logo
TESLA FACES LOSING BILLIONS AFTER TRUMP-MUSK FALLOUT Sky News analysis reveals the carmaker's benefit from state subsidies is threatened after its founder's row with the president Kate Schneider and Sophia Massam, Data & Forensics Unit, and Paul Kelso, business and economics correspondent

TESLA FACES LOSING BILLIONS AFTER TRUMP-MUSK FALLOUT Sky News analysis reveals the carmaker's benefit from state subsidies is threatened after its founder's row with the president Kate Schneider and Sophia Massam, Data & Forensics Unit, and Paul Kelso, business and economics correspondent

Sky News16 hours ago
Elon Musk's Tesla faces the loss of billions of dollars in government subsidies, following his explosive fallout with Donald Trump, after the president cut state support for green industries.
Subsidies have been central to Tesla's rise from upstart manufacturer to the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) producer in less than 20 years. But analysis by Sky News' Data & Forensics team reveals the president's cuts could leave a significant gap in its future earnings, raising questions about its business model and market valuation.
Revenue from state subsidies accounted for at least 38% of Tesla's profits of $7.1bn in 2024 as the company banked $2.8bn from trading "regulatory credits", a state-level subsidy paid to encourage production of electric vehicles.
Accounts for the first quarter of this year meanwhile show Tesla earned $595m from regulatory credits, almost 50% more than its net earnings of $409m, suggesting that without the subsidy Tesla would be operating in the red.
Tesla's total revenues in 2024 were $98bn, of which automotive sales made up $72bn.
Tesla has also benefited from a federal tax credit of $7,500 available to consumers buying any electric car. If applied to all of the more than 630,000 Tesla cars sold in the US last year, it would have been worth $4.7bn in discounts.
The federal tax credit was axed in Mr Trump's flagship tax and spending bill, while California's powers to issue credits as part of zero-emission vehicle schemes were revoked last month, threatening state-level schemes across the country.
Amid the public fallout between Mr Trump and the man who helped bankroll his election campaign, the president renewed his efforts to cut green industry subsidies.
In a Truth Social post, Mr Trump said: "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and, without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back to South Africa."
Pic: Reuters
Speaking to reporters on the White House lawn, where previously he had posed with Mr Musk alongside a selection of Tesla models, the president added: "Elon hates that the electric vehicle mandate is going to be terminated."
Tesla's worldwide sales have also declined in the face of increased competition and consumer unease about Mr Musk's previous support for the president.
' Elon's playing a very dangerous game '
Ross Gerber, early Tesla investor
Gordon Johnson, an investment analyst and prominent Tesla sceptic, told Sky News: "The changes that Trump is proposing have significant implications – negative implications – for Tesla's fundamentals.
"If all of these government programmes were taken away, Tesla would go into losing money and burning cash and the stock would implode."
Ross Gerber became one of Tesla's earliest investors after having what he calls "an amazing epiphany" when he saw the Tesla S-Class for the first time. "I thought, 'wow, this could actually change the way we travel'," he said.
Now he is selling his Tesla stock and considering offloading his Tesla Cybertruck because of the hostility it attracts. "Elon's playing a very dangerous game," he added.
GREEN INCENTIVES DROVE TESLA'S GROWTH
Tesla has long benefited from subsidies offered in the US, and by governments around the world, to incentivise the take-up of electric vehicles and low-carbon technologies.
In America, regulatory credits are an incentive intended to encourage car manufacturers to meet targets for EV production.
Several states, led by California, use them to enforce a "zero-emission vehicles mandate", under which manufacturers are required to produce a certain proportion of EVs as part of their overall output.
Because Tesla only makes electric vehicles, it earns credits at no cost and profits from selling them to manufacturers producing petrol and diesel vehicles, which need them to meet any shortfall against state targets.
Around a dozen US states and numerous European governments, including the UK, operate similar programmes.
In June, however, the president signed resolutions removing California's authority to set mandatory targets - a move that endangers similar programmes in other states.
Tesla customers also benefited from the federal grant of $7,500 available to buyers of any electric car.
Mr Johnson said: "The $7,500 subsidy that you get if you buy an electric car - that doesn't go to Tesla. But removing it means Tesla's cars immediately increase by $7,500 in value which would have significant implications for their demand."
"The EV subsidies are just crucially important," Mr Gerber said.
Tesla also has a burgeoning energy business selling domestic and commercial solar that could be impacted by the withdrawal of a tax credit worth up to 60% of the cost of a system. Tesla's energy division generated $10bn in revenue last year.
CUTS AND COMPETITION CHALLENGE TESLA'S 'TECHNOKING'
The withdrawal of subsidies is one of many challenges Tesla and its self-appointed "Technoking" Mr Musk face to its dominance in a market it helped create.
