logo
Some Ontario mayors against communities' financial incentives to attract doctors

Some Ontario mayors against communities' financial incentives to attract doctors

Global News08-05-2025
Several Ontario mayors have been calling on the province to ban financial incentives municipalities use to lure in doctors, saying the recruitment tactic is harming communities that can't pony up the cash – especially those in rural and northern regions.
But Sault Ste. Marie Mayor Matthew Shoemaker is going even further, suggesting the federal government should outlaw the practice from 'coast to coast.'
'I think it should be banned across the country actually,' he said in a recent interview.
Shoemaker said his city needs 40 more doctors, including 18 to practise family medicine, and while it does offer a moving allowance of up $10,000, it is not in a position to compete with municipalities that are offering doctors tens of thousands of dollars to relocate.
'We think incentives are bad and we don't agree with them, and so we're not at this point supportive of getting into a competition on incentives because it is a competition we will lose,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
Shoemaker said he asked Ontario's health minister to intervene and stop the practice during a meeting they had last August. But he said there seems to be no appetite for such a move in Ontario unless there is 'more widespread acceptance of banning of incentives' across the country.
'We don't want to become the place that is having all its doctors taken away from us,' he said.
A Ministry of Health spokesperson said the government has made big investments to connect more Ontarians with doctors, but didn't directly respond to a question on whether it would consider banning municipalities' financial incentives.
Shoemaker isn't the only one raising concern over the use of incentive-based programs to address Ontario's doctor shortage.
Todd Kasenberg, the mayor of North Perth, is also encouraging the province to ban cash incentives, which he calls a 'mistake.'
'We've entered an arms race and typically there aren't any winners in an arms race,' he said in an interview.
Kasenberg said around 3,000 of 17,000 people in his town north of London, Ont., are currently without a family doctor. With expected retirements in the next few years, the doctor shortage will be severe if officials can't recruit fast enough.
'So it's a substantial issue and met with a lot of frustration in the community, a lot of anxiety,' he added.
Story continues below advertisement
He said the town is expected to welcome four medical residents from Western University this year. Council approved spending $50,000 to provide housing support for those residents, even though Kasenberg said he was personally 'uncomfortable' with the move.
Get weekly health news
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
He hopes the recruits will stay in town beyond their residency period.
London Mayor Josh Morgan and Peterborough Mayor Jeff Leal have also publicly criticized municipalities' financial incentives for doctor recruitment.
Ontario's long-standing shortage of primary care providers affects millions of patients in every corner of the province, but advocates say rural communities are hit harder because they have fewer hospitals and walk-in clinics.
Experts have long warned that hefty financial incentives offered to doctors are widening the health-care access gap between poorer rural towns and richer urban centres.
Some say while the incentives might work, particularly in recruiting new graduates and medical residents who have education loans to repay, they don't serve to retain doctors in those communities.
'I think it is much more effective to be able to, from a retention standpoint, to support new grads by helping them to manage their schedule, add work slowly, avoid the risk of burnout,' said Dr. Sarah Newbery, a family physician in Marathon, Ont., a rural community 300 kilometres east of Thunder Bay.
Story continues below advertisement
'If they're too busy from the get-go, they will not be easy to retain.'
Newbery knows a thing or two about retention – she was one of six young physicians who moved to Marathon nearly three decades ago and ended the town's chronic doctor shortage.
At that time, Marathon was about to lose its only emergency department and the fate of the entire hospital was up in the air. The local physician recruitment committee even had burlap sacks ready to cover the hospital signs on the nearby highway.
'It was probably the most underserviced community certainly in the province, maybe in the country,' Newbery said.
She said the town gave the entire group $10,000 in bonuses — a little over $1,600 each — and housing support that included two years of free rent for some. But those incentives were not a deciding factor for Newbery and her partner to stay in Marathon for 29 years.
She said what kept that group of physicians in town was a collective commitment to provide better care for the community as well as an understanding of a healthy work and life balance. Marathon is home to six physicians now, and has only one doctor vacancy at a time when other rural communities are in a health-care crisis.
Instead of offering cash bonuses, Newbery suggested the money should be invested in making towns more welcoming and appealing to doctors in the long run.
Story continues below advertisement
Around 525,000 Ontarians who live in rural areas have no access to primary care, and that number is increasing four times faster compared to urban centres, according to data provided by the Rural Ontario Municipalities Association.
Christy Lowry, the association's chair, said improving access to health care, recruiting physicians and medical workers, and making sure local emergency rooms remain operational are 'top priority' for the association.
'All of those pieces are part of what we're focused on right now, and we can see how the lack of these services are negatively impacting our communities and the well-being of our communities,' she said.
Lowry, who is also the mayor of Mississippi Mills, a rural community east of Ottawa, said while her town has a modern hospital with 'tremendous service,' the shortage of primary care providers is a problem for residents, some of whom are travelling as far as Kingston to see their doctors.
The association estimates Ontario municipalities are spending nearly half a billion dollars on health care annually.
'Property tax dollars should be going to core municipal priorities. They were never designed to pay for health services,' Lowry said in a recent interview.
'The problem is there's a shortage. (We) don't have enough, so it becomes this competition between one community and the next.'
Story continues below advertisement
In northern communities, more than 350 doctors — including more than 200 family physicians — are needed to fill current vacancies, and that number is much higher if retirements expected over the next five years are factored in, according to the Ontario Medical Association.
The association's former president, Dr. Dominik Nowak, said that's 'unacceptable.'
The shortage had led to fierce competition for physicians.
'There are winners and losers when we have a situation like this and oftentimes the communities that can't afford to recruit and retain are northern and rural communities,' he said last month before his tenure ended.
Nowak said while municipalities should help create a welcoming environment for doctors and their families, ultimately it is the province's job to ensure communities have proper access to health care.
'It's a symptom of a larger problem,' Nowak said of incentive-based programs. 'The larger problem is that family practice is no longer seen as a viable career choice for new graduates.'
The Ministry of Health said the province has added 15,000 doctors and increased the number of family physicians by 10 per cent since 2018.
Ministry spokesperson Ema Popovic said the government is adding close to 1,500 family doctors in rural and northern areas as part of two different programs, which include bringing in foreign-trained doctors and providing education funds for students interested in working in those communities.
Story continues below advertisement
She said Ontario aims to connect everyone in the province to a primary care provider by 2029 as part of a $1.8-billion investment.
The province recently said there will be 'significant investments' in the Rural and Northern Physician Group Agreement primary care model. There will also be a new program called the Rural Emergency Medicine Coverage Investment Fund, which is meant to ensure appropriate doctor staffing levels year-round, and it replaces a now-expired temporary program that incentivized doctors to fill those shifts in rural and northern ERs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Home-care in Ontario can't keep up — and it's getting worse
Home-care in Ontario can't keep up — and it's getting worse

