Kennedy dismisses all 17 members of U.S. CDC vaccine panel
Kennedy removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a statement, and is in the process of considering new members to replace them.
The ACIP panel is tasked with recommending which vaccines get placed on the CDC immunization schedule and who should get them, which helps determine insurance coverage.
"Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," Kennedy said. "The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies."
All 17 sitting ACIP members were appointed under former President Joe Biden's administration, including 13 in 2024, HHS said. Not removing them would have prevented President Donald Trump's administration from choosing a majority of the committee until 2028.
"That's a tragedy," former Food and Drug Administration Chief Scientist Jesse Goodman said of the firings. "This is a highly professional group of scientists and physicians and others ... It's the kind of political meddling that will reduce confidence rather than increase confidence."
Kennedy, who for many years has questioned the safety and efficacy of vaccines, making claims contrary to scientific evidence, said the change was necessary because the committee is rife with conflicts of interest and most members receive funding from drugmakers.
But ACIP members are required to declare any potential or perceived conflicts of interest that arise in the course of ACIP tenure and any relevant business interests, positions of authority or other connections with organizations relevant to the work of the ACIP.
"Our worst fears have been realized," said one expert with close ties to the committee, adding that the vetting of ACIP members "is very, very rigorous."
Kennedy and HHS provided no specific evidence of industry conflicts of interest among departing ACIP members. The CDC's web page for conflicts of interest, last updated in March, showed that one current member had recused herself from votes on a handful of vaccines because she had worked on clinical trials for their manufacturers.
ACIP will convene its next meeting over June 25-27 at CDC headquarters in Atlanta, the department said.
The change was first announced in an editorial written by Kennedy for the Wall Street Journal. At least one ACIP member who spoke on the condition of anonymity learned that they were being retired from the committee from the editorial and they believe none of the members had been notified by the CDC.
ACIP members were required to disclose everything as part of the application process, including investments and all sources of income, the member said.
Once the FDA approves vaccines for sale to the public, the ACIP role is to review data in a public meeting and vote on vaccine recommendations, which are then sent to the CDC director to sign off.
The Affordable Care Act generally requires insurers to cover vaccines that are listed on the CDC vaccine schedule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
Trump tariffs spell trouble for Hawaii's few coffee farmers
Hawaiian coffee farmers have a message for President Donald Trump: Steep tariffs on major exporters such as Brazil will end up hurting them, too. Hawaii at first glance might seem the obvious beneficiary of tariffs on coffee. It is the only state in the country where the tropical goods grow, with the vast majority of java imbibed by Americans imported from South America and Vietnam. Higher-priced foreign imports should, in theory, make the island state's products comparatively more affordable. But growers say the opposite is true: rising prices across the board will hit consumers already struggling with inflation, curbing demand on everything from popular everyday roasts available at grocery stores to luxury Kona beans. While the discourse around trade and Trump's "Buy American' mantra could draw attention to Hawaiian goods, the upshot for the state's farmers is that "tariffs will probably hurt us as much as it would hurt the mainland roasters,' said Suzanne Shriner, the vice president of the Kona Coffee Farmers Association and the president of Lions Gate Farms. Brazil and Vietnam are the world's top coffee producers, and Trump has threatened a 50% and 20% levy on those countries, respectively, though Vietnamese officials have said negotiations are ongoing. Brazil, for its part, is weighing countermeasures and could ask for a reduction in the levies. But if tariffs hold, even at a lower rate, they would be a blow to U.S. consumers and companies that have already faced surging costs over the last year as poor weather impacted global coffee production. Americans' beloved morning cup of joe could get even more expensive as the cost of tariffs start getting passed down to consumers, and that could risk a ripple effect of decreased consumption. "Any time you drive up costs to the point where buyers reduce their demand, if people leave the coffee market in the sense that they'll switch to an energy drink versus a cup of coffee, that's going to harm us,' said Shriner. Starbucks