Why police accountability efforts failed again in the Washington Legislature
For a second year in a row, Washington police accountability advocates have seen their priorities fall flat in Olympia.
They entered this year's session wanting to grant the attorney general stronger oversight of local police departments. They also wanted to create an independent prosecutor to handle cases when police use deadly force; restrict when officers can pull drivers over; block law enforcement from lying during interrogations; and set new standards for police chiefs and sheriffs.
None of those proposals will become law this year. None even received votes from either chamber of the Washington Legislature, despite growing Democratic majorities.
'This is the saddest time of my life, because this is the world I have to leave my children,' said Nickeia Hunter, an advocate from the Coalition for Police Accountability, whose brother was killed by police. 'We have to stay on top of fighting for what we started.'
It's a far cry from a few years ago when police accountability gained momentum in the Legislature in the wake of George Floyd's murder by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020 and the social uprising that followed.
In the immediate aftermath, lawmakers passed a suite of laws to set additional guardrails for police. This included restricting when they could pursue people suspected of crimes — a move that drew such staunch pushback, lawmakers rolled back the policy last year.
They also banned police from using chokeholds, created a statewide use of force database and established a first-of-its-kind Office of Independent Investigations to look into deadly force cases.
Legislators' biggest move on policing this year was acquiescing to Gov. Bob Ferguson's ask for $100 million to hire more officers, a request that drew frustration from many progressive Democrats.
Steve Strachan, the executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, noted that officials are still waiting to see how some of the big changes made in 2021 are playing out and called the shift since then 'a more balanced approach.'
The difficult budget year also acted as a buzzsaw that sheared away police accountability bills that would've cost money.
Meanwhile, fears of rising crime have emboldened opposition to policies believed to hinder officers trying to do their jobs. In 2023, the last year with available statewide data, the state saw a significant decrease in year-over-year violent crimes after years of increases, according to the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs.
More broadly, this has all powered a pendulum swing in the establishment conversation from fixing policing to helping police.
'Increased accountability helps everyone be able to do their job well, and to make sure that they have the supports and the infrastructure in place to do their job well,' said Rep. Darya Farivar, a Seattle Democrat and leading police accountability proponent in the Legislature. 'It is, frankly, a little confusing to me why some folks don't seem to understand that.'
A new sheriff in town
Ferguson's rhetoric in his first few months in office played a part in the paradigm shift this year.
Starting on the campaign trail and in his inaugural address, the new Democratic governor, who supported police accountability efforts while attorney general, was steadfast in his request for a new $100 million grant program to bring on more law enforcement officers. He hopes the money will turn the tide on Washington's long-held last-place ranking nationwide in police staffing per capita.
After not including the funding in their initial proposals, Democrats relented under threat of veto to include it in the final budget that's now on the governor's desk.
This sucked away some money that could've been used for police oversight measures, said Sen. Yasmin Trudeau, D-Tacoma.
Strachan said that the funding tracks with the public's priorities.
'There's a general consensus, I think, among a lot of residents in our state, that, yes, we want to make sure that law enforcement is doing a good job and is being fair and transparent, but also that we need more officers and we need to support public safety,' he said.
Departments can use the $100 million for more than just officers on the beat. Under House Bill 2015, the money can also go toward peer counselors, behavioral health co-responders, training and other broader public safety efforts.
While Republicans generally supported the idea behind the grant program, many of them believe Washington's police staffing difficulties are caused more by the state's perceived hostility toward law enforcement than anything else.
The money also comes with strings.
To access grant funding, for example, cities and counties need to either implement a new 0.1% sales tax for public safety or have already imposed a similar tax. They also need to follow state model policies as well as collect and report use of force data.
In a statement, Ferguson said increasing hiring and adopting police accountability measures 'are not mutually exclusive.'
'They can, and should, go hand in hand,' the governor said. 'For example, HB 2015 creates a $100 million grant program to hire more law enforcement officers and contains strong accountability conditions for agencies that will receive the grants.'
