logo
Explained: YIMBY vs NIMBY - Why Barack Obama is calling out liberals on housing hypocrisy

Explained: YIMBY vs NIMBY - Why Barack Obama is calling out liberals on housing hypocrisy

Time of India15-07-2025
AI generated image
TL;DR
Obama goes YIMBY: The former US president has embraced the 'Yes In My Backyard' movement, urging more housing construction and zoning reform.
Liberal hypocrisy under fire: He's criticising wealthy, progressive communities that oppose new housing—especially affordable and mixed-income units.
DNC 2024 spotlight: Obama's push for YIMBYism is now central to the Democratic Party's housing agenda heading into 2025.
What's this all about?
The US is in the midst of a housing crisis. Sky-high rents, unaffordable homes, and crippling shortages have become daily realities for millions of Americans. Enter: the YIMBY vs NIMBY debate.
YIMBY stands for 'Yes In My Backyard'—a movement that wants to relax zoning laws, allow more housing (especially in urban areas), and build up supply. NIMBY, or 'Not In My Backyard,' represents resistance to new development, often from affluent or suburban homeowners who fear property devaluation, increased density, or social change.
What makes this a big deal now? Barack Obama—once the patron saint of the liberal elite—has come out swinging against the NIMBY mindset.
And he's not pulling punches.
Obama's YIMBY Turn: A Long Time Coming
Obama's alignment with the YIMBY movement didn't come out of nowhere. In fact, it began during his second term. In 2016, the Obama White House released a little-noticed but now prophetic document: the Housing Development Toolkit. It recommended local governments roll back exclusionary zoning, eliminate parking minimums, and legalise denser housing types like duplexes and apartments.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
發現這個之後我就不再玩其他遊戲了! ——大多數遊戲玩家都不知道…
突襲暗影傳奇
立即安裝
Undo
At the time, few noticed.
But with today's crisis-level housing prices, that document reads like a warning unheeded.
What did Obama say?
At a closed-door Democratic fundraiser and later during a major speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Obama made his most direct case yet: 'We have to get serious about housing. That means more construction. And yes, that means zoning reform—even when it's politically hard.'
He called out 'progressive neighbourhoods' that support liberal causes in theory but block low-income housing projects in practice.
In other words: they're pro-diversity, until it moves in next door.
Why is this a shot at fellow Democrats?
Because many of the most restrictive housing regulations in the US are in deep blue cities—places like San Francisco, New York, and parts of Los Angeles.
Obama is essentially saying: you can't claim to care about inequality, climate change, and racial justice while blocking housing near public transit or good schools. YIMBY advocates have long pointed out that opposition to dense, affordable housing often comes cloaked in environmental or aesthetic language—but in practice reinforces segregation and skyrocketing rents.
This puts him at odds with parts of the Democratic base: wealthy suburban liberals who vote blue but don't want their single-family neighbourhoods to change.
Why now?
A few reasons:
The youth crisis:
Young Americans can't afford to buy homes. Many are drowning in rent or forced to move far from job centres. Housing affordability is a top issue for voters under 40—a key Democratic constituency.
Climate and equity
: Denser housing near jobs and transit cuts emissions.
It also integrates neighbourhoods.
Political urgency:
With Trump back in power, Democrats are trying to show they offer practical solutions. Housing is now seen as a tangible, winnable fight.
How is YIMBYism changing Democratic politics?
The Democratic Party is undergoing a housing policy transformation, and Obama's backing gives YIMBYism establishment credibility. Key moments:
Kamala Harris' 2024 campaign made YIMBYism a core part of her agenda, pledging federal incentives for cities that reform zoning.
Mayors like Karen Bass (LA) and Brandon Johnson (Chicago) are testing pro-housing reforms at the local level.
Younger lawmakers, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and
Ro Khanna
, have expressed cautious support for YIMBY goals—if paired with tenant protections.
There's even talk of conditioning federal infrastructure and transit funds on whether cities allow more housing—a stick-and-carrot approach Obama helped pioneer.
So who's still saying 'Not In My Backyard'?
NIMBYism isn't gone. In fact, it's alive and well in blue and red states alike. Common arguments include:
'Character of the neighbourhood': A vague but often racially coded argument against multifamily housing.
'Traffic and parking': A perennial excuse to halt development.
'Environmental concerns': Sometimes legitimate—but often used to delay or kill projects.
Ironically, some NIMBYs are now rebranding as 'PHIMBYs' (Public Housing In My Backyard), arguing for 100% government-built units only. Critics say this is a clever way to block private development without looking regressive.
Bottom line
Barack Obama siding with YIMBYs marks a turning point in America's housing debate. It pits him—and now much of the Democratic establishment—against wealthy liberals who've long avoided scrutiny for their role in fuelling inequality.
He's not just talking policy. He's talking values. And asking a tough question:
Are we serious about justice? Or only when it doesn't mess with our property values?
FAQ
Q: What's YIMBYism in simple terms?
A: It's the belief that we need to build more housing—everywhere—to tackle affordability, segregation, and climate change.
Q: What's Obama's stance?
A: Strongly pro-YIMBY. He's called for zoning reform, denser housing, and ending liberal double standards on development.
Q: Is this a partisan issue?
A: Not entirely. There are YIMBYs and NIMBYs in both parties, though Democratic cities tend to face sharper contradictions between rhetoric and reality.
Q: Will this fix the housing crisis?
A: Not alone. But most economists agree more supply is essential—especially near jobs, transit, and good schools.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Governor C V Ananda Bose returns Bengal rape bill after Centre flags concerns
Governor C V Ananda Bose returns Bengal rape bill after Centre flags concerns

