Almond, peanut or cashew: Which nut butter is best for your health?
Muscling in on its territory are butters made from other, more glamorous nuts: almond, pecan, macadamia and the now popular pistachio. A tiny tub of walnut or cashew nut butter in Waitrose or Holland and Barrett might set you back £10, and in Wholefoods in Chelsea, London, you can make your own customised nut butter blend in a hand-churned machine for the small price of £1.19 for 100g.
Packed with protein, fibre and healthy fats, it's easy to see why nut butters appeal to the health-conscious among us. But is there really any difference between these stylish new spreads and the good old-fashioned peanut butter in the back of your cupboard? We asked the experts.
On the whole, nut butters are very healthy. 'I tend to recommend them a lot to clients,' says nutritionist Jenna Hope. 'They can be a really convenient way to get more nutrients into your diet.' Nut butters are a good source of protein, 'especially for people who are following plant-based or vegan diets,' Hope adds. A 30g serving of peanut butter contains around 8g of protein, roughly the same as that in a large egg. A spoonful this big would also contain nearly three whole grams of fibre.
There are many benefits to including a lot of nuts in your diet. Some research indicates that doing so can protect against cancer, Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and they are a core part of the MIND diet, which was developed to help stave off dementia.
The advantage of nut butters over whole nuts is that 'the blending done to make nut butters means that some of the digestion is done for your system before you actually eat, making those nutrients more readily available,' Hope says. That said, this also makes them more calorific, 'as your body is doing less work to break it down'.
'You need to be mindful of serving sizes when it comes to nut butters, as they contain a significant amount of fat, even though it's healthy fat for the most part,' she adds. 'Moderation is key. If you're having a nut butter on toast or to make a sauce for a noodle dish, I'd use no more than a tablespoon, and if it's going in a curry or on top of a yogurt bowl with lots of other toppings, then a teaspoon is ample.'
On that note: not all nut butters are made equal. Some nut butters come with added oils, like palm oil, 'which is high in unhealthy saturated fats,' Hope explains. Others can be heavily salted, with salty foods contributing to high blood pressure.
For this reason, 'try to find a nut butter that is a 100 per cent nut, or that only has a small amount of added salt, which I would count as less than 0.08 per cent on the ingredients' list,' Hope advises. Sugary or other flavoured nut butters are best avoided, as they will likely be high in sugar – 'even where they've used agave syrup or coconut sugar, which both sound healthier but aren't necessarily' – and contain added flavourings.
Peanut
Almond
Cashew
Hazelnut
Walnut
Macadamia
Pistachio
Pecan
91 calories, 7g fat, 4g protein, 1.3g fibre
When it comes to protein, peanut butter comes out top, making it 'especially good for people who don't eat meat,' says Hope. It also contains vitamin E, 'which is great for your skin health', as well as a good amount of folate and copper, which help with the production of red blood cells. Though peanut butter is high in fat, 'most of them in an peanut butter free from added oils will be monounsaturated or heart-healthy fats,' Hope says. 'Just be aware of how much you're adding to your meals.'
87 calories, 7.8g fat, 3.1g protein, 1.6g fibre
Almond butter has the most fibre of any nut butter, and also has fewer calories, making it a good option for people looking to eat well while restricting their calorie intake. It is also a good source of protein, though it contains marginally less of it than peanut butter, and it's packed with magnesium and calcium. It is more costly than peanut butter, however, and Hope would recommend having whole almonds rather than almond butter, as these contain even more fibre to 'nourish your gut bacteria'.
101 calories, 8.4g fat, 3.2g protein, 0.6g fibre
Cashew butter isn't so high in protein, but is packed with healthy fat and B vitamins as well as magnesium, 'which is crucial in more than 600 processes in the body,' Hope says.
102 calories, 9.8g fat, 2.6g protein, 1.5g fibre
Hazelnut butter is a good source of vitamin E and B vitamins, as well as folate (crucial to skin and eye health, immune response and the formation of red blood cells, respectively). Just steer clear of mock Nutella butters made with hazelnuts and chocolate, and added sugar, Hope says, unless you're looking for a treat.
