Virginia Tech study reveals some major US cities slowly sinking
A new study published in Nature Cities highlights 28 major urban cities in the US that are sinking by 2 to 10 millimeters every year. The lead author and former Virginia Tech graduate student, Leonard Ohenhen, said the main cause is the extraction of groundwater.
'When land shifts downward, even just a little bit, the structural integrity of buildings, roads, bridges, and dams can be profoundly impacted,' said Ohenhen. 'A lot of small changes will build up over time, magnifying weak spots within urban systems and heighten flood risks.'
Virginia Tech Alumni have been to more than 100 Metallica concerts
According to the data, New York, Dallas, and Seattle are seeing urban areas sink by 2 to 10 millimeters per year. The study created high-resolution maps showing the sinking areas using satellite-based radar measurements. These cities are home to 34 million people, which represents about 12 percent of the US population.
(Photo Credit: Virginia Tech – Houston, Texas, (at left) is the nation's fastest-sinking city, with areas subsiding more than 20 millimeters a year. Much of New York City (at right) is slowly sinking, with hot spots around La Guardia Airport. Warmer colors signify greater sinkage. Graphics courtesy of Jeremy Hinsdale based on Ohenhen et al., Nature Cities 2025.)
New York, Chicago, Seattle, Denver, and five other cities are sinking at about 2 millimeters per year. In every city studied, at least 20 percent of the urban area is sinking, and in 25 of 28 cities, at least 65 percent is sinking. Additionally, areas of Houston and other cities in Texas showed the highest measured rates of subsidence between 5 millimeters to 10 millimeters per year.
Associate Professor Manoochehr Shirzaei at Virginia Tech's Earth Observation and Innovation Lab, who works with Ohenhen, said, 'The latent nature of this risk means that infrastructure can be silently compromised over time with damage only becoming evident when it is severe or potentially catastrophic. This risk is often exacerbated in rapidly expanding urban centers.'
Inconsistent land motion can lead to cracks and the destabilization of building and their foundations. Shirzaei's team assessed the risks and said other cities with high subsidence variability include New York, Las Vegas, and Washington, D.C.
Virginia Tech experts discuss generative AI and its impact on scams and data privacy
The growth of cities and urban areas increases the demand for fresh water, and when water is extracted from an aquifer faster than it can be replenished, the ground can crumble and become compacted. Along with shifting weather patterns, urban population, and socio-economic growth, there is the potential to accelerate these processes into previously stable areas, according to Shirazi.
The study continued with how integrating land monitoring systems in urban areas can prevent the worsening infrastructure risks and recommended targeted mitigation and adaptation strategies, including:
Groundwater management to reduce excessive withdrawals
Enhanced infrastructure resilience planning to account for differential subsidence
Long-term monitoring frameworks for early detection and intervention
In the past year, Shirzai's team has provided a comprehensive look at the flood risks for 32 cities on three coasts by 2050 and revealed regions of the Atlantic coast to be sinking by as much as 5 millimeters per year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists make breakthrough with cutting-edge device that pulls clean water from thin air — here's how it works
In a cool development for global sustainability, scientists have improved a device that pulls clean, drinkable water straight from the air. Inspired by musical instruments and the fog-drinking power of California redwoods, which get about 35% of their annual water intake from fog, researchers at Virginia Tech created a 3D-printed "mesh-harp" hybrid fog collector that dramatically outperforms other methods. A study published in the Journal of Materials Chemistry A revealed that in lab tests simulating both light and heavy fog, the best-performing prototype captured up to 12.7% of airborne water. This makes it 8.5 times more efficient than mesh nets and nearly four times better than standard fog harps. Much like a musical harp, this vertical wire array channels fog droplets downward. But unlike previous designs that faced clogging or tangling challenges, this hybrid model uses horizontal supports — inspired by guitars — to keep wires evenly spaced. This innovation matters because many conventional fog-harvesting systems either miss most of the microscopic water droplets or struggle with design flaws. These next-gen harvesters avoid both pitfalls, making them practical and affordable for use in remote or drought-stricken areas. The environmental impact could be huge. Unlike desalination and groundwater pumping, fog harvesting is nonpolluting and can support local ecosystems by reducing strain on freshwater sources. It's also a public health win, offering safe drinking water in areas with poor infrastructure. As urban areas grow hotter and drier, passive water-harvesting technologies offer a climate-resilient way to make daily life easier, providing hydration with no long treks to distant water sources, no power outages interrupting access, and no complex and expensive machinery to maintain. For consumers, it could also mean lower utility costs and a more resilient daily water supply. While there's no clear timeline for a large-scale rollout, the researchers said they are hoping to move toward mass production soon. The timing couldn't be more urgent. Over 4 billion people worldwide experience severe water scarcity for at least one month each year, according to a previous study in Science. In underserved and remote regions, where traditional water infrastructure is often unreliable or nonexistent, this low-cost, energy-efficient solution could be a life-saving breakthrough.


Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Street Lamps Aren't The Main Source Of Light Pollution In Cities
Light pollution is a growing issue for our cities, and Hong Kong is no exception (photo taken on ... More Friday, July 4, 2025) How dark is the night sky where you live? If you're in an urban area, the answer will likely be 'not dark at all'. The pervasiveness of artificial light – be it in the form of streetlamps, billboards, screens or floodlights – keeps our cities bright long after most people have gone to bed. And it's on the rise. In 2016, a group of researchers found that 83% of the world's population and more than 99% of people in the U.S. and Europe live under light-polluted skies. In 2023, some of the same authors showed that the average night sky is getting brighter by 9.6% per year, due to artificial light in our surroundings spilling into the atmosphere. This is equivalent to a quadrupling of sky brightness over the duration of a human childhood (18 years). And while it's true that almost all light pollution is generated in urban areas, its effects extend beyond the streetscape. The 'light domes' of Las Vegas and Los Angeles can be seen from Death Valley National Park, despite it being 150km and 250km away, respectively. For many city-dwellers, true outdoor darkness is not something they experience regularly. In discussions around light pollution, the switch to LED (light-emitting diodes) streetlamps is often mentioned as a contributing factor. The high efficiency and low cost of LEDs makes them increasingly common on our urban roads. But if its pollution we're interested in, then it's not the streetlamps we should be talking about. The Nachtlichter ('night lights' in German) campaign involved hundreds of citizen scientists ... More counting and classifying many thousands of light sources in urban areas. They found that streetlamps make up a relatively small fraction of the total Bright lights, big city In Germany in 2021, a group of 257 citizen scientists, led by Dr Christopher Kyba (Ruhr University Bochum), carried out a novel study on artificial light at night (ALAN). Using a dedicated app called Nachtlichter ('night lights' in German), they counted and classified 234,044 illuminated light sources across a 22-km2 area that included city centers, residential neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas. No areas with skyscrapers were included in the survey. Their findings, published last week in the journal Nature Cities, showed that public streetlamps make up a relatively small percentage (10-13%) of all contaminating light sources counted. In dense areas, streetlamps were outnumbered by other light sources by a factor of up to 7. Instead, they found that private windows were by far the most frequently observed light source, representing more than 48% of the total. Commercial windows were the third most common type of night-time light source (7.4%), with floodlights and other building-mounted lights following closely behind (7.3% of the total). Signs – both illuminated and self-luminous – represented 5.5% of the total count. In terms of the brightness of surveyed lights, the vast majority of streetlamps were shieled, meaning that the light was being directed towards the ground, rather than 'trespassing' into the atmosphere. In contrast, the majority (58%) of observed floodlights and 29% of building-mounted lights were unshielded, and so were casting their light upwards, adding to the overall light pollution. The team's study area was chosen specifically to overlap with the path of a passing satellite carrying an instrument called the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS). VIIRS is ultra-sensitive in low-light conditions, and is regularly used to monitor night-time lights from space. This allowed the Nachtlichter team to make a comparison between their ground-based lighting inventory, and the orbit-based measurements of the same area. 