Bill banning deals that hide police misconduct, prompted by Chronicle investigation, clears hurdle
'Throughout California, dangerous and dishonest officers are skirting accountability through this practice,' the bill's author, Assembly Member Isaac Bryan, D-Culver City (Los Angeles County), told the committee.
The Chronicle investigation 'Right to Remain Secret,' produced with UC Berkeley's Investigative Reporting Program, revealed that at least 163 departments had signed 'clean-record agreements' that concealed allegations of corruption and criminality against nearly 300 officers, helping at least 108 of them to land subsequent jobs in law enforcement or as security guards.
The conduct hidden by these agreements included many accusations of serious misconduct, including sexual assault, falsifying police reports and excessive force. In many cases, the departments that agreed to bury the alleged misconduct in secret files did so despite an unwavering belief that the conduct had occurred.
As written, the bill would prohibit California law enforcement agencies from agreeing to destroy, remove, halt, modify, or conceal findings of any misconduct and void any of these promises retroactively. Additionally, the bill would make all such agreements disclosable.
Currently, the Peace Officers Research Association of California, or PORAC, the state's most powerful law enforcement lobbying organization, is the only group publicly opposing the bill. The California Police Chiefs Association and the California State Sheriffs' Association have not taken a formal position.
Testifying in opposition, PORAC's legislative advocate, Randy Perry, told the committee the bill is redundant, saying police accountability bills passed in California within the past decade have addressed this issue.
'Officers that they're using as examples would never be able to be peace officers now. They couldn't go to another department and be hired by somebody else,' Perry told the committee, referencing Senate Bill 2, which permits the state to revoke the licenses of officers accused of serious misconduct.
Bryan said that was a 'ridiculous argument,' saying, 'We just have not seen those numbers from the police certification board.' According to a website maintained by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training's website, the agency with the power to revoke licenses, only one officer identified in the Chronicle's investigation has lost his license.
As for the provision to make clean-record agreements disclosable, Perry said that the newspaper investigation, by getting access to more than 300 agreements, proved that this part of the bill is also unnecessary. He cited Senate Bill 1421 and Senate Bill 16, laws that for the first time gave the public access to specific police misconduct records.
'This bill is trying to help the press go back and get very old cases,' Perry said.
Bryan countered that 'the idea that this information is readily available is false,' noting that one-third of the agencies contacted by the Chronicle and the Investigative Reporting Program refused to disclose all or some of these secret deals, including the 10 largest agencies in the state.
In fact, the passage of SB1421 and SB16 were only part of why reporters received many of these agreements. Much of the underlying conduct covered up by the agreements does not fall in the categories of records disclosable under those transparency laws.
PORAC has offered an alternative to Bryan's bill — a clarification that any police separation agreements that conceal misconduct described in SB1421 and SB16 are disclosable. It does not propose a prohibition of these agreements.
Bryan said the amendment was not sufficient. 'These agreements shouldn't exist. They are against the public interest. They are against public safety. They allow for the worst of the worst to cover that misconduct,' he said.
PORAC has advocated for the use of clean-record agreements for years, records show. Almost every agreement obtained by reporters was executed by a small group of attorneys funded by PORAC, which is financed by police unions. Additionally, PORAC's website highlights dozens of examples of these lawyers' success in securing agreements that give officers a 'clean slate.'
The bill passed through committee with bipartisan support, with both Republicans on the committee — Juan Alanis of Modesto and Tom Lackey of Palmdale (Los Angeles County) — voting yes. The sole dissenting vote was James Ramos, D-San Bernardino. A spokesperson for the Assembly member did not explain the reason for the no vote but said Ramos is 'seriously reconsidering his vote before the bill comes to the full Assembly floor.'
