
Senate GOP needs Vance on recissions vote
Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon.
'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.'
The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program.
It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.'
Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP.
Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act.
'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.'
It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version.
MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week.
But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland.
Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair.
What else we're watching:
— Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case.
— Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess.
— Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning.
Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Moments After Announcing His Show Had Been Canceled, Stephen Colbert Went All In On Trump
Late Show host Stephen Colbert went after President Donald Trump on Thursday, the same day CBS announced his show is being canceled. Related: And he focused on two issues the president does not like to talk about: his health and his links to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'I want to be sensitive about this,' Colbert said on that first topic. 'His skin seems to be falling off.' In one recent appearance, Trump had makeup on his hand, apparently covering up a bruise. Related: The White House said the bruise is because he's 'a man of the people' and is 'shaking hands all day, every day' as well as due to aspirin use. Colbert showed a picture of Trump's makeup-covered hand. 'That's more than concealer,' he said. 'That's fondant. Is his makeup artist the Cake Boss?' Related: But the health talk might be serving as a distraction from another issue haunting the president. 'I'm sure Trump would rather have us talk about his hand than Jeffrey Epstein,' Colbert pointed out. 'That controversy is causing so much trouble for Trump that he recently ordered it to be put in a cell and for the cameras to stop working for three minutes.' That's a reference to the nearly three minutes missing from the surveillance footage near Epstein's prison cell the night he was found dead. Related: Colbert did not address his show's cancellation during the monologue, but did so at another point in the broadcast. While CBS said the decision was 'purely' financial, many have speculated that it was in reality because of his jokes about the president as well as his attacks on CBS parent Paramount for agreeing to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit with Trump that many consider frivolous. That settlement came amid a pending merger between Paramount and Skydance Media ― one that needs approval from the Federal Communications Commission. See more in his Thursday night monologue: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Education Department will release some frozen grants supporting after-school and summer programs
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Education Department will release some previously withheld grant money for after-school programs, days after 10 Republican senators sent a letter imploring the Office of Management and Budget to allow the funds to be sent to states. President Donald Trump's administration on July 1 withheld more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, adult literacy and English language instruction, as part of a review to ensure spending aligned with the White House's priorities. About $1.3 billion of that funding supported after-school programming for children. In a letter sent Wednesday, Republican senators said the withheld money supported programs that had longstanding bipartisan support and were critical to local communities. 'We share your concern about taxpayer money going to fund radical left-wing programs,' the senators wrote. 'However, we do not believe that is happening with these funds.' ____ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Annie Ma, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to sue Murdoch over Epstein letter? Without Fox News, Trump is toast.
The unfolding Jeffrey Epstein scandal has a frightened and flailing President Donald Trump turning on his own supporters and, in a major escalation, threatening to sue Rupert Murdoch, the father of Fox News. I'd love to see how that works out for him. Trump's anger at Murdoch stems from a new Wall Street Journal report on a creepy birthday note Trump allegedly sent to Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in jail awaiting sprawling sex trafficking charges. The Journal reported the note featured a drawing of a naked woman with Trump's signature 'mimicking pubic hair' and included the line 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' If Trump takes on Murdoch over the Epstein scandal, Trump will lose Trump, of course, denied he wrote the letter, and apparently tried to get the newspaper and Murdoch himself to kill the story. The fact that they published the story tells me all I need to know about who to trust in this case, and it sure ain't the guy who lies constantly about crowd sizes and how great his polling numbers are. On July 18, Trump posted on social media: 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ.' Opinion: Epstein files are so bad for Trump he's calling MAGA base 'weaklings.' Uh-oh. Delightful. I'm sure Mr. Murdoch – who has likely buried more scandalous Trump stories that he's published – is quaking in his loafers over that threat. Murdoch knows Trump, and he's certainly not afraid of him Earlier this year, shortly after Trump began his second term as president, he was singing an entirely different tune sitting alongside Murdoch in the Oval Office: 'Rupert Murdoch is in a class by himself, he's an amazing guy.' And that, right there, is a prime example of why Trump's usual scheming won't work this time. Murdoch knows Trump is a shameless opportunist, and surely isn't threatened or surprised by the president turning on him. Murdoch also, undoubtedly, knows Trump exists as a viable political figure almost solely because of the slobbering support he gets from Fox News. 'Stupid Republicans': Trump mocks GOP allies for seeking Epstein files release | Opinion If there were no Fox News, there would be no President Donald Trump. Fox News is the primary right-wing media megaphone that brainwashed the masses into accepting a morally bankrupt, transparent con artist as the leader of the free world, twice! The Epstein scandal is clearly more than Trump can handle So if Trump is willing to go to war with Murdoch and his media empire over the Epstein scandal, it tells us one thing: Whatever is in the Epstein files is so existentially bad for Trump he's willing to abandon the Greek chorus of Fox News blabberers who have long propped up his incessant lies and conspiracy theories. Opinion: Please stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein. You're making Donald Trump mad. As far as Murdoch choosing to toss gasoline on the Epstein fire with the Journal story, I'd like to believe it comes from a place of journalistic integrity, sunshine being the best disinfectant and such. But given everything Fox News and other Murdoch properties have done to melt the brains of Americans with right-wing propaganda, I don't trust that to be the primary motivation. Maybe Murdoch is just done with Trump and his nonsense Maybe Murdoch has just had it with a clearly addled Trump and his on-again/off-again tariff nonsense and erratic leadership. Whatever the reason, Trump is engulfed in a scandal he's not equipped to extinguish. He can threaten Murdoch all he wants, but if Trump loses Fox News, if that network starts taking the scandal seriously and the Journal keeps dogging the Epstein story, this president can kiss a good swath of his supporters goodbye. That would leave him largely alone. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: If Trump sues Murdoch over WSJ Epstein story, he'll lose | Opinion