'By comparing these data with the satellite observations, we identified a correlation between the number of counted lights per square kilometer and the radiance observed by the satellite sensor,' says Kyba. He continues, 'Both energy and lighting policy as well as research on the effects of artificial light on the environment have generally focused on street lighting. Our findings indicate that a broader approach that considers all lighting is necessary in order to understand and reduce the environmental impacts of light in cities." This photograph taken on March 22, 2025, shows a view of the ancient Acropolis with lights off ... More during the Earth Hour environmental campaign in Athens. Earth Hour is a global call to turn off lights for one hour in a bid to highlight the global climate change. (Photo by ARIS MESSINIS/AFP via Getty Images) Going Dark Another urban sky brightening study published this month focused on Hong Kong; one of the most densely populated regions in the world. There, a group of scientists took advantage of an annual event called Earth Hour to study light pollution. Organized by the World-Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) to raise environmental awareness, Earth Hour involves the voluntary switching off of lights for one hour (20:30-21:30 local time) on a specified day. The campaign is widely supported in Hong Kong, with more than 4,000 organizations and buildings opting in to the 'lights-out' event each year. This provided the team of researchers, led by Dr Chu-Wing So, with an opportunity to directly quantify the impact that bright lights have on the night sky. They examined footage from an all-sky camera installed on the roof of the Hong Kong Space Museum in the Tsim Sha Tsui district, and collected data from a night sky brightness meter co-located with the camera. This allowed them to compare images of the sky before, during, and after the lights-out hour every year from 2015 to 2024. To look at the influence of street-level billboards on storefronts and illuminated signs closer to the ground, they also carried out wide-field photography and a street-level survey. Taken together, this data showed a night sky that was more than 50% darker on average during the lights-out period. They showed that the presence of clouds also amplified the brightening effect of light pollution – as cloud coverage increased from 40% to 85%, urban night sky brightness increased sixfold. To identify the types of lighting that dominate light pollution in this district of Hong Kong, the team set up a portable spectrometer alongside the all-sky camera and brightness meter. This allowed them to identify the specific wavelengths of light that were decreased or absent during the lights-out period. They found that emission reductions mostly occurred in three wavelength bands: 445–500nm, 500-540 nm, and 615–650 nm, which corresponds to blue, green and red emissions from LED billboard screens. They also measured reductions in the 585–595 nm range, which is associated with metal halide floodlights used for facades and billboards. The sodium streetlamps had a negligible impact on sky brightening. They conclude 'the substantial darkening observed in Hong Kong [during Earth Hour] can be largely attributed to the simple act of turning off approximately 120 decorative or advertising lights on commercial buildings and shopping malls. Although they represent only a small fraction of the total external lighting in the city…. they are in fact the main contributors to light pollution in Hong Kong.' The 'light dome' of Los Angeles and other major cities can be visible from great distances. So what? It's becoming increasingly clear that excessive or inappropriate use of artificial lighting at night (ALAN) has widespread implications for ecological health. It can confuse and endanger nocturnal species who are active at night. Migratory birds and bats are diverted and disoriented by the presence of artificial lighting on their routes, with many killed as a result of colliding with brightly-lit structures. Other bird species and frogs change their breeding behaviors. A study published last month looked at 7 years of VIIRS data from 428 cities in Northern Hemisphere concluded that artificial light may be lengthening the growing season in urban environments by as much as 3 weeks compared to rural areas. Humans are also not immune from ALAN's influence, though it can be challenging to separate it out from that of other environmental factors. Unsurprisingly, it has been shown to disrupt our circadian rhythms (the 24-ish hour cycles that regulate how our bodies function, including our wake-sleep cycle). These disruptions, in turn, have been linked to an elevated risk of cardiovascular diseases, chronic stress, disorders and depression. Chronic, long-term, regular, or cumulative exposure to ALAN may even be a risk factor for certain cancers and neurodegenerative diseases. Put simply, too much light at night is bad for everyone. And as these (and many other) studies show, most of the light polluting our night skies has nothing to do with safety on our roads and streets. It's mostly about advertising and poorly mounted floodlights, and to a much lesser extent, people not closing their curtains. The solutions are relatively simple and numerous. As a start: Avoid lighting up places that don't actually need to be lit. Where light is needed, be more intentional about what type, how much, and its location. Use timers or motion sensors to enable lights-out periods. Light pollution is serious. Cities need to start treating it as such.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Can't sleep? It's not totally your fault
