logo
'Harraga'… The Moroccan Makhzen's Weapon for Blackmail in the Sahrawi Issue

'Harraga'… The Moroccan Makhzen's Weapon for Blackmail in the Sahrawi Issue

El Chorouk6 days ago
The Moroccan Makhzen regime continues to use irregular migration as a weapon for political blackmail, directing thousands of migrants towards Spain whenever it wants to exert pressure to extract concessions, especially in the issue of Western Sahara, in complete disregard for international laws and a clear disdain for international norms and conventions.
In this context, Sahrawi writer and political analyst, Taleb Ali Salem, said in an interview with the Spanish newspaper 'La Gaceta' that Morocco does not deal with migration as a social phenomenon that requires treatment, but rather employs it as a hybrid weapon in its political battles, replacing the logic of regional cooperation with a policy of threat and intimidation.
He added that 'the Moroccan regime uses the migration card to create crises when it fails to extract concessions through official channels,' pointing out that these practices confirm that this regime 'does not hesitate to traffic in human beings as bargaining tools' and that what is happening 'is not a momentary event, but part of an integrated strategy adopted by the Makhzen for decades, based on transforming human suffering into a diplomatic pressure card.'
For his part, Sahrawi human rights activist, Baba Ali Hasana, said in an article that the Moroccan regime exploits migrants, especially minors, as tools for political blackmail without any regard for their humanitarian situation or basic rights, adding that what happened in May 2021 constitutes a 'stark example' of this exploitation, where Morocco pushed more than 9,000 migrants, including about 1,500 minors, to cross the border into the city of Ceuta within 24 hours, in a move that 'was not spontaneous, but politically calculated.'
He explained that the Moroccan authorities did not only open the borders, but later refused to take back the children, despite the efforts made by Spanish child welfare institutions, which placed the host country under a great legal and humanitarian burden, pointing out that the minors were held in temporary centers, some in unsuitable conditions, due to the sudden number and the pressure of the crisis, while Morocco remained silent, refusing to bear its responsibilities.
Baba Ali Hasana stressed that this incident is not an exception, but rather falls within a systematic policy in which Rabat uses migrants as a pressure card, whenever it wants to create a crisis or convey political messages, adding: 'The Moroccan regime does not deal with migration as a humanitarian or social challenge, but as a tool within the negotiation and blackmail agenda, indifferent to the consequences of that on the lives of thousands of people.'
In this context, Spanish researcher, Javier Ruiz, commented that Morocco manages a 'black market for migration,' pointing out that the Moroccan regime does not hesitate to create crises and employ vulnerable groups as pressure tools, disregarding international laws and international conventions, in a systematic behavior that reflects the nature of a power that sees human beings as a means to achieve its political interests, even if the price is trafficking in human dignity and the security of the entire region.
According to testimonies from migrants and organizations such as 'Border Forensics,' 'Iridia,' and the 'Moroccan Association for Human Rights,' the Melilla massacre on June 24, 2022, was not a spontaneous result, but a planned operation in which the Moroccan Makhzen participated with prior coordination.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spanish Party: Morocco Uses Irregular Migrants For Political Blackmail
Spanish Party: Morocco Uses Irregular Migrants For Political Blackmail

El Chorouk

time18 hours ago

  • El Chorouk

Spanish Party: Morocco Uses Irregular Migrants For Political Blackmail

The Spanish Vox party accused Morocco of using migration as a political bargaining card by 'turning a blind eye' to illegal migrants, allowing hundreds of minors to gather at the border to swim across, and obstructing their expulsion. Following the increased migration pressure in Ceuta, on the Spanish enclave's borders, Juan Sergio Redondo, the party's president in the city, warned in a statement that 'this is due to Morocco's implementation of its roadmap with impunity and its continued disregard for border and maritime control.' He emphasised that 'this situation is not spontaneous, but rather the result of the usual passivity of the Moroccan authorities, which have allowed dozens of minors to gather in the Tarajal area over the past few days without deploying any kind of containment or monitoring mechanism.' The spokesperson noted that 'it is important to emphasise that Morocco is fully aware that Ceuta is under pressure,' yet it 'insists on increasing the pressure, ignoring its obligations to control the border and even allowing uncontrolled flows of minors leaving various Moroccan cities inland towards the Ceuta border, roaming throughout the country with complete impunity.' He emphasised that all of this is happening 'without the Moroccan authorities making any significant effort to prevent it, thus violating their obligations to protect minors.' He added that the Vox party has repeatedly warned that this situation 'is not a coincidence or a seasonal phenomenon, but rather a carefully considered strategy by Moroccans aimed at pressurising the Spanish state.' In light of this situation, the Spanish party official stressed the need to 'urgently reform national legislation to allow for more flexible procedures for the return of these minors to Morocco, which must protect them as Moroccan citizens under the age of 18.' He also emphasised that 'no matter how hard the Spanish authorities try to limit this problem to a purely migration issue and grant Morocco the status of a valid interlocutor or reliable partner in resolving it, the problem will continue to escalate indefinitely.'

