
Tranquilisers, heart disease, COPD: Obama-era report drops bombshells about Hillary Clinton's health woes in 2016
A newly declassified report reveals Russia had access to secret DNC information about Hillary Clinton's health.
The intel claimed Clinton was suffering from psychological and physical ailments—kept hidden from even her own advisors.
Obama and Democratic leaders reportedly found her condition 'extraordinarily alarming,' fearing it would damage her election chances.
These findings, previously redacted, raise fresh questions about what Russia knew—and why they withheld it during the 2016 race.
The backstory
This week, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a once-classified House Intelligence Committee report that sheds new light on the 2016 election and what foreign intelligence services—particularly Russia's SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service)—knew about the Democratic Party's inner workings.
While much of the 2016 Russia-related discourse focused on the alleged ties between Donald Trump and Moscow, the newly unredacted sections suggest that Russia had obtained damaging information about Hillary Clinton—but chose not to leak it.
What the SVR knew
According to the report, by September 2016, Russian intelligence had successfully accessed Democratic National Committee (DNC) communications that revealed internal concerns about Hillary Clinton's mental and physical health. The key findings included:
Obama-era panic: The report claims that President Obama and senior Democratic leaders were alarmed by Clinton's deteriorating health, calling it 'extraordinarily alarming' and believing it posed a 'serious negative impact' on her campaign.
This concern, it states, was kept in 'strictest secrecy,' with even top campaign advisors kept in the dark.
Psychological condition:
Russian SVR sources allegedly accessed DNC documents describing Clinton as suffering from 'intensified psycho-emotional problems,' including:
Uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness
A dependency on 'heavy tranquilizers'
A mindset 'obsessed with a thirst for power'
Physical health ailments: The report cites SVR knowledge that Clinton had:
Type 2 diabetes
Ischemic heart disease
Deep vein thrombosis
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Why didn't Russia leak it?
One of the most startling revelations is that Russia chose not to leak the most damaging information it had about Clinton—despite later being accused of favouring Trump.
Analysts now suggest the Kremlin may have expected a Clinton victory and refrained from leaking health-related details that could backfire diplomatically. Another possibility: Russia intended to retain that information as post-election leverage.
How the report came out
The original report was compiled by the House Intelligence Committee during the Trump administration.
However, much of it remained classified or heavily redacted during both the Biden and Obama years.
Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as DNI under President Trump, authorised its full release, citing transparency and the 'right of the public to know what really happened in 2016.'
Why this matters now
The revelations add to a growing narrative that the Russia-Trump collusion story was selectively told, with key pieces of context deliberately withheld.
At the heart of the controversy lies a question with global implications:
If Russia had more damaging information about Clinton than Trump—why did American intelligence, media, and political leadership build an entire election scandal around the latter?
The new disclosures also:
Undermine the Steele Dossier's credibility, already widely discredited
Suggest that foreign adversaries had deeper visibility into Democratic infighting than previously acknowledged
Put renewed scrutiny on how Obama-era officials handled intelligence dissemination
What Clinton's team has said
So far, Hillary Clinton has not issued a statement responding to the newly released material.
Her team has previously described health-related rumours as 'baseless right-wing conspiracy theories.' However, the newly cited DNC internal communications appear to show private admissions that contradict public denials.
Final takeaway
This is no longer just a debate about emails or hacked servers. The declassified House report paints a picture of:
A Democratic Party deeply divided and alarmed about its nominee's health
A foreign power with access to that panic
And a narrative that may have been shaped more by politics than truth
FAQ
Q: Who released this new information?
A: The full report was declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who now serves under President Trump.
Q: What agency is said to have obtained this intel?
A: Russia's SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service) allegedly intercepted internal DNC communications revealing concerns about Hillary Clinton's health.
Q: Is there any independent verification of Clinton's alleged illnesses?
A: No medical records have been released to confirm the specific claims listed (e.g., diabetes, COPD), but the report cites internal DNC discussions and SVR intercepts as sources.
Q: Why didn't Russia leak this if they were interfering?
A: Some analysts now believe Russia expected Clinton to win and withheld the most damaging material for potential post-election leverage.
Q: What is the political impact of this revelation?