It is only 18 years since the first Tesla Roadster rolled off a production line to the delight of early adopters and the scepticism of America's established car manufacturers.
Mr Musk's packaging of battery electric vehicles as not just virtuous but desirable and reliable too worked spectacularly, driven in large part by his personal popularity and profile on social media.
His drive helped the company overcome the enormous technical challenges of establishing a mass vehicle manufacturer from scratch, and he was quick to exploit the advantages of placing production in China where an entire auto industry had been directed at electrification.
"When I started with Tesla, there were no EVs, and it was Elon making EVs," recalls Mr Gerber. "And now, 10 years later, there are EVs everywhere. They're the fastest growing segment of the car market."
Tesla's growth was aided by governments around the world offering subsidies and tax breaks to consumers and companies to accelerate the transition to low-carbon transport.
By the turn of the 2020s, the company was established as the world's largest manufacturer of EVs, accounting for three-quarters of all those sold in the US.
It was also firmly entrenched as one of the most important tech stocks in the world, its fluctuations as likely to be triggered by the chief executive's Twitter feed as production updates.
In December 2024, Tesla's market value peaked at over $1.5trn, placing it among the most valuable companies in the world, but its indisputable success spurred rivals who have started to cut into its market share.
While European and American legacy auto manufacturers have flooded Tesla's premium electric niche with competition, considerably cheaper Chinese EVs have overtaken all of them in recent years.
Last year Chinese carmaker BYD passed Tesla's global market share for fully electric vehicles, according to market intelligence firm TrendForce.
China is also a crucial market for Tesla, accounting for more than half of its non-US car sales, but that share is now falling.
Pic: STAR MAX/IPx
Calls for boycotts against Mr Musk prompted by his previous support for Mr Trump saw sales decline in other markets too. Year-on-year sales in the first four months of 2025 fell by 58% in Germany, 44% in France, and 62% in Australia.
Sky News reached out to Tesla for comment on our findings but did not receive a response.
INVESTORS DIVIDED OVER MUSK
The combination of increased competition, the withdrawal of subsidies, and hostility from the president and potential customers has caused some investors to call time on Tesla.
Despite being an early supporter, Mr Gerber, president of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, has been reducing his firm's holdings in recent months.
"We've had to sell more Tesla stock and we're going to continue to sell more," he said. "The stock's wildly overvalued and, still just on a business level, has lots of issues."
' It's the biggest disruptive technology company in the world, along with Nvidia. '
Dan Ives, financial analyst and well-known Tesla backer
Tesla's valuation nosedived in the first few months of 2025 after Mr Musk joined Mr Trump's administration. By mid-March, its market value had essentially halved.
Although the stock has rallied slightly since Mr Musk first suggested he would exit the government, the share price is two-thirds of its December peak.
Other investors are far more positive, arguing that Tesla's worth should be judged not just on sales and productivity, but the value of Mr Musk's talent for innovation, particularly in the potential of AI and self-driving technology that he considers the next frontier for the automotive industry.
Tesla trialled its self-driving RoboTaxi in Austin, Texas, in June with mixed results. Several incidents triggered an investigation by the US road safety agency, but many investors are undeterred.
Dan Ives, senior analyst at prominent wealth management firm Wedbush Securities, is a long-term advocate whose view has not been changed by recent events.
"The Trump feud is not getting in the way of this in our view. We believe Tesla remains the most undervalued AI play in the market today," Mr Ives wrote in a recent report with fellow Wedbush analyst Sam Brandeis.
Mr Ives acknowledged in an interview with Sky News that state and federal tax breaks are "the roots of Tesla" without which the company would not be where it is today. But he said the larger part of its success is "innovation in everything they built".
"It's the biggest disruptive technology company in the world, along with Nvidia," he said.
Mr Gerber remains unconvinced and fears Mr Musk's pivot to politics has irreparably damaged the brand he built.
While he can offload the stock, he has struggled to find a buyer for the Cybertruck he bought just last year.
"I actually really like it," Mr Gerber said. "That said, I don't like the way it makes me feel when I drive it because people hate Tesla so much."
CREDITS
Reporting: Kate Schneider, Sophia Massam, & Paul Kelso
Editors: Chris Howard, Isla Glaister, Tom Boadle, & Natasha Muktarsingh
Production: Valerie Hamill, Thea Halpin, Michelle Inez Simon, & Reece Denton
Graphics: Taylor Stuart, Eloise Atter, & Bria Anderson
Photos from AP and Reuters. All videos courtesy of Tesla Inc.
Top Built with Shorthand
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US corn growers warn Trump's push for cane sugar in Coke will cost thousands of American jobs
US corn growers warn Trump's push for cane sugar in Coke will cost thousands of American jobs