The Moroccan Regime Is At War To Target Algeria's Memory.
The Moroccan Regime Is At War To Target Algeria's Memory.

El Chorouk

time4 days ago

  • El Chorouk

The Moroccan Regime Is At War To Target Algeria's Memory.

The Moroccan regime, with meticulous planning from the Royal Palace, is waging a war on Algerian memory, enlisting pseudo-historians to try and undermine one of the symbolic pillars of the revolution. This targeting also extended to a prominent French historical figure, Benjamin Stora, simply because this historian did not align with the expansionist theses of the Moroccan regime and its fifth column arms. This campaign is planned from within the Palace, and the tool is 'Al-360' newspaper, owned by Mounir Madjidi, the private secretary of Moroccan King Mohammed VI. It has consistently provided a platform for a French individual who claims to be a historian, named Bernard Lugan, who writes nothing but attacks on Algeria's history or casts doubt on its borders, precisely in line with the expansionist thesis of the Alawi regime, which knows no path to the honor of resistance and defending the nation's movement. The latest chapter of what the 'spokesperson' newspaper for the Palace wrote, penned by this alleged historian on Tuesday, July 29, 2025, was an attempt to target a pivotal historical moment in the history of the Liberation Revolution, namely the Soummam Congress. Its author, a mercenary Frenchman, tried to sow discord among the revolution's men, the makers of independence, accusing them of liquidating each other. These are illusions that French colonialism tried to exploit during the glorious Liberation Revolution to detonate it from within, but it failed. The Alawi Palace, through its article titled: 'The Soummam Congress… or what another Algeria could have been,' tried to give the impression that the imprisonment of the Franco-Algerian writer, Boualem Sansal, was due to the latter daring to repeat words that even the French themselves did not say, regarding the borders, and by accusing the men of the Liberation Revolution of being terrorists, as Sansal once said with utter impudence and baseness. What is striking is that the Alawi Palace's targeting, through its media arm, even extended to a globally recognized academic figure, particularly in France, the historian Benjamin Stora. Mounir Majidi, the private secretary of Moroccan King Mohammed VI, as its de facto editor-in-chief, did not hesitate to describe Stora as a 'charlatan in the service of Algeria.' The newspaper dedicated a lengthy article to the French historian, Benjamin Stora, describing him with the most heinous terms and using phrases inspired by the theocratic spirit of the Moroccan regime, evoked from the darkness of the Middle Ages: 'Benjamin Stora dreamed of being the hero of the great Franco-Algerian reconciliation, but he became its gravedigger.' And because Stora exposed many of the theses promoted by the Moroccan regime through some of its pawns, including the Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, he became a target for the Alawi Palace, which now acts as if it is more French than the French. In the view of the 'media spokesperson' for the Alawi Palace, Benjamin Stora 'finds himself rejected by France, which is tired of his Algerian patriotism and his lack of sympathy in the Sansal case.' However, the reason for the Moroccan regime's focused targeting of historian Benjamin Stora and its attempt to tarnish his image is no longer hidden from any observer. The historian, who is highly regarded in academic, media, and political circles in France, directly refuted the border thesis promoted by the Alawi regime on French public television. This brought him the wrath of the Alawi kingdom and its allies from Zionist and far-right circles in France. It is worth noting here the devastating response launched by Stora from a French television studio, refuting what Boualem Sansal had repeated, when he said that Tlemcen, which Sansal considers part of Morocco, gave birth to the father of the national movement in Algeria, Messali Hadj, and Mascara, which Sansal also attributed to the western neighbor, gave birth to the founder of the modern Algerian state, Emir Abdelkader El Djezairi. These statements shook the foundations of French propaganda as it tried to portray Sansal as a victim of freedom of expression, only to reveal that he is merely a mouthpiece in a fifth column, working for a regime devoid of honor and knowing no path to the values of sovereignty.

