logo
BoE echoes central banks' long bond sensitivity

BoE echoes central banks' long bond sensitivity

Reuters26-06-2025
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - Central banks sense that their once-bloated balance sheets are closing in on the fabled 'steady state', meaning they can concentrate solely on setting interest rates rather than fretting about the monetary effects of adding or shedding bonds.
A curious event at the Bank of England this week was the latest sign of G4 sensitivity to shaky investor demand for so-called long-duration government debt, suggesting policymakers are going to start scrutinizing the effects of their balance sheet activity more closely.
In a parliamentary testimony on Tuesday, Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey said the upcoming annual review of the BoE's balance sheet rundown - or 'quantitative tightening' policy - would be "interesting" this year in light of the sharply steeper UK yield curve.
What's more, he added that central bank reserves in the financial system could reach the top end of estimates from banks for their 'neutral' level during the second half of 2026.
Bailey's deputy Dave Ramsden - who oversees the annual QT review - later concurred with the governor without giving details away, adding "movements at the long end of the curve were a particular focus for us more generally in the Bank."
Partly drawn into the slipstream of sharp moves in long-term U.S. Treasuries, as Donald Trump returned to the White House this year and upended trade and diplomatic policies, long-dated British gilt yields have been on edge all year too.
Even after two quarter-point cuts in BoE policy rates since January, 30-year UK government borrowing costs are 15 basis points higher on the year - and were almost 50bp higher on the year at one point during a turbulent April when they hit their highest in 27 years.
The result has been a near doubling of the yield curve gap between 2- and 30-year gilts - the steepest curve in almost eight years.
Britain has its own home-grown debt worries, memories of a fiscal shock three years ago and limited borrowing room under the current Labour government's own rules at a time of mounting spending demands from defence to health.
There's also a complicated dance between the BoE's bond holdings, how they are funded with interest on commercial bank reserves and the extent to which government is on the hook for losses incurred.
But the nod and wink from the BoE's top brass this week also reflects some concern across major economies about growing indigestion among investment funds for very long-dated debt even as short-term interest rates fall.
Worries about rising public debt and long-term uncertainty about inflation add to the concerns and even changing demographics may be altering the appetite of pension funds for the sort of ultra-long dated debt they once demanded.
Japan's experience has been the spotlight too, with poor auctions of its super-long government bonds lately forcing the Bank of Japan and finance ministry to rethink both the amount of debt it sells at this maturity as well as how much the BOJ will buy and hold.
And the U.S. Federal Reserve has already slowed its QT process to a trickle, with little more than a token monthly runoff now underway.
The Bank of England is unusual, however, in that its QT plan involves both active sales of gilts as well as allowing the bond pile to just mature and roll off in a way other major central banks wholly rely on.
The big question is whether BoE wariness of yield curve swings forces it to reconsider QT altogether or just play around with the range of maturities it's shedding.
A report from Bank of America this month said it expects the BoE to slow the overall bond runoff to 60 billion pounds over the year from October from the 100 billion pace in the current year.
As that would include about 49 billion pounds of maturing debt, active sales would then drop to little over 10 billion. Keeping QT unchanged at this year's pace would mean about half of the drop in 2025/2026 would need to come from active selling.
Even though the BoE continues to say that its QT process has a relatively modest impact on the market, some of its policymakers and the BofA team doubt that and suspect it is actually tightening lending conditions in a way that dampens the effects of its main policy rate cuts.
As the BoE's QT process runs down commercial bank reserves and potentially squeezes lending capacity eventually, the Bank has set up special securities repurchases facilities and urged banks to use them more to manage their liquidity needs.
But BoE rate-setter Catherine Mann said this month that the central bank needs to pay closer attention to the impact of QT.
"Now that the MPC is reducing restrictiveness, I believe that we need to consider the differing effects of our policies on different parts of the yield curve and their effects on monetary policy transmission as a more salient issue," she said.
BofA's team tend to agree, adding the fiscal impact of slowing QT would be 'negligible'.
"We are sceptical whether QT is really operating in the background, not least in light of long-end Gilt price action developments as of late," the BofA report said. "At a time when the BoE is trying to ease monetary conditions by cutting rates, QT could be diluting the pass-through of cuts by tightening monetary conditions at the long end."
Whether the effects are enough to see the end of active gilt sales on the horizon is another question and the debate about where the 'steady state' is for a balance sheet that is still some 130 billion pounds of gilts above pre-pandemic levels will likely build too.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer faces difficult task persuading Trump to take different path on Gaza
Starmer faces difficult task persuading Trump to take different path on Gaza

