logo
Starmer immigration speech live: We will take back control of our borders

Starmer immigration speech live: We will take back control of our borders

Times12-05-2025
Sir Keir Starmer said without controls on immigration 'we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together'.
He said the immigration system is 'almost designed to permit abuse'.
It encourages some businesses to bring in lower paid workers rather than invest in our young people, he said.
It is also 'sold by politicians to the British people on an entirely false premise', he said.
If Nigel Farage is the political catalyst for Labour's immigration crackdown, the philosophical inspiration seems to be Danish.
Labour has long been uncomfortable with any criticism of immigration. But Sir Keir Starmer is now saying he supports it not despite being a progressive leader, but because of it.
The prime minister repeatedly insisted reducing immigration was 'fair' ,saying that 'nations depend on rules' and that without them 'we risk becoming an island of strangers'.
Such a progressive argument has been pioneered by Denmark's Social Democrats, who argue that a cohesive society with a strong safety net cannot co-exist with mass immigration.
Mette Frederiksen, Denmark's prime minister, argued recently: 'Being a traditional Social Democratic thinker means you cannot allow everyone who wants to join your society to come. It's impossible to have a sustainable society, especially if you are a welfare society.'
The US left is already looking closely at this line of argument and Starmer appears to have embraced it wholeheartedly.
The prime minister promised that migration will fall, but insisted it's 'not just about numbers'.
Starmer said: 'We will create a system that is controlled, selective and fair. A clean break with the past. We will link access to visas directly to investment in home grown skills.'
'If we do need to do more, then mark my words we will,' he added.
'Migration is part of Britain's national story,' the prime minister said.
He spoke of the events of last week commemorating the 80th anniversary of VE Day and the 'great rebuilding' after the war.
'Migrants were part of that and make massive contribution today,' he said.
'You will never hear me denigrate that. But people should commit to integration and learning our language. And the system should distinguish between those that do and don't. That's fair. Britain must compete for the best talent in the world.'
Sir Keir Starmer opened his announcement on migration by promising to 'take back control of our borders'.
He accused the previous Conservative government of conducting a 'one nation experiment in open borders'.
The prime minister said everybody knows the 'take back control' slogan and what it meant on immigration, but what followed with the previous government was 'the complete opposite'.
Between 2019 and 2023 net migration quadrupled to nearly one million in 2023, which is 'about the population of Birmingham', he continued.
'That's not control, it's chaos.'
One of the most consequential elements of Sir Keir Starmer's promise of a 'clean break' on immigration is whether he can end a Whitehall consensus that importing foreign workers is good for the economy.
The Home Office is deeply sceptical of this argument but is now taking it head on: Yvette Cooper argued on Sunday that if it were true the past decade would have been a time of surging growth.
But the Treasury has always firmly believed that immigration makes Britain richer and means more money for public services. Along with the Office for Budget Responsibility's conclusion that higher immigration as more money for the chancellor, the power of this argument within government has repeatedly overwhelmed years of promises to bring down numbers.
Starmer is already facing questions about whether his plan will be enough. To truly change government thinking on immigration, he will have to persuade the Treasury that it is not the economic and fiscal boon it has long assumed.
Government plans to get rid of care worker visas risks causing 'significant problems' in the sector, a care home chain director has said.
Amy Clark, commercial director of a Cornwall care home chain, told the BBC's Today programme that the measures could cause challenges because recruiting locally is 'very, very difficult'.
She said even when they raise wages they do not get applicants.
Continuing to pay higher than the minimum wage is also becoming 'increasingly difficult' due to government changes to national insurance and the minimum wage.
It comes after Care England's chief executive Martin Green labelled the government's plans 'cruel'.
The general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, professor Nicola Ranger, is also expected to tell its annual congress that the government has 'no plan to grow a domestic workforce' and its plans are 'pandering and scapegoating'.
• Automatic residency rights will cease to apply after five years and the time a person must have spent in the UK in order to qualify will be extended to ten years• The wait for residency will be reduced based on a 'contributions-based model', including the consistency of tax payments or evidence of working in public services or highly skilled private sector jobs• English language requirements will be raised across all immigration routes• Skilled worker visas will require a university degree• Tighter restrictions will be introduced on recruitment for jobs with skills shortages• Care providers will no longer be able to hire workers from overseas• Overseas citizens will require digital IDs• The rules could be tightened up around the right to a family life for foreign offenders looking to evade deportation
The government's resistance to setting a new net migration target has been criticised by Reform and the Conservatives.
The Conservatives have promised to force a vote on a binding cap. Reform have accused the government of 'merely tinkering around the edges' with a plan 'doomed to fail'.
Net migration rose to a record high of 906,000 in the year to June 2023.
The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said on Sunday that she thought a target 'undermined the credibility of anything that governments do … so, we're not taking that specific target approach'.
Migrants who pay their taxes on time, volunteer in the community and work in public sector or high-skilled jobs will be prioritised for residency rights under new immigration reforms.
Sir Keir Starmer is set to unveil plans to drive down net migration in the wake of sweeping election gains by Nigel Farage's Reform UK by making it harder for migrants to secure settlement and citizenship in the UK.
The prime minister will declare in a Downing Street press conference that indefinite leave to remain in Britain is 'a privilege that must be earned, not a right'.
• Read in full: Staying in UK is a privilege not a right, Keir Starmer will tell migrants
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BBC bosses might as well be replaced with Muppets – they're a national embarrassment and no longer promote honesty
BBC bosses might as well be replaced with Muppets – they're a national embarrassment and no longer promote honesty