'These protect the self-described bad apples of the department from whom they would like to separate,' he said. 'We need to end this practice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Elle
12 hours ago
- Elle
Katy Perry and Justin Trudeau's Complete Relationship Timeline
THE RUNDOWN In late July, pop star Katy Perry and former Canadian Prime Minster Justin Trudeau sparked dating rumors after being seen with one another on several occasions in Montréal. On August 2, a source stated that the 'romance is in very early stages.' Both Perry and Trudeau ended their long term relationships relatively recently. On July 3, Perry and actor Orlando Bloom announced their split after six years of being engaged in a joint statement to People, saying, 'Due to the abundance of recent interest and conversation surrounding Orlando Bloom and Katy Perry's relationship, representatives have confirmed that Orlando and Katy have been shifting their relationship over the past many months to focus on co-parenting [their daughter, 4-year-old Daisy]. They will continue to be seen together as a family, as their shared priority is—and always will be—raising their daughter with love, stability, and mutual respect.' Trudeau and his ex Sophie Grégorie separated in 2023 after 18 years together. In a statement posted on Instagram at the time, Trudeau wrote, 'Hi everyone, Sophie and I would like to share the fact that after many meaningful and difficult conversation, we have made the decision to separate. As always, we remain a close family with deep love and respect for each other and for everything we have built and will continue to build. For the well-being of our children, we ask that you respect our and their privacy. Thank you.' Here's the complete relationship timeline of Perry and Trudeau so far. On July 28, the pair shared a long day of activities together, starting with a walk in Montreal's Mount Royal Park. TMZ obtained photos of Trudeau smiling alongside Perry as they strolled. They were then filmed eating at Le Violon in Montréal. In footage obtained by TMZ, Perry and Trudeau can be seen chatting, with the singer looking attentively at Trudeau. After their meal, they had drinks on the terrace of Taverne Atlantic. Shortly after TMZ published the dinner video, the outlet ran an interview with Le Violon's co-owner and co-executive chef, Danny Smiles, who served them. Smiles said Perry and Trudeau didn't show any PDA, and 'he didn't get any dating vibes from Katy and two friends enjoying a meal.' Perry and Trudeau enjoyed a series of courses from the chef's tasting menu, including lobster, tuna, lamb gnocchi, and beef tartare, according to TMZ. The meal was a few hours long, and Trudeau covered the bill. Smiles called them the 'perfect guests—super chill, extremely nice to the staff.' On July 30, Trudeau was seen at Perry's Lifetimes Tour stop in Montréal. The former Canadian prime minister was spotted by fans in the crowd. His daughter Ella-Grace, was also at the concert, per Daily Mail. Trudeau also sang along to Perry's hit song 'Firework.' A source speaking with People said that the pair definitely have a connection, but it is a logistical challenge to date. 'They are interested in each other, but it will take a while to see where this goes,' the insider stated. 'She is traveling around the world, and he is figuring out his life now that he is no longer prime minister of Canada, but there is an attraction. They have a lot in common.' The source added, 'Music is one of many things they can share. Both are idealists and still live in a world where they think they can make improvements, although it has gotten more difficult.' They both have full lives already, as well as kids they share with former partners. 'Their own personal responsibilities could make this relationship move slower than it would, but there are ways to see the other and still fulfill their parenting responsibilities,' the source said. 'For one thing, they each have an ex. So, duties are split in half. And long-distance relationships, while still hard, are possible for these two.' A second source told People, 'Justin is a [politician] who is used to living a secret life with his personal activity, and wouldn't put on a public display at this stag. He knows they were being watched and is smart enough to play it low-key for now.' '[The] timing seems good for them, although a romance is in very early stages,' the source added.
San Francisco Chronicle
19 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. residents say sex work has ‘spiraled out of control' in this neighborhood
A group of San Francisco residents says efforts by officials to deter sex work in the city's Mission District have again failed to fix the problem. After a lawsuit filed by residents on Shotwell Street last year, the city installed street barricades to deter prostitution and launched a 'Dear John' program to discourage potential clientele from coming to the area to purchase sex. But residents down the street on Shotwell say the barricades have merely pushed the city's illicit sex trade to their doorsteps and that there are no signs that letters the city sends to 'johns' are working. Some see the situation as another example of city officials displacing rather than resolving San Francisco's most pressing societal issues. 'We feel for the workers, whether they chose this because of a lack of opportunities or were forced into it,' said Laurel, a mother who lives near 18th and Shotwell streets, 'but these activities are harming them and residents.' Laurel, whom the Chronicle agreed to identify by first name only due to safety concerns in accordance with its policy on anonymous sources, said she and her neighbors have become 'very disheartened' by the lack of meaningful response from city officials. 'It feels like our concerns are not a priority,' she said. The residents who live near the corner of 18th and Shotwell streets have asked for a handful of improvements, including better street lighting, public signage urging people to report sex trade activity, cameras to capture sex trafficking and increased overnight police presence. They've also requested an audit of the effectiveness of the Dear John program, which officials launched in November to send letters to the owners of registered vehicles caught on camera soliciting sex. SFPD has sent out only 57 letters, which advise recipients that 'it is illegal to engage in or solicit prostitution,' in the past eight months. As part of a pilot program, cameras were briefly set up on Shotwell Street to help with surveillance and deployment of the program, but the cameras were later removed when the camera company's free pilot program expired. Evan Sernoffsky, a spokesperson for the San Francisco Police Department, said the cameras were better suited to identify stolen vehicles rather than enforcing the solicitation of prostitution. He added that the department is evaluating other surveillance options and working closely with the community to identify better ways to address the neighborhood's challenges. 