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Starmer faces difficult task persuading Trump to take different path on Gaza

Moments after Air Force One touched down at Prestwick on Friday for a trip in which politics will take as big a billing as golf, Donald Trump was asked about his relationship with Keir Starmer. 'I like your prime minister. He's slightly more liberal than I am, as you've probably heard. But he's a good man,' the US president told reporters. At a time when the UK wants Trump's ear on numerous weighty issues, his response to questions about the 'special relationship' will have given Downing Street some reassurance. But it has been hard won. Starmer has been clear since before Trump's re-election that he would work with him if it was in Britain's national interest. There have been uncomfortable moments, but so far his decision to align himself with the US president has broadly paid off. Most notable was the economic deal agreed by the two leaders that slashes some of Trump's tariffs on cars, aluminium and steel, and which – even though it is not yet fully implemented – the UK government hopes will be a first step towards a closer trading relationship. Starmer, along with other western allies, has also helped encourage Trump to shift his position on Ukraine. After initially siding with Vladimir Putin and appearing to blame Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the invasion, the US president has since declared himself 'very unhappy' with his Russian counterpart. The prime minister now faces his toughest diplomatic task of all: trying to persuade Trump to take a different path on the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East. Even getting the issue on the agenda will not have been straightforward, with the White House not regarding Gaza as a priority. Trump is the only international leader whom the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, listens to – though even then, not all of the time – so getting the US president's ear at this precise moment is an opportunity not to be squandered. With international fury over the situation on the ground in Gaza growing, Starmer has also been under pressure domestically – from his cabinet, Labour MPs and increasingly the public – to take further action against Israel. Government advisers are defensive – citing what the UK has already done to hold Israel to account since Labour came to power – and promising further action will follow, even if it is not clear what that might constitute. They point to the UK restoring funding to the UN agency Unrwa, sanctioning far-right Israeli ministers and those who committed settler violence, breaking off trade negotiations with Israel, backing the legitimacy of the international criminal court and restricting arms licences to Israel (though not preventing them entirely). Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The initial urgency is around humanitarian aid, with mass starvation spreading across Gaza, and Starmer will be hoping to persuade Trump that the situation on the ground will only worsen unless the Israelis fully lift their blockade of almost all aid into the territory. The longer-term prize, however, would be a ceasefire. Starmer will press Trump to revive ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, after the US and Israel withdrew their negotiation teams from Qatar last week. Getting them back round the table to agree a 60-day break from fighting is a prerequisite to a more permanent cessation of violence. The window of opportunity is narrow: the Israeli parliament is not sitting until October, which gives Netanyahu the cover he would need to agree a deal. But Starmer knows Trump is the only international figure who can put pressure on him to do so. Only at that point does Starmer feel the UK could follow France and formally recognise a Palestine state. No 10 insiders say it is a 'matter of when, not if' and David Lammy, the foreign secretary, will be at a UN conference this week to establish a pathway to formal recognition. To the deep frustration of many in his party, the prime minister last week rejected a call to follow France in recognising Palestine amid concerns the move would be largely symbolic without a ceasefire in place, and that issue could overshadow the talks with Trump. But that means even more is riding on Monday's meeting with the US president. It will be a test of whether the energy put into maintaining a good relationship with Trump has been worth it. And it will also show how far Starmer really is prepared to push to help bring an end to the catastrophe in Gaza.

