's governance lens: does this meaningfully advance lives? Does it align with our broader social relevance? By treating purpose as a strategic filter, not just a slogan, the board turned intent into accountability. This contrasts with organisations where purpose is rubber-stamped but absent from key decisions. Discovery, under Adrian Gore's leadership, provides another example. The Vitality-based business model, which incentivises healthier behaviour through financial rewards, has been underpinned by a clear purpose: making people healthier and enhancing lives. The board has integrated this purpose into international expansion strategies, risk frameworks, and partnerships, ensuring that the business logic aligns with its social intent. Discovery's directors understand that purpose, when governed actively, is not a constraint, but a multiplier of innovation and differentiation. Another glaring case is that of Unilever under the leadership of Paul Polman. He challenged the status quo by embedding sustainability into the core of business strategy, encouraging longer-term thinking even when quarterly earnings suffered. The board backed a shift away from short-termism, aligning its oversight functions with Unilever's Sustainable Living Plan. The board's resolve to support Polman's decisions amid investor resistance shows how purpose can be governed with conviction, not just communicated. Conversely, when purpose is absent or allowed to fracture, organisations risk governance drift, cultural malaise, and even catastrophic ethical failure. Intention is not enough. Purpose must be fully embedded in strategy, oversight, and reward, integrated into board processes and strategic decisions. Is purpose considered when approving strategy, setting KPIs, evaluating executive performance, or assessing risk appetite? Does the board measure the alignment between stated purpose and stakeholder perception? Or is purpose left behind once the mission statement is signed off? Purpose also acts as a powerful diagnostic tool. When governance failures emerge, whether through ethical lapses, reputational harm or cultural toxicity, they often reflect a disconnection between stated intent and actual behaviour. Purpose, when governed well, is a form of risk mitigation. But when left untethered, it can become a source of disillusionment. Stakeholders are increasingly attuned to authenticity, and they hold boards accountable not just for financial results, but for moral coherence. This is not to suggest that boards must become moral philosophers or abandon profit. Rather, it is to remind us that profit without purpose is extractive and unsustainable. A well-governed purpose does not undermine commercial viability; it enhances it by providing a consistent framework for decisions, a north star during uncertainty, and a narrative that binds employees, customers, and investors to a shared vision. Reclaiming purpose is not about rewriting taglines but about embedding intent into the DNA of governance. Boards serious about reclaiming purpose should ask: Are we governing purpose as a core board responsibility or outsourcing it to brand managers? Do our strategic decisions reflect our declared intent, especially when trade-offs are required? Have we built governance processes that test for purpose alignment across performance, risk, and remuneration? Are we willing to revisit our purpose when stakeholder needs, societal expectations or market realities shift? As boards prepare for increasingly complex futures shaped by technological disruption, climate imperatives, and shifting social expectations, purpose becomes more than a virtue. It becomes a necessity. It is the one thing that cannot be automated, outsourced or legislated. It must be owned. At the highest level. With clarity. And with courage. Nqobani Mzizi is a Professional Accountant (SA), (IoDSA) and an Academic. Image: Supplied * Nqobani Mzizi is a Professional Accountant (SA), (IoDSA) and an Academic. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. BUSINESS REPORT

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store