Disabled could be helped back into work with new right similar to maternity law
A new right to reintegration for workers on sick leave could see firms prevented from dismissing someone unless it is shown the employer has made sufficient efforts at reintegrating the person, the Resolution Foundation think tank said.
They said such a right would 'would clarify and strengthen existing legal protections' under the the Equality Act and 'provide a much stronger message to workers about what they are entitled to'.
The report warned that the Government risks failing to meet its aim to raise the employment rate to 80% without a 'serious strategy to shift employer behaviour' and argues employers must be incentivised to reintegrate existing workers back into jobs.
The report comes in the same week as the Universal Credit Bill cleared the House of Lords, aimed at rebalancing the benefit 'to remove work disincentives', according to a Government minister, while giving existing claimants 'the security and certainty they need'.
Separately during the debate, Paralympic champion Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, who sits in the Lords, said disabled people have been portrayed as 'benefit scroungers and a drain on society' in the conversation on welfare reform.
In its report, the Resolution Foundation said around 12% of disabled staff leave work each year – consistently 1.5-times the rate of non-disabled workers.
It added that twice as many people move from work into inactivity due to ill health – around 304,000 each year – than those moving the other way (around 151,000).
But the think tank said despite there being 'strong' legal obligations in place already on employers, they are 'simply not doing enough to retain existing workers', with fewer than half of disabled workers who request a reasonable adjustment – which can include a change to working arrangements or provision of equipment, services or support – having this granted in full.
With 15% of disabled people reporting workplace discrimination relating to their disability in 2022, the report said this remains a 'pressing issue'.
The think tank said: 'Boosting disability employment is not straightforward: it will involve improvements to the health system, benefits system and world of work. But action to incentivise and support employers is a vital piece of the puzzle.'
Louise Murphy, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: 'The Government should do more to incentivise firms to employ disabled people – especially those who have been out of work for long periods – but employers need to do more in return.
'A new right to reintegration could help disabled workers back into work in the same way that maternity rights transformed women's employment prospects a generation ago.'
The foundation said the new right could be enforced through employment tribunals, but urged the Government to also consider 'more proactive enforcement mechanisms, whether via the Equalities and Human Rights Commission or connected to a new system of caseworkers that are expected to be covered in the forthcoming Mayfield Review'.
Former John Lewis boss, Sir Charlie Mayfield, is undertaking a review to investigate how Government and businesses can work together to support ill and disabled people into work, with a report expected in autumn.
The Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
DIY cervical cancer tests most likely to be used if offered by GPs
DIY cervical cancer tests are more likely to be used if they are offered by a GP during a routine appointment, a study suggests. From January next year, at-home kits will be offered to women who have rarely or have never attended their cervical screening. The tests, which can be performed at home, look for the human papillomavirus (HPV) – the virus which is linked to the majority of cases of cervical cancer. A new study examined the most effective ways women can be approached about performing the tests themselves at home. Researchers from Queen Mary University of London and King's College London performed a study across 13 GP surgeries in west London. They found that under-screened women were more likely to take up the offer of a self-sample test if they were 'opportunistically' approached when they were visiting a GP for another reason. Fewer tests were returned when under-screened women were sent a test in the post, or were sent a letter inviting them to get a self-sampling kit. Of 449 women opportunistically offered a self-sample kit, 333 (74%) accepted the offer and 234 (52%) returned a sample within six months. Meanwhile, 198 of the 1,616 women sent a kit in the post (12%) and 76 of the 1,587 women sent a letter inviting them to order a kit (5%) returned a self-sample within six months. 'We showed that the uptake of self-sampling was by far the highest among women who were opportunistically offered kits in primary care,' the researchers wrote in the journal eClinicalMedicine. But the researchers said that more work was needed to ensure women who took up the offer returned their sample. 'Substantial numbers accepted (an opportunistic offer) or ordered (sent a letter) a kit but did not return a sample and over a quarter of those whose self-sample was HPV positive did not follow through with a clinician sample,' the authors added. They suggested that text or phone reminders 'could be valuable'. Senior researcher, Professor Peter Sasieni from Queen Mary University of London, said: 'Our study showed that offering a self-sample kit in person was the most effective method of encouraging women to complete their cervical cancer screening tests. But he said that a 'combination of approaches may be best for enabling more women to participate in cervical screening'. The NHS offers cervical screening tests – previously known as smear tests – to all women aged 25-64 every three years. But many people do not take up the offer, with a number citing a lack of time, discomfort or embarrassment. Data published by the NHS last November showed five million women are not up to date with routine check-ups.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why five-a-day might not be enough – and the number of plants you should be eating
