Judge orders Trump administration to give Mass. back $106 million in COVID funds it took away
What are the relief funds?
The funds in question are mostly public school relief funds
known as ESSER funds, part of the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act, which granted $1.8 billion to Massachusetts schools. The money was mostly unrestricted, with 20 percent required to go to academic recovery.
Because it was one-time funds,
Related
:
Advertisement
The money largely went to high-poverty districts like the Gateway Cities, as the dollars were allocated according to the Title I formula that distributes money to districts according to their number of low income students.
The primary deadline to use the funds was Sept. 30, and the vast majority was spent by then. But many districts were
Advertisement
What did the Trump administration do?
In March, Education Secretary Linda McMahon informed states she had 'reconsidered' the extensions previously granted by the Biden administration.
'By failing to meet the clear deadline in the regulation, you ran the risk that the Department would deny your extension request,' McMahon wrote. 'Extending deadlines for COVID-related grants, which are in fact taxpayer funds, years after the COVID pandemic ended is not consistent with the Department's priorities and thus not a worthwhile exercise of its discretion.'
The move affected close to $3 billion,
Just two districts had most of the unspent funds: Springfield, with about
$47 million remaining, and New Bedford, with about
$15 million. Eighteen other districts were hit, including Fitchburg, Everett, Revere, and Boston. Two private religious
schools also experienced cuts to a separate 'Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools' program.
Massachusetts leaders
What did the judge do?
The judge's order is just a preliminary injunction while the lawsuit continues to play out in court. It temporarily blocks the federal government from enforcing the termination of funds for affected states and requires 14 days of notice for future changes, though the Education Department's decision could still be allowed as the legal case proceeds.
'As we work to recover from learning loss and financial hardship caused by the pandemic, our schools rely on federal funding to serve their most vulnerable students,' Campbell said in a statement. 'I commend the court's decision to restore school districts' access to this money and I will continue fighting against reckless decisions by the Trump administration that threaten our youth and harm our schools.'
Advertisement
A preliminary injunction is a temporary order that preserves the status quo early in a proceeding, meaning the federal government could still win the case and be allowed to cut off the funds later.
In addition, New Bedford Superintendent Andrew O'Leary said losing this case would not prevent the Education Department from later taking the funds: it could make the same decision after following correct procedures and thereby reach the same conclusion legally.
'It still leaves room for [the Education Department] to act to withdraw the funds in a less arbitrary and capricious manner, so we're not out of the woods yet,' O'Leary said. 'It's welcome news, but I would say there's still a little caution about it.'
What will the money go to?
With the restored funds, districts can more safely
proceed with planned capital improvements. New Bedford Superintendent Andrew O'Leary
O'Leary said Friday the state had advised the district to proceed with their projects, and the district has contingencies in place.
'These projects are going to get completed,' he said. 'We are going to push hard to hold the Department of Education and the secretary to account.'
Springfield leaders did not specify what plans were
vulnerable to the cuts, but in a news release said they have used ESSER funds for one-time investments like HVAC installations and outdoor learning spaces, with 'many of these projects . . . close to being done.'
Advertisement
Christopher Huffaker can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump says he's considering ‘taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is considering 'taking away' the U.S. citizenship of a longtime rival, actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her.' The two have criticized each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive GOP-backed tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk . But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. The U.S. State Department notes on its website that U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish U.S. nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. 'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen,' Frost said in an email Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.' O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn.'
Business Insider
34 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump says he wants to send Patriot batteries to Ukraine. One country might be down to pay for them.
President Donald Trump said on Sunday that he plans to send Patriot batteries to Ukraine, though this time with Europe paying for the air defenses. "We basically are going to send them various pieces of very sophisticated military equipment," he told reporters at Joint Base Andrews. "They are going to pay us 100% for that, and that's the way we want it." Trump did not say on Sunday how many Patriot batteries he planned to send to Ukraine. But one NATO ally is likely already willing to foot the bill. For the past few weeks, German leaders were reported to be scouting ways to procure more air defenses for Ukraine, which has been pounded relentlessly by growing waves of Russian drones and missile strikes. Bloomberg reported, citing an unnamed government source, that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called Trump about the matter as early as July 4. In the days since, Merz has publicly confirmed such discussions. "We are ready to acquire additional Patriot systems from the United States and make them available to Ukraine," he said Thursday at the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome. More recently, Germany's defense minister, Boris Pistorius, told The Financial Times that he would discuss with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth the possibility of Berlin buying two Patriot systems for Kyiv. "We only have six left in Germany," Pistorius told the outlet in an interview published on Sunday. "That's really too few, especially considering the NATO capability goals we have to meet. We definitely can't give any more." Germany is believed to have 12 Patriot systems, three of which it has given to Ukraine. It's stationed at least two more in Poland. The MIM-104 Patriot system, in service since the 1980s, is considered one of the world's most advanced surface-to-air missile defense systems. Analysts think Ukraine likely has six to eight batteries — far less than what it needs to shield its cities from Russia's nighttime strikes. Meanwhile, the US has procured over 1,100 Patriot launchers so far. Eight of these launchers can be deployed at a time on a single battery. Roughly 200 such launchers have been exported to other countries, while the US military actively runs 16 battalions of four batteries each. That could mean the Pentagon has about 400 launchers, or about 50 batteries, left in its stockpile or in maintenance. "The Americans need some of them themselves, but they also have a lot of them," Merz said on Thursday of the Patriot systems. Last year, his nation became the largest military spender in Western Europe for the first time since the Cold War, ramping up its defense budget by nearly 30% to $88.5 billion, per the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. The German Defense Ministry did not respond to a request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Trump's latest comments about the Patriot batteries come after he had paused American weapons and ammo aid to Ukraine at the start of the month, sparking concerns about the latter's ability to defend itself with air interceptors. But the president appeared to change his mind a week later, saying at a White House dinner event that he wanted to send more weapons to Kyiv. "They have to be able to defend themselves," Trump told reporters at the dinner.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
EU delays retaliatory tariffs on U.S. to allow time for negotiations
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced Sunday that they were pausing retaliatory tariffs on the United States. File Photo by Olivier Matthys/EPA-EFE July 14 (UPI) -- European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has announced that Europe's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods have been delayed to allow more time for negotiations. The retaliatory measures, worth about $24 billion, were to go into effect on Monday. They were first announced in March in response to Trump's imposing a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, and were previously paused for talks between the two governments. On Saturday, Trump announced an additional 30% tariff would go into effect on EU goods starting Aug. 1. In a letter to von der Leyen, he explained that if the EU retaliated, whatever percentage of tariff they responded with would be added to the EU's overall levy. During a press conference Sunday, alongside Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, she said their retaliatory measures have been paused until Aug. 1. "This is very important. This is now the time for negotiations," she said. "But this also shows are are prepared for all eventual scenarios." She told reporters that they have always preferred to negotiate a solution with the United States and that "we will use the time that we have now until the first of August." If an agreement is not reached with the United States, she said they are prepared to respond. "We've prepared for this and we can respond with countermeasures if necessary," she said. Trump has turned to tariffs as a tool to even out trade deficits, as a negotiation tactic and as an attempt to spur the domestic manufacturing industry. The U.S. trade deficit with the 27-member EU was $235.6 billion last year, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