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

US corn growers warn Trump's push for cane sugar in Coke will cost thousands of American jobs

U.S. corn growers have said that Donald Trump 's push to use real sugar cane in Coca-Cola 'doesn't make sense' and will cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs. In a statement, the Corn Refiners Association added that the move would also lower farm income and boost imports of foreign sugar 'all with no nutritional benefit.' It comes after Trump announced Wednesday that he had spoken to executives at Coca-Cola about changing the recipe – replacing high fructose corn syrup with sugar cane. 'This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' the president wrote. While Coca-Cola in the U.S. is typically made with high-fructose corn syrup, the soda company uses cane sugar in other countries, such as Mexico. 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense,' the CRA wrote in their statement.'President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers and reducing the trade deficit.' 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.' While it has been claimed previously that high-fructose corn syrup is more harmful than other sugars, a Healthline article last updated in December 2023 said high-fructose corn syrup and regular table sugar have similar effects on a person's health, and both are harmful when consumed excessively. Trump is known for his love of Diet Coke, which is made with the artificial sweetener aspartame. In January, Coca-Cola presented Trump with a commemorative Diet Coke bottle. As noted by Axios, a full shift to the use of cane sugar from high fructose corn syrup in Coca-Cola could result in an economic hit to Iowa – the country's largest corn producer. However, it would also help the economy of Florida, the U.S.'s top cane sugar producer. In a statement, Coca-Cola did not confirm a full shift to the use of sugar cane. "We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca‑Cola brand," a spokesperson said. "More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon."

Britain's trade tsar will pressure Trump to slash tariffs on US trip
Britain's trade tsar will pressure Trump to slash tariffs on US trip

Telegraph

time18 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britain's trade tsar will pressure Trump to slash tariffs on US trip

Britain's business secretary will put pressure on the White House to slash the blanket 10 per cent tax slapped on UK imports during a visit to Washington DC. Jonathan Reynolds intends to discuss sectoral tariffs and ways to drive down Mr Trump's tariffs when he meets with Howard Lutnick, the US commerce secretary, and trade representative Jamieson Greer, sources told Politico. In May, the UK became the first country to secure a trade deal with the Trump administration, which provided tariff relief for car imports and the British Aerospace industry. However, most UK goods imported to the US remain subject to Mr Trump's 10 per cent blanket reciprocal tariffs announced on his self-dubbed 'liberation day', and no deal was reached on the steel, film or pharmaceutical industries, triggering alarm among business executives. Mr Reynolds plans to spend four to five days in Washington in the final week of July, a source told Politico. The trip falls around the time that Mr Trump is planning to meet Sir Keir Starmer during a private visit to Scotland, where the US president said he expects trade talks. 'We are going to have a meeting with him, probably in Aberdeen. And we're going to do a lot of different things, also refine the trade deal that we've made,' he said on Monday. Peter Mandelson, the British ambassador to Washington, warned last weekend that the 10 per cent tariffs are 'here to stay' despite UK pushback. Under the terms of the current agreement, tariff rates on imports of British cars to the US fell to 10 per cent, down from 27.5 per cent, for up to 100,000 vehicles a year. The British aerospace sector was also spared from Mr Trump's 10 per cent tariff. Last month, Mr Reynolds said he has 'no doubt' that the US will lower 25 per cent tariffs on British steel and aluminium imports, which are yet to kick in. A White House source said Howard Lutnick, the US commerce secretary, would determine a quota of steel and aluminium products that could enter the US without being subject to the 25 per cent tariff. Uncertainty still hangs over drug makers amid Mr Trump's demands for them to move factories to the US. The US president said on Tuesday he would impose tariffs on pharmaceutical imports 'probably at the end of the month', adding: 'We're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff.'

