ePIPE ®: The Faster, Cost-Effective Solution for Lead (Pb) Pipe Remediation
With ePIPE's trenchless application, lead service lines can be protected in hours, not days, minimizing disruption to homes, businesses, and roadways. An NSF 61-approved epoxy barrier is applied inside existing pipes, sealing lead and other contaminants while extending the pipe's life; without the need for full replacement.
Why Choose ePIPE Over Traditional Repiping?
American-Made Innovation – Designed and manufactured in the U.S., ensuring top quality and reliability.
Cost Savings – Reduces labor, material, and remediation costs associated with full pipe replacement.
Time Efficient – Pipes are protected in just a few hours, drastically reducing downtime.
Minimal Disruption – Minimizing extensive excavation, preserving streets, sidewalks, and landscaping.
Durability – Extends the lifespan of existing infrastructure, reducing environmental impact.
Beyond lead remediation, ePIPE is trusted for commercial, residential, and government applications, including leak protection, corrosion control, and water quality improvements.
With service locations in Southern California, Washington D.C., and Tampa, FL, ePIPE provides nationwide support to organizations seeking a faster, smarter solution to lead pipe remediation.
To learn more about how ePIPE can save money and time, visit our website or contact us at (800) 359-6369.
About ePIPE
With over 40 US and International patents, the ePIPE process involves restoring pipes in-place, with an application of an approved epoxy barrier coating resulting in a restored and protected epoxy lined piping system. The process provides a solution for slab leaks, pinhole leaks, and the reduction of lead leaching from lead pipes and lead contributors. For more information, contact ePIPE ® Pipe Restoration Inc. at www.WhyRePipe.com or (800) 359-6369.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What if the dollar has bottomed?
-- A recent rebound in the U.S. dollar may mark the end of its year-to-date slide, potentially easing pressure on European equities and resetting key assumptions across global markets. The dollar, down around 10% from January highs, has recently bounced following U.S. trade agreements with Japan and the EU. Barclays analysts say this move could reflect the early stages of a broader shift, particularly as speculative positioning against the dollar looks stretched and U.S. earnings and macro data remain firm. The rally in the euro, driven more by capital flows than interest rate differentials, has been a drag on European earnings, especially for exporters. Barclays' FX strategists expect the euro to weaken gradually, forecasting EUR/USD to fall toward 1.13. That shift would reverse some of the eurozone's year-to-date 'exorbitant benefit' from dollar weakness, which had exacerbated the impact of deteriorating terms of trade due to tariffs. European stocks have lagged U.S. peers in part due to this FX dynamic. Barclays says the stronger euro has hit corporate earnings harder than tariffs, contributing to a wave of EPS downgrades in export-heavy sectors. But a dollar turnaround may offer some relief, with the potential to put a floor under European earnings estimates. Medium-term risks remain. Concerns around Federal Reserve independence and potential rate convergence in 2026, especially if German or EU growth surprises to the upside — could limit sustained dollar strength. Still, Barclays concludes that FX is no longer a one-way bet. If the dollar has in fact bottomed, it would mark a meaningful shift in global equity drivers, the brokerage said. Related articles What if the dollar has bottomed? After soaring 149%, this stock is back in our AI's favor - & already +25% in July If Powell goes, does Fed trust go with him?
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Forecasts predict a dismal decade for stocks. Here's what to do.
