Young people ‘should do National Service or lose benefits'
John Allan said the Government should exercise a 'bit of coercion' to get young people into the workforce as the number of people aged between 16 and 24 who are not in education, employment or training (Neet) soars.
Mr Allan, who was also served as the chairman of Barratt Developments, one of Britain's biggest homebuilders, told Times Radio that Neets should be pushed to do military training or municipal work.
Mr Allan said: 'You could make some benefit payments conditional, particularly in that age group on people really seeking work.
'You could find work for people to do municipal work.
'I think getting people into the habit of getting out of bed in the morning, going and doing some useful work is very habit-forming once people have done it for a while.
'Or we could reintroduce military training for people who are not working. That would be a way of actually helping us with, you know, stepping up our defence capability as well, which is another important issue.'
It comes as Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has drawn up plans to save £5bn from a benefits crackdown as the Chancellor scrambles to balance the books in her Spring Statement on Wednesday.
The number of 16 to 24-year-olds who are classed at Neets has surged by nearly a quarter since the pandemic began and now totals nearly 1m – the highest level since records began in 2013.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has revealed himself to be the most politically hopeless PM of my lifetime
We are told that it was 'personal' reasons which caused Rachel Reeves to weep at Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) on Wednesday. No doubt that is true. But when a prominent person weeps on a public occasion, the tears are prompted by a confluence of the personal and the political. Whatever upset Ms Reeves felt was surely compounded by her desperate and isolated political situation following the collapse of the Government's welfare reform Bill. The first Rachel wept, as is recorded in the Old Testament Book of Jeremiah. She was weeping for her children, but hers were public tears too: she was revered as the wife of the patriarch Jacob and mother of Joseph. God told her: 'Refrain thy voice from weeping and thine ears from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded.' It has to be said that Sir Keir Starmer was rather less generous to his Rachel than was the Almighty to the Mother of Israel. When, across the floor of the House, Kemi Badenoch pointed out to him that his Chancellor 'looks absolutely miserable', he did not turn round to comfort or even to check. Nor did he take up the Leader of the Opposition's invitation to confirm Ms Reeves in her post. Before the session ended, the Prime Minister did say something about being 'grateful' to her, but by then it was too late. Afterwards, No 10 declared that Ms Reeves was 'going nowhere', a phrase which, in the circumstances, was either tin-eared or barbed. In an interview, Sir Keir insisted she would continue as Chancellor for the next election and for years beyond. He is in no position to make such a promise. People often complain about the 'bearpit' of PMQs. This week's half hour was certainly uncomfortable to watch, but it did show why such occasions can make a difference. In a few minutes of parliamentary theatre, we got to the heart of the matter. In passing, it is worth pointing out that Mrs Badenoch did well. With wit and concision, she identified Labour's key embarrassments – the second U-turn at the very last moment, the fact that a cost-cutting Bill will now save nothing at all and Sir Keir's problem that 'he does not know what he believes'. She seized the chance to get her own party back on the long road to the economic respectability it so badly lost in government. Whereas Labour had just voted for spending more money, she said, the Conservatives know the nation must 'live within its means'. Sir Keir's capitulation vacates the political ground of prudence, giving the Tories the chance to re-occupy it – and at a time when Reform has decided to become a big-spending party. In the end, those who want to give ever more public money to people who do not want to work are fewer than those who do work and will now almost certainly have to pay higher taxes. On this point, Mrs Badenoch spoke with justified confidence. An oddity caused by the slow Conservative leadership election process last year is that Mrs Badenoch has still not addressed her annual party conference as leader, so the troops do not feel they know their general. Now she has a victory under her belt to celebrate with them. She has won on some other subjects recently, such as the grooming gangs inquiry, but this week was her first big breakthrough. More important right now is what all this means for the Government which we might still have for four more years. Again, PMQs gave useful optics. Most of the time, the camera concentrated on just three people on the front bench – the Prime Minster in the middle, inexpressive as usual; to the right, the crumpled Chancellor, in a blue suit, trying and failing to conceal her distress; to the left, in a striking all-red number, the Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner, head erect and smiling in a nothing-to-do-with-me sort of way. You could see the future, and why it won't work. It still seems almost incredible that a government only a year old should have cut off its room for future progress so early. There may be a case that the public finances, though bad and getting worse, are not so disastrous that all is lost, but history does suggest that such a serious failure of economic and political will is very hard to come back from. Wilson's Labour government lost confidence after having to devalue the pound in 1967, and lost the election in 1970. Heath's Tories executed their U-turn on free markets and non-intervention in 1972, and lost (twice) in 1974. Labour went 'cap in hand' to the IMF in 1976, and lost to Mrs Thatcher in 1979. John Major's Tories won a general election in April 1992 but had to take the pound out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism in September. Tony Blair trounced them in 1997. In some of these cases, notably Major's, the economy did recover, but in all of them the government was seen to have failed in its economic stewardship. The voters duly punished it. This time, the Government has undoubtedly failed. Labour's selling-point to the electorate a year ago was that, unlike the Tories, and particularly the horror story of Liz Truss, it would restore growth and control the public finances with enough discipline that the proceeds of that growth would improve public services. It has taken only 12 months, almost to the day, to discredit all those promises. In reaction, some