98 calories, 9.9g fat, 2.1g protein, 1.2g fibre
Walnuts are high in omega-3s, says Hope, which is what makes the nuts powerful for protecting your brain health, an effect observed in many studies. Consuming it in butter form may add to those benefits by making the nutrients more readily available. Bear in mind its high fat content, however, and the fact that it is slightly less protein-rich than some other options. Walnut butter as a niche product is also much more expensive than whole walnuts, 'which are likely just as good for you,' Hope says.
108 calories, 11.4g fat, 1.2g protein, 1.4g fibre
Macadamia nuts 'are said to have the best omega-3 to omega-6 ratio, making them excellent for brain health, especially if you don't eat fish,' says Hope. Though they are lower in protein than peanuts, this balance of healthy fats 'means that they have a profile that's very favourable when it comes to reducing inflammation'. If you're struggling to get enough omega-3 into your diet, it may be worth adding a dollop of this spread to your breakfast, though they don't offer the same level as walnuts.
90 calories, 8.3g fat, 2.7g protein, 0.9g fibre
Trendy pistachios are packed with beneficial plant compounds, lending their bright green colour, Hope says. This also indicates the presence of antioxidants, though they're also high in potassium (which is good for your muscles, blood pressure and heart) and vitamin B6 (which aids metabolism and boosts your mood and brain function). Just swerve the sugary pistachio creams that have also become commonplace on shelves if you're looking for a healthy add to your breakfast, Hope advises: they look similar but are a very different product.
106 calories, 10.8g fat, 1.4g protein, 1.4g fibre
Pecans are naturally sweet, with a rich, nutty taste. They're not quite as high in protein or fibre than other nuts, but having it on your toast or adding a spoonful to smoothies may help to curb your sweet tooth.
Which nut butter is healthiest, then? It all depends on what you're looking for, says Hope. Really 'it's best to switch them up when you can, as they all contain different micronutrients and can play a role in adding to the variety in your diet'. But if you're going to pick one, there's no harm in making it peanut.
You can always make your own nut butters: it's as easy as 'roasting the nuts and then blending them in a high-speed food processor,' says Hope. But you may not want to spend the time needed. 'If you're time-constrained, you're much better off making yourself a healthy dinner and opting for one of the more minimally processed nut butters in supermarkets.'
Meridian's peanut and almond butters are as simple as it gets: both, in their crunchy and smooth varieties alike, are 100 per cent nut. They're also blended into butters with their skins on, retaining more fibre and micronutrients. Aside from almond and peanut, Meridian also makes cashew and hazelnut butter, as well as light and dark tahini (and a range of other flavoured, less healthy nut butters).
With no added salt, this range is the best you'll find in mainstream stockists, though Hope notes that many supermarket own brand products are actually sugar-free and oil-free, and either very low-salt or salt-free, and much kinder on your wallet to boot.
Pip & Nut's smooth peanut butter contains 99.5 per cent peanuts and 'just a sprinkle' of salt – nothing else. It's the same story for the brand's almond smooth and chunky almond butters. This makes it a winner in Hope's book, though its flavoured sweet and salty products contain agave syrup, coconut oil, and more than just a pinch of salt, at 1 per cent of the total jar.
Manilife makes a range of nut butters with different roast strengths, a bit like coffee, providing a range of different flavour options without additives or sugar. Its peanut and almond butters are on the slightly high side when it comes to salt, however, which comes in at 0.9 per cent of each jar, slightly above Hope's safe range. 'Overall though, it's a very good brand. I'd just avoid it if you have high blood pressure or you're concerned about developing it,' she says.
Whole Earth has the sort of healthy-looking label and name you might reach for when you see it on the shelves, but it falls far short of some of its rivals when it comes to health. Its smooth peanut butter is just 96 per cent nut, the rest being made up of salt and dreaded palm oil. All this and it costs a pretty penny. It's best swerved, Hope says.