Ferguson has not yet approved the final budget or House Bill 2015. He has a couple weeks to do so.
Looking forward
Trudeau hopes once local law enforcement can address the staffing issue, the discussion can turn back to accountability.
Rep. Roger Goodman, D-Kirkland, plans to spend the interim before next year's legislative session meeting with police officials. He wants to mend the relationship between Olympia and on-the-ground law enforcement.
'It's, I believe, incumbent on me to do some repair work with the police community, because it's been a pretty aggressive effort, all well meaning and I think good policy, but it needs to be done in a more collaborative fashion,' said Goodman, the chair of the House Community Safety Committee.
Hunter, with the Coalition for Police Accountability, described the path forward as 'bleak.'
'But we'll be damned if we sit down and be like, 'Oh, we're just going to have to have to accept it,'' she said.
With a short, 60-day legislative session in 2026, she isn't hopeful for major gains. But she and others plan to keep telling their stories in hopes of convincing people about the importance of the issue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump attacks Charlamagne Tha God over criticism
Trump said on Truth Social that Charlamagne was a 'dope' who voted for Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris. Charlamagne said he personally will benefit from tax breaks approved in Trump's tax-and spending law, but said, 'There's going to be so many people that's hurt by that bill.'' 'Anything that takes away Medicaid from people and will put people in a worse financial situation than they were previously in, I'm not for,' he added. Charlamagne also predicted that 'traditional conservatives' are going to take back the Republican Party from Trump's Make America Great Again movement, citing controversy over Trump's refusal to release files related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'I think there's a political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people aren't paying attention to,' Charlamagne said. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back. I really do. I think that they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up, the MAGA base isn't letting this issue go and for the first time they can probably take their party back and not piss off the MAGA base. I think they're going to do that.' Trump on social media called Charlamagne a 'racist sleazebag' and criticized his use of God in his professional nickname. 'Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?' Trump asked. Charlamagne told Lara Trump that his criticism of the Republican president was not new, adding that he 'gave President Biden the same hell' when he didn't think the Democrat was doing a good job.


Chicago Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Texas House Democrats flee to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort
Opting to use what Texas politicians called a nuclear option, Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives left for Chicago on Sunday under threat of fines and arrest to deny Republicans the quorum they need to redraw five congressional districts aimed at helping President Donald Trump and the national GOP maintain a U.S. House majority in next year's midterm elections. The Texas Democrats were scheduled to be met by a supportive Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker upon their arrival in Chicago. Pritzker issued a statement echoing Texas Democratic arguments that Republicans were using a special legislative session in Austin, aimed at providing relief for last month's flood victims in the state's Hill Country, to please Trump and 'as political cover to push through a racially gerrymandered congressional map.' 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' state Rep. Gene Wu, the chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement. 'We're leaving Texas to fight for Texans,' Wu said. 'We will not allow disaster relief to be held hostage for a Trump gerrymander. We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent. As of today, this corrupt special session is over.' By coming to Illinois, the Democrats from Texas are leaving a state where Republicans dominate and will find themselves in a state where the opposite is true. Pritzker, in his statement, said the move denies Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott a quorum 'to pass his rigged redistricting scheme,' which was encouraged by Trump's political allies. Pritzker and Abbott clashed often in the last few years over the Texas governor's decision to bus and fly thousands of immigrants from the southern border to Chicago in part to mock state and city sanctuary policies, resulting in Illinois and the city spending tens of millions of dollars for services. A source close to Pritzker said discussions about Texas Democrats seeking help from the governor began June 28, when Pritzker attended a dinner for the Oklahoma Democratic Party. There, Pritzker met with Kendall Scudder, the head of the Texas Democratic Party, and the two spoke about the challenges facing Texas Democrats. Pritzker vowed to support and defend them if they came to Illinois, the source said. The topic came up again a little more than a week ago when the governor met on Chicago's South Side with some Texas Democratic lawmakers to discuss that state's GOP midterm redistricting effort, the source said. The 150-member Texas House has 88 Republicans and 62 Democrats, with 100 members required to be present for a quorum call in order to conduct legislative business. It was not immediately clear how many Democrats were making the trip to Chicago. It's not the first time that Texas House Democrats fled the state capital in Austin to deny a quorum. In