The Sun

timea few seconds ago

  • The Sun

BBC bosses might as well be replaced with Muppets – they're a national embarrassment and no longer promote honesty

I SPENT decades defending the BBC. In a world of fake news, I used to say it had the best journalists and highest standards. 5 5 I thought it promoted Britain's values of democracy, honesty and fairness around the world. Not any more. It has gone from the world's best broadcaster to a national embarrassment. You might as well replace BBC bosses with the cast of the Muppet Show. This week, it hit a new low. It had to finally admit it had paid the son of a Hamas official to star in a film about Gaza. That broke the BBC's own rules, but Deborah Turness, the chief of BBC News, told staff there is a 'difference' between the terrorist group's political and military wings. All of Hamas is proscribed. You'd expect someone paid £430,000 to know this. The BBC cannot be trusted to report on the war between Israel and Hamas. Instead we get unbalanced coverage. When it rushed to accuse Israel of bombing a hospital in Gaza, international editor Jeremy Bowen said it had been 'destroyed' and 'flattened'. John Torode SACKED from MasterChef after 'racist remark' in another blow for scandal-hit show after Gregg Wallace saga The hospital hadn't been hit at all. This is not a theoretical debate about a conflict thousands of miles away. The BBC's coverage has a terrible impact on people in the UK. Constantly falsely accusing Israel of committing a genocide will fuel hatred towards people who identify with Israel, which is the vast majority of Jewish people. And look what happened at Glastonbury, as the BBC broadcast a group chanting 'Death to the IDF'. It has been three weeks, yet no one has been held responsible. Sack Tim Davie What needs to change? Start by replacing Jeremy Bowen. Close BBC Arabic which squanders taxpayers' money on content that barely differs from Qatar's propaganda channel Al-Jazeera. And sack BBC staff guilty of glorifying terror online. Deborah Turness needs to go and Tim Davie should follow if he can't take swift action to clear up the mess. It seems the only people who get it are Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy and Ofcom boss Dame Melanie Dawes who said the public's trust is being undermined. Nandy has already been in to read the riot act. She was completely right to demand changes at the top because that's the only way this can be sorted out. 5 5 5

BBC is on ‘final warning' after being rocked by a triple whammy of scandals
BBC is on ‘final warning' after being rocked by a triple whammy of scandals

The Sun

timea few seconds ago

  • The Sun

BBC is on ‘final warning' after being rocked by a triple whammy of scandals

THE BBC is on its 'final warning' after being rocked by a triple whammy of scandals, government insiders say. The public-funded broadcaster faces tougher regulation by MPs unless it turns itself around, The Sun on Sunday understands. The Beeb is in crisis after Masterchef presenters Greg Wallace and John Torode were sacked over allegations of inappropriate and racist language. It is also facing massive questions over its Glastonbury coverage, which streamed crowds chanting 'Death of the IDF" led by punk duo Bob Vylan. And earlier this week, the BBC was found to have breached its own guidelines by airing a Gaza documentary narrated by the son of a Hamas official. Hamas is a banned terror group in Britain. But despite this, BBC head of news Deborah Turness sparked fresh fury by telling staff the Hamas government of Gaza is 'different' to its military wing - who slaughtered Jews in the October 7 terror attack. A government source said: 'This is the BBC's final warning. The public expects better - and so do we. 'When you are funded by taxpayers' hard-earned cash, there's no excuse for these kinds of failures. 'The BBC needs to get a grip or risk losing trust for good.' Bosses at the BBC are being hauled into parliament to be quizzed by MPs on the scandals after the summer. The government is currently undertaking a full warts and all review of the BBC's Charter - which sets out how it will be funded and how it answers to the government. BBC boss admits he KNEW Huw Edwards' arrest was over most serious level of child sex abuse pics It is considering giving ministers more powers to hold BBC execs to account. Ian Austin - a former Labour MP who now sits as a peer - today blasts the BBC over the shameful failures. Writing in The Sun on Sunday, he said: 'I spent decades defending the BBC. Not any more. 'It has gone from the world's best broadcaster to a national embarrassment. 'That is why even long-time supporters like me are beginning to ask why we should have to pay for it. 'You might as well replace BBC bosses with the cast of the Muppet Show.' 4 4 4