Corp. could take about a 1.4% earnings hit if tariffs on Brazil increase from the current 10% to 50%, according to TD Cowen analyst Andrew Charles, who estimates that more than 20% of the roaster's North American beans come from Brazil. Starbucks had boosted lobbying spending earlier this year to the second-highest quarterly amount on record, noting tariff-related issues. Trump has said his tariff campaign is aimed at rewriting trade practices he thinks are unfair to the U.S. and encouraging a reshoring of production, from cars to metals mining. Coffee, however, is not an imported commodity that can easily be replaced. The owner of Kona Star Farms rakes coffee beans that are laid out for drying at his farm in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, in October 2007. | BLOOMBERG "Unlike other cases where tariffs may address unfair practices or incentivize domestic producers, coffee simply cannot be grown in most of the United States,' National Coffee Association president Bill Murray wrote in a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative requesting an exemption from tariffs back in March. Coffee is more popular in the U.S. than even bottled water, with two-thirds of Americans drinking it every day. Those drinkers average three cups daily, according to the National Coffee Association. The U.S. imported more than 450,000 tons of unroasted coffee from Brazil in 2024, valued at nearly $2 billion, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Hawaii is seen producing just 12,040 tons of coffee cherries in the 2024-2025 season, a figure that will shrink once the cherries are processed into beans, USDA data shows. Such production "is not anywhere near the scale required' to meet U.S. demand, Murray said in the letter. The association declined to comment on the latest Brazil tariffs. Hawaiian farmers don't see much room to expand production significantly, constrained by land, labor and climate. But demand has plenty of space to drop, especially if consumers decide that their "affordable luxury' isn't cost-effective anymore. "If they like drinking their Starbucks and then they come to Hawaii and they're like, 'Oh, I'll get the good stuff,' that's awesome. But if we price them out of a coffee at home, then we're going to price them out of exotic coffees too,' said Adam Potter, who owns or manages about 18,000 cocoa trees on the Big Island and farms another 3,000 coffee trees. Economists and consumers have been bracing for higher prices stemming from Trump's tariff campaign. So far, the impact has been relatively muted, though June's consumer price index, which excludes the volatile food and energy categories, showed some companies are starting to pass on higher import costs. Hawaiian coffee farmers received about $21.90 per pound for green coffee in the 2024-2025 marketing year, according to the USDA. By the time that makes it to consumers, the best quality beans can cost even more. A pound of roasted coffee from Ka'awaloa Trail Farm in Big Island's famed Kona coffee-growing region retails for $60. Even at a current record high in data going back to 1980, a pound of ground roast coffee in the U.S. averaged just over $8 a pound, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "If the price of, let's say, Maxwell House, doubles at the grocery store, I don't think people are going to be like, 'Oh, now I'm going to buy Kona coffee,'' said Tony Tate, who along with his partner runs Ka'awaloa, a 7-acre coffee and cacao farm. The chocolate industry has also been pushing for an exemption from tariffs. Hawaii's cocoa production is barely existent, not even topping 50 tons of dry beans in 2022. The U.S. imported nearly 200,000 tons of cocoa beans last year — and that's already after a significant drop due to lower global production, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Hershey Co. said in May that it would seek an exemption, citing as much as $20 million in tariff costs during the second quarter. Unmitigated impacts could rise to $100 million later in the year after working through existing inventories, the company said. A tariff would have to be "so high, like hundreds of percent, to make it start to be competitive — and then there'd be no chocolate,' said Mānoa Chocolate founder Dylan Butterbaugh. The company uses both Hawaiian and imported beans to produce about 50 tons of chocolate each year. Lonohana Estate Chocolate's plans to expand are also being stymied. The Honolulu-based company already grows raw cacao and churns out cocoa liquor every day, and is trying to take on the next step of processing — extracting butter and powder from the liquid. But Trump's levies on China, the only country currently making new machines in the necessary size, have complicated the project, said founder Seneca Klassen. "Not only has the machinery come up in price, the instability of the marketplace has to be priced into financing,' he said. "Everything gets more expensive, everything gets less reliable. It's just bad news for business.'