have criticised the rebel Labour MPs who forced Sir Keir's retreat for their economic illiteracy. Downing Street special advisers speak unattributably to lobby journalists with foul-mouthed quotations about the idiocy and self-indulgence of their party's backbenchers. It is true that social media have made MPs more narcissistic and less loyal to their party. It is also true that failure to rein in welfare spending is – along with the NHS – the road to national ruin. But Sir Keir and his political advisers seem to have a very hazy idea of what it is like to be a member of Parliament. With all aspects of social policy, MPs will have numerous constituents who will be directly affected and will complain to them. Most MPs of the governing party will be prepared to justify unpopular government policy if they can do so as part of a big story of foreseeable recovery or of dire necessity. It is incredibly hard to do so, however, when the policy unexpectedly removes existing money from claimants, and when the overall picture of what the government is trying to do is so contradictory and confusing. In the case of personal independence payments (PIPs), there are a great many scandals (some recently documented by the TaxPayers' Alliance) about how easily people can get the money for inadequate or trumped-up reasons. A government set on persuasion could have dramatised such freeloading to win over voters. It did not. Instead, it suddenly threatened millions of claimants, thwarting reasonable expectations. You don't have to be a Zarah Sultana-style Corbynista to worry. Any decent MP would want to voice those discontents at Westminster. In my lifetime, and therefore in the lifetime of the great majority, no Labour government has ever been able to cope with bad economic conditions. They have been boom-time phenomena, triumphantly so in the case of Tony Blair's first two terms. Sir Keir's administration has quickly reverted to this depressing type, adding a political incompetence that would make anyone weep.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Senedd hears food processing industry ‘in managed decline'
Nick Allen, chief executive of the British Meat Processors' Association, told the Senedd's rural affairs committee: 'My members are incredibly concerned about the direction of travel. 'And it doesn't just apply to Wales, [it's] right across the whole country, but I think it's particularly significant here: the decline in livestock numbers, the projections and, dare I say, the attitude and the desire… in the Welsh Government to actually drive a further reduction.' Mr Allen said: 'Big investors and employers in Wales are incredibly concerned about the future: more than concerned, I'd say incredibly depressed about what the future holds.' He warned: 'Unfortunately, it seems endemic within civil servants that they don't really want to help industry and work with them. They seem to almost [act] as a police force to stop us doing things rather than thinking 'this is what's good for the country'.' Mr Allen, who has been involved in discussions since the controversial sustainable farming scheme was paused by ministers, suggested the dial has barely moved in the months since. He described ministers' approach to bluetongue disease as 'another nail in the coffin'. José Peralta, chief executive of Hybu Cig Cymru/Meat Promotion Wales, said livestock numbers have dropped significantly and will likely continue to fall. Giving evidence on June 2, he warned: 'That poses a big question mark about how do we carry on in the future with an industry that remains competitive.' Kepak, a family owned business which runs a beef and lamb processing site in Merthyr Tydfil, employing 1,000 people, raised urgent and grave concerns about livestock numbers. In its written evidence, the company said: 'The efficiency and viability of our operations and the jobs that we provide rely on a critical mass of livestock.' Asked about the Welsh Government's 2021 vision for the industry, Mr Peralta said: 'It's a set of very nice and good aims but I struggle to see sometimes what's underneath that's going to drive all the different elements to get to that final aim.'
Powys County Times
4 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Ministers ‘pushed ahead too fast' on welfare reform, says Phillipson
Ministers 'pushed ahead too fast' and 'didn't listen enough' on welfare reform, the Education Secretary has said. Bridget Phillipson also said that future spending decisions had been made 'harder', when asked about the prospect of the two-child benefit cap being scrapped. Ms Phillipson told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme that she was 'not going to pretend that it hasn't been a tough or a challenging week' after ministers were forced to scrap their plans for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. 'I'd be the first to acknowledge that, both in the pace and the nature of what we set out, we didn't get it right, but we do need to reform the system we've got,' she said. Asked about the Prime Minister's authority, the Education Secretary said: 'What the Prime Minister has said, and what I also believe, is that what we set out, we pushed ahead too fast, we didn't listen enough to people, including, I would say, including to lots of people who had concerns about the nature of that change.' Ministers have warned MPs that there will be financial consequences to the decision not to reform Pip as planned. Labour backbenchers have also been pushing for the Government to scrap the two-child benefit cap. When asked if there was now less chance of the cap being scrapped given the costs that come with Tuesday's decision, Ms Phillipson told the BBC that ministers were 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. Pushed on whether the likelihood of the cap going was now slimmer, Ms Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' Meanwhile, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride had written to the budget watchdog asking whether a new updated fiscal forecast was in the works after Labour's U-turns on welfare and winter fuel. I've written to the @OBR_UK seeking urgent clarity on the multi-billion pound hole created by Labour's unfunded spending commitments. When governments lose control of the finances and transparency is sidelined, confidence in our economy is put at risk. Parliament and the public… — Mel Stride (@MelJStride) July 6, 2025 In his letter to the Office for Budget Responsibility, Sir Mel said: 'The public, Parliament and markets deserve clarity and transparency about the impact of recent events on the nation's finances and the Government's fiscal strategy.' The Conservatives will try to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten up access to Pip and universal credit by laying a series of amendments this week.
