
RFK Jr. wants placebo testing for ‘new' vaccines, experts say it's unethical
In a statement to the Washington Post this week, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said, 'All new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure — a radical departure from past practices.'
If implemented, the new regulations would require some test subjects to receive vaccine doses, while others would be injected with a non-reactive substance.
Story continues below advertisement
Vaccines that target new infectious agents are often tested using the placebo method, but for well-known and researched diseases, health experts say using a placebo poses ethical issues because the group receiving it will not know if they are actually protected against the illness.
Get weekly health news
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The health department did not provide details on how the proposed changes will be enforced or to which vaccine trials they will apply. It also did not define what it meant by 'new vaccine,' though it said the policy would not include the flu shot, which is updated yearly.
Health experts have argued that updated COVID-19 vaccines may be included, which they say could delay access.
Peter Lurie, a former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official, told the BBC, 'It's hard to tell exactly what is being proposed.'
'But, broadly, if they mean that every modification to an existing vaccine would require a new placebo-controlled trial, they are treading in ethically dubious territory and likely to deny Americans life-saving vaccines at some point.'
An HHS spokesperson also told the BBC that Kennedy's goal is to achieve 'radical transparency,' which means 'being honest and straightforward about what we know—and what we don't know—about medical products, including vaccines.'
The statement went on to claim that none of the vaccines recommended for children in the U.S., except the COVID-19 shot, had gone through placebo testing, which the health department says leaves it knowing 'very little about the actual risk profiles of these products.'
Story continues below advertisement
However, health experts warn that the statement is misleading because vaccines administered to children, including for hepatitis A and B, polio, and mumps, were all tested against a placebo during their development stages.
The BBC adds that all new immunizations go through a type of random testing where one test group receives the vaccine and the other is given a placebo.
But in the new system proposed by HHS, experts say vaccines under testing may not undergo the same randomized process, because it is unethical to withhold an injection that is known to be safe from a particular group, and because shots that are updated yearly go through minimal alterations.
For example, the COVID-19 vaccine has endured scrupulous testing for years, and all of that is necessary to update it for a different Omicron variant than the one used the year prior, Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told the BBC.
Story continues below advertisement
Nevertheless, an HHS spokesperson said that 'significant updates to existing vaccines' could be seen as 'new products,' which could necessitate additional trials.
'A four-year-old trial is also not a blank cheque for new vaccines each year without clinical trial data, unlike the flu shot, which has been tried and tested for more than 80 years,' the spokesperson told the BBC.
Meanwhile, Lurie says requiring placebo tests for basic updates to existing vaccines that are proven to work would be expensive and could lead to drug companies opting not to upgrade them altogether.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Woman charged $21Gs in medical bills after bat flies into her mouth
Erica Kahn, who is on the hook for more than $20,000 US in medical bills after a bat flew in her mouth while on vacation in Arizona. Photo by Erica Kahn / Instagram A Massachusetts woman is struggling to pay off more than US$20,000 in medical bills after a bat ended up in her mouth while on vacation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Erica Kahn, 33, of Massachusetts, was in Arizona in August 2024, taking photos of the sky when a bat suddenly flew and became briefly trapped between her head and the camera, resulting in part of the animal landing in her mouth when she screamed. Kahn did not think the bat bit her during the seconds-long encounter. However, her father, a doctor, urged her get a series of rabies vaccinations as a precaution — but she didn't have health insurance. Kahn had recently been laid off from her biomedical engineering position at the time but purchased a health insurance policy online the day after the incident, believing she would be covered for the shots she would need over a two-week period, according to the Washington Post . She got four rabies shots at clinics in Arizona and Massachusetts as well as at a hospital in Chicago. But a few months later, she began receiving medical bills that stated she owed US$21,000. She soon learned that the company she had bought coverage from denied payments for her care, citing a 30-day waiting period, the publication reported. 'The required waiting period for this service has not been met,' the company said in a letter to Kahn, per the Post. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Her bills totaled about US$20,749 across the four treatment centres. 'I thought it must have been a mistake,' she told the publication of the denials. 'I guess I was naive.' Kahn has since gotten a new job — with new health insurance — but is still stuck for most of the bills stemming from the ordeal. RECOMMENDED VIDEO She managed to negotiate down one bill, set up a payment plan for a second, and is continuing to try to appeal the rejected payments, she told the Post. Kahn's one regret is letting her health coverage lapse after losing her job, calling it 'a very big lesson I learned the hard way.' That said, she did have a sense of humour about the ordeal. Read More 'I know what bats taste like now. It's an earthy, sweet kind of flavour,' she said. 'It's actually a pretty funny story — if it weren't for the horrible medical bill that came with it.' Celebrity Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Columnists Ontario


Toronto Star
10 hours ago
- Toronto Star
EU chief's texts to a pharma boss during pandemic were likely erased, the NYT reports
BRUSSELS (AP) — Text messages exchanged between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and a pharmaceutical boss during the COVID-19 pandemic were seen by her top adviser and have likely been destroyed, the New York Times reported Friday. Von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla exchanged the messages as COVID-19 ravaged European communities from Portugal to Finland and the EU scrambled to buy millions of hard to find vaccines. She was under intense scrutiny to deliver.


Canada News.Net
17 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
FDA science chief Prasad leaves, returns to California
WASHINGTON, D.C.: Vinay Prasad, the chief medical and science officer at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has left the agency, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which confirmed his departure. "Dr. Prasad did not want to be a distraction to the great work of the FDA in the Trump administration and has decided to return to California and spend more time with his family," an HHS spokesperson said in an emailed statement to Reuters. "We thank him for his service and the many important reforms he was able to achieve in his time at the FDA." His resignation follows a series of controversial decisions involving the FDA's handling of Elevidys, a gene therapy developed by Sarepta Therapeutics for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The agency initially paused distribution of the treatment after the deaths of several patients but reversed the suspension earlier this week. STAT News was the first to report Prasad's departure. The outlet previously noted in June that Prasad had been named to the FDA's top science post, citing an internal memo. In May, Prasad, an oncologist known for publicly criticizing FDA leadership and COVID-19 policies, was also appointed director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.