The Moroccan Regime In A Frantic Bid To Circumvent European Justice
The Moroccan Regime In A Frantic Bid To Circumvent European Justice

El Chorouk

time5 days ago

  • El Chorouk

The Moroccan Regime In A Frantic Bid To Circumvent European Justice

The Moroccan regime is making frantic efforts to convince the member states of the European Union to circumvent the decision of the European Court of Justice issued on October 4, 2024, in anticipation of the end of the deadline set by the European Court, which is one year, coinciding with October 4, 2025. The final and conclusive decision of the European Court of Justice gave the member states of the Union one year to enable the concerned companies to manage their affairs before the definitive cessation of work on three trade agreements related to agriculture and fisheries between the Moroccan regime and the European Union. After one year, Europeans are prohibited from importing any agricultural or fishery product originating from the occupied Western Sahara, provided that its source is Morocco, based on the European Court's decision which considers Western Sahara a territory not covered by Moroccan sovereignty. In this regard, Moroccan media reports spoke of strenuous efforts being made by the foreign minister of the Alawi regime, through which he is playing his last possible cards to dissuade the European side from the decision to cease work on the agriculture and fisheries agreements between Rabat and Brussels. It quoted a statement by Bourita saying that 'the problem' exists at the European level and not at the Moroccan regime's level, and that Rabat will not agree to any trade partnership that does not include the territories of the occupied Western Sahara. Bourita called on the European Union to 'establish partnership with Morocco and defend it against blackmail and legal and economic harassment,' indicating that the ball is now in Brussels' court. He stated that the Kingdom 'is watching how the European Union will deal with these provocations, through the measures and policies it will take to deal with this reality.' According to Rabat's foreign minister, as stated on the Moroccan website 'Al-Sahifa', Rabat expects the European side to 'establish partnership with Morocco and defend it against blackmail and legal harassment,' indicating that the Moroccan regime does not recognize the sovereign decision of the European Court of Justice, which ruled in a final and unappealable decision that the Kingdom of Morocco has no sovereignty over the Sahrawi territories. Commenting on the desperate Moroccan maneuvers, diplomat Mostafa Zaghlash, in communication with 'Al-Shorouk', believes that the Moroccan regime is trying to exert pressure through political leverage to circumvent the decision of justice, which is a well-known behavior, indicating that Rabat does not differentiate between political and judicial, despite its awareness that the two authorities are governed by an unalterable constitutional principle. Mostafa Zaghlash says: 'The European Commission represents the executive branch of the European Union (governments), while the European Court of Justice is an independent judicial entity not subject to political influence on its decisions, as evidenced by the court's decision issued about a year ago, contrary to the orientations of a number of European governments, which called for maintaining the fisheries and agriculture agreements.' He added: 'The decision originates from a judicial body and the problem originates from an executive body. However, the judiciary does not view the cases it handles with the same approach that governments advocate. There are considerations that strengthen the judiciary's position, such as the United Nations considering the Sahrawi territory as a territory under the authority of a colonial power with duties, including protecting the resources of this territory, which should be enjoyed by the people who inhabit it.' Therefore, the party that may be involved in violating the decision of justice will be subject to legal accountability, says diplomat Mostafa Zaghlash, whether it is an executive political body or a company that benefited from the agreement. He gave an example of the accountability faced by the Hungarian government, following the human rights violations in that country due to the mistreatment of migrants, because there is a law in the Union that emphasizes the protection of human rights. The most dangerous weapon that can be used against the party that violates the decision of European justice is the weapon of financial aid from which the Moroccan regime benefits, because the European Union spends billions of euros in the form of funding for some sectors of economic activity in Morocco, says the diplomat, at a time when Rabat is in dire need of it. The weapon of justice also remains activatable at any moment, whether by the Sahrawi government or by European associations and organizations active in the field of human rights, against any government or company that may try to violate the decision of justice, which makes the mission of the Moroccan regime's foreign minister merely desperate attempts to circumvent a reality imposed by unalterable decisions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store