In Delhi and New York, Hindu right wing lines up against NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani
'Save NYC from global intifada,' it read in letters five feet high. 'Reject Mamdani.'
The banner, seemingly aimed at the city's Jewish voters, touched on the campaign's most charged foreign policy issue:
Mr Mamdani's criticism of Israel . But the group behind it wasn't Jewish or Israeli. Its members are Indian American Hindus, who accuse Mr Mamdani of pushing an anti-Hindu and anti-Indian agenda.
For years, Mr Mamdani has assailed the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a populist whose political ideology inextricably links nationalism with Hinduism at the expense of the country's Muslim minority.
Mr Mamdani called the prime minister a 'war criminal' in May. Previously, he lobbied to stop Mr Modi from visiting New York, and demanded that a state assembly member return campaign contributions from Indian Americans whom he characterised as 'Hindu fascists'.
While campaigning for the state assembly in 2020, Mr Mamdani attended a demonstration in Times Square at which a group protesting the construction of a Hindu temple on the site of a one-time mosque in India chanted, 'Who are Hindus? Bastards!'
Mr Mamdani has never publicly condemned those remarks, and his campaign initially declined to comment when asked about them, among other matters. Later in the video, Mr Mamdani says he is there to fight for an India that is 'pluralistic' and 'where everyone can belong regardless of their religion'.
After this story's publication, Ms Zara Rahim, a senior campaign adviser, said in a statement that Mr Mamdani 'rejects rhetoric targeting Hindus' and attended the 2020 protest to 'stand against right-wing nationalism' in India. She added that Mr Mamdani's mother is Hindu, and that the religion 'is a meaningful part of Zohran's life'.
Now, Mamdani is within striking distance of becoming the city's first Muslim and first person of South Asian heritage to become mayor, and he finds himself
on the receiving end of attacks by an army of Mr Modi supporters , both in India and the United States.
The efforts reveal how sectarian politics in Delhi can affect an election in New York. In India, attacks on Mr Mamdani blare from pro-Modi news outlets across millions of TVs and smartphones. In the United States, Indian American groups, some with direct ties to Mr Modi and his governing Bharatiya Janata Party, are taking a more subtle approach – raising money for Mr Mamdani's opponents.
'There were simultaneous campaigns by India-based Hindu nationalists and U.S.-based Hindu groups, pushing the idea that he would be an anti-Hindu candidate,' said Mr Raqib Naik, director of the Center for the Study of Organized Hate, a watchdog group that tracks Islamophobia online.
Despite such attacks, Mr Mamdani has found passionate support among many South Asians in New York. Younger, working-class, Muslim and liberal South Asians including Hindus are energised by the possibility that New York could have its first South Asian mayor, even if some Indian Americans think his views are anti-Hindu. Mr Mamdani won by large margins in some neighbourhoods with sizeable South Asian populations, and he captured 52 per cent of all first-choice votes cast in majority-Asian neighbourhoods.
New York City's roughly 447,064 South Asian residents are an important pool of voters, but they are hardly a monolithic bloc, and it is hard to predict the effect some degree of Hindu opposition might have on Mr Mamdani's electoral chances. (Between 2023 and 2024, the Pew Research Center estimated that Hindus make up 2 per cent of New York's metropolitan population, and other survey data places the number of Hindu adherents in the city at close to 80,000.)
New York is America's largest city and financial capital, affording its mayor an outsize role on the world stage. As Mr Mamdani prepares for the general election and tries to reassure moderate Democrats that he is a viable contender, he is also facing the ire of a party machine a world away.
One of Mr Mamdani's main criticisms of Mr Modi concerns his role in 2002 as leader of the Indian state of Gujarat during sectarian riots. Mr Modi has been accused of failing to slow or stop violence that left hundreds dead, most of them Muslims. In the aftermath, Mr Modi faced sanctions by the United States and at one point was denied a visa to visit.
Backlash to Mr Mamdani's remarks has come from the top in India. A BJP national spokesperson Sanju Verma recently called Mamdani a 'Hinduphobic bigot' and 'a rabid liar'.
The BJP's talking points have been amplified to a global audience by a network of pro-Modi outlets and influencers.
One anchor at a pro-Modi television network recently called Mr Mamdani a 'part-time revolutionary, full-time Modi baiter'. Another announcer said Mr Mamdani associated 'with Pakistani lobbyists in the United States', suggesting that the candidate would promote the interests of India's longtime rival.
According to data reviewed by The New York Times and compiled by The Center for the Study of Organized Hate, in the weeks between June 13 and June 30, more than 600 posts criticising Mr Mamdani were uploaded to X from known right-wing accounts in India and global profiles associated with Hindu nationalism, some with hundreds of thousands of followers.
