Ford CEO says rare earths shortage forced it to halt production
Rare earth minerals, which are a set of 17 metallic elements, are integral to automobile production, and enable features like windshield wipers, seat belts and speakers to function. About 90% of the U.S.'s rare earth minerals come from China, the world's largest producer of rare earths, according to data from the Geological Survey.
China has leveraged its grip on rare earths and their widespread utility amid a trade war with the U.S. In April, Beijing announced greater export controls on the materials — a sticking point in tariff negotiations — along with other retaliatory trade measures. The controls require businesses to apply for a license to export rare earths, which U.S. automakers say they have been struggling to secure.
Earlier this week, on June 11, following two days of discussions in London, U.S. and Chinese negotiators struck an agreement under which Beijing would resume regular exports of rare earths to the U.S.
"The centrality of rare earth export restrictions to the trade deal underscores the criticality of minerals to the U.S. economy as well as the severity of the chokehold Beijing holds on global supply chains," policy experts from the Center for Strategic and International Studies wrote in a research note.
"Hand-to-mouth"
Farley said the slowing flow of the critical minerals into the U.S. has presented a challenge for Ford.
"It's day to day," he told Bloomberg TV Friday. "We have had to shut down factories. It's hand-to-mouth right now."
Ford did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch's request for comment.
Ford Chief Financial Officer Sherry House addressed disruptions caused by new restrictions on rare earth minerals from China at a June conference.
"There are many components that rare earth minerals are in. And any of those that are coming from China require you to now go through export control," she said. "And so there's an additional layer of administrative process that has to happen."
The process isn't reliable, she added, noting that sometimes it goes "really smoothly," while other times applications are not approved quickly.
"Most frequently, it goes through; it just may take more time," she said.
For now, Ford is able to manage the cumbersome process, House said, but added that it has the potential to become a "larger issue for us."
Farley also told the outlet that he is optimistic about the developments in trade talks between the U.S. and China, and hopes that rare earth supply constraints will ease soon. He added that Ford is awaiting approval of applications with China's Ministry of Commerce to export more rare earths.
"We have applications into MOFCOM and they are being approved one at a time," Farley told Bloomberg TV.
Video shows Air India plane crashing in Ahmedabad
Air India plane crashes shortly after takeoff, carrying more than 240 people
Israel ready to launch operation into Iran, U.S. officials say
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
38 minutes ago
Why hosting a July Fourth pool party may cost less this year
NEW YORK -- Americans have one more reason to celebrate this Fourth of July: getting all the gear needed to host a pool party costs less than it has in years, according to a market research company's preliminary data. The total price to buy beach towels, a beverage cooler, bathing suits and other accountrements of summer fun averaged $858 in June, the lowest amount for the month since 2020, consumer data provider Numerator said in an analysis prepared for The Associated Press. The finding from the firm's seasonal snapshot comports with broader economic measures indicating that U.S. consumers so far have not seen major impacts from President Donald Trump's vigorous application of tariffs on foreign goods. Numerator tracks U.S. retail prices through sales receipts, online account activity and other information from a panel of 200,000 shoppers. To see how prices are shaping up for the summer, the company looked at the average purchase price for 16 seasonal items typically made in China. Along with four towels, a cooler and bathing suits for two adults and a toddler, the hypothetical shopping list for a poolside gathering included a grill, four patio chairs, four cushions, a patio umbrella and four outdoor pillows. Recreation supplies included a cornhole set, two pairs of swim goggles, a set of diving rings, two beach balls and two pool floats or noodles. Leo Feler, Numerator's chief economist, offered a few theories for why buying all that stuff cost 11% less last month than it did in June 2023, when the average cost reached a high of $966, and 8.4% less than it did in June 2024. Wholesale suppliers and retailers that order from Chinese manufacturers may have imported too much stock while trying to stay ahead of high tariff bills, Feler said. As declining consumer confidence measures pointed to the possibility of weak sales, those businesses might have offered early discounts rather than risking their merchandise going unsold, he said. Given wide swings in Trump's trade posture toward China, retail vendors may have decided to absorb any initial tariff costs instead of trying to figure out how much more to charge their business customers, Feler said. The tariff rate on Chinese products soared to 145% in April before China and the U.S. reached a deal last month that brought the overall rate down to 55%. Suppliers often work on six-month contracts that are signed in January or February and again in June or July. That means many contracts for patio tables and chairs, for example, were signed before the White House included metal furniture in the aluminum or steel products that would be subject to a 25% tariff that went up to 50% last month. Customers who want to buy a new set of beach towels or to replace an old cooler still might want to hold off until August since prices will get lower in late summer, Feler said. But waiting until next year may prove costly, if the tariffs on products from China remain in place, he said. Just because preparing for a backyard bash might be comparatively less expensive right now, many economists and retail industry analysts still expect consumers to feel the weight of Trump's favorite trade negotiation tool. Shoppers are likely to see higher prices for back-to-school items starting in July and August, according to Feler. The time it's taking for the extra taxes on imports to reach stores could turn out like the pandemic-induced supply chain disruptions that contributed to U.S. inflation in 2021 and 2022. 'It wasn't like there was a sudden surge," Feler said. "It was a few prices increased here, then a few more prices, and a few other prices, and a couple more prices. And it started gaining speed.'