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
'Frightening': Trump's historic power grab worries experts
Donald Trump has spent six months testing the limits of his authority like no other modern U.S. president, say analysts — browbeating Congress and the courts in a power grab that may come to define his second term. Since January, the Republican leader has repeatedly pushed to secure more power for himself, calling for judges to be axed, firing independent watchdogs and sidestepping the legislative process. Barbara Perry, a University of Virginia professor and an expert on the presidency, called Trump's successes in shattering the restraints on his office "frightening." "All presidents have been subject to Congress's and the Supreme Court's checks on their power, as well as splits in their own political parties," she said. "Trump has faced almost none of these counterpoints in this second term." It is all a far cry from his first stint in office, when Trump and his supporters believe he was hamstrung by investigations and "deep state" officials seeking to frustrate his agenda. But those guardrails have looked brittle this time around as Trump has fired federal workers, dismantled government departments and sent military troops into the streets to quell protest. He has also sought to exert his influence well beyond traditional presidential reach, ruthlessly targeting universities and the press, and punishing law firms he believes have crossed him. The U.S. system of checks and balances — the administration, the courts and Congress as equal but separate branches of government — is designed to ensure no one amasses too much power. But when it comes to Trump's agenda — whether ending diversity efforts and birthright citizenship or freezing foreign aid — he has largely dodged the hard work of shepherding bills through Congress. Policies have instead been enacted by presidential edict. Six months in, Trump has already announced more second-term executive orders than any American leader since Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s. He has even sought to bend the economy to his will, escalating attacks on the chief of the independent central bank in a bid to lower interest rates. Once a robust restraining force against presidential overreach, the Republican-led Congress has largely forsaken its oversight role, foregoing the investigations that previous presidents have faced. That has left the judiciary as the main gatekeeper. But Trump has managed partly to neuter the authority of the federal bench too, winning a Supreme Court opinion that mostly reduces the reach of judges' rulings to their own states. In his first term the high court made Trump immune from prosecution for actions taken as part of his official duties — no matter how criminal. And almost every time Trump has turned to the country's highest legal tribunal to rein in the lower courts in his second term, it has obliged. His long shadow has extended far beyond Washington's institutions, pushing into private realms his predecessors avoided. Trump has picked fights with elite universities, prestigious law firms and the press — threatening funding or their ability to do business. The arts haven't escaped his clunking fist either, with the 79-year-old taking over the running of the Kennedy Center in Washington. Trump has claimed falsely that the U.S. Constitution gives him the right to do whatever he wants as the ultimate authority over government activities. This so-called "unitary executive theory" was pushed in the "Project 2025" blueprint for government produced by Trump's right-wing allies during last year's election campaign. Although he disavowed "Project 2025" after it became politically toxic, Trump's own platform made the same claims for expansive presidential powers. Pessimistic about the other branches' ability to hold the administration to account, the minority Democrats have largely been limited to handwringing in news conferences. Political strategist Andrew Koneschusky, a former senior Democratic Senate aide, believes the checks on Trump's authority may ultimately have to be political rather than legal or constitutional. He points to Trump's tanking polling numbers — especially on his signature issue of immigration following mass deportations of otherwise law-abiding undocumented migrants. "It's not entirely comforting that politics and public opinion are the primary checks on his power," Koneschusky said. "It would be better to see Congress flex its muscle as a co-equal branch of government. But it's at least something."