'They are equally healthy,' says Hope. 'Peanut butter is higher in protein, but almonds are higher in micronutrients. It all depends on what you're looking for.'
'Macadamia nut butter and almond butter are both lower in carbs than peanut butter,' Hope says, though it's worth pointing out that all nut butters are low in sugar so long as none has been added to your jar of choice.
'I would say that almond butter is the best alternative to peanut butter,' Hope says, given its high fibre content, but 'the best nut butter is the one that you enjoy the most'.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Britons smoke an estimated 28.6 billion cigarettes every year, study finds
An estimated 28.6 billion cigarettes are smoked in Britain each year, the equivalent of 78 million a day, according to new analysis. There are particularly high levels of consumption in more disadvantaged areas, with researchers calling for targeted public health efforts to tackle smoking rates. Charities warned the 'staggering figure' is a 'stark reminder of the deadly toll of inaction', and urged the Government to prioritise the Tobacco and Vapes Bill after Parliament's summer recess. The Cancer Research UK study, carried out by experts at University College London (UCL), used monthly Smoking Toolkit Study data from between 2022 and 2024. The analysis estimates adults who smoked consumed an average of 10.4 cigarettes per day, with 5.5% of those smoking more than 20 a day. Average consumption per smoker per year was 528 cigarettes, equating to 28.6 billion per year. Office for National Statistics (ONS) data suggests 11.9% adults in the UK – the equivalent of six million people – smoked in 2023, the lowest proportion since current records began in 2011. However, England could struggle to meet its smokefree target of 5% by 2030 if current trends continue, according to Cancer Research UK, with projections suggesting it may not be met until 2039. The study also highlighted inequalities in cigarette consumption in Britain. People from more deprived backgrounds smoked 11 cigarettes a day on average, compared to those in wealthier areas, who smoked 9.4 per day. Researchers also found people in the North East and Scotland smoked the most – 11.7 each – while people in London and the South West smoked the least, with 8.4 and 9.5 cigarettes respectively. Dr Sarah Jackson, research fellow at UCL's Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, said bringing down consumption rates can improve public health and also help the environment. 'Tackling smoking is not just about preventing uptake among future generations,' she said. 'Supporting the six million people in the UK who currently smoke cigarettes to quit will have major benefits for public health and for the environment. 'Despite declining smoking rates, over 28 billion cigarettes are still consumed in Great Britain each year, generating up to 140,000 metric tons of toxic, non-biodegradable waste annually. 'Reducing cigarette consumption, particularly in the most affected regions and communities, is critical not only to save lives and narrow health inequalities, but also to protect our environment from one of the most pervasive forms of plastic pollution.' Dr Ian Walker, executive director of policy at Cancer Research UK, said: 'While great strides have been made to bring down smoking rates, we can't afford to be complacent. 'Every week, around 550 million cigarettes are still smoked in Britain – that's enough to fill an Olympic sized swimming pool. It's vital that everyone, wherever they live, can access the support they need to quit smoking for good.' Dr Walker described the Tobacco and Vapes Bill as 'a historic opportunity to help stub out the harms of smoking' but said it is frustrating the the legislation 'isn't progressing through Parliament as quickly as it should be'. The legislation – which cleared the House of Commons in March – will prevent anyone born on or after January 1 2009 from legally smoking if it becomes law. It is set to undergo further scrutiny in the House of Lords. However, around 20 billion cigarettes have been smoked in Britain since the bill was reintroduced in Commons in November last year, according to the analysis. Dr Walker added: 'Tobacco is a toxic product that should have no place in our future, and I urge all parliamentarians to back a smokefree UK and prioritise this Bill when it returns to the House of Lords. 'This world-leading legislation has strong political and public support that can't be ignored.' Reacting to the study, Hazel Cheeseman, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health (Ash), said: 'Since Parliament last debated the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, an estimated 6.7 billion cigarettes have been smoked in the UK. 'That staggering figure is a stark reminder of the deadly toll of inaction. Every day that passes without this legislation is a day lost in protecting our children from addiction and improving public health. 'We urge the Government to make this Bill a priority immediately after summer recess. The country cannot afford further delay – this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a smokefree future, and it must not be squandered.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