For much of history, humans probably got pretty lousy sleep. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, many people slept in the same bed alongside their family in dwellings lacking any temperature control beyond a fire or air ventilation. Those homes were littered with bed bugs, fleas, and lice that not only feasted on their hosts at night but also spread diseases, which — in the absence of modern medicine — kept the infirm awake and suffering. The noises of cities and rural life alike also made sleep difficult, thanks to the all-hours bustling of laborers, horse-drawn carriages, and livestock with whom farmers might've shared a home. 'Because in the winter they generated warmth,' says A. Roger Ekirch, a history professor at Virginia Tech and author of At Day's Close: Night in Times Past. Nighttime itself was a risk. Slumber left people vulnerable to crime or death from fire or other natural disasters. Some prayers throughout history sought God's protection from the litany of threats adherents encountered in the dark, says Ekirch. For those who are lucky enough to have access, modern marvels like central heating and air conditioning, comfortable beds, and even Tylenol have all but eliminated many of these barriers to sleep. 'We don't have to worry about the myriad perils to sound slumber and our physical well-being that people did 300, 400 years ago,' Ekirch says. 'We don't have to worry about the myriad perils to sound slumber and our physical well-being that people did 300, 400 years ago.' Still, sleep doesn't come easily to millions of Americans. Over 14 percent of adults had trouble falling asleep most days in 2020, according to the National Health Interview Survey. Nearly just as many people — 12 percent — have been diagnosed with chronic insomnia, according to an American Academy of Sleep Medicine survey. Among the 33 percent of US adults who get less than seven hours of sleep a night, native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander and Black adults are the most likely to get shorter durations of shut-eye. Those with an annual household income of less than $15,000 are also likely to be sleep-deprived. Despite seemingly prime conditions for sleep, why do so many suffer from restless nights? The most comfortable bed in the darkest room might not be enough to overcome a mix of environmental, systemic, and behavioral forces preventing quality slumber. Modern lifestyles aren't ideal for sleep American sleep culture is marked by contradictions. Anyone who's endured a night of terrible sleep can attest to its importance in cognitive functioning, mood, hunger, and overall health. Yet, many people act in ways that sabotage their hope for a good night's sleep. We stay up later than we should to catch up on work or news or precious free time — what is sometimes called revenge bedtime procrastination. We consume content on our phones so upsetting or attention-grabbing as to prevent our falling asleep, although many of us know by now that screen use an hour before bed results in delayed bedtime and less sleep overall. We settle into bed and realize that late-afternoon coffee or nightcap too close to bedtime has come to collect its vengeance. Some people innately need more sleep than others, and these so-called long sleepers simply cannot find the time in their busy schedules to devote to 10 hours of slumber. Try as we might to have it all, optimizing our waking hours might come at the detriment of our sleep. 'We're trying to have our cake and eat it, too,' Ekirch says. 'The less time we accord to sleep, the more perfect we want it to be for when we do nod off.' Ironically, a population of people with no notable sleep issues has turned sleep into a competitive sport, leveraging mouth tape, expensive mattresses, and sleep trackers like the Oura Ring in pursuit of the perfect night's sleep. This fixation on enhancing sleep may actually do more to promote insomnia than peaceful slumber, experts say. Most disruptions to sleep cannot be blamed on personal choices, though. Parents and other caregivers are among the most sleep-deprived, often contending with their children's inconsistent sleep schedules. And the sleep patterns of shift workers — which account for 20 percent of the US workforce — are dictated by their employers. The ill effects of poor sleep can negatively impact mental health. The opposite is true, too: Mental distress has consequences for sleep. 