July 2021, when Republicans in the state pushed for tighter restrictions on voting, they spent five weeks in Washington, D.C. The move prompted a Texas House rule of $500 per day fines for any such future absences. But the Texas Tribune reported that in recent days, members of the state's Democratic congressional delegation were contacting their campaign donor base to put together funds to compensate missing members for fines as well as their accommodations in Illinois. One estimate put the cost at $1 million per month. Additionally, Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is mounting a primary challenge to GOP U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, has offered the services of his office in 'hunting down and compelling the attendance of anyone who abandons their office' to deny quorum. Pritzker, who is a billionaire, has no plans to pay for the Texas Democrats' stay in the Chicago area, but his campaign staff would make hotel recommendations and help with other logistics, according to the Pritzker source. The move by Democrats came a day after a Republican-led Texas House panel voted along party lines to advance a draft congressional map altering current district boundaries to create five districts that favor Republicans. The GOP currently holds a 25-12 advantage among the 38-member congressional delegation, with one vacancy. While the U.S. Department of Justice under Trump sought to offer legal justification for redrawing the map, contending four districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered, Texas House Republicans flatly stated their goal was to increase GOP representation in the state's congressional delegation. 'Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush,' said state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican who sponsored the remap legislation. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Texas Democrats said the new map would come at the expense of representation for Black and Latino voters who would either be packed into new districts or widely dispersed among them. It's not the first time that Illinois has become home for another state's Democratic lawmakers. In 2011, Indiana Democrats crossed the border and stayed for five weeks in the Champaign-Urbana area to deny a quorum over a Republican push for union-weakening legislation and creation of a school voucher program. A right-to-work bill passed the following year under GOP majorities achieved through the 2011 remap.


San Francisco Chronicle
23 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on redrawn House map backed by Trump
Texas Democrats are leaving the state in an attempt to prevent the state House from holding a vote Monday on new congressional maps that Republicans hope will net them several additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. The dramatic move Sunday could expose Democrats to fines and other penalties — with the state's attorney general having previously threatened to arrest them if they took such an action. Refusing to attend legislative session is a civil violation, however, so Democrats legally could not be jailed and it's unclear who has the power to carry out the warrants. Democrats have cast the decision to leave the state as a last-ditch effort to stop Republicans who hold full control of the Texas government from pushing through a rare mid-decade redrawing of the congressional map at the direction of President Donald Trump. "This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' said Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement. To conduct official business, at least 100 members of the 150-member Texas House must be present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber. At least 51 Democratic members are leaving the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. 'Apathy is complicity, and we will not be complicit in the silencing of hard-working communities who have spent decades fighting for the power that Trump wants to steal," he said. The move marks the second time in four years that Texas Democrats have fled the state to block a vote. In 2021, a 38-day standoff took place when Democrats left for Washington in opposition to new voting restrictions. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature that started last month to take up the redistricting effort, as well as to respond to flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people in July. Trump has urged Texas Republicans to redraw the map to help the party net a handful of seats in the midterms next year. Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. By leaving the state, Democrats are looking to block Republicans from the needed quorum to hold votes on the map set for Monday. The Texas House has rules to fine lawmakers $500 each day they break a quorum. GOP Attorney General Ken Paxton has said previously that if Democrats break quorum, 'they should be found and arrested no matter where they go.' 'My office stands ready to assist local, state, and federal authorities in hunting down and compelling the attendance of anyone who abandons their office and their constituents for cheap political theater,' Paxton said on the social media platform X on July 15. A large chunk of the Texas Democrats are heading to Illinois, where Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker had been in quiet talks with them for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term. Last week, Pritzker hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort. California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Now, with Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the Trump-backed congressional map, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and the president. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them.