'This activity is unacceptable, and we are committed to ensuring our streets are clean and safe for everyone,' Sernoffsky wrote in an email. 'We are always devoting resources to these challenges, making arrests and holding individuals accountable who are engaged in this activity.' Although SFPD occasionally conducts special operations to arrest suspected sex workers and their clients, Sernoffsky said enforcing solicitation of prostitution is resource-intensive and generally results only in misdemeanor cases. Similar to the city's homelessness and drug crises, the illicit sex trade has had a longstanding presence in San Francisco and other Bay Area cities. The Mission's quiet side streets and convenient highway access make Shotwell and other nearby streets a popular hot spot for sex workers and their clientele. Two years ago, officials set up bollards to deter sex work on Capp Street and the center of the city's illicit sex trade migrated a few blocks east to Shotwell. Frustrated by what they described as a public nuisance, a group of Shotwell residents sued the city in hopes of forcing officials to eradicate the issue. The city tried to address their concerns by setting up more barricades along Shotwell between 19th and 21st streets. Some residents opposed the barriers, arguing they would reduce parking spots, make access more difficult for emergency vehicles and potentially shift sex workers to new areas of the Mission. But Ayman Farahat, a lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, said the blockades were better than the alternative. Those blockades, which remain in place, are set up mid-block to cut down on through traffic and in intersections to prevent left turns. 'What is not fine is to not do anything about it,' Farahat said. 'Having barricades is better than not.' Farahat and the other plaintiffs dropped their lawsuit against the city earlier this year. City Attorney David Chiu said in a statement that he was pleased that the plaintiffs in the suit 'recognized the city worked tirelessly to address complaints from community members.' Residents around 18th and Shotwell, however, say their fears that the barricades would shift the sex trade down to their corner quickly materialized. They often see sex workers appear as early as 8 p.m., with some still on the street when they get up in the morning. They say the activity has made them fearful to leave their homes at night and that the loud noises and increased traffic that come along with it has led many to lose sleep at night. 'For years, it was very quiet, but now it's terrible,' said Marcia, who has lived in an apartment in the area for nearly 40 years and who also asked that her last name not be used due to safety concerns. 'I cannot sleep.' The residents sent a series of emails to public officials urging them to take action. In one, they argued 'this is not merely a nuisance — it is a humanitarian, public safety, and economic emergency that has spiraled out of control.' On Thursday evening, more than a dozen sex workers were in the area soliciting customers. Walking toward the corner of 18th and Shotwell in tall heels, mesh pants and a furry pink jacket, a sex worker named Kim said that recent actions taken by the city were not stopping her or others from coming to the area. 'Honestly it's probably just f—ing up the morning commute more than it is affecting our business,' she said about the street barriers. 'You can see the girls are still out here working and people still find a way to maneuver around to get to us.' Officers in a squad car stopped at various intersections along Shotwell Street and flashed their lights for several minutes at a time in an apparent effort to scatter the sex workers. A pair of workers who stood nearby seemed unfazed. Shortly after the cops left, a car rolled to a stop, and after speaking briefly to the driver, a sex worker hopped in.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting use of sales tax passes
GUILFORD COUNTY — Voters will be asked again to approve a sales tax increase of 0.25% of a penny for every $1 of sales, but this time legislation dictates how the revenue must be spent if the increase is approved. House Bill 305 was amended by Sen. Phil Berger Sr., R-Rockingham and Senate president pro tem, to set parameters on how the revenue, estimated at $28.7 million a year, would be allocated, with most of it going for teacher pay. The bill passed the General Assembly this week. The Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously in mid-June to place the sales tax referendum issue on the November 2026 general election ballot. A little more than a week after the commissioners' action, Berger amended House Bill 305 to address the sales tax proposal. Berger, whose legislative district includes Guilford County and some precincts in High Point, has said he placed directives on allocating the tax revenue to assure Guilford County voters on how the money would be spent. Although the county commissioners have pledged that all revenue raised by the proposed sales tax increase would go to teacher pay, there was no provision in state law preventing the money from being directed to other purposes. 'House Bill 305 now provides them with information so they can make an educated decision,' Berger previously said. If the proposed tax increase is approved by voters and raises $28.7 million, this is how the money would have to be allocated, according to the new legislation: • Teacher pay supplements in Guilford County Schools, $19.2 million. • Guilford County Fire and Rescue Council for equipment purposes and capital expenditures, $5.5 million. • Guilford Technical Community College capital projects, $2.7 million. • Allocations for Whitsett, Summerfield, Stokesdale, Pleasant Garden and Oak Ridge, $1.3 million. Berger's allocation approach apparently was the first time that has been applied in North Carolina to a sales tax referendum. Whether it will change how Guilford County voters view the proposal is uncertain. Voters have rejected the same proposed sales tax increase six times in the past 20 years, most recently in the November 2024 general election. Solve the daily Crossword