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
Trump aims tariff double whammy at industries and nations by Aug. 1
U.S. President Donald Trump is readying plans for industry-specific tariffs to kick in alongside his country-by-country duties in two weeks, ramping up his push to reshape the United States' standing in the global trading system by penalizing purchases from abroad. Administration officials could release details of Trump's planned 50% duty on copper in the days before they're set to take effect Aug. 1, according to a person familiar with the matter. That's the same date so-called reciprocal levies on products from more than a 100 nations are slated to begin. Trump said Tuesday he is likely to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals by month's end, adding that import taxes on semiconductors could come soon as well. One person familiar with the process said after copper, Trump's team has discussed making announcements on lumber, chips, critical minerals and drugs in that order, though that cadence has not been finalized and may change. Those would follow existing duties on steel, aluminum, automobiles and car parts. Once fully implemented, all the sectoral tariffs would cover 30% to 70% of a country's imports, with much of the rest being hit by country-specific charges, according to a person familiar with the matter. The coming wave of U.S. customs taxes will test the calm in financial markets, where investors mostly see Trump's tough tariff talk as a negotiating ploy prone to delays and de-escalation rather than a prolonged economic headwind. After investigations that can last about nine months, sectoral duties are being imposed on national security grounds under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. It's seen as stronger legal footing than the emergency powers Trump used for his country levies, which face court challenges and are being assigned in letters to dozens of trading partners without a deal. The European Union, Japan, India and others have sought to lower both their reciprocal and sectoral rates. That's complicating talks, given that U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer handles country-based rates, while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick oversees tariffs on industries, according to people familiar with the dynamics. Here's where tariffs on each industry stand. Pharmaceuticals Trump told reporters Tuesday that drug duties would come "probably at the end of the month, and we're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff.' Last month, he said duties on pharmaceuticals could grow as high as 200%. Lutnick said on July 8 that the phase-in period could last up to two years. A staff draft document has focused levies on between 80 and 90 generic essential medicines, as well as specialty chemicals and precursors, according to a person familiar with it. Those parameters have not been set, however, and the complex nature of the investigation could mean the process could drag out longer, another person said. Levies on generic medicines that have slim profit margins could hit companies including Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Sandoz Group AG. A broader hit that includes brand-name drugs like Ozempic and Keytruda will weigh on the largest manufacturers, such as Eli Lily & Co., Merck & Co. and Pfizer. Semiconductors Chips tariffs are on a "similar' timeline to drugs and are "actually less complicated,' Trump said Tuesday. Semiconductors were exempted earlier this year from U.S. tariffs on China to give the administration time to develop separate duties. The wide array of exempted products, including inputs for consumer electronics, suggests a very broad consideration of item that could get hit later. Tech companies, auto manufacturers, boat makers and cryptocurrency enthusiasts are among those who have registered complaints over potential levies, according to public comments on the probe, which started in April. The charges won't just hit the chips themselves, but popular products including Apple and Samsung Electronics smartphones and laptops. It's even brought together rivals Tesla, General Motors and Ford Motor, which have all voiced reservations. Copper Copper duties are set to include all refined metal as well as semi-finished products used in power grids, data centers and the military. The outcome of the investigation that started in March could have an outsize effect on consumer prices, because the metal is in automobiles, homebuilding materials, appliances and many other products. While domestic copper producers competing with foreign suppliers may benefit, U.S. buyers of copper targeted with levies will face higher costs. Some of the nation's largest copper miners met Thursday in Washington to discuss how best to message the administration on how to boost the domestic industry while also avoiding punitive tariffs that would harm production. Lumber The administration's lumber investigation is proceeding on a separate track from existing duties on the material from Canada — by far the U.S.'s top source of imports. The probe is expected to conclude by summer's end, trade attorney Luke Meisner said during a Wednesday panel. More than a dozen lawmakers have pushed the Commerce Department to implement tariffs of at least 60% on imported wood products, such as cabinets and vanities. Some have urged the administration to tariff cabinets at 100% tariffs. Republicans from Alabama, North Carolina and Pennsylvania have written letters to the administration that their home-state manufacturers are threatened by cheap foreign imports. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said he expects the administration to fulfill their requests. Critical minerals The critical minerals investigation has proved difficult, according to people familiar with the process. The administration has made several moves to speed domestic mineral extraction and processing in order to reduce dependence on China. But in the short term, there is little domestic industry to protect with tariffs. Only one U.S.-based company operates a rare-earth mine and processing operation. America remains reliant on imports and tariffs could create supply crunches. Commercial aviation The EU is among the economies negotiating with the administration for exemptions from possible tariffs on commercial aircraft and jet engines. The Commerce Department launched its investigation in May, which remains pending. Others The Commerce Department on Monday launched investigations into drones and polysilicon, a key material for solar panels, setting the stage for tariffs but likely at a later date. The department also started an investigation into medium- and heavy-duty trucks used in shipping in April that is ongoing.