Toronto Star

time2 days ago

  • Toronto Star

Home-care in Ontario can't keep up — and it's getting worse

Ontario's home-care is in trouble. There simply aren't enough personal support workers (PSWs) to go around. It's a critical shortage that's stretched thinner by the growing number of private agencies. Vulnerable Ontarians are caught in the middle of a widening chasm between what they need and what's publicly available. Two years ago, the home-care required by some 650,000 Ontarians was delivered by Local Health Integration Networks, or LHINs. It's a system that worked: Provincial surveys showed that over 90 per cent of clients were satisfied with the co-ordination and quality of care they received. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details

Knee surgery changes course of common knee problem, according to local researchers
Knee surgery changes course of common knee problem, according to local researchers

CTV News

time3 days ago

  • CTV News

Knee surgery changes course of common knee problem, according to local researchers

London-based study shows that a specialized knee surgery can prevent knee replacement. CTV's Reta Ismail has more. Researchers at Western have made significant progress treating a common knee issue, allowing some to avoid knee replacement. People suffering with knee osteoarthritis, a condition which brings pain, stiffness and sometimes the need for joint replacement surgery, can undergo a surgical operation called high tibial osteotomy. 'So in the surgery, they'll take that maligned limb, so that bowed limb, and actually straighten it to shift loads away from the most damaged compartment of the knee,' said Dr. Trevor Birmingham, professor and Canada research chair in musculoskeletal rehabilitation in Western's faculty of health sciences. The study is led by researchers at Western University and the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic. A two-year clinical trial followed 145 patients and compared those who had HTO and non-surgical therapy with those who only had therapy. The results showed that HTO slowed joint damage, reduced pain and improved movement. This is the first real evidence that a treatment can cand the course of osteoarthritis. The surgery is less common than joint replacement, but the researchers believe it needs more attention to help people in their 50s with specific alignment issues. - With files from CTV's Reta Ismail

Canada is hosting the world's biggest dementia conference for the first time in a decade. What's changed since then?
Canada is hosting the world's biggest dementia conference for the first time in a decade. What's changed since then?