Over the past several decades, the U.S. stock market has yielded average annual returns around 10%. What if those days are over? In recent forecasts, Vanguard projects the stock market will rise by only 3.3% to 5.3% a year over the next decade. Morningstar sees U.S. stocks gaining 5.2% a year. Goldman Sachs forecasts the broad S&P 500 index will gain only 3% a year. Those numbers aren't outliers. A roundup of market prognostications, charted by Morningstar, finds no one projecting annual returns higher than 6.7% for the domestic stock market in the next 10 years. In June, USA TODAY noted that many analysts predict the stock market will end the year with only meager gains. Some readers reacted with surprise, others with disbelief. Stock indexes have been posting record highs, despite lingering inflation, a softening job market and rising import tariffs. As it turns out, those record highs are one reason forecasters don't expect much from the stock market over the rest of this year, nor in years to come. Here, then, is a closer look at why economist have dim hopes for the stock market in the next decade, and what everyday investors can do about it. Stocks are overpriced The simple reason forecasters don't expect much from the U.S. stock market over the next decade: stock prices are already very high. Stock indexes have been breaking records. To analysts, that means many stocks are overpriced. Bargains are fewer. The indexes have less room to grow. Just how overpriced is the stock market? Economists have a yardstick to measure that. It's called the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, or CAPE ratio. It measures a stock's price against corporate earnings. It tells you, in effect, whether the stock is overvalued or undervalued. Right now, the CAPE ratio for the S&P 500 stands at 38.7. That means stock prices are very expensive, relative to earnings. 'Right now, the U.S. stock market is trading at more than double the post-World War II average price-to-earnings ratio,' said Randy Bruns, a certified financial planner in Naperville, Illinois. There are two prior moments over the past century when the CAPE Ratio was really high. One was in 1929. The other was in 1999. In the decades that followed those peaks, the stock market sank like a stone: The Great Depression of the 1930s, and the dot-com bust and Great Recession of the 2000s. 'Our projection is that that ratio is going to somehow come down,' said Paul Arnold, global head of multi-asset research at Morningstar. Investors forget to buy low No one is forcing anyone to purchase expensive stocks. Why, then, do investors keep buying them? It's easy to recite that old investing adage about buying low and selling high. It's harder to follow the rule, especially when you don't know how high is too high. Purchasing stocks when the market is high sounds like a flagrant violation of the buy-low rule. And yet, investment advisers routinely encourage consumers to keep buying stocks when prices are high. The reason: Stocks tend to rise over time. Even if you buy high, you can bet the market will eventually climb even higher. All those headlines about stock-market records function like ads for stocks. And investors keep buying them, pushing prices up. 'When stocks are going up, investors have this tendency to think that now's the time to get in,' said Todd Schlanger, senior investment strategist at Vanguard. 'Stocks are one of the few things people don't like to buy on sale.' The stock market is too 'concentrated' Here's another reason many forecasters are down on U.S. stocks, and especially the monster stocks known as the Magnificent Seven: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Tesla. Together, the Seven represent 34% of the overall value of the S&P 500, up from 12% in 2015, Motley Fool reports. That's called market concentration, and it can be a bad thing. Investors are urged to diversify: Not to hold only stocks, and not to hold too much of any one stock. The problem with the Magnificent Seven, Goldman Sachs reports, is that their massive growth is unsustainable: 'It is extremely difficult for any firm to maintain high levels of sales growth and profit margins over sustained periods of time.' Those seven stocks are 'already priced to perfection,' Schlanger said. That's a gentle way of saying that they are expensive. Vanguard forecasts that growth stocks, the category dominated by the Magnificent Seven, will grow by only 1.9% to 3.9% a year over the next decade. That does not mean the Magnificent Seven stocks are going to crash. 'I find it hard to believe that something would happen that would throw one of those companies into a tailspin,' said Catherine Valega, a certified financial planner in Winchester, Massachusetts. 'The larger companies have resources to pivot, if they need to.' Forecasters question, though, whether the Magnificent Seven will continue to grow at the same fevered pace of the past. 'If those companies are booming, that's great,' Bruns said. 'But when the writing on the wall hits for those seven companies, it'll be bad news for the S&P 500 as a whole.' What to do about those gloomy stock forecasts? If you want to avoid market concentration and overpriced stocks, forecasters say, here are some places to look: Value stocks. Many mutual funds and ETFs invest in 'value' stocks. A value stock is a good deal, basically, trading at a relatively low price relative to corporate sales, earnings and dividends. Vanguard expects value stocks to rise by 5.8% to 7.8% a year over the next decade. Small-cap stocks. One way to skirt the Magnificent Seven is to invest in small-cap stocks, which are shares in smaller companies. Vanguard predicts small-cap stocks will rise 5% to 7% annually over the next ten years. Non-U.S. stocks. Some analysts consider foreign stocks a better deal than U.S. stocks, because they 'have not seen the same level of froth and growth,' Arnold said. Morningstar projects non-U.S. stocks in developed markets will rise 8.1% annually over the next 10 years. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Stocks have been earning 10% a year. That's about to end.
Los Angeles Times
37 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON — For all of President Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators last week told a potentially worrisome story as the effects of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared with last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax-and-spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his liking. He's eager to take credit for any perceived wins and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's monthly jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the report. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on his social media platform, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carry significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Trump's tariff announcement Thursday as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by American consumers in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, casting the economy as emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale — as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. The economic numbers over the last week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the last three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates — even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech in December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.' Boak and Rugber write for the Associated Press.