Eating five fruits and vegetables a day might not cut it, research suggests, with those who eat 11 different plants a day proving to be healthier. People in the UK eat a median of eight different plants a day – including spices and fat-based oils – with some eating just two daily, researchers from King's College London found. But eating a more diverse range of plant-based foods, such as fruit, vegetables, pulses and herbs, is associated with better heart and metabolic health. Researchers found that a diverse diet improved cholesterol levels, blood sugar markers, better overall diet quality and higher intakes of key nutrients, including fibre, vitamins, and minerals. Dr Eirini Dimidi, senior lecturer in nutritional sciences at King's College London and senior author of the study, said: 'Current dietary guidance in the UK often emphasises quantity, such as 'five-a-day' for fruit and vegetables. 'Our findings suggest that dietary variety, across all plant-based food groups, may be just as important for improving diet quality and lowering the risk of cardiometabolic diseases.' The research, published in the journal Clinical Nutrition, analysed data on more than 670 adults from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey between 2016 and 2017. Participants from the survey were split into three groups based on how many different plants they ate. Those in the low-diversity group ate around 5.5 different plant foods per day, the moderate-diversity group 8.1 types, and those in the high-diversity group included roughly 11 different plant foods in their daily diets. Blood tests revealed that people who ate less of a variety of plants in their diet had lower HDL cholesterol, known as 'good cholesterol'. Lower levels of this type of cholesterol could make you more likely to have a heart problem or a stroke. They also found that HBA1C concentration – blood glucose levels – is lower for every one-unit increase in plant diversity. However, the study also found that people who ate a variety of plants generally had a healthier lifestyle. For example, only 6 per cent of people in the high-diversity group smoked, compared with 30 per cent in the low-diversity group. They had also consumed more total sugar, likely due to greater intake of fruits and fruit juices. Although excess sugar can have negative health effects, fruits provide additional beneficial nutrients such as fibre and antioxidants, which may help offset these impacts on blood sugar and overall health. Researchers found vegetables were the largest contributors (21.0 per cent) to diversity, followed by plant-based fats and oils (18.8 per cent), and fruit (17.0 per cent). Dr Dimidi said: 'While higher diversity was associated with better nutrient adequacy overall, key shortfalls remained even among those with the most diverse plant-based diets, particularly for fibre and several micronutrients which are important for maintaining a strong immune system and health bones and tissues.' She added: 'In addition to fruits and vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds, herbs and spices are great plant-based food sources that can help us to introduce more plant diversity into our diets.' The British Nutrition Foundation highlights that adults should eat 30g of fibre a day - roughly the same amount as you can get from eating five fruits and vegetables a day or by eating 30 plants a week including nuts, seeds, beans and spices in addition to fruit and vegetables. Nutritionist Kim Pearson, who specialises in weight loss, told The Independent: 'Rather than just focusing on quantity, like ticking off five-a-day, we should also be thinking about variety. We know that eating a broader range of plant foods provides a wider range of nutrients and supports gut health, this study highlights how it may also impact metabolic health markers like blood sugar balance and blood lipid levels. 'The fibre and polyphenols found in different fruits, vegetables, pulses, nuts, seeds, and herbs all help to feed beneficial gut bacteria. A healthy microbiome is closely linked with metabolic health, immune function, and even mood. Aiming for eleven different plants a day is a great goal. 'This may sound like a lot, but simple strategies like adding a sprinkle of herbs, a mix of salad leaves, a handful of seeds, or trying a new vegetable each week can all help increase variety.' Dietitian Dr Duane Mellor told The Independent: 'This does not go against the idea of five-a-day, it just suggests we should vary the plants we eat. This goes beyond fruit and vegetables and includes herbs, seeds and pulses. Enjoying a variety of foods is key, perhaps more than focusing on eating a certain number.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer told to delay DWP Universal Credit cuts for new claimants
The Work and Pensions Committee led by Labour MP Debbie Abrahams warns in a new report disabled people could still be pushed into poverty as a result of the watered-down reforms Keir Starmer must delay a cut to Universal Credit for new claimants, a new report by MPs warns today. The Work and Pensions Committee says disabled people could still be pushed into poverty as a result of the watered-down reforms. Earlier this month the PM U-turned on plans to restrict eligibility for a key disability benefit — Personal Independence Payments (PIP). But there will be changes to the health element of Universal Credit for new claimants. From April 2026 all existing and new claimants with severe or terminal conditions will be protected, the MPs said. But they added other claimants assessed as having limited capability for work and work-related activity will see their awards halved — from £423.27 to £217.26 a month. While welcoming the major U-turn on PIP last month, the MPs' report said: "We remain critical, however, of the Government's failure to properly assess the impact of the cut to UC health on poverty, health and labour force participation. "For this reason, we urge it to delay the measure until it has had time to make such an assessment." Committee Chair Debbie Abrahams said: 'We welcome the concessions that the Government made to the UC and PIP Bill (now the UC Bill). But there are still issues with these welfare reforms not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive.' She added: "The Government's own analysis published in March indicates that from next April approximately 50,000 people who develop a health condition or become disabled – and those who live with them - will enter poverty by 2030 as a result of the reduction in support of the UC health premium.' 'We recommend delaying the cuts to the UC-health premium, especially given that other policies such as additional NHS capacity, or employment support, or changes in the labour market to support people to stay in work, have yet to materialise.' 'We agree in a reformed and sustainable welfare system, but we must ensure that the wellbeing of those who come into contact with it is protected. The lesson learned from last month should be that the impact of policy changes to health-related benefits must be assessed prior to policy changes being implemented to avoid potential risks to claimants.' Responding to the report, Nil Guzelgun from charity Mind, said: 'We cannot build a fair and compassionate system by stripping away support from those who need it most. Real reform must start with listening, both to the evidence and to disabled people themselves. "We urge the Government to pause these damaging plans and commit instead to a benefits system that protects people's health, dignity and independence.'