Globe and Mail

time6 days ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada is hosting the world's biggest dementia conference for the first time in a decade. What's changed since then?

This week, researchers from around the globe are descending upon downtown Toronto to attend the Alzheimer's Association International Conference, the world's biggest and most influential meeting for dementia research. The gathering is a chance for the international dementia community to discuss the latest research in the field; it's also where significant breakthroughs are often unveiled. At a related event on Saturday, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) – Canada's health research funding agency – announced $44.8-million in new funding for dementia and aging-related research initiatives, including the creation of 16 teams that will study everything from Alzheimer's biomarkers to dementia in Indigenous populations. To set the stage for this year's conference, The Globe and Mail checked in with Jane Rylett, a professor at Western University and scientific director at the CIHR Institute of Aging, which hosted Saturday's event. The last time this global conference was held in Canada was in 2016, nearly a decade ago. How has the dementia research landscape changed since then? This is a really important inflection point. There is a new class of drugs, the antibody therapy, that came into the market within the last three or four years; they probably will be approved in Canada in the coming years. But while there's huge hope around it . . . right now, there's a lot of debate around if they're really beneficial. For certain people, they don't work at all; other people have negative side effects by creating inflammation in the brain. And the benefit-to-risk ratio is not great. So I think at this year's conference, it's going to be really important to hear about new findings with that. Something that's really gained momentum over the last few years is stepping back from the pharmacological approach to treatment and saying, 'What else can we do that will reduce the risk of developing dementia?' Health system urged to brace for major shift in dementia demographics The other thing that's changed is there's always been an 'amyloid hypothesis' of Alzheimer's disease, based on these toxic peptides that get made in the brain and clearly have a role in brain health and development of dementia. But during these nine years, there's been a much greater move towards understanding the role of those and recognizing that while they're still important, they're not the whole story. Now there's more openness to looking at other hypotheses about how brain health can be impacted during the life course and can lead to dementia. How should people feel about this present moment? Thinking back to 2012, the United States' health department set an ambitious goal to prevent and effectively treat Alzheimer's disease by 2025. But here we are today and that goal is far from met. When people or groups make those kinds of statements, it doesn't necessarily mesh with the complication of the thing. And then what happens is people see [the missed deadline] and think, well, it didn't happen. That's always the danger of doing something like that. The brain is a complex thing, it really is. The problem with something like Alzheimer's disease is it's so multi-faceted and it's a spectrum. There's so many areas of the brain that are impacted and the clinical presentation can look similar for people but what's happening in their brain, and where the degeneration is initiated, can be quite different. There's no one pill that you're going to have that's going to be able to change the course or alleviate the symptoms. So was it realistic to say in 2012 that this could be cured by 2025? Probably not. But it stimulated a lot of activity. We understand much more about the underlying pathology and the pathogenesis of the disease. And stepping back was an important thing, saying what can we do that is not a pharmaceutical or a pill? What are the life, behavioural and other things that we can do? Canada has a chance to change the Alzheimer's experience - let's not squander it There's been a lot of focus on the funding cuts in the U.S. that are under way right now, including to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). How has that affected things? is it looming over the conference this year? Yes. A number of Canadian researchers also have been funded by NIH, either in their own right or as subcontracts on larger studies within the U.S., and for the most part, that has been ended, which is very problematic. So we have a number of very good Canadian researchers in all fields that have lost substantial funding, and we don't have the resources in Canada to replace that. One of the big question marks is the impact it's going to have on the number of Americans that are going to be able to attend the conference. And I don't know the answer to that yet. Let's talk about Canadian researchers. What role are they playing within the broader effort? Canadian researchers are leaders internationally in these fields of study. There's really significant work being done by Canadians in the biomarkers area, so the diagnostic area. We have a lot of expertise around how to develop and promote new methods for supporting caregivers and persons with dementia. Alzheimer's trial brings at-risk patients hope for the future, but new doubts in the present We've got outstanding Indigenous cognitive health researchers that are developing new culturally safe and appropriate diagnostic and caregiving methods. And we do have some very good work going on around pathogenesis, looking at changes in the brain during aging and how that may lead to loss of cognition. That's important because you really need to understand where those earliest changes come from. Those are the targets where you need to develop drugs and therapies. This interview has been edited and condensed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store