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Governor C V Ananda Bose returns Bengal rape bill after Centre flags concerns

West Bengal governor C V Ananda Bose (Pic credit: ANI) KOLKATA: West Bengal governor C V Ananda Bose has returned the Aparajita bill to the Assembly for reconsideration, citing serious objections raised by the Centre regarding proposed changes to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), according to a high-ranking Raj Bhavan source. The Centre found that the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, passed in Sept 2024, contains changes in penal provisions for rape under multiple BNS sections, proposing "excessively harsh and disproportionate" punishments, sources said. A major point of contention is an amendment to BNS section 64. The state bill increases the punishment for rape from the current minimum of 10 years to either imprisonment for the remainder of the convict's natural life or capital punishment. The ministry of home affairs (MHA) reportedly deemed this as unduly harsh and inconsistent with principles of proportionality. Another change that MHA has objected to involves the removal of BNS section 65, which prescribes stricter penalties for sexual assault of minors. According to sources, Union govt believe scrapping this clause weakens protections for the vulnerable groups and risks diluting the intent behind age-based classifications in rape laws. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo However, the clause that the Centre found most problematic is the one under section 66, making the death penalty mandatory in rape cases where the victim either dies or is left in a vegetative state. The MHA raised constitutional concerns, arguing that removing judicial discretion in sentencing violated established legal norms and Supreme Court rulings, sources said. State govt, however, said it had received no official communication either from the Centre nor the governor's office about these observations. Earlier, bills similar to Aparajita, like Andhra Pradesh Disha Bill, 2019, and Maharashtra Shakti Bill, 2020 - which had mandatory death penalty for all rape and gang-rape cases - were passed unanimously by state legislatures, but did not get President's assent. Trinamool Congress indicated the party would make it a political issue. TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said: "The returning of the Aparajita bill is unfortunate, deplorable and condemnable... This has proved that BJP is unwilling to impose maximum punishment in these cases, as their members are implicated in molestations and rapes."

Pitched battle on cards as CAL goes to polls today
Pitched battle on cards as CAL goes to polls today

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Pitched battle on cards as CAL goes to polls today

Lucknow: Cricket enthusiasts, players and administrators will keep a close eye on the much-awaited election of the Cricket Association Lucknow (CAL) scheduled to be held on Saturday. A total of 155 voters, including 34 executive members and 121 club representatives, will cast vote. Before elections, these voters would decide on the mechanism of voting – through ballot or raising of hands – by majority vote. "CAL is prepared for both the mechanisms, as ballot papers have also been printed," a member told TOI. At least 49 candidates filed nominations for different posts of whom eight withdrew their nominations on the last date for withdrawal and scrutiny of nomination papers. Total 16 candidates have filed nominations for the post of the members of executive committee. Elections were to be held on a total 23 posts including that of one president, one senior vice-president, three vice-presidents, one secretary, four joint secretaries, one treasurer, one PRO and 11 executive members. Of these, three vice-presidents and one PRO were elected unopposed on the last day of withdrawal of nomination papers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nvidia's AI Strategy Is Clear - But Is Wall Street Paying Attention? Seeking Alpha Read More Undo Now the elections will be held for 19 posts. Since the elections are being held after a long time, those who have been watching the CAL closely believe that it could go to wires on some posts. Among the prominent candidates are retired IAS officer Navneet Sehgal (incumbent), Haider Raza, younger brother of former minister in Yogi govt Mohsin Raza, former president of Lucknow University Students' Union Neeraj Jain and Congress functionary from Bakshi Ka Talab Lallan Kumar. For the post of secretary, incumbent Khaleeq Mukhtar Khan is pitted against Arshi Raza, youngest brother of former minister Mohsin Raza, and Gopal Singh, who looks after LDA, Aliganj, sports complex. Meanwhile, candidate for the post of president Haider Raza said, "We have demanded election by ballot paper and boycott the election if it is held by raising of hands."

Trichy police tighten security ahead of PM's visit
Trichy police tighten security ahead of PM's visit

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trichy police tighten security ahead of PM's visit

Trichy: Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's two-day visit to Tuticorin and Ariyalur districts for participating in various govt events, Trichy city police have beefed up the security arrangements as the PM is scheduled to stay in the city on Saturday night. On Friday, police personnel and sniffer dogs were deployed near a private hotel in Cantonment and the govt circuit house complex at TVS Tollgate. They inspected the premises of both establishments and curtailed public movement in the areas. Around 1,300 police personnel were engaged for security in multiple areas including the Trichy international airport where Modi will land on Saturday night after attending govt events including the opening of the expanded passenger terminal at Tuticorin airport. From there, he will reach either the private hotel or the govt guest house by road. On Sunday morning, the PM would reach Trichy airport to take a chopper to the Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple in Ariyalur district. Once there, he would preside over the Aadi Thiruvathirai (birth anniversary) festival of Chola emperor Rajendra Chola I and commemoration of 1,000 years of the king's maritime expedition to southeast Asia. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Write Better, Work Smarter With This Desktop App Grammarly Install Now Undo A temporary helipad for the PM's visit was constructed near the Chola-era temple, an Unesco world heritage site, and a trial landing of a chopper was conducted on Friday. After completing the temple event on Sunday afternoon, PM would return to Trichy and head back to New Delhi.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store