PepsiCo to rebrand Lay's, Tostitos without artificial dyes, flavors
By Jessica DiNapoli and Juveria Tabassum (Reuters) -PepsiCo is planning to highlight what will no longer be in its potato or tortilla chips - artificial colors or flavors - when it re-launches its Lay's and Tostitos brands later this year, executives said on Thursday. The overhaul for the company's top-selling snack brands comes as U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pushes Americans to eat "whole foods" and pressures manufacturers to ditch dyes. U.S. food makers have been announcing plans to remove dyes from their products and introduce new ones without the colors under pressure from Kennedy and the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) social movement backing him. "We're trying to elevate the real food perception of Lay's. If you think about the simplest and most natural snack, it is a potato chip; it's a potato, it's oil, and it's a little bit of salt—the most simple, no artificial ingredients," said CEO Ramon Laguarta in a call with investors. The company also said it was expanding use of avocado and olive oil across its brands, rather than the canola or soybean oil it uses. The MAHA movement has questioned the health benefits of certain food oils. In April, PepsiCo said it planned to migrate its entire portfolio to natural colors, or give consumers the option to have a product without a synthetic dye. Its Cheetos snacks and Gatorade drinks rely on synthetic dyes for their bright hues. It already offers Lay's and Doritos without artificial colors or flavors under its Simply segment. 'The Simply line extension for existing chip brands is still in early innings - consumers have not engaged so far, and given that, it will be seen how consumers react to a rebranding of Lay's and Tostitos over the next couple of quarters,' said Christian Greiner, F/m Investments senior portfolio manager. COSTLY PREMIUM PRODUCTS? The soda pop maker also said on Thursday it would use sugar in its products like Pepsi beverages if consumers want it. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump said Coca-Cola will start using cane sugar in its beverages in the U.S., a dietary preference of Kennedy's MAHA movement. Both Pepsi and Coke use high-fructose corn syrup for their sodas, which is generally more cost-effective. The moves come at a time when packaged food companies like PepsiCo are seeing consumers reel in their spending after the industry raised prices over the years since the COVID-19 pandemic to shield their margins. PepsiCo has been offering more products at lower price points and smaller pack sizes in its food segment to meet the demand for affordable snacks. "While there is clearly demand for cleaner ingredients in food and beverage products, it remains to be seen if consumers will be willing to pay up for these more premium products, especially in today's inflationary environment and more price-sensitive consumer base," said Arun Sundaram, analyst at CFRA Research. Laguarta also said on Thursday the company would be entering the "liquid protein" space, as protein shakes grow increasingly popular. He also said the company would be adding protein options to its popcorn brand PopCorners and Quaker snacks. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists use DNA from three people to protect babies from rare disease
LONDON - A pioneering IVF technique combining DNA from three people to protect a baby from a rare genetic disease has been used in Britain, leading to a healthy cohort of eight babies with no sign of serious disease, scientists said Wednesday. Four girls and four boys, including one set of twins, were born healthy after scientists used the treatment to prevent mothers with mutations in their mitochondrial DNA from transmitting the condition to their children, scientists at Newcastle University in northern England said in a statement Wednesday. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The authors say it represents the first study into an entire cohort of babies and paves the way for further research on their health outcomes, as well as improved medical techniques for that specific treatment - which is granted approval in the United Kingdom on a case-by-case basis. Mitochondria are commonly known as the 'powerhouse of the cell' and produce energy required for major parts of the body to function. However, small mutations in mitochondrial DNA can affect tissues with high-energy demands such as the heart, muscle and brain, causing devastating disease and, in some cases, death. Mitochondrial DNA is inherited from the mother, and although males can be affected, they do not transmit the disease, researchers said. About 1 in 5,000 babies are born worldwide each year