Zero-hours contracts: peers accused of ‘trying to block stronger UK workers' rights'
Zero-hours contracts: peers accused of ‘trying to block stronger UK workers' rights'

The Guardian

time40 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Zero-hours contracts: peers accused of ‘trying to block stronger UK workers' rights'

Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers have been accused of trying to block stronger rights for millions of workers amid a growing campaign by business leaders to water down Labour's zero-hours contract plans. In a blow for the government, the Lords last week voted to curtail the manifesto promise to give workers a right to a guaranteed hours contract and day-one protections against unfair dismissal. Setting up a showdown with the upper chamber, the Lords passed a series of amendments to the employment rights bill that will must be addressed by ministers when MPs return from their summer break. In an angry intervention on Monday, the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, Paul Nowak, said the Lords was 'doing the bidding of bad bosses' and ought to 'get out of the way' of the plans. 'The sight of hereditary peers voting to block stronger workers' rights belongs in another century. It's plain wrong,' he said. Under the Lords' amendments, a requirement for employers to offer zero-hours workers a contract covering a guaranteed number of hours would be shifted to place the onus on staff to ask for such an arrangement. Protections against unfair dismissal from the first day of employment – which the government plans to reduce from the current level of two years – would be extended to six months, and changes to free up trade unions would be curtailed. The bill will return to the Commons in September for MPs to consider the amendments. The two houses then continue to vote on the changes in a process known as 'ping-pong' until a way forward is agreed. The amendments were put forward by the Lib Dem Lord Goddard, a former leader of Stockport council, and two Tory peers: Lord Hunt, who is a shadow business minister, and Lord Sharpe, a former investment banker. Hunt did not respond to a request for comment. Sharpe said: 'Keir Starmer's unemployment bill is a disaster for employees as much as it is a threat to business. Labour politicians who have never worked in business are destroying the economy. Only the Conservatives are listening to business and making the case for growth.' Goddard said he feared Labour's 'rushed bill' would be bad for workers in small businesses and on family-owned farms. 'They were badly let down by the Conservatives, and Labour seems to have a blind spot when it comes to farms and small businesses, too. 'We support the bill as a whole and have worked constructively to try to improve it. It's a shame to see the government getting upset that we didn't simply give them a blank cheque.' Employers groups welcomed the changes, saying the Lords was responding to business concerns. Helen Dickinson, the chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, said: 'Putting forward positive, practical and pragmatic amendments to the employment rights bill [will] help to protect the availability of valuable, local, part-time and entry level jobs up and down the country.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Industry chiefs have stepped up lobbying against the workers' rights changes, warning that companies were already slashing jobs and putting up prices in response to tax rises in chancellor Rachel Reeves's autumn budget. Dickinson said there was 'further to go' to curb the employment rights bill. 'Even with these amendments accepted, retailers remain worried about the consequences for jobs from other areas of the bill.' Union leaders have, though, urged ministers to stand firm. A recent mega poll of 21,000 people commissioned by the TUC found a majority of UK voters – including Conservative, Lib Dem and Reform UK supporters – backed a ban on zero-hours contracts. Nowak said the government plan included 'commonsense protections' that a majority of people wanted to see become law. 'These peers are not just out of touch, they are actively defying their own voters – and the public at large. The government must stand firm in the face of cynical attacks and deliver the employment rights bill in full.'

Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting
Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting

The ousted head of the Financial Ombudsman Service received a pay-off of almost £230,000, it has been disclosed in the annual report. Abby Thomas, who left abruptly on 6 February, was paid £229,869 in severance payments on top of her normal salary. The payoff included £100,000 for loss of office, £107,692 in lieu of notice and £22,177 for a period of gardening leave that began on the day she left, the FOS said. MPs on the Treasury select committee have hit out at the manner of her departure and criticised the FOS chairwoman Baroness Manzoor for refusing to answer questions on why Thomas left and whether she was forced out. The FOS, which rules on complaints by consumers about financial services firms and can set compensation orders, is under pressure to reform. Rachel Reeves has pledged to curb its powers so it no longer acts like a regulator after complaints from the industry that it has increased the cost of 'mass redress events'. It has been dealing with a significant rise in claims, mainly related to car finance loans, but also because of concerns about other consumer loans and more people complaining about banks' handling of frauds. Dame Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the Treasury committee, said this month: 'The handling of this situation by the senior leadership has been deeply disappointing.' Thomas, a former Virgin Media executive, served for less than three years. She has been replaced by James Dipple-Johnstone as chief ombudsman and Jenny Simmonds as interim chief executive. Manzoor is due to retire on August 1. The FOS received 450,000 new inquiries in the year to March, up from 330,000. The motor finance industry is braced for a judgment from the Supreme Court this Friday that could determine the scale of compensation payments for failing to disclose commissions paid to dealers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store