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Boeing Stock Climbs Despite Evidence of Possible Dual Engine Failure in Air India Crash
Aerospace stock Boeing (BA) climbed about 1% in Wednesday's trading session, even as unsettling new details emerged from the investigation into last month's Air India Flight 171 disaster. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. The fatal crash, which took place on June 12 shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, claimed 241 lives and marked the first deadly hull loss of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. This model has served as a workhorse for international airlines since its introduction. Despite the gravity of the situation and the ongoing scrutiny from aviation authorities, investors appear to be taking the news in stride. Boeing shares have remained resilient, brushing off growing concerns that a catastrophic dual-engine failure may have played a role in the tragedy. Simulations Point Toward Technical Fault As reported by Bloomberg, investigators have been relying heavily on simulator exercises to shed light on the cause of the crash. Pilots have reenacted the final minutes of Air India Flight AI 171, experimenting with different flight settings, such as lowering the landing gear and retracting the wing flaps, to assess whether human error or atypical configurations might account for the rapid descent. Yet, none of these simulated scenarios replicated the aircraft's sudden loss of altitude, further fueling the theory that a technical fault was the underlying factor. The investigation, led by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) along with Boeing and the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), is now paying closer attention to the rare but serious scenario of both engines failing at almost the same time. The Boeing 787, which had General Electric engines, appeared to have trouble gaining altitude right after takeoff, according to early findings and security camera footage reviewed by investigators. Black Box Data Under Review Key to unraveling the cause of the disaster is data retrieved from the aircraft's flight recorders, or 'black boxes.' Authorities have yet to release an official readout, but initial information suggests the plane's landing gear was in the process of retracting at the time of the crash. Oddly, the doors covering the gear had not opened, which pilots indicate could result from a hydraulic or electrical failure – both systems that depend on engine function. Further raising alarms, a Ram Air Turbine (RAT), a small emergency fan that automatically deploys when the aircraft loses electrical power, was found to have been activated before impact. While the RAT is critical for maintaining basic flight controls in an emergency, it cannot provide thrust or keep the plane aloft. This detail points to a severe loss of power, consistent with a possible dual-engine failure. Investigators noted that there was just a 15-second gap between the crew's Mayday distress call and the moment of impact. During this brief interval, the crew would have had limited options as they attempted to regain control. Analysis of the wreckage further indicated that the aircraft's wing flaps and slats were deployed correctly, suggesting the pilots acted in line with standard takeoff procedures. The Dreamliner's otherwise strong safety record is now under intense scrutiny. While this is the first fatal crash involving the 787, the probe's focus on technical and systems failures has led some aviation experts to warn that the findings could have implications for similar aircraft in operation worldwide. Should You Bet on Boeing Stock Right Now? For now, Boeing's stock performance stands in stark contrast to the troubling headlines. Investors seem to be betting that the ultimate cause may prove to be a rare, isolated event, or that any technical flaws can be promptly addressed through regulatory action and engineering fixes. Still, as the investigation continues, all eyes remain on the AAIB's final report and Boeing's response. Should definitive evidence of a systemic technical issue emerge, the fallout for Boeing could be significant, both financially and reputationally. Despite the uncertainty, Boeing stock still enjoys a Strong Buy consensus among analysts, with 17 recommending a Buy, 2 advising Hold, and only 1 suggesting a Sell. The average price target sits at $224.56, implying a ~6% upside from current levels. (See Boeing stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI job predictions become corporate America's newest competitive sport
In late May, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appeared to kick open the door on a sensitive topic, warning that half of entry-level jobs could vanish within five years because of AI and push U.S. unemployment up to 20%. But Amodei is far from alone in sharing aloud that he foresees a workforce bloodbath. A new WSJ story highlights how other CEOs are also issuing dire predictions about AI's job impact, turning employment doom into something of a competitive sport. Several of these predictions came before Amodei's comments. For example, at JPMorgan's annual investor day earlier in May, its consumer banking chief Marianne Lake projected AI would 'enable' a 10% workforce reduction. But they've been coming fast, and growing more stark, ever since. In a note last month, Amazon's Andy Jassy warned employees to expect a smaller workforce due to the 'once-in-a-lifetime' technological shift that's afoot. ThredUp's CEO said at a conference last month that AI will destroy 'way more jobs than the average person thinks.' Not to be outdone, Ford's Jim Farley delivered perhaps the most sweeping claim yet, saying last week that AI will 'literally replace half of all white-collar workers in the U.S.' It's a dramatic shift from executives' previous cautious public statements about job displacement, notes the Journal. Indeed, the outlet notes that while some tech leaders — including from powerful AI companies — have proposed that fears are overblown, the growing string of warnings suggests massive restructurings are coming, whether people are ready for them or not. Sign in to access your portfolio