A: It calls into question the narrative that Trump was the sole beneficiary of Russian meddling, and raises concerns about transparency within the Obama and Biden intelligence communities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rs 437 crore tax collection: For crypto traders, evading income tax is getting difficult as Tax Dept uses AI, data analytics tools
ET Online Crypto tax In India, avoiding taxes on bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and other virtual digital assets is becoming increasingly difficult. The Income Tax Department is increasing its efforts to monitor transactions related to the virtual digital assets (VDAs) made by individuals. This is being done through the use of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and other data analytics tools. According to the government's reply in the Parliament, the government has collected Rs 437 crore in taxes for FY 2022-23 from VDA-related income. The government implemented income tax rules for crypto and other VDAs from FY 2022- 23. In FY 2022-23, the government collected Rs 269.09 crore in taxes from VDA income. Also read: Indian Railways has deactivated 2.5 crore IRCTC user IDs: Has yours also been deactivated? Check now Members of Parliament asked several questions regarding tax collection, potential revenue loss due to under-reporting/mis-reporting from VDAs' income and the technological tools being used to monitor crypto activity. ET Wealth Online breaks down the government's responses on the use of data tools, centralised systems for matching crypto tax data, and ongoing training programs for tax officers. Questions on income tax collection from VDAs, cryptocurrency Parliamentarians Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu and G M Harish Balayogi, Members of Parliament, Lok Sabha, asked the following questions and the government's response in the Parliament. a) The total revenue collected from income tax on VDA/cryptocurrency-related income during the last three years, year-wise; The government in the Parliament replied: The tax on income from transfer of Virtual Digital Assets (VDA), under section 115BBH of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was introduced from FY 2022-23. The collection of tax on income from VDA, for last three years is as under:Table (b) whether any estimates have been made by the Government regarding the projected revenue loss due to under-reporting/misreporting of income from VDA/cryptocurrency transactions; The government in Parliament replied: No such estimates have been made. (c) Whether the government is using AI/ML/data analytics tools to identify tax evasion in VDA transactions, if so, details thereof; The government in Parliament replied: The government is utilising data analytics tools to trace and detect tax evasion from VDA-related transactions. The analysis includes the use of Non-Filer Monitoring System (NMS), project insight and internal databases of the Income Tax department, to correlate available information on VDA transactions with the transactions disclosed in the return of income by the taxpayer.(d) Whether a centralised system has been established by the Government for real-time matching of VDA-related ITR filings with TDS returns filed by Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), if so, the status of its implementation; andThe government in Parliament replied: Real time matching of VDA related transactions, filed in income tax returns, with information filed by Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) is not being carried out. However, TDS returns filed by VASPs and income tax returns filed by the taxpayers are analysed to identify discrepancies in reported VDA transactions. The Central Board of Direct Taxes has initiated the NUDGE (Non-Intrusive Use of Data to Guide and Enable) campaign to identify such discrepancies for further action. Under NUDGE campaign suitable communications, to review and update their income tax returns, were issued to all taxpayers who did not report VDA-related transactions in their income tax returns, despite tax being deducted at source for such transactions by VASPs, where the quantum of such discrepancy was more than Rs 1 lakh. (e) Whether the Government has undertaken any capacity-building initiatives to equip tax officials for effective compliance monitoring and investigation in the VDA/cryptocurrency ecosystem, if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor?The government in the Parliament replied: Several capacity-building initiatives are being undertaken by the Government to equip officers for effective compliance monitoring and investigation of VDA related transactions. Training programs, specialized workshops, Chintan Shivirs and hands-on workshops are regularly conducted by various training institutes under the Income Tax Department. At local level, field offices conduct training sessions and webinars on digital forensics, blockchain analysis, legal frameworks, and handling of digital evidence. The officers and officials are also imparted short term training on digital forensics, in partnership with National Forensic Science University (NFSU), Goa, which empower them to identify and trace VDA related transactions from data captured during intrusive actions. Penalty for not disclosing crypto earnings According to a report in The Economic Times, the Income Tax Department has sent bulk notices to taxpayers who have either not paid the correct income tax amount or failed to report income from cryptocurrency in their tax returns. Also Read | Didn't report your crypto earnings? Income tax dept sending tax notices, conducting search undefined know your options If an individual taxpayer fails to report crypto transactions, they may be liable to pay a