Are the Scottish Greens descending into civil war?
Are the Scottish Greens descending into civil war?

BBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • BBC News

Are the Scottish Greens descending into civil war?

Patrick Harvie has been a Green MSP for more than 20 years - but now a group of his own local activists want to replace just one of the latest twists in a series of internal disputes that have been rumbling away in the Scottish this is going on as the party searches for two co-leaders to take it into the next Holyrood Harvie is standing down from one of these positions. He's proud of his record, though he believes political circumstances kept him in the role for too longest-serving leader in Scottish politics still wants to go back to Holyrood at the 2026 a group of "radical" Green activists are now looking to replace him as the party's top MSP candidate in Glasgow, a position that more or less guarantees part of what some in the party are calling the "Glasgow Faction", and they're critical of how the Greens have operated in recent contest has become something of a proxy battle for the direction of the party. In a social media campaign video, three activists - Ellie Gomersall, Iris Duane and Councillor Seonad Hoy - argue that "a fresh start" is needed, and that internal power has been "consolidated into a smaller and smaller group of people".They're critical of the time the Greens spent in government with the SNP, saying there was a lack of investment in communities during that period.I contacted all three to try and speak to them for this article but couldn't secure any Harvie spoke to me for 30 minutes near his office in gave a passionate defence of the Bute House Agreement – the deal that took the party into government with the SNP between 2021 and outgoing co-leader insisted that politics requires compromise, adding that "for a long time the Greens sometimes were guilty of - and sometimes even felt satisfied about - just saying 'we're right, everyone else is wrong'."Sometimes that can make activists feel satisfied. But it doesn't achieve very much. And I think to a lot of voters it comes across as smugness."He won't name names but says some individuals "never accepted the legitimacy of the decision on the Bute House Agreement and set out to try and undermine not just the position of the party but some of the individuals [involved]. That behaviour is out of order". But one party insider, who wanted to remain anonymous, accused the Green leadership of using "a made-up tale about 'factions' to shore up their own position and drive out any minor dissent".They added that a lack of tolerating alternative views about the Bute House Agreement made the Greens look "petty".The disagreements go beyond this one selection battle in vocal critic of the party leadership, Niall Christie, was a candidate in Glasgow at the general election last complaints, he's been suspended as a member while candidate selections are under way. Some have questioned if there's a political motivation behind this party refused to comment on this disciplinary Green Party figure told me that despite a "happy clappy" reputation there's been a "civil war" going on for some time, with members leaking material to journalists and briefing against one said the culture had become "much worse" since the recent leadership contest began. And they claimed that arguments framed as policy disagreements were actually more to do with "personal beefs".The same individual was critical of the "Glasgow Faction", saying these activists believed "if we go out with our banners and flags eventually we'll win. They think we can activate the proletariat, but that's not how the world works". These divisions may well spill into the ongoing leadership co-leader Lorna Slater is seeking re-election to one of the two positions. And fellow MSPs Gillian Mackay and Ross Greer have also launched Greer is close to outgoing party leader Patrick Harvie and was involved in the drafting of the Bute House Agreement. Ms Mackay said she was "upset" when that deal came to an co-leaders don't have to be MSPs, and some are predicting a challenge from a grassroots Scottish Greens are perhaps suffering from the inevitable consequences of their own they're an important political party - with a taste for government and a cohort of engaged relevance can often intensify internal disagreements. There's more at stake for each "side" in these do these internal squabbles really matter to anyone beyond the 7,000 members the party has?When you cast an eye over at the polls looking ahead to the Holyrood election in 2026, it's looking likely that any government will need the support of at least one other Greens have the potential to be kingmakers. And whether or not they will support a government – and the terms on which they will do so – could ultimately have a much broader direction this party takes in the coming months, and how these arguments play out, may have an impact well beyond the Scottish Green membership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store