'Stress, anxiety, weird work schedules,' says Jessi Pettigrew, a clinical social worker who focuses on sleep disorders, 'can lead to the development of sleep disorders like insomnia or circadian rhythm disorders, which basically means being misaligned with your biological sleep schedule because of social reasons.' Environmental and systemic barriers can disrupt sleep Outside of individual behavior, where we live has a role in sleep. Not having the ability to control the temperature in your bedroom because you lack effective heating or air conditioning can be a barrier to sleep, Pettigrew says. If you feel unsafe in your environment, you're less likely to get restful slumber, too, she adds. This tends to impact people with housing insecurity, refugees, and those who are incarcerated. Beyond the bedroom, noise and light pollution from bright street lights and traffic have been shown to interrupt sleep and contribute to insomnia — and those in low-income neighborhoods are more susceptible to these conditions. 'People who live in places with good natural light, green spaces, the ability to control the temperature and light and noise in their environment,' Pettigrew says, 'helps them to sleep better and better regulate their circadian rhythm during the day and sleep at night.' All of our waking experiences impact our ability to sleep, says Anita Shelgikar, a neurology professor at the University of Michigan Medical School and the president of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine board of directors. And some of those waking experiences may be colored by racism and discrimination. Stress associated with racial discrimination has been linked to poor sleep. Among shift workers, people of color are more likely to work alternating day/night schedules, resulting in disrupted circadian rhythms. 'If that disrupts your sleep enough, that technically qualifies as shift-work sleep disorder,' says Jade Wu, a behavioral sleep medicine psychologist and author of Hello Sleep: The Science and Art of Overcoming Insomnia Without Medications. This disorder is marked by excessive sleepiness, insomnia, or both. The knock-on effects of altered sleep-wake schedules are profound, ranging from cardiovascular disease and obesity to mood and immune disorders. 'Sleep health disparities disproportionately affect the same populations who suffer from overall health disparities,' Shelgikar says. Those in rural or low-income areas who generally lack access to healthcare, let alone specialized sleep medicine, may continue to suffer from poor sleep, in addition to any number of physical and mental health conditions. Without individualized care, Shelgikar says, the disparities may only widen. How to overcome these sleep obstacles If you work odd hours or have a fussy baby, hearing the common advice of keeping your room cool and dark and only retreating to bed when you're sleepy can seem trite. Wu suggests identifying the environmental or circumstantial reason you aren't getting restful sleep and doing whatever you can to mitigate it. For those who live in spaces that aren't conducive to sleep — hot bedrooms or the constant wail of sirens all night — there are few things people can do beyond getting a fan or earplugs, Wu says. People with means and flexibility can seek out a doctor specializing in sleep medicine to diagnose potential disorders like insomnia or sleep apnea. If you work odd hours or have a fussy baby, hearing the common advice of keeping your room cool and dark and only retreating to bed when you're sleepy can seem trite. But if your conditions for sleep are pretty good and you still struggle to get shut-eye, the key, according to Wu, may be to not obsess over it as much. 'What you see in people with insomnia is that they're trying too hard,' she says. 'They're tracking their sleep too closely. They are perfectionistic about their sleep hygiene and doing things like going to bed too early or trying to take too many naps, trying to achieve a certain number of hours of sleep, or a certain score on their sleep tracker.' The human body was meant to sleep. And despite all the constructs and complications society throws our way, we still require sleep. Ironically, though, the more we fret over it, the more elusive it can become. As difficult as it seems, the best advice may be to surrender to the circadian rhythm. 'One thing that can help with sleep,' Pettigrew says, 'is just saying, I'm going to trust my body to take care of this.'