penalty under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Under this section, a taxpayer is liable to pay a sum equal to fifty per cent of the amount of tax payable on under-reported income. If the under-reported income is in consequence of any misreporting of income, then it is equal to two hundred per cent of the amount of tax payable on the under-reported income. N.R. Narayana Murthy Founder, Infosys Watch Now Harsh Mariwala Chairman & Founder, Marico Watch Now Adar Poonawalla CEO, Serum Institute of India Watch Now Ronnie Screwvala Chairperson & Co-founder, upGrad Watch Now Puneet Dalmia Managing Director, Dalmia Bharat group Watch Now Martin Schwenk Former President & CEO, Mercedes-Benz, Thailand Watch Now Nadir Godrej Managing Director, of Godrej Industries Watch Now Manu Jain Former- Global Vice President, Xiaomi Watch Now Nithin Kamath Founder, CEO, Zerodha Watch Now Anil Agarwal Executive Chairman, Vedanta Resources Watch Now Dr. Prathap C. Reddy Founder Chairman, Apollo Hospitals Watch Now Vikram Kirloskar Former Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Watch Now Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Executive Chairperson, Biocon Limited Watch Now Shashi Kiran Shetty Chairman of Allcargo Logistics, ECU Worldwide and Gati Ltd Watch Now Samir K Modi Managing Director, Modi Enterprises Watch Now R Gopalakrishnan Former Director Tata Sons, Former Vice Chairman, HUL Watch Now Sanjiv Mehta Former Chairman / CEO, Hindustan Unilever Watch Now Dr Ajai Chowdhry Co-Founder, HCL, Chairman EPIC Foundation, Author, Just Aspire Watch Now Shiv Khera Author, Business Consultant, Motivational Speaker Watch Now Nakul Anand Executive Director, ITC Limited Watch Now RS Sodhi Former MD, Amul & President, Indian Dairy Association Watch Now Anil Rai Gupta Managing Director & Chairman, Havells Watch Now Zia Mody Co-Founder & Managing Partner, AZB & Partners Watch Now Arundhati Bhattacharya Chairperson & CEO, Salesforce India Watch Now


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
How many countries supported India in Kargil War, countries that stood with Pakistan were…
How many countries supported India in Kargil War, countries that stood with Pakistan were… Do you know the names of the countries that supported India during Kargil war and the countries which stood with Pakistan? By Joy Pillai Edited by Joy Pillai Advertisement How many countries supported India in Kargil War, countries that stood with Pakistan were… Kargil War was the time when the Indian Armed Forces showcased their prowess, defeating Pakistan. The neighbouring country was badly defeated in the war on both diplomatic and military fronts. If we talk about Operation Sindoor, the United States' attitude towards Pakistan was quite soft and sympathetic, but during the Kargil War the situation was completely different, and the then US president Bill Clinton was not happy with Pak and behaved very rudely with Nawaz Sharif. Advertisement === Notably, Sharif's offer to meet in private was rejected by Clinton. He even told the then Pak PM that 'I already told you that if you do not withdraw your troops unconditionally, then there is no need to come here.' Which Country Supported India During Kargil War? Advertisement === During the Kargil war, the G-8 countries supported India in the Cologne Summit. The European Union and the ASEAN organisation also stood with India's efforts to protect the integrity of the Line of Control. India also received the support of the ASEAN Regional Forum. Amidst the advancing Indian forces and strong international pressure, Pakistan had no option but to retreat. Indian forces had already pushed Pakistan far back. After initial blunders, the Indian Armed Forces had turned the war in their favour. The then US President was extremely upset with Pakistan's attitude. Then Indian prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had travelled to Lahore by bus to put an end to the decades-long hostility between the countries. Clinton Was Very Angry With Pakistan Following India's successful 'Operation Sindoor', US President Trump appears to be showing more support for Pakistan. In contrast, during the 1999 Kargil War, then US President Bill Clinton expressed displeasure towards Pakistan. On July 4, 1999, Clinton met with Nawaz Sharif, a meeting that Clinton had reluctantly agreed to. Clinton had told the Pak PM that he wanted this conversation to be on record. This attitude of US president shocked Sharif. It was the time when the process of improvement in relations between India and America started, which later turned into a strategic partnership. Sharif then agreed to withdraw his troops remaining within Indian borders. Kargil Vijay Diwas 2025 After 74 days long war was officially ended on July 26, 1999, with Pakistan withdrawing its troops from the warzone. With the help of the US, it tried to hide its face from the shame of defeat under the guise of a ceasefire. In reality, Pakistan was defeated on every front in the Kargil War.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Dragged out live on cam! Democrat arrested at Texas Capitol sparks outrage shocking video
Democratic congressional candidate Isaiah Martin was forcibly removed and arrested during a fiery protest at the Texas State Capitol. The 27-year-old refused to end his speech at a redistricting hearing, shouting 'It is a shame!' before being dragged out by three officers one falling on top of him. Martin, running for Texas' 18th District, now faces charges including trespass and resisting arrest. The chaotic moment has since gone viral. Show more 03:15 14:22 02:27 04:04 03:22 04:24 03:06 02:34 02:01 02:32 03:00 03:27 10:26 06:37 05:16 03:13 02:27 08:03 03:01 03:32 03:46 03:51 04:01 04:49 03:09 05:03 12:08 01:16