Professor Rohit Chopra of Santa Clara University, who studies Hindu nationalism, said Mr Mamdani's Muslim identity and sharp criticism of Mr Modi have been enough to 'discredit him among Indian Americans while also being played to maximum effect for political capital within India'.
His parents' backgrounds have provided additional ammunition for the Hindu right. Mr Mamdani, 33, was born in Uganda, but his father is from Gujarat, Mr Modi's home state, where hundreds of people, many of them Muslim, were killed in riots in 2002. His mother, filmmaker Mira Nair, is a doyenne of India's progressive left.
In the United States, the distrust of Mr Mamdani among some Hindus has motivated on-the-ground political action, and those efforts have been supercharged by diaspora groups' close ties to Mr Modi and his party.
The Gujarati Samaj of New York, an Indian cultural centre in Queens with about 4,000 members, exemplifies the U.S. groups that are in close contact with Mr Modi and are actively supporting Mr Mamdani's opponents.
Samaj members visited Mr Modi in India in February and remain 'in touch' with him, speaking to him 'directly', the group's president Harshad Patel said. In July, members held a fundraiser for Mayor Eric Adams, the incumbent running against Mr Mamdani as an independent. In 2023, Mr Adams shared a stage with Mr Modi at the UN's International Yoga Day.
Mr Satya Dosapati, the founder of the Indian Americans for Cuomo PAC, which paid for the aerial banner over the Statue of Liberty, previously led protests against the University of Pennsylvania when Mr Modi was dropped as a speaker there in 2013.
The Hindu American Foundation, whose members maintain relationships with the Indian government and which is the largest Hindu advocacy organization in the United States, was cofounded by Dr Mihir Meghani, who wrote a Hindu nationalist essay adopted by the BJP.
The foundation has not taken a public position on Mr Mamdani's campaign, but its director Suhag Shukla attacked Mr Mamdani in an online post as 'an entitled, dilettante' and said in a statement that he has used 'demonising rhetoric' against Hindus. Other former and current leaders of the foundation have also criticised the candidate online.
Mr Mamdani, now running in a general election and seeking a broader base of support, said recently that he would 'discourage' using the controversial phrase 'globalise the intifada,' which inspired the banner over the Statue of Liberty. Many see the statement as a call for violence.
The question remains whether Mr Mamdani will similarly temper his criticism of Mr Modi as November's vote approaches. He declined a request to be interviewed for this article.
Since the clip of Mr Mamdani calling the prime minister a war criminal went viral among Hindu voters, Mr Mamdani has been less vocal about Indian politics. NYTIMES
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
US House panel subpoenas Clintons in Epstein probe
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ex-US president Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary arrive at the White House for a state dinner on May 23, 2024. WASHINGTON - US lawmakers on Aug 5 subpoenaed former president Bill Clinton and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton for testimony on Jeffrey Epstein, in a major escalation of the controversy surrounding the investigation into the notorious sex offender. The Clintons were among multiple former Democratic and Republican government officials – as well as the Justice Department – targeted by investigators reviewing the handling of the disgraced financier's case after he died in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent after the Justice Department angered Trump supporters – many of whom believe Epstein was murdered in a cover-up – when it confirmed in July that he had died by suicide in his prison cell and that his case was effectively closed. The department also said Epstein had no secret 'client list' – rebuffing conspiracy theories held by Mr Trump's far-right supporters about supposedly high-level Democratic complicity. Mr Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in the Republican-led Congress – with some support from majority lawmakers – have also been seeking a floor vote to force their release. 'By your own admission, you flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane four separate times in 2002 and 2003,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote to former president Clinton. 'During one of these trips, you were even pictured receiving a 'massage' from one of Mr Epstein's victims.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading The White House has been seeking to redirect public attention from uproar over its handling of the affair with a series of headline-grabbing announcements including baseless claims that former president Barack Obama headed a 'treasonous conspiracy' against Mr Trump. Epstein was for years a friend and associate of Mr Trump and numerous high-profile people before he was convicted of sex crimes and then imprisoned pending trial for allegedly trafficking underage girls. His death supercharged a conspiracy theory long promoted by Trump supporters that Epstein had run an international pedophile ring and that elites wanted to make sure he never revealed their secrets. After Mr Trump returned to power in January, his administration promised to release Epstein case files. Past relationship When Attorney-General Pam Bondi announced on July 7 that she had nothing to release, Republicans were furious – and Mr Trump has attempted to control the scandal ever since. The case got even more complicated for the president after a Wall Street Journal report that he had written a lewd birthday letter to Epstein in 2003. Mr Trump denies this and has sued the Journal. The Journal then dropped a separate story, saying Bondi had informed Mr Trump in May that his name appeared several times in the Epstein files, even if there was no indication of wrongdoing. Other officials targeted by the Oversight Committee include former FBI director James Comey, former special counsel Robert Mueller and ex-attorney-generals Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Bill Barr, Jeff Sessions, and Alberto Gonzales. Their depositions will take place between mid-August and mid-October. Mr Comer also issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein – including its communications with Mr Trump's predecessor Joe Biden and his officials. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his alleged crimes – although her cooperation is considered unlikely. The latest move from Mr Comer comes after Democrats on the oversight panel forced a vote to issue a subpoena just before the August recess, with three House Republicans backing the effort. 'Justice must apply to everyone, no matter how rich, powerful, or well-connected they are,' said Ms Summer Lee, the Democratic congresswoman who introduced the motion. AFP

Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury information largely already public: US DOJ
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ghislaine Maxwell stands at the podium during her sentencing in a courtroom sketch in New York City, on June 28, 2022. NEW YORK - Much of the information presented to the grand jury that indicted Ghislaine Maxwell for helping the late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls has already been made public, the Justice Department said in a court filing on Aug 5. President Donald Trump in July instructed Attorney-General Pam Bondi to seek the release of the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material, as he sought to quell discontent from his base of conservative supporters and congressional Democrats over his administration's handling of documents from the cases. Aug 5's filing underscored how it is unclear whether the public will learn anything new or noteworthy from the potential release of such material. The Justice Department said much of the testimony from law enforcement officers at Maxwell's grand jury proceedings in 2020 was corroborated by the victims and witnesses who testified publicly at her trial the following year. "Much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony - with the exception of the identities of certain victims and witnesses - was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses," the Justice Department wrote in the filing. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted of sex trafficking. Epstein died by suicide in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. In July, Deputy US Attorney-General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell to see if she had any information about other people who may have committed crimes. Neither party has provided a detailed account of what they discussed. Maxwell last week was moved from a prison in Florida to a lower-security facility in Texas. Grand juries meet in secret to guard against interference in criminal investigations, and records of their proceedings cannot be disclosed without a judge's permission. The Justice Department has cited what it calls continuing public interest in the cases in asking Manhattan-based judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer to authorise the disclosure of the grand jury transcripts. Lawyers for Epstein, Maxwell and their alleged victims are due to share their views on the potential disclosures with the judges by Aug 5. Separately on Aug 5, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein. Epstein was known for socialising with wealthy and powerful individuals, and his death in jail has fuelled conspiracy theories that other prominent people may have been involved in his crimes and that he was murdered. Mr Trump, a Republican, had promised to make public Epstein-related files if re-elected and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. Democrats are also pushing for the release of Epstein files, saying Mr Trump should be held accountable for breaking his promise to release them. REUTERS

Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury information largely already public, DOJ says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell stands at the podium to address Judge Alison Nathan during her sentencing in a courtroom sketch in New York City, U.S. June 28, 2022. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg/File Photo NEW YORK - Much of the information presented to the grand jury that indicted Ghislaine Maxwell for helping the late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls has already been made public, the Justice Department said in a court filing on Tuesday. President Donald Trump last month instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material, as he sought to quell discontent from his base of conservative supporters and congressional Democrats over his administration's handling of documents from the cases. Tuesday's filing underscored how it is unclear whether the public will learn anything new or noteworthy from the potential release of such material. The Justice Department said much of the testimony from law enforcement officers at Maxwell's grand jury proceedings in 2020 was corroborated by the victims and witnesses who testified publicly at her trial the following year. "Much of the information provided during the course of the grand jury testimony - with the exception of the identities of certain victims and witnesses - was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses," the Justice Department wrote in the filing. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted of sex trafficking. Epstein died by suicide in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. Last month, Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell to see if she had any information about other people who may have committed crimes. Neither party has provided a detailed account of what they discussed. Maxwell last week was moved from a prison in Florida to a lower-security facility in Texas. Grand juries meet in secret to guard against interference in criminal investigations, and records of their proceedings cannot be disclosed without a judge's permission. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading The Justice Department has cited what it calls continuing public interest in the cases in asking Manhattan-based judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer to authorize the disclosure of the grand jury transcripts. Lawyers for Epstein, Maxwell and their alleged victims are due to share their views on the potential disclosures with the judges by Tuesday. Separately on Tuesday, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein. Epstein was known for socializing with wealthy and powerful individuals, and his death in jail has fueled conspiracy theories that other prominent people may have been involved in his crimes and that he was murdered. Trump, a Republican, had promised to make public Epstein-related files if reelected and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. Democrats are also pushing for the release of Epstein files, saying Trump should be held accountable for breaking his promise to release them. REUTERS