with mutations that can cause the disease, researchers said. Now, scientists have detailed how an IVF technique called pronuclear transfer has been used to combine the DNA of three people to reduce the risk of mitochondrial disease being passed down the generations, in accompanying studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday. The technique uses 99.9 percent of the DNA from a man and woman, with another 0.1 percent from a second woman's donor egg. It works by transplanting the nuclear genome of an egg from the mother with the condition - which contains genes essential for individual characteristics like hair color and height - to an egg donated by an unaffected woman that has had its nuclear genome removed, researchers said. The resulting embryo inherits nuclear DNA from its two parents, but the mitochondrial DNA comes from the donated egg, researchers said. The treatment was offered to certain women at very high risk of passing on serious mitochondrial disease, in accordance with U.K. regulations that assess each application for the procedure on a case-by-case basis. The eight infants - who range in age from newborn to over 2 years old - were assessed to be healthy, meeting developmental milestones and reported levels of mitochondrial disease-causing mutations that were undetectable or at levels unlikely to cause disease, the Newcastle University statement said. Three of the babies had levels of disease-causing mitochondrial DNA mutations of up to 20 percent, which is still below the 80 percent threshold for clinical disease, it added. Doug Turnbull, a neurologist at Newcastle University who co-wrote the study, said it was the first to document a 'cohort' of children who had received the treatment. He said it is the result of an extremely cautious approach by scientists and regulators that has been more than two decades in the making. 'People have used very similar techniques, but nobody's quite used this particular technique,' he told The Washington Post in a phone interview Thursday. 'It's just absolutely critical when you're doing a new technique to be cautious and to make sure … it's as safe and efficient as possible.' The procedure has also raised concern from some, including religious groups, about its ethics and the fear that it could open the door to further genetic modification. Peter Thompson, chief executive of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, which regulates the process in Britain, said that only people with a 'very high risk' of passing on a serious mitochondrial disease are eligible for the treatment and that every application is assessed individually. As of July 1, 35 patients have been granted approval by U.K. authorities to proceed with the treatment since it was first licensed in 2017. 'These robust but flexible regulatory processes allow the technique to be used safely for the purposes that Parliament agreed in 2015,' Thompson said in a statement in response to Wednesday's news. Scientists have cautiously welcomed the findings, while stressing the importance of long-term monitoring and raising the prospect of whether the procedure offers advantages over embryo screening for genetic disease. Others have raised the issue of cost in the long-term project that is supported by Britain's National Health Service and medical charity the Wellcome Trust, among other groups. Mary Herbert, who is professor of reproductive biology at Newcastle University and lead author of the research paper, said 'the findings give grounds for optimism' but further research is needed to 'bridge the gap' between reducing risk of mitochondrial disease and preventing it. Turnbull said the team is also looking to improve medical techniques and follow up with the children involved for as long as possible to track their health outcomes. He said researchers are offering health assessments for five years, but it 'would be lovely to be able to follow them up much longer.' Joanna Poulton, a professor in mitochondrial genetics at the University of Oxford, who was not involved in the research, said 'time will tell' whether the treatment results in 'dramatic clinical advance.' The births come amid a wider boom in genomic sequencing and IVF start-ups that have sparked a wider debate about the ethics and science behind embryo screening and genetic preselection. In the United States, those undertaking IVF typically test for rare genetic disorders stemming from a single gene mutation, such as cystic fibrosis, or chromosomal abnormalities such as Down syndrome. The use of donor mitochondria, however, is not permitted under U.S. regulations. In Britain, the creation of babies using DNA from three people was first made legal in 2015, hailed for its ability to prevent serious disease being passed on. Related Content An asylum seeker abandons her claim and leaves Trump's America He may have stopped Trump's would-be assassin. Now he's telling his story. He seeded clouds over Texas. Then came the conspiracy theories. Solve the daily Crossword