How Trump's anti-immigrant policies could collapse the US food industry
How Trump's anti-immigrant policies could collapse the US food industry

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

How Trump's anti-immigrant policies could collapse the US food industry

The Trump administration's assault on immigrants is starting to hit the American food supply. In Texas, farmers who have for years depended on undocumented people for cheap labor – to plant, harvest and haul produce – have reported that workers are staying home to avoid raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). In Los Angeles, restaurants and food trucks have been forced to close as the immigrants who cook and wait tables fear Ice and other law enforcement. 'Farm workers in many states are thinking about leaving the country because they are facing more obstacles to work under this anti-immigrant administration,' said Elizabeth Rodriguez, director of farm worker advocacy with National Farm Worker Ministry, a longstanding organization in south Texas. 'They are scared, there are fewer opportunities, and they are no longer prospering here. Their fear will soon be seen in the harvest, when the quantities of produce are depleted.' From farm to table, at least one in five jobs in the food industry is carried out by immigrants, the equivalent of 14 million workers across the sector. This includes 27% of agricultural workers nationwide and 33% of meatpackers. In restaurants, 46% of chefs and 31% of cooks were born outside the US – mostly in Mexico, China, Guatemala and El Salvador. These jobs are critical: immigrants made up a disproportionate number of 'essential' workers during the Covid-19 pandemic, and many were exposed to unsafe conditions so that crops could be harvested, cows milked and takeout delivered. 'Whether it's the workers behind the scenes in meatpacking plants or on the frontlines of the grocery store, our country relies heavily on the labor of immigrants to keep our food system running and our families fed,' said Mark Lauritsen, international vice-president at United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. 'Without a stable, skilled workforce, safety and quality can decline, shelves can sit empty and grocery prices could rise even more.' Yet food industry jobs, from fields to slaughterhouses and supermarkets to delivery drivers, are notoriously difficult and often low-paid: sometimes as little as $7.25 per hour, the federal minimum wage. Farmhands are often paid only a few dollars per box of tomatoes or cabbages harvested - backbreaking work with no shade. American food companies rely on undocumented people for almost half of the most physical jobs, including the farm laborers who cultivate crops, tend livestock and build fences, as well as the meat processors who slaughter, eviscerate and package at high speeds. Most Americans understand this. In the run-up to last year's election, 75% of registered voters told Pew Research that they believed undocumented immigrants mostly fill jobs US citizens don't want to do. And now, with Ice raids and mass deportations, these jobs have become even more dangerous. At least one farm worker, Jaime Alanís, a 57-year-old Mexican man, has died after falling from a greenhouse trying to escape armed Ice agents during a raid in southern California last week. In response to these terrifying Ice raids which are spreading and becoming more violent, some farm workers in California are planning a strike in coming weeks and will be calling on consumers to boycott produce. 'It is appalling to see the threat of violence and deportation that immigrant workers face every day. These people play a crucial role in restaurants, and more importantly in the community,' said Elyanna Calle, a restaurant worker in Austin, Texas, and president of Restaurant Workers United. 'A raid, a deportation means the destruction of a life someone has fought to build; it means the destruction of families and vibrant communities. I have seen my co-workers fear for their safety, I have seen them go into fight or flight mode at the prospect of an Ice raid – this is not something that any person, any immigrant deserves.' If the Trump administration oversees even a fraction of its promised mass deportation of 11 million undocumented immigrants, it could lead to major disruptions across the food system: crops left to spoil in the fields, supermarket shelves unstocked, takeout deliveries delayed and food prices soaring even higher. It could also upend rural economies that depend on migrant workers and their families who live, work and go to school in small declining communities. 'All of this will have a huge impact on the rest of us because the immigrant community contributes much more than their labor; they pay taxes,' said Rodriguez. 'They invest in the economy, and if they make less money, we all make less, and when corporations make less, they increase prices so we lose again.' Data for this piece, unless otherwise noted, come from the Migration Policy Institute

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store